ZenIsWhen wrote:
"TMG" <TMG@Nowhere.org> wrote in message
news:65mdnTWTQYao4ybdRVn-sA@comcast.com...
Gwar wrote:
On Mon, 31 May 2004, George Hammond wrote:
[Hammond]
that's the stupidest statement ever. How can there be
"observables' is there is no such thing as an "observer".
I'm not talking about trees falling in the forrest while
the woodsmen are asleep... I'm talking about
before "Man" existed.
The universe existed before human beings showed up & will exist after
human beings are no longer around. Get use to it.
At least 5 days even by Hammond's count. His story has everything
getting created and existing before the sixth day when man was created
(including the dinosaur fossils God put underground just to mess with us).
There's a whole mess of "And God saw it, and it was good" before
Hammond's man existed, became an observer, and existence sprang into
being.
You're surprised that George's lunacy does not even agree with God's word?
NOT EVEN IN THE SLIGHTEST! Very often Hammond has trouble getting the
front of his sentences agreeing with the back of his sentences. It's not
so much "god's" words, it the internal randomness of Hammond's own writings.
He's clearly insane, and has admitted to it (at least with regard to his
past). He still admits to being on welfare and being a ward of the
state. As a taxpayer to the commonwealth (MA), I'd like him to sweep
streets or flip burgers rather than heckle other Productive members of
society with insane nonsense. I suspect Hammond's posting from the
Hyannis public library, but since I moved, I haven't had the opportunity
to catch him at it.
.
