Science > Physics > Re: Dark matter does not exist - Einstein wins again!
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"brian a m stuckless" |
| Date: |
12 Oct 2005 01:59:06 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Dark matter does not exist - Einstein wins again! |
WHAT is THAT "three body problem", in particular, there.?
Newton SiMPLiFiED the 3-BODY PROBLEM to profoundly TWO.!!
Newton SiMPLiFiED the N-body PROBLEM to profoundly TWO.!!
No. NOT POiNT-mass. Newton's central mass M1 has radius r3.!!
That is how to find relative average densities of the planets
( where M1 is the Sun ) and the moon ( where M1 is EARth ).!!
There is NO mass mathematically defined like that in GR (gtr).
The ONLY mass allowed at all in GR gtr Tivity is a POiNT-mass.
[ FOR which the GR terms G_uv ..and T_uv, CANNOT be equated. ]
[ i.e. No GR equation was EVER solved for ANY mass M1 or m1. ]
[ i.e. No GR equation was YET done, relating G_uv & M1 & m1. ]
[ That didn't STOP DOCTOR CHRiSTOPHER HiLLMAN, either ..duh. ]
<> >><> >><> >><> >><>
Androcles wrote:
"Sue..." <suzysewnshow@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
| > Yeah, see, at perihelion Mercury goes faster, which
| > means it's clock slows down,
| You ARE pullin' my leg. Mercury has no clock.
| > | Hmmm....
| > | << It is important at this stage to examine the
| > | problems which now arose. Newton had completely
| > | solved the theoretical problem of the motion of
| > | two point masses
insert ..see top of PAGE.!! [ Hint: NOT POiNT-mass.!! ]
| > | under an inverse square law of attraction.
| > | For more than two point masses
..repeat, as above. See top of PAGE.!!
| > | only approximations to the motion of the bodies
| > | could be found and this line of research led to
| > | a large effort by mathematicians to develop
| > | methods to attack this three body problem.
WHAT is THAT "three body problem", in particular, there.?
Newton SiMPLiFiED the 3-BODY PROBLEM to profoundly TWO.!!
Newton SiMPLiFiED the N-body PROBLEM to profoundly TWO.!!
| > | Yep! A single celestial body is many bodies
| > | and must be calculated that way.
Why broken-off parts of the SAME mass fall identically.!!
brian a m stuckless
<> >><> >><> >><> >><>
| :-))
|
| Sue...
|
|
| > Androcles
.
|
|
| User: "Sue..." |
|
| Title: brian a m stuckless wrote: alt.local.village.idiot,alt.morons,sci.physics.relativity |
15 Oct 2005 04:26:43 AM |
|
|
Proginoskes wrote:
brian a m stuckless wrote:
[...]
| > | only approximations to the motion of the bodies
| > | could be found and this line of research led to
| > | a large effort by mathematicians to develop
| > | methods to attack this three body problem.
WHAT is THAT "three body problem", in particular, there.? [...]
You have three objects in the universe, and you know the mass, the
position, and the velocity of each at time t=0. Find the position and
velocity of each object for all times t>0. The difficulty is due to
"sensitivity of the initial conditions"; if you change one slightly,
then the difference between the answers grows exponentially.
--- Christopher Heckman
.
|
|
|
| User: "Henry Haapalainen" |
|
| Title: Re: brian a m stuckless wrote: alt.local.village.idiot,alt.morons,sci.physics.relativity |
16 Oct 2005 05:02:16 PM |
|
|
"Sue..." <suzysewnshow@yahoo.com.au> kirjoitti viestissä
news:1129368403.117409.281710@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Proginoskes wrote:
brian a m stuckless wrote:
[...]
| > | only approximations to the motion of the bodies
| > | could be found and this line of research led to
| > | a large effort by mathematicians to develop
| > | methods to attack this three body problem.
WHAT is THAT "three body problem", in particular, there.? [...]
You have three objects in the universe, and you know the mass, the
position, and the velocity of each at time t=0. Find the position and
velocity of each object for all times t>0. The difficulty is due to
"sensitivity of the initial conditions"; if you change one slightly,
then the difference between the answers grows exponentially.
--- Christopher Heckman
There is no answer to three body problem, because when there are more than
two bodies then there are also two different factors affecting, gravity and
'tidal force'. Read more about tidal force here:
http://www.wakkanet.fi/~fields/
Henry Haapalainen
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
