Re: Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulations



 Science > Physics > Re: Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulations

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Sergey Karavashkin"
Date: 23 Jul 2003 12:41:53 AM
Object: Re: Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulations
"Pmb" <someone@somewhere.com> wrote in message news:<_2yQa.15772$Kw1.6147@nwrdny02.gnilink.net>...

<jmfbahciv@aol.com> wrote in message news:betv93$1bv$2@bob.news.rcn.net...

In article <bdev0c$r65$3@hood.uits.indiana.edu>,
glhansen@steel.ucs.indiana.edu (Gregory L. Hansen) wrote:

In article <1305a9da.0306251324.160282a5@posting.google.com>,
Sergey Karavashkin <selflab@go.com> wrote:

<snip>

May I hope, you will not repeat the 'methods' of discussions used by
your 'twin' and 'PMB' flying away from the thread. It would actually
help me to distinguish you from your 'twin' about whom
jmfbahciv@aol.com kindly prompted. ;-)


I'm piggy-backing here. Gregory spells his last name with an E,
not an O; just remember Excellence which is the quality of his
posts.


Why do I keep seeing my name in this thread?

Because the raised question calls for your respond, as a ghost of
guiltlessly killed problem. It's a time, PMB, it's a good time to show
your professionalism and to answer the question raised in this thread.
Please do solve the suggested problem in Lagrangian with additional
boundary conditions. Or in your university only those solve problems
who sit behind good students, and good students get 'excellent' for
their beautiful eyes? Today is again Tuesday, I'm waiting, and you
still don't solve.
Sergey.


Pmb

.

User: "Gauge"

Title: Re: Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulations 23 Jul 2003 04:57:44 AM
(Sergey Karavashkin) wrote in message news:<1305a9da.0307221955.1e73f07@posting.google.com>...

"Pmb" <someone@somewhere.com> wrote in message news:<_2yQa.15772$Kw1.6147@nwrdny02.gnilink.net>...

<jmfbahciv@aol.com> wrote in message news:betv93$1bv$2@bob.news.rcn.net...

In article <bdev0c$r65$3@hood.uits.indiana.edu>,
glhansen@steel.ucs.indiana.edu (Gregory L. Hansen) wrote:

In article <1305a9da.0306251324.160282a5@posting.google.com>,
Sergey Karavashkin <

> wrote:

<snip>

May I hope, you will not repeat the 'methods' of discussions used by
your 'twin' and 'PMB' flying away from the thread. It would actually
help me to distinguish you from your 'twin' about whom
jmfbahciv@aol.com kindly prompted. ;-)


I'm piggy-backing here. Gregory spells his last name with an E,
not an O; just remember Excellence which is the quality of his
posts.


Why do I keep seeing my name in this thread?


Because the raised question calls for your respond, as a ghost of
guiltlessly killed problem. It's a time, PMB, it's a good time to show
your professionalism and to answer the question raised in this thread.
Please do solve the suggested problem in Lagrangian with additional
boundary conditions. Or in your university only those solve problems
who sit behind good students, and good students get 'excellent' for
their beautiful eyes? Today is again Tuesday, I'm waiting, and you
still don't solve.

I haven't followed this thread and I don't want to have to dig through
it to try to figure out what problem it is that you'd like me to
solve.
Please restated the question that you'd like me to answer.
Thank you
Pmb
.
User: "Gauge"

Title: Re: Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulations 09 Aug 2003 08:25:35 AM
(Sergey Karavashkin) wrote

No problem. Please read here my question from the beginning of this
thread (from my post to you of 15 June):

Post 28 in thread
From: Gauge (gauge5@hotmail.com)
Thread: Re: Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulations
Newsgroup: sci.physics
Date: 2003-07-23 02:57:45 PST

Now let us come back to our equations. Recently I answered you a
little, now let me add. Please find in our paper "Oscillation pattern
features in mismatched finite electric ladder filters", in the page
42,

http://angelfire.lycos.com/la3/selftrans/v2_1/load42/load42.html

the analytical solution - formulas (23), (24) and (25) - for an
elastic lumped line having an inhomogeneity at its end (Fig. 4 a).

[...]

*****************

However it seems, you have read this post;

This is probably why you keep refering to me. I never read the post
and never saw the problem. In fact I posted for a specific reason. You
were posting some insults. I responded
(1) Greg does not quiver about anything in physics
(2) I stated that the purpose of Lagrange's equations are not to solve
the problem but to give you the differential equations to the problem.
(3) Physicists don't just "believe" in things.
I don't recall saying that you were wrong with respect to anything not
pertaining to this.

it is much easier "to do not follow the thread" than to solve youself
specific problems. ;-)

Yes. It is. That's true.

It also seems, now you will be so busy that you
will not have a time to respond at all.

Yes. That's correct as well. It's not like I sit around all day and
look at the walls. I have things that I spend all my waking time and
energy on. And that's the only thing I will put a large effort into
while I working for now.
I'm still not clear on what exactlty your problem is. You wrote down
what you claim is a solution and show none of the work to get there.
Then you say the problem can't be solved by standard techniques!
What's the deal with that?? I'm not even sure what it is that you
think I said you were wrong about. Also It's been over a decade since
I've solved or worked with problems in circuits so I'd have to review
that material - that takes time and I have things I have to do (not
*want* to do but *have* to do).
Perhaps the problem is that you thought that I said you were wrong. If
you're sayinng that the equivalent mechanical problem can't be sovled
then that's a question on the existance an uniqueness of differential
equations.
Pmb
Pmb
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Re: Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulations
Re: Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulations
Re: Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulations
Re: Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulations
Re: Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulations
Maxwell's and Faraday's formulations of induction
Is Lubos Motl's Dissertation "Nonperturbative Formulations of Superstring Theory" a Postmodern Hoax? Does a none-perturtbative forumlation of ST exist? Is that why he attacks Smolin & Woit? Moving Dimesntions Theory (MDT) to the Rescue!!!
Quantum Gravity 135.0: The Russians, Baez, Smolin, Rovelli, and Their Hamiltonian Anti-Inflation Approach
Quadratic time dependent Hamiltonian
Dimensional analysis and measurement; what is the relativistic Hamiltonian?
Question about Hamiltonian notation
Two hamiltonian questions
Hamiltonian for Nonholonomic Systems
EPR entanglement and hamiltonian
Hamiltonian constraints in general relativity
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER