Re: Einstein and Lorentz trapped in a loop



 Science > Physics > Re: Einstein and Lorentz trapped in a loop

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Timo Nieminen"
Date: 29 Aug 2003 12:01:04 AM
Object: Re: Einstein and Lorentz trapped in a loop
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Mathew Orman wrote:

According to Einstein-Lorentz it takes aprox. 9.5 nanosecond for the
electric field
to propagate such distance.

According to Maxwell it takes approx 9.5 ns for any change in the electric
field to propagate over such a distance.
You have a well-defined laboratory frame in which to do all of your
measurements and calculations, so it says nothing about Einstein-Lorentz.
Maxwell is sufficient.
All along, you've been blindly refusing to see the most important
implication of your revolutionary work - that it falsifies Maxwell's
equations. It means all of the practical engineering based on Maxwell's
equations needs to be overhauled, clearly much more important that any
proof or disproof of special relativity.
--
Timo Nieminen - Home page: http://www.physics.uq.edu.au/people/nieminen/
Shrine to Spirits: http://www.users.bigpond.com/timo_nieminen/spirits.html
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Einstein and Lorentz trapped in a loop 29 Aug 2003 06:41:03 AM
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 15:01:04 +1000, Timo Nieminen
<timo@physics.uq.edu.au> wrote:

On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Mathew Orman wrote:

According to Einstein-Lorentz it takes aprox. 9.5 nanosecond for the
electric field
to propagate such distance.


According to Maxwell it takes approx 9.5 ns for any change in the electric
field to propagate over such a distance.

You have a well-defined laboratory frame in which to do all of your
measurements and calculations, so it says nothing about Einstein-Lorentz.
Maxwell is sufficient.

All along, you've been blindly refusing to see the most important
implication of your revolutionary work - that it falsifies Maxwell's
equations. It means all of the practical engineering based on Maxwell's
equations needs to be overhauled, clearly much more important that any
proof or disproof of special relativity.

What about applications that are in a dynamic accelerated state?
Perhaps anisotropy of the waves could be used for things like inertial
gyros?
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Re: Einstein and Lorentz trapped in a loop............................................................................................
Re: Einstein and Lorentz trapped in a loop............................................................................................
Re: Einstein and Lorentz trapped in a loop............................................................................................
Re: Einstein and Lorentz trapped in a loop............................................................................................
Re: Einstein and Lorentz trapped in a loop............................................................................................
Re: Einstein and Lorentz trapped in a loop...
MAX VON LAUE gives credit to Einstein for relativity and more
eer
Physics looks for new Einstein as nature rewrites laws of universe (Was: Re: ... was Einstein wrong?)
Einstein (1905) Absurdities
For once Einstein didn't win
"The Einstein Hoax "
Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence
Einstein's Equations are Holographic
Einstein (1905) Absurdities
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER