Re: Hammond's god argument



 Science > Physics > Re: Hammond's god argument

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "GODSTAR"
Date: 19 Apr 2004 12:00:08 PM
Object: Re: Hammond's god argument
"...T..." <brooklynjt@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<c4732e$2f6rb6$1@ID-228677.news.uni-berlin.de>...

"George Hammond" <research137@hotmail.com> wrote a bunch

Not to mention that terrorism is a statistically insignificant cause
of death. More people died in car crashes in the next few weeks after
what was the worst day for terrorism ever. It just makes better news
than eat your veggies, wear your seatbelt. etc.
Plus politicians can justify etc....
I'd like to know how many non military mediterrainian civilians were
killed in both Iraq and Afganistan by UN/US forces. And if its more
or less than the 3K from who died in the trade towers + pentagon
atack.

I don't know you, and you don't know me. I briefly looked
at your
"proof" for a chuckle, and while I admit I have neither the
smarts
nor the temerity to disprove your theory, I do know that you
couldn't be more wrong here - because even if you were
correct
(and to be clear, I mean that in the same way I mean whether
someone could "prove" that the Teletubbies were a higher
life form),
your proof would fall on deaf ears. "Proof" and "Faith" are
mutually exclusive terms. At best, radical Moslems would
state that
Allah created the tensor thingie that you state you proved
exists -

No doubt. I think Isreal studied palistinians who executed failed
terrorist attacks and found by in larg they were essentially agnostic,
young people... who were not particularly religious... but did come
from totalitarian/fundamentalist backgrounds...
I think that there is little doubt that fundamentalism is the

as would radical Jews using God, fundamentalist Christians,
etc. At
worst, you fan the flames of hatred by once again having
America
try to force feed doctrine down the throats of those whose
FAITH

Dont forget about the church of the subgenius science proves slack...
Slack offers a hundred google virgins if thats what you want, they can
be any age, race, gender or species... and being lazy is enough for
martyrdom... Slack doesn't claim that god is all-power just that god
acts exponentially more powerfull than all-powerful deities do... And
god isn't male per se but god has more genders than all human beings
have brain cells put together so there is no reason to go into that
right now...

leads them to believe differently than you.
In short, you try to plead with fanatics using rational
thought. It never
works.
Besides which, I think you're a loonie.


All the best with your future research,

.

User: "George Hammond"

Title: Re: Hammond's god argument 04 May 2004 11:42:36 AM
"GODSTAR" <godstar@my-deja.com> wrote
snip
[GH]
Interesting name you got there.
====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
====================================
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER