"Bilge" <dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> wrote in message
news:slrnd15qqt.498.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net...
Like all crackpots you first reject what is written and then say
you didn't understand it.
[*snip ******]
"Where in that equation did (c+v) occur?" --- Poe the blind man.
"Randy Poe" <poespam-trap@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1108480538.284135.143160@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Androcles wrote:
Differentiate this for me, Poe :
½[tau(0,0,0,t)+tau(0,0,0,t+x'/(c-v)+x'/ something_not_there )]
= tau(x',0,0,t+x'/(c-v))
Poe responds:
The original equation is this:
(1/2)*[tau(0,0,0,t)+tau(0,0,0,t+x'/(c-v)+x'/(c+v)] =
tau(x',0,0,t+x'/(c-v))
Like all crackpots, you first DENY what is written and then claim
to understand it.
Dumbass.
BTW, you *****-faced baboon, "(c+v) appears nowhere in the paper, nor
could it. Hey Androcyst, you are an ineducable idiot. Your high
school should be leveled and replaced by an abandoned bowling alley.
- CarbUncle Sch-wart-zit.
Like all crackpots, you first DENY what is written and then claim
to understand it.
*****-faced bullshitting baboon.
Androcles.
.
|
