$ GPS PREset & REset equation.
v1^2 (3873)^2 (R*g1) | GPS ambient density vVLO^2 |
-- -- = -- -- -- = -- --- = |(-- -- -- - -- -- -- ) + (------)|
2*c^2 2*c^2 2*c^2 | VLO ambient density 2*c^2 |
| 2*G*M1 2*G*M1 vVLO^2 |
= |(-- -- --- -- -- --) - (-- -- -- - -- -- -- --) + (------)|
| 2*(nGPS - 1)*R*c^2 2*((nVLO - 1)*rVLO*c^2 2*c^2 |.
Where, for nGPS & nVLO @ R & rVLO, factor 2*c^2 CANCELLs OUT.!!
So, this GUESS iSS RATiO of 8.333E-11 which, adhocly, "works"..
||> out to 7.2 microseconds out of 86400 seconds (one day).
Show us exactly HOW you derive an EARth DAY of 86400 seconds.!!
||> GPS satellites are in circular orbits at 20200 km altitude,
||> or about 26580 km from the center of earth. The orbital
||> speed is given by > -=-
Given:
G*M1*m1 / R^2 = (n - 1)*m1*v1^2 / R
Where:
v1^2 = G*M1 / (n - 1)*R = (6.673E-11)*(5.974E24) / 2.658E7
| 2*(GPS ambient density)*c^2 | |2*dGPS*c^2 |
|(-- -- -- -- --- -- -- -- -- ) + vVLO^2| = |-- - -- -- + vVLO^2|
| vVLO ambient density | | dVLO |
| 2*G*M1 2*G*M1 |
= |(-- -- --- --) - (-- -- --- -- --) + (vVLO^2)| = R*g1
| (nGPS - 1)*R (nVLO - 1)*rVLO |
|4*(pi)^2*R^2| |4*(pi)^2*R*lbob| |R*vbob^2|
= |-- --- -- --| = |-- -- --- -- --| = |-- -- --| = vGPS^2 = v1^2.
| t1^2 | | tbob^2 | | lbob |
Then: v1 = 3873 -> meter / sec; ..And: v1^2 / 2*c^2
= (3873^2 / 2*c^2) = 8.333E-11.
CLEARLY, the "EARth" clock OUGHT BE in a Very Low Orbit (a VLO)
for your arithmetic to *REALLY* "work out", as per the equation.
[ The FACT that the EARth clock is sitting *ON* EARth and NOT in
a VLO (so-as the arithmetic works) is REASON for DAiLY reSETs. ]
Ratio, density dGPS / dVLO = 4.4*10^-10 = GPS PRE-set FACTOR.!!
Please go-go Google GROUP SEARCH < My BiGGER bang > ..dooOPs.!!
Other GP Systems can avoid these so-claimed GR "predictions".!!
<> >><> >><> >><> >><>
$ "The emptyness between points", by jOE FiSHER
The TimeLord wrote: > > On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 22:36:42 -0800,
"Pentcho Valev" <pvalev@yahoo.com> posted in sci.physics.relativity:
-=- scientist will reject Relativity. Every physicist that I know
of (including myself) admits that Relativity *could* break down
one day, but not today, since most critics can not demonstrate how
it is wrong.
|> > By accepting that space has no attributes, the
|> > emptyness between points or objects is made absolutely
|> > continuous, as it has no granularity whatsoever.
Heisenberg was NOT *WRONG* ..just because he GOT CAUGHT, too OFTEN,
"trying to.." ((focus)) on BOTH ENDs of VELOCiTY vectors, AT ONCE.!!
And, jOE FiSHER is NOT WRONG just because he got CAUGHT, too often,
"trying" to focus, PARTiCULARLY, on the "emptyness between points".
Note AVAGADRO's Law is PROOF of an iNTERFACE connection, BETWEEN.!!
Note ..All SPACE with PARTiCLEs is DiSCRETE ..the REST, continous.!!
SPACE with PARTiCLEs in it is DiSCRETE; ALL the REST is continous.!!
$ Light VELOCiTY v keeps DECREASiNG, inversely as particle COUNT.
Light VELOCiTY c is now a MATHEMATiCAL CONSTANT ..just like pi.
Light VELOCiTY v keeps iNCREASiNG, inversely as particle COUNT.
Light VELOCiTY v is CONSTANT ..ONLY at CONSTANT particle COUNT.
STP&g EARth AiR is 26 orders-of-magnitude MORE dense than VACUUM.
Light VELOCiTY c has NEVER EVER BEEN measured @ specified VACUUM.
The LOWEST PRESSURE ever measured, behind a SHUTTLE's back-plate,
(LOW EARth orbit), was 16 orders-of-magnitude denser than VACUUM.
[There is LESS THAN 3 orders-of-magnitude between air, and iRON].
Note Newton and Einstein BOTH embarrasingly call this the VACUUM.
But that was because they couldn't figure how to cope with MEDiA.
The GUESS iSS ambient media factor (n - 1) takes care of all now.
The GUESS iSS GR G_uv = T_uv = Ga / G = 1 / (n - 1) = G_relative.
SPACE is MEASURED by the parts per million ..PARTiCLE COUNT.!!
[i.e. So, if it has a NON-ZERO particle COUNT ..it's MEDiA].!!
[i.e. So, if it has a *ZERO* particle COUNT, it's a VACUUM].!!
NATURE abhors an "EMPTY space", especially, without error-bars.!!
Bilge wrote: > > Bob:
-=- A perfect poisson process (i.e., a perfectly random process) is
the one means by which a clock could in principle, keep perfect time.
-=-
Since the wave function in quantum theory contains everything there
is to know by definition, there is nothing else. In any case, even
if you imagine some underlying process, the fact that it cannot
affect the outcome of anything, begs the question of how meaningful
it is to say it exists.
WAVE-function isN'T meaningful ..the Hamiltonian ENTHALPY E is.
Go-go Google GROUP SEARCH: < My BiGGER bang.!! >< ENTHALPY E >.
However, whence the laws of physics
originate and exist, and why they are of the particular form that
they are, is unknown, and in the purview of metaphysics.
$ No LiFE in coup GR.
LiFE, itself, is metaphysics ..in coup GR (i.e. Ph.Tivity cults).!!
In fact, it would be unphysical to suppose any additional
explanation was required.
It has sometimes been suggested that the laws of nature are not
real - that they are entirely inventions of the human mind,
attempting to make sense of the universe.
It's also silly, since it presumes reality has to be deeper
than there is any evidence to suppose it is. The fact that at
the quantum level, you have to accept a rather radically
altered view of reality, suggests that it isn't all that deep.
"PERFECT-vacu" (i.e. REAL-vacu) is WHY LAB-vacu has error-bars.!!
[LAB-vacu error-bars are calibrated by the "order-of-magnitude"].
[LAB-vacu error-bars are calibrated by in-vacu "particle-COUNT"].
[LAB-vacu error-bars are calibrated by in-vacu REDUCTiON-COUNTs].
"PERFECT-time" (i.e. REAL-time) is WHY LAB-time has error-bars.!!
$ "forced" to be c ..by Tom Roberts
Tom Roberts wrote: > > Aetherist wrote:
|||> For labs on earth and light propagating in vacuum, -=-
What are the error-bars on the "vacuum", Tom?
Brian A M Stuckless
Closing: ^
My RESTmass*c^4=(iNTRiNSiC energy e)*c^2=(mol part)*K*Volt*meter.
My GUESS iSS STANDARD
< The STANDARD Set. >
/\
__ _\/_ __
\_\/_/\_\/_/
/\_\/_/\ ("`-/")_.-'"``-._
_\/_/\_\/_ \. . `; -._ )-;-, `)
/_/\_\/_/\_\ \ / (v_,) _ )`-.\ ``-'
/\ - O - _ .- _..-_/ / ((.'
\/ / \ ((,.-' ((,/ By: Toe.!
$$ By deeds you know them.!! >><> >><> >><> >><> >><>
Re: THAT IAM circumcising the FORESKiNs of your hearts.!!
:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'`
____ _ _ _ _
| _ \ | | ___ _ __ | | __ | | | |
| |_) | | | / _ \ | '_ \ | |/ / | | | |
My BiG | __/ | | | (_) | | | | | | < _ |_| |_|
|_| |_| \___/ |_| |_| |_|\_\ (_) (_) (_)
:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_
IAM THAT IAM WHOLLY WHOLLY WHOLLY He and No more is more.
For instance, using slow clock transport for synchronization,
it's not obvious that the speed of light is somehow "forced" to be c
(using Einstein's method it clearly is).
-=-
Tom Roberts
Re: A little challenge for relativists.
.
|
