| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Keith P Walsh" |
| Date: |
11 Sep 2005 03:52:23 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams |
On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 23:31:55 GMT, Sue <s.c.madden@comcast.net> wrote:
Keith P Walsh wrote:
I get the impression that you have conceded that the dental
profession doesn't know what the electromagnetic properties of a
typical dental amalgam are.
Am I correct?
REPLY. My guess is that the many of the dental profession do not see
the clnical relavence of this and therefore simply do not care.
How does that work? "We don't know anything about this so it can't
possibly be of any importance"? That isn't science. It's just sheer
blind arrogance.
Keith you are the one studying this issue. Maybe you can tell us?
You mentioned that amalgam has the [potenial of generating 350 mV.
Whoever measured this must have measured the other properties that
affect voltage like current, resistance, impedance..
No, I didn't say that amalgam "has the potential of generating 350mv."
I said that it has been demonstrated experimentally that amalgam
fillings generate electrical potentials with magnitudes of up to
350mV. My use of the word "potentials" here is synonymous with the
word "voltages". The measurement of electrical voltages of this order
of magnitude in amalgams is commonplace, and it places an obligation
on the part of those who continue to promote the use of amalgams in
restorative dentistry to take all reasonable steps to demonstrate that
these electrical voltages are not capable of dissipating electrical
energy through the nerves in people's heads.
You mentioned that the resting potential of neurological tissue is
70 mV. My comment is ...so what? Do you really think that a transient
maximum of 350 mV that may be generated by amalgam will interrupt or
activate cranial nerve activity?
The 350mV is not a "transient maximum". It represents the magnitude of
largest of the electrical potentials measured in the study which I
quoted, but there is no indication in the findings of this study that
the level of this potential is transient in nature. Moreover, an
alternative investigation into the nature of the electrical potentials
generated by amalgam fillings appears to have established that such
potentials are found to quickly return to their maximum "steady state"
values after being discharged. See:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=2103035&dopt=Abstract
The resting potential of SA nodal tissue is -65 mV. The resting
potential of ventricular tissue is -85 mV. The activation threshold of
SA nodal tissue occurs at about -45 mV. Does this mean that 25 mV
applied to the chest will result in myocardial stimulation? No.
If you are suggesting that the established scientific knowledge of
neurological physiology in the region of the chest is sufficient to
determine whether or not the electrical potentials generated by metal
amalgam dental fillings are able to dissipate electrical energy
through the nerves in people's teeth then I would argue that you are
at best cutting corners, and at worst evading the issue.
And I would also argue that since amalgam fillings are placed in
childrens' teeth then there is little justification for it.
When we implant a pacemaker, we place a lead (conductive wire)
directly into the right ventricle. The other end of this lead is
connected to a power source. We determine the lowest (safest and most
reliable) voltage threshold necessary to effect myocardial stimulation
(i.e. pace) by creating a strength duration curve.
This is a graph relating pulse width (pulse duration) to voltage
necessary to effect capture (i.e. effect a pace).
The volatge threshold varies from person to person, but generally the
voltage threahold to effectively pace the heart is less than 1 volt,
preferrably less than 0.5 mV at a pulse width less than 2.0 ms.
However this is via a wire connected directly to the heart! In
addition the wire senses the sinus beat, so the pulse is timed to be
deleivered during the period when cell can actually accept a stimulus.
(There is period in which the cell is refractory to any stimulus).
So please tell me, how can an amalgam which resides within a tooth,
i.e. not in direct contact with nay caranial nerves.. adn which may
transiently conduct some mild electrical activity.... how is this going
to effect or affect nerve activity?
Well I would suggest that by using modern instrumentation it might be
possible to detect whether or not the electrical potentials generated
by dental amalgams are able to influence neurological activity in the
vicinity of teeth with amalgam fillings. (I prefer the scientific
approach rather than guesswork.)
And if such an investigation were to show that they are, it might then
be appropriate to speculate as to exactly how this happens.
IMHO, you must make a stronger case as to why the fardaic activity of
amalgam may be of any clinical relavence.
Best Regards,
Sue
I hope you don't mind, but I'm going to cross-post this message to the
other newsgroups so that the regular correspondents at sci.physics,
sci.materials and sci.physics.electromag get an idea of just how
easily people such as yourself who may be implicated in or supportive
of the use of amalgams in dentistry are able make up excuses for
failing to acknowledge their own ignorance.
Best regards to you,
Keith P Walsh
.
|
|
| User: "carabelli" |
|
| Title: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams |
11 Sep 2005 05:04:42 PM |
|
|
"Keith P Walsh" <keith.p.walsh@btinternet.com> wrote .......
If you are suggesting that the established scientific knowledge of
neurological physiology in the region of the chest is sufficient to
determine whether or not the electrical potentials generated by metal
amalgam dental fillings are able to dissipate electrical energy
through the nerves in people's teeth then I would argue that you are
at best cutting corners, and at worst evading the issue.
I believe they keep all that information just outside of Roswell.
carabelli
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Clinton" |
|
| Title: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams |
11 Sep 2005 04:20:32 PM |
|
|
Keith P Walsh wrote:
How does that work? "We don't know anything about this so it can't
possibly be of any importance"? That isn't science. It's just sheer
blind arrogance.
Keith you are the one studying this issue. Maybe you can tell us?
You mentioned that amalgam has the [potenial of generating 350 mV.
Whoever measured this must have measured the other properties that
affect voltage like current, resistance, impedance..
No, I didn't say that amalgam "has the potential of generating 350mv."
I said that it has been demonstrated experimentally that amalgam
fillings generate electrical potentials with magnitudes of up to
350mV. My use of the word "potentials" here is synonymous with the
word "voltages". The measurement of electrical voltages of this order
of magnitude in amalgams is commonplace, and it places an obligation
But is that from electromagentic energy or from other effects such as
galvansim? the question is how much energy is transferred from EM
effects.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Keith P Walsh" |
|
| Title: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams |
12 Sep 2005 12:35:37 AM |
|
|
On 11 Sep 2005 14:20:32 -0700, "Clinton" <clintonz@prodigy.net> wrote:
No, I didn't say that amalgam "has the potential of generating 350mv."
I said that it has been demonstrated experimentally that amalgam
fillings generate electrical potentials with magnitudes of up to
350mV. My use of the word "potentials" here is synonymous with the
word "voltages". The measurement of electrical voltages of this order
of magnitude in amalgams is commonplace, and it places an obligation
But is that from electromagentic energy or from other effects such as
galvansim? the question is how much energy is transferred from EM
effects.
Good question.
Can you suggest how anyone might find the answer?
Keith P Walsh
PS, further enquiries regarding the electrical properties of dental
amalgams can be found at:
http://book.boot.users.btopenworld.com/intro.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Morien" |
|
| Title: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams |
12 Sep 2005 01:28:44 AM |
|
|
In article <4m4ai1p0n7ma7t4qd8e46bnil5danshhnt@4ax.com>,
Keith P Walsh <keith.p.walsh@btinternet.com> wrote:
On 11 Sep 2005 14:20:32 -0700, "Clinton" <clintonz@prodigy.net> wrote:
No, I didn't say that amalgam "has the potential of generating 350mv."
I said that it has been demonstrated experimentally that amalgam
fillings generate electrical potentials with magnitudes of up to
350mV. My use of the word "potentials" here is synonymous with the
word "voltages". The measurement of electrical voltages of this order
of magnitude in amalgams is commonplace, and it places an obligation
But is that from electromagentic energy or from other effects such as
galvansim? the question is how much energy is transferred from EM
effects.
Good question.
Can you suggest how anyone might find the answer?
The real question is: Keith, why aren't you going to the physics
department of your local college/university and asking them this?
.
|
|
|
| User: "LadyLollipop" |
|
| Title: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams |
12 Sep 2005 01:56:01 AM |
|
|
"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote
The real question is: Keith, why aren't you going to the physics
department of your local college/university and asking them this?
The real questions are Robert: What is*your* position on the safety of
amalgams?
What is *your* position on the electromagnetic properties of typical dental
amalgams?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Morien" |
|
| Title: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams |
12 Sep 2005 04:34:58 PM |
|
|
In article <5E9Ve.345031$xm3.307508@attbi_s21>,
"LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:
"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote
The real question is: Keith, why aren't you going to the physics
department of your local college/university and asking them this?
The real questions are Robert: What is*your* position on the safety of
amalgams?
What is *your* position on the electromagnetic properties of typical dental
amalgams?
I see you continue to support Keith in his useless complaints.
What is your position about keiths inability to find his local
college/university.
.
|
|
|
| User: "LadyLollipop" |
|
| Title: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams |
12 Sep 2005 05:09:27 PM |
|
|
"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote in message
news:PhD_failure-3F6BD1.14345812092005@news.isp.giganews.com...
In article <5E9Ve.345031$xm3.307508@attbi_s21>,
"LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:
"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote
The real question is: Keith, why aren't you going to the physics
department of your local college/university and asking them this?
The real questions are Robert: What is*your* position on the safety of
amalgams?
What is *your* position on the electromagnetic properties of typical
dental
amalgams?
I see you continue to support Keith in his useless complaints.
OOOPPPPPSSSSS.
The real questions are Robert: What is*your* position on the safety of
amalgams?
What is *your* position on the electromagnetic properties of typical dental
amalgams?
<snip>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Morien" |
|
| Title: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams |
12 Sep 2005 07:07:46 PM |
|
|
In article <r0nVe.326222$_o.311376@attbi_s71>,
"LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:
"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote in message
news:PhD_failure-3F6BD1.14345812092005@news.isp.giganews.com...
In article <5E9Ve.345031$xm3.307508@attbi_s21>,
"LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:
"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote
The real question is: Keith, why aren't you going to the physics
department of your local college/university and asking them this?
The real questions are Robert: What is*your* position on the safety of
amalgams?
What is *your* position on the electromagnetic properties of typical
dental
amalgams?
I see you continue to support Keith in his useless complaints.
OOOPPPPPSSSSS.
The real questions are Robert: What is*your* position on the safety of
amalgams?
What is *your* position on the electromagnetic properties of typical dental
amalgams?
<snip>
Nope. you see my position on anything is irrelevent...you know what
irrelevent is. I might as well ask you your position on
tampons...doesn't have the least bit of relevence to the problem of why
keith can't find the physics department of his local college/university.
OTOH if you can show me how my position on amalgams prevents keith from
finding the physics department of his local college/university I might
consider informing you of it.
So what is your position on tampons?
.
|
|
|
| User: "LadyLollipop" |
|
| Title: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams |
12 Sep 2005 07:40:43 PM |
|
|
"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote in message
news:PhD_failure-B51906.17074612092005@news.isp.giganews.com...
In article <r0nVe.326222$_o.311376@attbi_s71>,
"LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:
"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote in message
news:PhD_failure-3F6BD1.14345812092005@news.isp.giganews.com...
In article <5E9Ve.345031$xm3.307508@attbi_s21>,
"LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:
"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote
The real question is: Keith, why aren't you going to the physics
department of your local college/university and asking them this?
The real questions are Robert: What is*your* position on the safety of
amalgams?
What is *your* position on the electromagnetic properties of typical
dental
amalgams?
I see you continue to support Keith in his useless complaints.
OOOPPPPPSSSSS.
The real questions are Robert: What is*your* position on the safety of
amalgams?
What is *your* position on the electromagnetic properties of typical
dental
amalgams?
<snip>
Nope. you see my position on anything is irrelevent...
Afraid not.
The fact is:
You have no right to grill Keith over and over with questions, when you
refuse to answer them.
This is a dental newsgroup.
You have run out of excuses for not answering.
You have clearly shown, you are here to harass.
<snip>
.
|
|
|
| User: "billkatz" |
|
| Title: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams |
12 Sep 2005 08:01:21 PM |
|
|
You have no right to grill Keith over and over with
questions, when you refuse to answer them.
This is a dental newsgroup.
You have run out of excuses for not answering.
You have clearly shown, you are here to harass.
The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its
limits.
BTW... Do you own any cats?
.
|
|
|
| User: "LadyLollipop" |
|
| Title: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams |
12 Sep 2005 08:33:19 PM |
|
|
"billkatz" <billthekat@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126573281.897189.252760@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
You have no right to grill Keith over and over with
questions, when you refuse to answer them.
This is a dental newsgroup.
You have run out of excuses for not answering.
You have clearly shown, you are here to harass.
The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its
limits.
Off topic. Please learn to attribute the postings correctly.
BTW... Do you own any cats?
Off topic.
Now back to the subject.
The real questions are Robert: What is*your* position on the safety of
amalgams, Robert?
What is *your* position on the electromagnetic properties of typical
dental amalgams, Robert?
.
|
|
|
| User: "billkatz" |
|
| Title: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams |
12 Sep 2005 09:08:30 PM |
|
|
The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its
limits.
Off topic. Please learn to attribute the postings correctly.
I thought was ;*)
.
|
|
|
| User: "carabelli" |
|
| Title: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams |
12 Sep 2005 10:03:36 PM |
|
|
"billkatz" <billthekat@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126577310.732849.85960@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its
limits.
Off topic. Please learn to attribute the postings correctly.
I thought was ;*)
And it was, if Keith won't take his medications as prescribed it's not our
fault.
carabelli
.
|
|
|
| User: "billkatz" |
|
| Title: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams |
13 Sep 2005 06:22:16 AM |
|
|
Off topic. Please learn to attribute the postings correctly.
I thought was ;*)
And it was, if Keith won't take his medications as prescribed it's not our
fault.
Nahhh, she's right. We should definitely keep this thread limited to
Faradic cats with 350 mV feminine hygiene problems in need of an
ortha-donnanist and how Ohm's law applies to them.
Now THAT would make sense!
BTW, what's this about the beer can chicken I hear?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Morien" |
|
| Title: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams |
13 Sep 2005 12:28:43 AM |
|
|
In article <z%pVe.325484$x96.239588@attbi_s72>,
"LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:
"billkatz" <billthekat@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126573281.897189.252760@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
You have no right to grill Keith over and over with
questions, when you refuse to answer them.
This is a dental newsgroup.
You have run out of excuses for not answering.
You have clearly shown, you are here to harass.
The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its
limits.
Off topic. Please learn to attribute the postings correctly.
BTW... Do you own any cats?
Off topic.
Now back to the subject.
The real questions are Robert: What is*your* position on the safety of
amalgams, Robert?
What is *your* position on the electromagnetic properties of typical
dental amalgams, Robert?
I need to know your position on tampons.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Morien" |
|
| Title: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams |
13 Sep 2005 12:22:46 AM |
|
|
In article <fepVe.325305$x96.150355@attbi_s72>,
"LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:
"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote in message
news:PhD_failure-B51906.17074612092005@news.isp.giganews.com...
In article <r0nVe.326222$_o.311376@attbi_s71>,
"LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:
"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote in message
news:PhD_failure-3F6BD1.14345812092005@news.isp.giganews.com...
In article <5E9Ve.345031$xm3.307508@attbi_s21>,
"LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:
"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote
The real question is: Keith, why aren't you going to the physics
department of your local college/university and asking them this?
The real questions are Robert: What is*your* position on the safety of
amalgams?
What is *your* position on the electromagnetic properties of typical
dental
amalgams?
I see you continue to support Keith in his useless complaints.
OOOPPPPPSSSSS.
The real questions are Robert: What is*your* position on the safety of
amalgams?
What is *your* position on the electromagnetic properties of typical
dental
amalgams?
<snip>
Nope. you see my position on anything is irrelevent...
Afraid not.
The fact is:
You have no right to grill Keith over and over with questions, when you
refuse to answer them.
This is a dental newsgroup.
You have run out of excuses for not answering.
You have clearly shown, you are here to harass.
<snip>
do you feel harassed?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Morien" |
|
| Title: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams |
13 Sep 2005 12:26:37 AM |
|
|
In article <fepVe.325305$x96.150355@attbi_s72>,
"LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:
"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote in message
news:PhD_failure-B51906.17074612092005@news.isp.giganews.com...
In article <r0nVe.326222$_o.311376@attbi_s71>,
"LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:
"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote in message
news:PhD_failure-3F6BD1.14345812092005@news.isp.giganews.com...
In article <5E9Ve.345031$xm3.307508@attbi_s21>,
"LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:
"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote
The real question is: Keith, why aren't you going to the physics
department of your local college/university and asking them this?
The real questions are Robert: What is*your* position on the safety of
amalgams?
What is *your* position on the electromagnetic properties of typical
dental
amalgams?
I see you continue to support Keith in his useless complaints.
OOOPPPPPSSSSS.
The real questions are Robert: What is*your* position on the safety of
amalgams?
What is *your* position on the electromagnetic properties of typical
dental
amalgams?
<snip>
Nope. you see my position on anything is irrelevent...
Afraid not.
The fact is:
You have no right to grill Keith over and over with questions, when you
refuse to answer them.
Who are you to tell me this? Keith asks questions that Keith could
clearly answer yet chooses not to. That is worth questioning him about.
I take it that you support Keiths right to ask questions he could easily
answer, but you don't support my right to ask questions he could easily
answer. That makes you a terrorist.
This is a dental newsgroup.
are you a dentist?
You have run out of excuses for not answering.
I haven't made any excuses for not answering. You questions are
irrelevent and not worthy of an answer.
You have clearly shown, you are here to harass.
You are here to harass, admit it.
<snip>
Just what is your position on tampons
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams |
12 Sep 2005 09:02:18 PM |
|
|
-More comfortable standing than sitting
-Not good conductors (prior to use)
-After use contain ferrous ions; possible Faradaic activity
-Expensive at grocery store
-Cheapest at Walmart
-Free at work*
Anything else you want to know?
-Sue
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Clinton" |
|
| Title: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams |
12 Sep 2005 04:44:02 AM |
|
|
LadyLollipop wrote:
"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote
The real question is: Keith, why aren't you going to the physics
department of your local college/university and asking them this?
The real questions are Robert: What is*your* position on the safety of
amalgams?
What is *your* position on the electromagnetic properties of typical dental
amalgams?
The truth is that if you went to a physics department and asked
them to write an equation for changes in hg vapor release as
a function of Electromagnetic fields they wouldn't be able to
answer.
but if you asked them to determine the amount of EM radiation
absorbed and dissipated they could probably come up with
a pretty good answer.
the information you posted in the other thread was very interesting
but keep in mind that galvanism and changes in chemical behavior
in general (including Hg vapor pressure) as a function of EM fields is
a separate phenomena from absorbtion and dissipation of Electromagnetic
energy by amalgams.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Joel M. Eichen" |
|
| Title: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams |
12 Sep 2005 04:48:10 AM |
|
|
The truth is that if you went to a physics department and asked
them to write an equation for changes in hg vapor release as
a function of Electromagnetic fields they wouldn't be able to
answer.
This is true. Few people realize that most Physics Departments have
loads of staff sitting around, just waiting for visitors to come in
with requests like this ........
Wait a minute, sorry, ,,,,,,, I got that mixed up with the internet.
Joel
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Joel M. Eichen" |
|
| Title: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams |
12 Sep 2005 04:46:08 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 06:56:01 GMT, "LadyLollipop"
<LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:
"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote
The real question is: Keith, why aren't you going to the physics
department of your local college/university and asking them this?
The real questions are Robert: What is*your* position on the safety of
amalgams?
What is *your* position on the electromagnetic properties of typical dental
amalgams?
Too many millivolts to be safe ........
.
|
|
|
| User: "LadyLollipop" |
|
| Title: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams |
12 Sep 2005 05:00:54 PM |
|
|
"Joel M. Eichen" <joeleichen@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:fijai1hpq8cade25ng7rv00pkc9sqlkpki@4ax.com...
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 06:56:01 GMT, "LadyLollipop"
<LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:
"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote
The real question is: Keith, why aren't you going to the physics
department of your local college/university and asking them this?
The real questions are Robert: What is*your* position on the safety of
amalgams?
What is *your* position on the electromagnetic properties of typical
dental
amalgams?
Too many millivolts to be safe ........
Butt out, Joel.
Still waiting for Robert to answer.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Morien" |
|
| Title: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams |
12 Sep 2005 07:08:29 PM |
|
|
In article <qUmVe.325137$x96.224368@attbi_s72>,
"LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:
"Joel M. Eichen" <joeleichen@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:fijai1hpq8cade25ng7rv00pkc9sqlkpki@4ax.com...
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 06:56:01 GMT, "LadyLollipop"
<LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:
"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote
The real question is: Keith, why aren't you going to the physics
department of your local college/university and asking them this?
The real questions are Robert: What is*your* position on the safety of
amalgams?
What is *your* position on the electromagnetic properties of typical
dental
amalgams?
Too many millivolts to be safe ........
Butt out, Joel.
Still waiting for Robert to answer.
what is your position on tampons. I need to know before I can answer
anything.
.
|
|
|
| User: "carabelli" |
|
| Title: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams |
12 Sep 2005 08:08:46 PM |
|
|
"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote ...........
what is your position on tampons. I need to know before I can answer
anything.
There is a distinct difference between the message and the messenger. There
are a few messengers here that deserve all they get, and there are a few
that deserve being ignored.
carabelli
.
|
|
|
| User: "LadyLollipop" |
|
| Title: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams |
12 Sep 2005 08:40:54 PM |
|
|
"carabelli" <huerter@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:yEpVe.236179$5N3.189115@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote ...........
what is your position on tampons. I need to know before I can answer
anything.
There is a distinct difference between the message and the messenger.
There are a few messengers here that deserve all they get, and there are a
few that deserve being ignored.
carabelli
It would like to be ignored that mercury amalgams are indeed dangerous. Dan
like to ignore the truth. Dan was caught LYING. Dan would like to ignore the
*truth*, just as ALL the dentists here, except Steve Bornfeld.
The truth is Robert is here to harass, so he fits in well with Dan.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Morien" |
|
| Title: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams |
13 Sep 2005 12:29:46 AM |
|
|
In article <G6qVe.325493$x96.71481@attbi_s72>,
"LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:
"carabelli" <huerter@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:yEpVe.236179$5N3.189115@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote ...........
what is your position on tampons. I need to know before I can answer
anything.
There is a distinct difference between the message and the messenger.
There are a few messengers here that deserve all they get, and there are a
few that deserve being ignored.
carabelli
It would like to be ignored that mercury amalgams are indeed dangerous. Dan
like to ignore the truth. Dan was caught LYING. Dan would like to ignore the
*truth*, just as ALL the dentists here, except Steve Bornfeld.
The truth is Robert is here to harass, so he fits in well with Dan.
And you don't call what you do harassing? Please define harassment so we
can all understand.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Morien" |
|
| Title: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams |
13 Sep 2005 12:30:21 AM |
|
|
In article <G6qVe.325493$x96.71481@attbi_s72>,
"LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:
"carabelli" <huerter@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:yEpVe.236179$5N3.189115@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote ...........
what is your position on tampons. I need to know before I can answer
anything.
There is a distinct difference between the message and the messenger.
There are a few messengers here that deserve all they get, and there are a
few that deserve being ignored.
carabelli
It would like to be ignored that mercury amalgams are indeed dangerous. Dan
like to ignore the truth. Dan was caught LYING. Dan would like to ignore the
*truth*, just as ALL the dentists here, except Steve Bornfeld.
The truth is Robert is here to harass, so he fits in well with Dan.
I only harass spammers.
Do you feel harassed?
.
|
|
|
| User: "LadyLollipop" |
|
| Title: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams |
13 Sep 2005 01:42:05 AM |
|
|
"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote in message
news:PhD_failure-5F0FE4.22302112092005@news.isp.giganews.com...
In article <G6qVe.325493$x96.71481@attbi_s72>,
"LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:
"carabelli" <huerter@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:yEpVe.236179$5N3.189115@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote ...........
what is your position on tampons. I need to know before I can answer
anything.
There is a distinct difference between the message and the messenger.
There are a few messengers here that deserve all they get, and there
are a
few that deserve being ignored.
carabelli
It would like to be ignored that mercury amalgams are indeed dangerous.
Dan
like to ignore the truth. Dan was caught LYING. Dan would like to ignore
the
*truth*, just as ALL the dentists here, except Steve Bornfeld.
The truth is Robert is here to harass, so he fits in well with Dan.
I only harass spammers.
Wrong.
You have been harassing, Keith.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Morien" |
|
| Title: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams |
13 Sep 2005 03:12:43 AM |
|
|
In article <1xuVe.325992$x96.158697@attbi_s72>,
"LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:
"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote in message
news:PhD_failure-5F0FE4.22302112092005@news.isp.giganews.com...
In article <G6qVe.325493$x96.71481@attbi_s72>,
"LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:
"carabelli" <huerter@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:yEpVe.236179$5N3.189115@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote ...........
what is your position on tampons. I need to know before I can answer
anything.
There is a distinct difference between the message and the messenger.
There are a few messengers here that deserve all they get, and there
are a
few that deserve being ignored.
carabelli
It would like to be ignored that mercury amalgams are indeed dangerous.
Dan
like to ignore the truth. Dan was caught LYING. Dan would like to ignore
the
*truth*, just as ALL the dentists here, except Steve Bornfeld.
The truth is Robert is here to harass, so he fits in well with Dan.
I only harass spammers.
Wrong.
You have been harassing, Keith.
By asking a question?
So that means that you have been harassing me.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Morien" |
|
| Title: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams |
13 Sep 2005 03:16:49 AM |
|
|
In article <1xuVe.325992$x96.158697@attbi_s72>,
"LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:
"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote in message
news:PhD_failure-5F0FE4.22302112092005@news.isp.giganews.com...
In article <G6qVe.325493$x96.71481@attbi_s72>,
"LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:
"carabelli" <huerter@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:yEpVe.236179$5N3.189115@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote ...........
what is your position on tampons. I need to know before I can answer
anything.
There is a distinct difference between the message and the messenger.
There are a few messengers here that deserve all they get, and there
are a
few that deserve being ignored.
carabelli
It would like to be ignored that mercury amalgams are indeed dangerous.
Dan
like to ignore the truth. Dan was caught LYING. Dan would like to ignore
the
*truth*, just as ALL the dentists here, except Steve Bornfeld.
The truth is Robert is here to harass, so he fits in well with Dan.
I only harass spammers.
Wrong.
You have been harassing, Keith.
do you feel harassed?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
