nightbat wrote
Double-A wrote:
herbertglazier@webtv.net (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote in message news:<13028-41404628-172@storefull-3171.bay.webtv.net>...
Hi Double-A You say singularities don't occur in the physical
world(universe),and its written black holes are not part of the physical
world(go figure) I see the core of a black hole cut off from the
universe. I see the BH core as a place gravity has squeezed "all there
is" into elementary particles(building blocks) and took away all space
between these particles. I see no motion at the exact center of a black
hole.
Double-A
Of course there is no motion. According to GR, time dilation
approaches infinity at the event horizon. Yet time dilation is said
to increase more the deeper you go into a gravity well. Seems there
is a bit of a logic problem here. Anyway, with time having ground to
a virtual stop, there is no way a collapsing star can be squeezed any
further than the radius of the event horizon. Hence, no singularity
can form.
nightbat
But time dimension being added Double-A was Einstein's applied
problem not the Universe's. And pi value cannot be reduced down to 0 or
infinity.
Bert
That is why I posted no "entropy"( no disorder or randomness)
Without motion no heat. Seems Double-A we are hung up on a singularity
having no volume(like it is not immersed in the three dimensions of
space or the fourth dim4dimention "time" I have trouble with that
feature. Even a string in string theory might not have a thickness,but
it has length. Well to me singularities are
one of the last stops made by the compression force of gravity.
Gravity created the universe,
Double-A
Seems to me that gravity was the biggest thing preventing the creation
of the universe. The whole question, given the Big Bang scenario, is
how was gravity overcome to let the universe expand?
nightbat
Yes, outside or reciprocal neutralizing force, where is it? And
in the absence of it then the Universe, from that frame, was always in a
defaulted non uniform momentum state. But the missing frame clue is
present in all energy and matter's propensity to apparent plastic like
memory attempt to uniform renormalize. Look, you can't hopefully
physical deduce or point value find something in abstract math that
doesn't now presently exist. Even intuitively you need a correlating
frame in which to compare, which is none existent. But that all energy
and matter wants to unify into base field momentum but is not able to,
under conservation deduced and observed laws, is the giveaway that
outside or neutralizing force is missing. Don't blame Dr. Einstein for
missing it for he and peers only relied on actual verifiable physical
and mathematical deducible and observable correlation's topological
solutions not abstract hidden nightbat found defaulted ones.
Bert
and after the big bang evolved it into
us,and now it can see itself. Bert PS I'll get some flaming on a BH
having no entropy Jacob Bekenstein thought otherwise,and he had
"Princeton"with Wheeler as his back ground
Double-A
nightbat
Bert and Double-A, the Universe is in a reciprocal state, and
its disturbed momentum can never reach total uniformity because of a
lack of equal or greater force.
the nightbat
.
