Re: Lorentz transforms physical incoherence



 Science > Physics > Re: Lorentz transforms physical incoherence

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Dirk Van de moortel"
Date: 10 May 2005 05:01:53 AM
Object: Re: Lorentz transforms physical incoherence
<mluttgens@wanadoo.fr> wrote in message news:1115718969.271219.84770@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

Lorentz transforms physical incoherence
_______________________________________

(Based on an example presented by Daryl McCullough)

Marcel Luttgens based on Marcel Luttgens:
Marcel Luttgens' fumbles:
http://www.google.com/search?q=luttgens+site%3Ausers.pandora.be
Marcel Luttgens' home page:
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/mluttgens/
March 2003
"The Lorentz transformation (LT) are false":
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/mluttgens/LTfalse.htm
shot down in
http://groups.google.com/groups?&threadm=b45b8808.0303270557.276fb4a@posting.google.com
May 2003
"There is no length contraction"
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/mluttgens/mmx.htm
shot down in
http://groups.google.com/groups?&threadm=b45b8808.0305140114.2499a771@posting.google.com
Sep 2001
"The Twin paradox falsifies SR"
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/mluttgens/twinpdx1.htm
shot down in
http://groups.google.com/groups?&threadm=20010905090646.22330.00000003@nso-cl.aol.com
"Newton vs Einstein"
http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/Pre2001/V05NO1PDF/V05n1lut.pdf
Dirk Vdm
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Lorentz transforms physical incoherence 10 May 2005 08:23:35 AM
Moronic crackpot!
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
:: quantum incoherence and the logical structure of science (re: mike gordge and obscene videos) ::
looking for a theorem for Fourier transforms
I am a little bit confused about Fourier transforms and their existence
Non-unique-valued nature of Lorentz transforms
EINSTEIN 1905 DERIVATION OF LORENTZ TRANSFORMS
Fourier Transforms to factor numbers?
PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 31 October 2003 http://focus.aps.org/
PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 9 January 2004
Physical reality: s.p.research failed
Physical constants?
PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 24 January 2005 http://focus.aps.org/
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, February 21, 2005
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, February 28, 2005
Human Failings (was Re:number theory as a Physical theory?)
White Holes Related to Spheres, Acceleration, Expansion of Universe 3: Equations with solutions have physical relevance
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER