On Thu 3 Feb 2005, "Peter van der Goes" wrote:
In the fairly recent past, the way Google Groups works seems to have been
changed, reducing the utility from very good to almost nil.
<snippity>
Is/was there some information provided that will return Google
Groups to it's former usefulness?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
IN STARK CLARITY, in truth, and by way of demonstrable facts,
Google intentionally and with malice of forethought censored
and obfuscated the ever-burgeoning public newsgroup archives
specifically for *political* reasons. Consider these facts...
"Google" is owned and operated by left-wing liberals, with
even the likes of the bitterly-disenfranchised former Vice-
President AL GORE among Google's left-wing Senior Advisors.
Google's co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin are plainly
motivated by their reprehensibly left-wing liberal bias and
post-election desperation--given that the liberals no longer
wield much if any influence on Capitol Hill, whereas moderate
Democrats are now well-motivated to distance themselves from
the inviably-radical left-wing extremists like Kerry, Kennedy,
Boxer et al lunatic fringe terrorist-supporting Bush-bashers,
to date, barely clinging to power in the abjectly-failed DNC.
Even though the liberals have NO future in American politics,
they're not about to go completely down the tubes without one
last-ditch effort to dissuade their powerless ever-dwindling
voter-base from jumping the sinking liberal ship, their lost
cause which is hemorrhaging both internally -and- externally,
daily losing support particularly from the moderate Democrats
who've realized that the liberals have hijacked their party,
especially since November 7, 2000 and November 2, 2004 which
proved irrefutably that ALL liberals are only self-defeating
pessimists who have hopelessly alienated themselves from the
hopeful and optimistic (mainstream) American political arena.
Thus we see that Google's medievally-draconian post-election
suppression campaign against the more than a quarter-century
old newsgroup archives was carefully planned and implemented
circa December 1, 2004 when their so-called "beta" kicked in,
forcing all local Google "Groups" domains to censor archived
content across-the-board! Let's closely examine some of the
most obvious and egregious changes to local "Groups" domains
since about one month to-the-day after the left-wing liberals
were hammered in the most important election in human history...
1) All embedded Google-archived links, message id's and email
addys are now totally *broken*. For example, compare these
three links to the SAME archived message i.d., paying close
attention to how Google's beta breaks all aforestated links
and truncates any longer messages, plus forces all messages
to appear in non-mono-spaced text--thereby further munging
and obfuscating messages originally intended to be viewed
in mono-spaced text, e.g. charts, ascii art, text-justified
paragraphs, etc. Try it. ANYONE can see this for themselves:
http://www.google.co.in/groups?selm=5d24b5eaa007da8b663168f90ea8a915@dizum.com
http://www.google.co.uk/groups?selm=5d24b5eaa007da8b663168f90ea8a915@dizum.com
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=5d24b5eaa007da8b663168f90ea8a915@dizum.com
Even the original format of all archived messages now show
all embedded links, message id's and email addys as broken
by a "...". Click "show options" then click "Show original"
and you'll see that Google is DEFINITELY censoring content
on local-domain Google "Groups" servers...ask yourself Why?
Like I said, it is specifically engineered by the liberals
in their post-election desperation in some vain and foolish
attempt to delay their rapid demise and destiny in Hellfire.
Censoring the archives will stop neither. The liberals have
sealed their doom. They're destined for *global* Extinction.
2) All archived PGP-clearsigned messages on every local domain
Google "Groups" server can no longer be verified either as
"good" -AND- neither can they be proven "bad", by contrast.
Thus ANY archived newsgroup message can now be either truly
or else falsely attributed to anyone without recourse. This
renders the newsgroup archives on local domains useless and
unverifiable. Doubtless because knowledge is power, and the
archives are replete with a great deal of knowledge posted
from all over the free world, with messages dating back to
1981--and some messages rumored to be post-dated from 1979,
this is why Google has censored the archives, because they
transparently betray the liberals' abject incompetence and
dishonesty. Liberals have long-since lost all credibility,
as even a cursory search of the newsgroup archives proves.
Truth is the liberals' greatest enemy. Liberals HATE truth,
which clearly explains *why* Google censored the archives.
3) While the foreign-domain back-door to the Google archives
still functions at this writing (February 3, 2005), there
can be little doubt that Google's censorship programmers
are working overtime to "correct" their little oversight.
So, until the liberal nutjobs at Google finish what they
started, specifically by disabling foreign-domain access
to the pre-election style ergo uncensored archives, the
savvy newsgroup user can still browse through archived
newsgroup messages in their pristine format by applying
a little extra elbow grease. For example, the user can
manually highlight, copy and paste any archived message
ID after any functional foreign-domain Google "Groups"
server, such as http://www.google.co.in./groups?selm=
in India, or http://www.google.co.uk./groups?selm= in
the UK, or any other foreign-domain Google server, and
gain access to the *uncensored* version of the archives.
Users can also search through the uncensored archives
via any foreign-domain advanced search feature, e.g.:
http://www.google.co.in/advanced_group_search
http://www.google.co.uk/advanced_group_search
And there are other post-election information-suppression
and obfuscation tactics being employed by the hopelessly-
disenfranchised liberals at Google and by other similarly-
maladroit left-wing desperados, but it no longer matters
what they do. They LOST control of the federal government.
And the few moderate Democrats seated in Congress will be
voting in favor of Bush's rock-solid Republican *MANDATE*
with each Republican-sponsored bill that comes to a vote,
in effect superseding the threatened liberal filibusters.
This is because the moderates know what's good for them,
now that the Democrat party has been reduced to rubble by
the liberal lunatics therein who'd hijacked it and ruined
it for the foreseeable future. So moderates MUST cooperate
with our dominating Republican majority if they expect to
gain ANY bi-partisan cooperation or concessions in return.
Meanwhile, NO liberal-sponsored legislation will be heard
by the Republican majority. The liberals have wholly lost
ANY meaningful voice in American politics & that's a fact.
IN CONCLUSION, it is irrefutable that Google censored the
newsgroup archives owing to their indefensibly-treasonous
self-destructive Anti-American vitriol and incurable post-
election socio-political and religious inviability. PERIOD.
Enjoy!
Daniel Joseph Min
http://www.google.co.in/groups?selm=XJBDEJF138262.9022453704@anonymous.poster
http://www.google.co.uk/groups?selm=XJBDEJF138262.9022453704@anonymous.poster
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=XJBDEJF138262.9022453704@anonymous.poster
http://www.geocities.com/daniel_joseph_min
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B1CCFE7
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBQgLZgZljD7YrHM/nEQI7NACeN3nyCJC//b1NjDPrjhepl8/5q1wAoPKD
38if3US/W0E3Eu2TL2LJmCKy
=FXGT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
|
