| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Big Crunch" |
| Date: |
03 Jul 2005 08:54:31 AM |
| Object: |
Re: if you dare to answer to bilge the troll |
Bilge wrote:
Dirk Van de moortel:
"TomGee" <lvlus@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1120328837.760834.
193030@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Don, I reported him to Google for doing that and I noticed just today
he did not do that in a tread where I post. Maybe if others reported
him they might put him and other children in their place.
Just click "show options" and select "report abuse".
You *really* don't understand anything about Usenet, do you?
My guess is that it's about the same as his understanding of
relativity, which is to say, nil. I'll bet the folks at google
will frame his ``report'' - right after they get through rolling
on the floor. On the other hand, they might consider it a troll.
STOP REDIRECTING POSTS, YOU FOKIN MORON
onece again, you made a fool of yourself
asking it makes you looks like a
***** bilge, you know *****
about c/c++ programming, but "knowing"
usenet
....ahaha AHAHA ahaha...
when you post from google, there is a link
called "report abuse"
it might not remove your posts from usenet,
but them could be blocked from googles
databases
so, not being availabed into googles databases,
then no one searching google wouldnt find them
simply, google can make things disappear for the
guys searching on google, they did it before
even more, there are tendences, that the new
servers arround the world synchronize their
databases taken google dbs as references
....hahahah, what a fool you made of yourself,
again, thank you very much
....ahaha AHAHA ahaha....
.
|
|
| User: "Bilge" |
|
| Title: Re: if you dare to answer to bilge the troll |
03 Jul 2005 05:21:03 PM |
|
|
Big Crunch, the McDonalds of sock puppets,
so, not being availabed into googles databases,
then no one searching google wouldnt find them
simply, google can make things disappear for the
guys searching on google, they did it before
even more, there are tendences, that the new
servers arround the world synchronize their
databases taken google dbs as references
Add usenet and the nntp protocol to the list of things
you know nothing about.
...hahahah, what a fool you made of yourself,
again, thank you very much
You're welcome.
.
|
|
|
| User: "rst" |
|
| Title: Re: if you dare to answer to bilge the troll |
04 Jul 2005 06:16:23 AM |
|
|
Bilge wrote:
Big Crunch, the McDonalds of sock puppets,
so, not being availabed into googles databases,
then no one searching google wouldnt find them
simply, google can make things disappear for the
guys searching on google, they did it before
even more, there are tendences, that the new
servers arround the world synchronize their
databases taken google dbs as references
Add usenet and the nntp protocol to the list of things
you know nothing about.
wrong again, you fooool
there is no nntp protocol, but nntp, which is
the shorthand for Network News Transport Protocol
saying nntp protocol means saying
Network News Transport Protocol protocol, which is
totally stooopid
you know nothen about protocols, even my litle
sister can do nntp
you are a fool, again
i thougt i come between smart people around here, take
a look
bilge,
the super moron, pretending knowing nntpp (!?) and showing
people buggy arithemtics, numerical schemes by rampant
programming, what a fool... ahahaha
***** van de somthin,
expressing new "understangs" of complex numbers, but
knowing ***** about complex numbers, etc
bill hobba,
super moron, pretending understanding maxwell but knowing
nothing about vector fields and vf operations, etc
old man,
new discovered moron, reporting his own local host ip-adr,
and taken his mate, moron bilge, as being right by definition
in all the ***** he vomit
tom roberts
teaching people about vector fields as being potentials
the list is open, ill be around a bit
...hahahah, what a fool you made of yourself,
again, thank you very much
You're welcome.
.
|
|
|
| User: "yt56erd" |
|
| Title: Re: if you dare to answer to bilge the troll |
04 Jul 2005 10:58:38 AM |
|
|
rst wrote:
wrong again, you fooool
no, he may be semantically off but he isnt wrong. no matter how many
new identities you post with you are still a tit.
there is no nntp protocol, but nntp, which is
the shorthand for Network News Transport Protocol
saying nntp protocol means saying
Network News Transport Protocol protocol, which is
totally stooopid
grow up. people always talk about pin numbers, http is refered to as
the http protocol in numerous textbooks.
if this is the sum total of your argument, you have lost.
you know nothen about protocols, even my litle
sister can do nntp
your little sister beats you every night doesnt she?
you are a fool, again
please, just because you had the day off school today why do you make
peoples lives worse off?
i thougt i come between smart people around here, take
a look
there are some smart people here. you arent one of them.
bilge,
the super moron, pretending knowing nntpp (!?) and showing
people buggy arithemtics, numerical schemes by rampant
programming, what a fool... ahahaha
***** van de somthin,
expressing new "understangs" of complex numbers, but
knowing ***** about complex numbers, etc
bill hobba,
super moron, pretending understanding maxwell but knowing
nothing about vector fields and vf operations, etc
old man,
new discovered moron, reporting his own local host ip-adr,
and taken his mate, moron bilge, as being right by definition
in all the ***** he vomit
tom roberts
teaching people about vector fields as being potentials
the list is open, ill be around a bit
great. another crank on sci.physics.relativity. just what the world
wants.
here is a formula for you:
rst=f_00l
.
|
|
|
| User: "rst" |
|
| Title: Re: if you dare to answer to bilge the troll |
04 Jul 2005 05:36:55 PM |
|
|
yt56erd wrote:
rst wrote:
wrong again, you fooool
no, he may be semantically off but he isnt wrong. no matter how many
new identities you post with you are still a tit.
semantically being a fool
then the other is a tit because he pointed this out
your logic is a *****
there is no nntp protocol, but nntp, which is
the shorthand for Network News Transport Protocol
saying nntp protocol means saying
Network News Transport Protocol protocol, which is
totally stooopid
grow up. people always talk about pin numbers, http is refered to as
the http protocol in numerous textbooks.
refered by fools in "learn bulshit in 24 hours" books, your kind
of favor books you read
if this is the sum total of your argument, you have lost.
no, you and bilge did
you know nothen about protocols, even my litle
sister can do nntp
your little sister beats you every night doesnt she?
have you a point or you just need to talk?
you are a fool, again
please, just because you had the day off school today why do you make
peoples lives worse off?
!?
i thougt i come between smart people around here, take
a look
there are some smart people here. you arent one of them.
yes, few of them, take a look to the list
bilge,
the super moron, pretending knowing nntpp (!?) and showing
people buggy arithemtics, numerical schemes by rampant
programming, what a fool... ahahaha
***** van de somthin,
expressing new "understangs" of complex numbers, but
knowing ***** about complex numbers, etc
bill hobba,
super moron, pretending understanding maxwell but knowing
nothing about vector fields and vf operations, etc
old man,
new discovered moron, reporting his own local host ip-adr,
and taken his mate, moron bilge, as being right by definition
in all the ***** he vomit
tom roberts
teaching people about vector fields as being potentials
the list is open, ill be around a bit
great. another crank on sci.physics.relativity. just what the world
wants.
then you are the clever guy qualified to decide who is a crank
here is a formula for you:
rst=f_00l
invalid becus rst-fool=0, you cant handle zeros you being one
.
|
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: if you dare to answer to bilge the troll |
05 Jul 2005 07:23:50 AM |
|
|
"rst" <release_willy@lawyer.com> wrote in message
news:1120516615.937741.241150@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
semantically being a fool
then the other is a tit because he pointed this out
your logic is a *****
Wow. You really are grown up about this "internet thing" arent you?
That post of yours in alt.null must have really annoyed you.
refered by fools in "learn bulshit in 24 hours" books, your kind
of favor books you read
favor?
Let me get this straight. Your argument centres on you picking up on the
terminology some one else uses. You got called out on this and your defence
was that of an eight year old. Now, you are posting semi-coherent messages.
Looks like your argument is well and truly lost.
no, you and bilge did
I think they won. You lost but cant admit defeat.
have you a point or you just need to talk?
Are you talking to yourself here?
there are some smart people here. you arent one of them.
yes, few of them, take a look to the list
? You are saying your list is the smart people here?
bilge,
the super moron, pretending knowing nntpp (!?) and showing
people buggy arithemtics, numerical schemes by rampant
programming, what a fool... ahahaha
***** van de somthin,
expressing new "understangs" of complex numbers, but
knowing ***** about complex numbers, etc
bill hobba,
super moron, pretending understanding maxwell but knowing
nothing about vector fields and vf operations, etc
old man,
new discovered moron, reporting his own local host ip-adr,
and taken his mate, moron bilge, as being right by definition
in all the ***** he vomit
tom roberts
teaching people about vector fields as being potentials
the list is open, ill be around a bit
great. another crank on sci.physics.relativity. just what the world
wants.
then you are the clever guy qualified to decide who is a crank
This smacks of a school playground conversation.
here is a formula for you:
rst=f_00l
invalid becus rst-fool=0, you cant handle zeros you being one
Almost funny. Well done.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "yt56erd" |
|
| Title: Re: if you dare to answer to bilge the troll |
05 Jul 2005 09:19:18 AM |
|
|
rst wrote:
yt56erd wrote:
rst wrote:
wrong again, you fooool
no, he may be semantically off but he isnt wrong. no matter how many
new identities you post with you are still a tit.
semantically being a fool
then the other is a tit because he pointed this out
your logic is a *****
well this says it all. jerk.
there is no nntp protocol, but nntp, which is
the shorthand for Network News Transport Protocol
saying nntp protocol means saying
Network News Transport Protocol protocol, which is
totally stooopid
grow up. people always talk about pin numbers, http is refered to as
the http protocol in numerous textbooks.
refered by fools in "learn bulshit in 24 hours" books, your kind
of favor books you read
if this is the sum total of your argument, you have lost.
no, you and bilge did
go back to playschool you assmuncher.
you know nothen about protocols, even my litle
sister can do nntp
your little sister beats you every night doesnt she?
have you a point or you just need to talk?
like you and your little catamites on this thread, i just like to type.
you are a fool, again
please, just because you had the day off school today why do you make
peoples lives worse off?
!?
isnt it a school day for you today?
i thougt i come between smart people around here, take
a look
there are some smart people here. you arent one of them.
yes, few of them, take a look to the list
so that is your list of smart people then?
then you are the clever guy qualified to decide who is a crank
when it comes to you? yes.
here is a formula for you:
rst=f_00l
invalid becus rst-fool=0, you cant handle zeros you being one
sorry, i must have mistyped.
rst=*****^2(fool)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Big Crunch" |
|
| Title: Re: if you dare to answer to bilge the troll |
05 Jul 2005 11:09:08 AM |
|
|
yt56erd wrote:
rst wrote:
yt56erd wrote:
rst wrote:
wrong again, you fooool
no, he may be semantically off but he isnt wrong. no matter how many
new identities you post with you are still a tit.
semantically being a fool
then the other is a tit because he pointed this out
your logic is a *****
well this says it all. jerk.
you cant se your logic is *****, then you are fool
there is no nntp protocol, but nntp, which is
the shorthand for Network News Transport Protocol
saying nntp protocol means saying
Network News Transport Protocol protocol, which is
totally stooopid
grow up. people always talk about pin numbers, http is refered to as
the http protocol in numerous textbooks.
refered by fools in "learn bulshit in 24 hours" books, your kind
of favor books you read
if this is the sum total of your argument, you have lost.
no, you and bilge did
go back to playschool you assmuncher.
kiss my ***** *****,
we talk about implementing relativity numerical
schemes in c code, bilge version
take a look
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
#include <stdio.h>
#include <math.h>
double jn(int m, double y);
int main(){
double x,J[10];
int n;
J[0] = (double)0.7651976866;
J[1] = (double)0.4400505857;
fprintf(stdout, "\nOrder Iterated Value Correct Value\n\n");
for(n=1; n<=9; n++){
J[n+1] = 2.0*n*J[n] - J[n-1];
fprintf(stdout, "%-2d %+1.10f %+1.10f\n",
n+1, J[n+1], jn(n+1, (double)1.0));
}
fprintf(stdout, "\n");
exit(0);
}
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
have you comments to the topic, do the comments
if none comments to the topic, then tell me your
mothers girlname, maybe you are my son without knowing it [1]
you know nothen about protocols, even my litle
sister can do nntp
your little sister beats you every night doesnt she?
have you a point or you just need to talk?
like you and your little catamites on this thread, i just like to type.
you are a fool, again
please, just because you had the day off school today why do you make
peoples lives worse off?
!?
isnt it a school day for you today?
i thougt i come between smart people around here, take
a look
there are some smart people here. you arent one of them.
yes, few of them, take a look to the list
so that is your list of smart people then?
have you comments to the list, if none then look [1]
then you are the clever guy qualified to decide who is a crank
when it comes to you? yes.
here is a formula for you:
rst=f_00l
invalid becus rst-fool=0, you cant handle zeros you being one
sorry, i must have mistyped.
rst=*****^2(fool)
static unsigned int iMoronCounter
int moron_counting(char *cMoron)
{
if (!strcmp(cMoron,"yt56erd"))
return iMoronCOunter++;
else if (...to be continued)
}
.
|
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: if you dare to answer to bilge the troll |
05 Jul 2005 01:03:39 PM |
|
|
"Big Crunch" <relativity@artlover.com> wrote in message
news:1120579748.496116.302870@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
snip gibberish.
Is C programming anything to do with physics? Are you and RST the same
person?
Very strange that you have answered on his behalf.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Big Crunch" |
|
| Title: Re: if you dare to answer to bilge the troll |
06 Jul 2005 01:16:41 PM |
|
|
T Wake wrote:
"Big Crunch" <relativity@artlover.com> wrote in message
news:1120579748.496116.302870@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
snip gibberish.
Is C programming anything to do with physics? Are you and RST the same
person?
you never had you ***** in an university, did you? you fokin moron
physics is not about numerical schemes implementation of the models?
you fool, what are you doin here?
Very strange that you have answered on his behalf.
.
|
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: if you dare to answer to bilge the troll |
09 Jul 2005 02:30:45 PM |
|
|
"Big Crunch" <relativity@artlover.com> wrote in message
news:1120673801.755646.48540@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
T Wake wrote:
"Big Crunch" <relativity@artlover.com> wrote in message
news:1120579748.496116.302870@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
snip gibberish.
Is C programming anything to do with physics? Are you and RST the same
person?
you never had you ***** in an university, did you? you fokin moron
physics is not about numerical schemes implementation of the models?
you fool, what are you doin here?
Hmm.
No answer I see. Is there a reason you don't post this on one of the comp
groups?
Your grammar is as impeccable as your spelling.
The real question, I think, is what are you doing here?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Don Giovanni" |
|
| Title: Re: if you dare to answer to bilge the troll |
09 Jul 2005 02:53:28 PM |
|
|
T Wake wrote:
"Big Crunch" <relativity@artlover.com> wrote in message
news:1120673801.755646.48540@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
T Wake wrote:
"Big Crunch" <relativity@artlover.com> wrote in message
news:1120579748.496116.302870@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
snip gibberish.
Is C programming anything to do with physics? Are you and RST the same
person?
you never had you ***** in an university, did you? you fokin moron
physics is not about numerical schemes implementation of the models?
you fool, what are you doin here?
Hmm.
do we need to know about your fokin diftongs, you moron
i hmm my ***** on your fokin mother
No answer I see. Is there a reason you don't post this on one of the comp
groups?
open your fokin eyes you fokin ***** moron
you never had you ***** in an university, did you? you fokin moron
physics is not about numerical schemes implementation of the models?
you fool, what are you doin here?
physics is all about numerical schemes programming
models you fool, what else
then your fokin bilge posted the crappy code
Your grammar is as impeccable as your spelling.
what letter gives you problems you stoopd piece of *****
The real question, I think, is what are you doing here?
im shittin big on morons of your kind, isnt it abvious?
get lost moron
.
|
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: if you dare to answer to bilge the troll |
09 Jul 2005 03:26:32 PM |
|
|
"Don Giovanni" <release_willy@lawyer.com> wrote in message
news:1120938808.765477.103720@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
do we need to know about your fokin diftongs, you moron
i hmm my ***** on your fokin mother
Your illiteracy is matched only by your stupidity. Not to mention your
apparent necrophilla.
open your fokin eyes you fokin ***** moron
This is not an answer to my question, but based on the apparent lack of
cognitive functions you don't have an answer. If you want to discuss
programming languages discuss it in a programming news group.
physics is all about numerical schemes programming
models you fool, what else
Now, you have got yourself all confused. You are trying to attack my post
but you are attacking the comments made by Big Crunch.
Nice going. You really are clever.
then your fokin bilge posted the crappy code
Nothing to do with me.
Your grammar is as impeccable as your spelling.
what letter gives you problems you stoopd piece of *****
Well, lets start will spelling the word "stupid." Oh, sorry, you aren't
really up to that yet. Lets leave it with the very apt description of you -
thick.
The real question, I think, is what are you doing here?
im shittin big on morons of your kind, isnt it abvious?
Nope, you are making yourself look stupid. Keep it up though. Everyone
should have a hobby.
get lost moron
Please, don't talk to yourself.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Don Giovanni" |
|
| Title: Re: if you dare to answer to bilge the troll |
09 Jul 2005 03:33:05 PM |
|
|
im sorry about your mother, lets stop here
then you redirecting the posts
T Wake wrote:
"Don Giovanni" <release_willy@lawyer.com> wrote in message
news:1120938808.765477.103720@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
do we need to know about your fokin diftongs, you moron
i hmm my ***** on your fokin mother
Your illiteracy is matched only by your stupidity. Not to mention your
apparent necrophilla.
open your fokin eyes you fokin ***** moron
This is not an answer to my question, but based on the apparent lack of
cognitive functions you don't have an answer. If you want to discuss
programming languages discuss it in a programming news group.
physics is all about numerical schemes programming
models you fool, what else
Now, you have got yourself all confused. You are trying to attack my post
but you are attacking the comments made by Big Crunch.
Nice going. You really are clever.
then your fokin bilge posted the crappy code
Nothing to do with me.
Your grammar is as impeccable as your spelling.
what letter gives you problems you stoopd piece of *****
Well, lets start will spelling the word "stupid." Oh, sorry, you aren't
really up to that yet. Lets leave it with the very apt description of you -
thick.
The real question, I think, is what are you doing here?
im shittin big on morons of your kind, isnt it abvious?
Nope, you are making yourself look stupid. Keep it up though. Everyone
should have a hobby.
get lost moron
Please, don't talk to yourself.
.
|
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: if you dare to answer to bilge the troll |
09 Jul 2005 03:36:18 PM |
|
|
"Don Giovanni" <release_willy@lawyer.com> wrote in message
news:1120941185.238468.100880@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
im sorry about your mother, lets stop here
then you redirecting the posts
Nothing to be sorry about my mother for - she was quite old when she died.
It was a fair while ago and you never met her despite what you may think.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jerry" |
|
| Title: Re: if you dare to answer to bilge the troll |
05 Jul 2005 01:37:47 PM |
|
|
Big Crunch wrote:
you cant se your logic is *****, then you are fool
kiss my ***** *****,
we talk about implementing relativity numerical
schemes in c code, bilge version
take a look
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
#include <stdio.h>
#include <math.h>
double jn(int m, double y);
int main(){
double x,J[10];
int n;
J[0] = (double)0.7651976866;
J[1] = (double)0.4400505857;
fprintf(stdout, "\nOrder Iterated Value Correct Value\n\n");
for(n=1; n<=9; n++){
J[n+1] = 2.0*n*J[n] - J[n-1];
If n equals 9, then n+1 equals 10.
J[10] does not refer to a valid array address.
Very careless, stupid error, especially given
the few lines of code.
fprintf(stdout, "%-2d %+1.10f %+1.10f\n",
n+1, J[n+1], jn(n+1, (double)1.0));
}
fprintf(stdout, "\n");
exit(0);
}
Jerry
.
|
|
|
| User: "rst" |
|
| Title: Re: if you dare to answer to bilge the troll |
06 Jul 2005 05:06:05 PM |
|
|
Jerry wrote:
Big Crunch wrote:
you cant se your logic is *****, then you are fool
kiss my ***** *****,
we talk about implementing relativity numerical
schemes in c code, bilge version
take a look
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
#include <stdio.h>
#include <math.h>
double jn(int m, double y);
int main(){
double x,J[10];
int n;
J[0] = (double)0.7651976866;
J[1] = (double)0.4400505857;
fprintf(stdout, "\nOrder Iterated Value Correct Value\n\n");
for(n=1; n<=9; n++){
J[n+1] = 2.0*n*J[n] - J[n-1];
If n equals 9, then n+1 equals 10.
J[10] does not refer to a valid array address.
Very careless, stupid error, especially given
the few lines of code.
J[10] is gay ...ahaha AHAHA ahaha...
i only looked ar the algorithm, and it starts okay, how to
expected such a beginer mistake
maybe you were right bilge, your posts are appropiated to
alt.morons and similars
say sorry to shoenfeld
fprintf(stdout, "%-2d %+1.10f %+1.10f\n",
n+1, J[n+1], jn(n+1, (double)1.0));
}
fprintf(stdout, "\n");
exit(0);
}
Jerry
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jerry" |
|
| Title: Re: if you dare to answer to bilge the troll |
06 Jul 2005 06:19:34 PM |
|
|
rst wrote:
Jerry wrote:
Big Crunch wrote:
you cant se your logic is *****, then you are fool
kiss my ***** *****,
we talk about implementing relativity numerical
schemes in c code, bilge version
take a look
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
#include <stdio.h>
#include <math.h>
double jn(int m, double y);
int main(){
double x,J[10];
int n;
J[0] = (double)0.7651976866;
J[1] = (double)0.4400505857;
fprintf(stdout, "\nOrder Iterated Value Correct Value\n\n");
for(n=1; n<=9; n++){
J[n+1] = 2.0*n*J[n] - J[n-1];
If n equals 9, then n+1 equals 10.
J[10] does not refer to a valid array address.
Very careless, stupid error, especially given
the few lines of code.
J[10] is gay ...ahaha AHAHA ahaha...
i only looked ar the algorithm, and it starts okay, how to
expected such a beginer mistake
maybe you were right bilge, your posts are appropiated to
alt.morons and similars
say sorry to shoenfeld
Why? A beginner's mistake in programming is a beginner's
mistake in programming. I am quite right to call him
on that, just as Bilge is right to call me on when -I-
make a stupid mistake.
Shoenfeld's idiocy, however, deserves no mercy.
Jerry
.
|
|
|
| User: "rst" |
|
| Title: Re: if you dare to answer to bilge the troll |
06 Jul 2005 06:32:41 PM |
|
|
Jerry wrote:
rst wrote:
Jerry wrote:
Big Crunch wrote:
you cant se your logic is *****, then you are fool
kiss my ***** *****,
we talk about implementing relativity numerical
schemes in c code, bilge version
take a look
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
#include <stdio.h>
#include <math.h>
double jn(int m, double y);
int main(){
double x,J[10];
int n;
J[0] = (double)0.7651976866;
J[1] = (double)0.4400505857;
fprintf(stdout, "\nOrder Iterated Value Correct Value\n\n");
for(n=1; n<=9; n++){
J[n+1] = 2.0*n*J[n] - J[n-1];
If n equals 9, then n+1 equals 10.
J[10] does not refer to a valid array address.
Very careless, stupid error, especially given
the few lines of code.
J[10] is gay ...ahaha AHAHA ahaha...
i only looked ar the algorithm, and it starts okay, how to
expected such a beginer mistake
maybe you were right bilge, your posts are appropiated to
alt.morons and similars
say sorry to shoenfeld
Why? A beginner's mistake in programming is a beginner's
mistake in programming. I am quite right to call him
on that,
why, physics doesnt involves computers?
just as Bilge is right to call me on when -I-
make a stupid mistake.
Shoenfeld's idiocy, however, deserves no mercy.
why that, show me what he did
Jerry
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "tj Frazir" |
|
| Title: Re: if you dare TAO and el capitan cave |
06 Jul 2005 06:29:44 PM |
|
|
the current page
Address:http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:iwyJs-RtS6kJ:www.fs.fed.us/geology/paleo_research_overview_ak.rtf+prince+of+wales+island+canada+cam&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
.
|
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: if you dare TAO and el capitan cave |
09 Jul 2005 02:32:17 PM |
|
|
"tj Frazir" <GravityPhysics@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:14265-42CC6968-94@storefull-3217.bay.webtv.net...
the current page
Address:http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:iwyJs-RtS6kJ:www.fs.fed.us/geology/paleo_research_overview_ak.rtf+prince+of+wales+island+canada+cam&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
What does that have to do with the thread?
You are mad.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: if you dare to answer to bilge the troll |
06 Jul 2005 09:15:25 AM |
|
|
Jerry wrote:
Big Crunch wrote:
you cant se your logic is *****, then you are fool
kiss my ***** *****,
we talk about implementing relativity numerical
schemes in c code, bilge version
take a look
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
#include <stdio.h>
#include <math.h>
double jn(int m, double y);
int main(){
double x,J[10];
int n;
J[0] = (double)0.7651976866;
J[1] = (double)0.4400505857;
fprintf(stdout, "\nOrder Iterated Value Correct Value\n\n");
for(n=1; n<=9; n++){
J[n+1] = 2.0*n*J[n] - J[n-1];
If n equals 9, then n+1 equals 10.
J[10] does not refer to a valid array address.
Very careless, stupid error, especially given
the few lines of code.
Yes, that is your idols code. Remember? That fool which you "respect
very much"? There is no greater fool than the fool who fooled themself.
Congratulations.
fprintf(stdout, "%-2d %+1.10f %+1.10f\n",
n+1, J[n+1], jn(n+1, (double)1.0));
}
fprintf(stdout, "\n");
exit(0);
}
Jerry
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jerry" |
|
| Title: Re: if you dare to answer to bilge the troll |
06 Jul 2005 09:33:08 AM |
|
|
wrote:
Yes, that is your idols code. Remember? That fool which you "respect
very much"? There is no greater fool than the fool who fooled themself.
Congratulations.
Yes, I respect Bilge very much. You I don't respect at all.
Jerry
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bilge" |
|
| Title: Re: if you dare to answer to bilge the troll |
05 Jul 2005 03:04:26 AM |
|
|
rst, hillbilly sock puppet from deliverance, drawled:
even more, there are tendences, that the new
servers arround the world synchronize their
databases taken google dbs as references
Add usenet and the nntp protocol to the list of things
you know nothing about.
wrong again, you fooool
Just to keep things on your level, ``nuh uhh.''
there is no nntp protocol,
Then how come section 15.2 in volume III of w. richard stevens three
volume set on internet protocols is titled: ``NNTP Protocol?'' I guess
he failed to call your consulting firm first, huh?
but nntp, which is the shorthand for Network News Transport Protocol
No *****, sherlock. I guess some information makes it to your
barn out in the sticks, after all. What's your point (besides the
one between your ears)?
saying nntp protocol means saying Network News Transport Protocol
protocol, which is totally stooopid
So, what you are saying is that, using the idiomatic expression that
conforms to what everyone else does, is wrong? Have you sent emails to
the authors of the 24,400 urls google found, who are just as
``stoopid[sic]'' as me?
"nntp protocol" => 24,400 hits on google.
I didn't think so, nor is it likely that receiving 24,400 replies
suggesting you're a moron, would clue you in.
you know nothen about protocols,
<sniff><sniff>
even my litle sister can do nntp
Converting the polaroids of her doing you and your relatives to jpegs
and then cross-posting them to, alt.justahillbilly, alt.sex.stories.incest
and alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.bestiality.hamster.duct-tape, doesn't
count as doing nntp.
you are a fool, again
Let me guess - you got all the recessive genes in the family.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Big Crunch" |
|
| Title: Re: if you dare to answer to bilge the troll |
05 Jul 2005 11:22:45 AM |
|
|
Bilge wrote:
rst, hillbilly sock puppet from deliverance, drawled:
even more, there are tendences, that the new
servers arround the world synchronize their
databases taken google dbs as references
Add usenet and the nntp protocol to the list of things
you know nothing about.
wrong again, you fooool
Just to keep things on your level, ``nuh uhh.''
what are saying, you admit you are a fool just
to keep the thinsg on my level!? then you a square powered fool
there is no nntp protocol,
Then how come section 15.2 in volume III of w. richard stevens three
volume set on internet protocols is titled: ``NNTP Protocol?'' I guess
he failed to call your consulting firm first, huh?
posting page numbers is trollish
anyway, quote the whole sentence, then ill teach you how it
should be formulated
but nntp, which is the shorthand for Network News Transport Protocol
No *****, sherlock. I guess some information makes it to your
barn out in the sticks, after all. What's your point (besides the
one between your ears)?
read at least the whole paragraph fool, then make a comment
saying nntp protocol means saying Network News Transport Protocol
protocol, which is totally stooopid
So, what you are saying is that, using the idiomatic expression that
conforms to what everyone else does, is wrong? Have you sent emails to
the authors of the 24,400 urls google found, who are just as
``stoopid[sic]'' as me?
no, you are just stoopid as they
"nntp protocol" => 24,400 hits on google.
I didn't think so, nor is it likely that receiving 24,400 replies
suggesting you're a moron, would clue you in.
why arent you admit that you are an ignorant, again
mmtpp doesnt exists
you know nothen about protocols,
<sniff><sniff>
even my litle sister can do nntp
Converting the polaroids of her doing you and your relatives to jpegs
and then cross-posting them to, alt.justahillbilly, alt.sex.stories.incest
and alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.bestiality.hamster.duct-tape, doesn't
count as doing nntp.
posting this you made a pedophile of yourself
you associate the word "sister" with "alt.sex.stories.incest" and
simillar
what can i say, you know your boxing
you are a fool, again
Let me guess - you got all the recessive genes in the family.
.
|
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: if you dare to answer to bilge the troll |
05 Jul 2005 02:16:54 PM |
|
|
"Big Crunch" <relativity@artlover.com> wrote in message
news:1120580565.872038.213700@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
mmtpp doesnt exists
Who was talking about "mmtpp"?
Converting the polaroids of her doing you and your relatives to jpegs
and then cross-posting them to, alt.justahillbilly,
alt.sex.stories.incest
and alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.bestiality.hamster.duct-tape, doesn't
count as doing nntp.
posting this you made a pedophile of yourself
Interesting assumption.
you associate the word "sister" with "alt.sex.stories.incest" and
simillar
Hmm, again an interesting assumption.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: if you dare to answer to bilge the troll |
04 Jul 2005 02:56:43 PM |
|
|
Big Dunce is more appropriate for you.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
