Re: DiRk VaN DeR MoORteL



 Science > Physics > Re: DiRk VaN DeR MoORteL

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Mike"
Date: 18 Sep 2006 10:22:28 AM
Object: Re: DiRk VaN DeR MoORteL
Sorcerer wrote:

"Mike" <eleatis@yahoo.gr> wrote in message
news:1158587736.593976.75620@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
|
| This is his new hairstyle. Locally inertial at an infinitesimal time
| period of an accelerated motion this is how he looks to a globally
| inertial observers. hahahahahaha
|
|
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci.physics.relativity/tree/browse_frm/thread/7e6a09e1b521cf2a/b91b271e1bc385d4?rnum=1&_done=%2Fgroup%2Fsci.physics.relativity%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2F7e6a09e1b521cf2a%2Fb91b271e1bc385d4%3F#doc_22f97e426496efb3
|
| Mike
|
Cutting it down to size:

"at a LOGICAL level an accelerated system is at constant velocity in an
infinitesimal time period" -- "The Hobbit, or There and Back Again"

By the same fuckin' intensified stupidity, a constantly moving system
is stationary in an infinitesimal time period.

And who says "Yep" with a silly grin ":-)"?
Our local village dog tord, of course.

Thus we see trains move by relativistic peristalsis:
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Smart/Smart.htm
Androcles.

Those retards should be asked how small should the infinitesimal
interval be so that they can fix a local inertial frame on it.
I blame cheap education for this retarded behavior. Often in cheap
schools some teachers will use the infinitesimal method to try to
explain to a group of students whose highest IQ is below 100 how to
understand geometrically accelerated motion: Break down the path to
small infinitesimal intervals, then take the differences, divide by the
infinitasimal time and take the limit.
God forbit the retard of sci.groups thinks this is a method he can use
to incorporate accelerated motion in SR. This is because that is all he
knows. Consider a mass m in free fall near the earth surface to see
what he essentially does:
s = gt^2/2 (1)
let s ---> s+ds t ---> t+dt
(s+ds) = g (t+dt)^2/2
Expand and simplify. You get:
s+ds = g [ t^2 +2tdt+(dt)^2]/2 or given (1)
ds/dt = gt + dt/2
I am asking the retards now: how small they want the dt to have
constant velocity ds/dt?
He is such a retard that he cannot understand that even if he lets
ds--->0, still ds/dt = gt, far from a constant unless the clock in his
stupid head stops ticking, which appears to be the case.
One exception: at Planck time level, the ds--> 0 can give rise to ds/dt
= constant between Planck intervals but of course you have HUP there
and you are not able to fix the local inertial FoR.
Mike
.

User: "Sorcerer"

Title: Re: DiRk VaN DeR MoORteL 18 Sep 2006 11:48:56 AM
"Mike" <eleatis@yahoo.gr> wrote in message
news:1158592948.299366.236110@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
|
| Sorcerer wrote:
| > "Mike" <eleatis@yahoo.gr> wrote in message
| > news:1158587736.593976.75620@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
| > |
| > | This is his new hairstyle. Locally inertial at an infinitesimal time
| > | period of an accelerated motion this is how he looks to a globally
| > | inertial observers. hahahahahaha
| > |
| > |
| >
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci.physics.relativity/tree/browse_frm/thread/7e6a09e1b521cf2a/b91b271e1bc385d4?rnum=1&_done=%2Fgroup%2Fsci.physics.relativity%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2F7e6a09e1b521cf2a%2Fb91b271e1bc385d4%3F#doc_22f97e426496efb3
| > |
| > | Mike
| > |
| > Cutting it down to size:
| >
| > "at a LOGICAL level an accelerated system is at constant velocity in an
| > infinitesimal time period" -- "The Hobbit, or There and Back Again"
| >
| > By the same fuckin' intensified stupidity, a constantly moving system
| > is stationary in an infinitesimal time period.
| >
| > And who says "Yep" with a silly grin ":-)"?
| > Our local village dog tord, of course.
| >
| > Thus we see trains move by relativistic peristalsis:
| > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Smart/Smart.htm
| > Androcles.
|
| Those retards should be asked how small should the infinitesimal
| interval be so that they can fix a local inertial frame on it.
|
| I blame cheap education for this retarded behavior. Often in cheap
| schools some teachers will use the infinitesimal method to try to
| explain to a group of students whose highest IQ is below 100 how to
| understand geometrically accelerated motion: Break down the path to
| small infinitesimal intervals, then take the differences, divide by the
| infinitasimal time and take the limit.
|
| God forbit the retard of sci.groups thinks this is a method he can use
| to incorporate accelerated motion in SR. This is because that is all he
| knows. Consider a mass m in free fall near the earth surface to see
| what he essentially does:
|
| s = gt^2/2 (1)
|
| let s ---> s+ds t ---> t+dt
|
| (s+ds) = g (t+dt)^2/2
|
| Expand and simplify. You get:
|
| s+ds = g [ t^2 +2tdt+(dt)^2]/2 or given (1)
|
| ds/dt = gt + dt/2
|
| I am asking the retards now: how small they want the dt to have
| constant velocity ds/dt?
|
| He is such a retard that he cannot understand that even if he lets
| ds--->0, still ds/dt = gt, far from a constant unless the clock in his
| stupid head stops ticking, which appears to be the case.
In the words of Al Schwartz, himself an arrogant fool,
"ignorance is educable -- stupidity is forever".
Dork and Hobbit have no mathematical training or ability,
they wish to bask in what they see as glory while adding
nothing to science. They see themselves as infallible,
anyone that agrees with them is ok, but they can only
change the subject and/or ridicule those that do not.
Essentially they are bullies and like all bullies cannot
stand to be proven wrong.
Einstein defined c to have two values, c and -c.
He had no mathematical ability either.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/DominoEffect.GIF
As each domino falls, Dork and Hobbit rush around trying
to stand it up again.
Ghost even tries to uphold the first domino by arguing that
"Geschwindigkeit" translates to both speed and velocity, but
fails since words have little use in mathematics, equations rule.
http://tinyurl.com/kxb8x
He complains the LHC has a "low" operating frequency of
11.245 kHz for it's 27km ring, and sarcastically suggests that
it was not designed on Newtonian calculations. He imagines
it should be in the MHz rnge for some strange reason.
However, 27000 * 11245 = 303,615,000 m/s and so
a hadron in sync with the ring is moving faster than
299,792,456.2 m/s, the alleged speed of light.
Pointing this out, he then confuses himself and attempts
to sidetrack into the mass of the particle with relativistic
calculations.
I suspect the real ring diameter is 8.492 kilometres,
26,678 km circumference and the operating frequency is adjustable.
I'm sure the engineers that designed the thing are tongue-in-cheek.
|
| One exception: at Planck time level, the ds--> 0 can give rise to ds/dt
| = constant between Planck intervals but of course you have HUP there
| and you are not able to fix the local inertial FoR.
|
| Mike
|
.
User: "Dirk Van de moortel"

Title: Re: DiRk VaN DeR MoORteL 18 Sep 2006 12:04:57 PM
"Sorcerer" <Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_b> wrote in message news:Y5APg.12715$cd1.6988@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
[snip]

In the words of Al Schwartz, himself an arrogant fool,
"ignorance is educable -- stupidity is forever".

Dork and Hobbit have no mathematical training or ability,
they wish to bask in what they see as glory while adding
nothing to science. They see themselves as infallible,
anyone that agrees with them is ok, but they can only
change the subject and/or ridicule those that do not.
Essentially they are bullies and like all bullies cannot
stand to be proven wrong.
Einstein defined c to have two values, c and -c.
He had no mathematical ability either.

Here we go...
Androcles' ability and Boolean algebra:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/XORWildStab.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Gibberish.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/XOROnceMore.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/XORrevisited.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/XORContinued.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/XORpersistence.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/LooksBoolean.html
Androcles' ability and differentials:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/DiffConst.html
Androcles' ability and integrals:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Integral.html
Androcles' ability and geometry:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/SimpleEnough.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/FullyAware.html
Androcles' ability and transformations:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/AndroTransform.html
Androcles' ability and calculations:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/FALSE.html
Androcles' ability and groups:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/AndroGroups.html
Androcles' ability and logs:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/LogsHuh.html
Androcles' ability and vectors:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/IdiotVectors.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/AndroVec.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/VectorLength.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/VectorSpaces.html
Androcles' ability and polar coordinates:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/PolarManager.html
Androcles' ability and limits:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Limit.html
Androcles' ability and equations:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Doofus.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/SetSolve2.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Persuasive.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/AndroDistri.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Pythagoras.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/ToothlessBite.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Competent.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/UseTrans.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Sheesh.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/SetSolve.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/DivZero.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Think.html
Androcles' ability and square roots:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/GoodTeachers.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/TwoTurds.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/STILL.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/CanSpecify.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Nearly.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Quadratic.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/GrowUp.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Tautology.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Material.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/GIVEN.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/PythagoRescue.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/SqrtRev.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/NegSqrt.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Humour.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/SqrtAnswers.html
Androcles' ability and partial differential equations:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/PartialDiff.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/PartialDiff2.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/PartialDiff3.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/PartialDiff4.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/NotFxy.html
Dirk Vdm
.
User: "Sorcerer"

Title: Re: DiRk VaN DeR MoORteL 18 Sep 2006 12:13:56 PM
"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote
in message news:ZkAPg.83366$Du1.1257523@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
|
| "Sorcerer" <Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_b> wrote in message
news:Y5APg.12715$cd1.6988@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
|
| [snip]
gladly
.



User: "Dirk Van de moortel"

Title: Re: DiRk VaN DeR MoORteL 18 Sep 2006 12:03:56 PM
"Mike" <eleatis@yahoo.gr> wrote in message news:1158592948.299366.236110@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
[snip]

Those retards should be asked how small should the infinitesimal
interval be so that they can fix a local inertial frame on it.

I blame cheap education for this retarded behavior. Often in cheap
schools some teachers will use the infinitesimal method to try to
explain to a group of students whose highest IQ is below 100 how to
understand geometrically accelerated motion: Break down the path to
small infinitesimal intervals, then take the differences, divide by the
infinitasimal time and take the limit.

God forbit the retard of sci.groups thinks this is a method he can use
to incorporate accelerated motion in SR. This is because that is all he
knows. Consider a mass m in free fall near the earth surface to see
what he essentially does:

s = gt^2/2 (1)

let s ---> s+ds t ---> t+dt

(s+ds) = g (t+dt)^2/2

Expand and simplify. You get:

s+ds = g [ t^2 +2tdt+(dt)^2]/2 or given (1)

ds/dt = gt + dt/2

I am asking the retards now: how small they want the dt to have
constant velocity ds/dt?

He is such a retard that he cannot understand that even if he lets
ds--->0, still ds/dt = gt, far from a constant unless the clock in his
stupid head stops ticking, which appears to be the case.

One exception: at Planck time level, the ds--> 0 can give rise to ds/dt
= constant between Planck intervals but of course you have HUP there
and you are not able to fix the local inertial FoR.

Mike

"I blame cheap education for this retarded behavior"
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/CheapEducation.html
A stunning beauty :-)
Dirk Vdm
.
User: "Sorcerer"

Title: Re: DiRk VaN DeR MoORteL 18 Sep 2006 12:13:55 PM
"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote
in message news:0kAPg.83364$aj2.1184804@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
|
| "Mike" <eleatis@yahoo.gr> wrote in message
news:1158592948.299366.236110@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
|
| [snip]
gladly
.


User: "Eric Gisse"

Title: Re: DiRk VaN DeR MoORteL 23 Sep 2006 03:25:26 AM
Mike wrote:
[...]
You fail first semester calculus. Good job.


I am asking the retards now: how small they want the dt to have
constant velocity ds/dt?

If velocity is constant, ds/dt = 0. Certaintly was a difficult task...


He is such a retard that he cannot understand that even if he lets
ds--->0, still ds/dt = gt, far from a constant unless the clock in his
stupid head stops ticking, which appears to be the case.

One exception: at Planck time level, the ds--> 0 can give rise to ds/dt
= constant between Planck intervals but of course you have HUP there
and you are not able to fix the local inertial FoR.

Yummy, word salad. Heavy in volume, light in substance.


Mike

.
User: "Phil"

Title: Re: DiRk VaN DeR MoORteL 23 Sep 2006 09:35:50 AM
"Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158999926.551735.57100@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...


Mike wrote:

[...]

You fail first semester calculus. Good job.


I am asking the retards now: how small they want the dt to have
constant velocity ds/dt?


If velocity is constant, ds/dt = 0. Certaintly was a difficult task...


He is such a retard that he cannot understand that even if he lets
ds--->0, still ds/dt = gt, far from a constant unless the clock in his
stupid head stops ticking, which appears to be the case.

One exception: at Planck time level, the ds--> 0 can give rise to ds/dt
= constant between Planck intervals but of course you have HUP there
and you are not able to fix the local inertial FoR.


Yummy, word salad. Heavy in volume, light in substance.

Eric,
You do realize that ds/=/0, don't you? God I hope so. Give him that, only
that, but at least that. Sounds cranky when you argue against it.
Phil
.

User: "Mike"

Title: Re: DiRk VaN DeR MoORteL 23 Sep 2006 09:41:55 AM
Eric Gisse wrote:

Mike wrote:

[...]

You fail first semester calculus. Good job.

I fail you type of calculus. Not the calculus I studied.



I am asking the retards now: how small they want the dt to have
constant velocity ds/dt?


If velocity is constant, ds/dt = 0. Certaintly was a difficult task...

It seems that what I am talking about is above your empty skull.



He is such a retard that he cannot understand that even if he lets
ds--->0, still ds/dt = gt, far from a constant unless the clock in his
stupid head stops ticking, which appears to be the case.

One exception: at Planck time level, the ds--> 0 can give rise to ds/dt
= constant between Planck intervals but of course you have HUP there
and you are not able to fix the local inertial FoR.


Yummy, word salad. Heavy in volume, light in substance.

Don't speak and eat at the same time.
Mike



Mike

.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Problem for Dirk Van der Moortel
More bad news for Dirk van Der Moortal
Auf die Frage der Faraday's Law
THE DER COACH CRIMINAL
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bestimmung_des_Faktors_der_D=E4mpfun?==?ISO-8859-1?Q?gs-_und_Reibungsverluste_in_Wasser!?=
The model of the Van der Waals interaction
VAN DER MEULEN CONFIRMS HAMMOND
He-der THEORY (He-ALL-der) with RED-and-BLUE-shifted RAW DATA.!!
KARL ROVE -- Der Verschwörung di governo di Experte 911? ? ? ? ? - Versione del englischer del mit del kommt -
KARL ROVE -- Der Verschwörung di governo di Experte 911? ? ? ? ? - versione del englischer del mit del kommt .
Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS
Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS
Spy ware from Dirk Van de moortel
Crank Alert [Dirk Van de moortel ] - Dec 16, 2004 9:28 EST
NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER