Science > Physics > Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Mike" |
| Date: |
08 Sep 2006 09:05:29 AM |
| Object: |
Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. |
Henri Wilson wrote:
This is just a theory.
Our concept of space is linear. Is it possible that distances we measure are
really logarithmic?
Impossible and easily refuted by simple experimentation. If that was
the case, for instance, the INS (Inertial navigation System) 747's used
for a long time would not work at all.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_guidance_system
You are an empirical fool.
Mike
HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
Appropriate message snipping is considerate and painless.
.
|
|
| User: "Wilson" |
|
| Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. |
08 Sep 2006 04:29:52 PM |
|
|
On 8 Sep 2006 07:05:29 -0700, "Mike" <eleatis@yahoo.gr> wrote:
Henri Wilson wrote:
This is just a theory.
Our concept of space is linear. Is it possible that distances we measure are
really logarithmic?
Impossible and easily refuted by simple experimentation. If that was
the case, for instance, the INS (Inertial navigation System) 747's used
for a long time would not work at all.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_guidance_system
You are an empirical fool.
Mike
Ah! the log function is not as straightforward as you might think.
HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
You can burn all yer books!
Space is logarithmic.
.
|
|
|
| User: "YBM" |
|
| Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. |
08 Sep 2006 06:37:02 PM |
|
|
Henri Wilson a écrit :
Ah! the log function is not as straightforward as you might think.
I'd guess you've just dicovered the Log function two days ago...
Anyway, you could have a look at Poincaré disk :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_disk_model
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_metric#The_punctured_disk_model
.
|
|
|
| User: "Wilson" |
|
| Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. |
10 Sep 2006 06:23:46 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 01:37:02 +0200, YBM <ybmess@nooos.fr> wrote:
Henri Wilson a écrit :
Ah! the log function is not as straightforward as you might think.
I'd guess you've just dicovered the Log function two days ago...
Anyway, you could have a look at Poincaré disk :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_disk_model
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_metric#The_punctured_disk_model
There, see!
I told you so!
HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
You can burn all yer books!
Space is logarithmic.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. |
08 Sep 2006 08:12:51 PM |
|
|
YBM wrote:
Henri Wilson a =E9crit :
Ah! the log function is not as straightforward as you might think.
I'd guess you've just dicovered the Log function two days ago...
It certaintly is amazing how often the "applied mathematican" learns
about a brand new topic that I already know and then thinks he did the
impossible by learning it.
Anyway, you could have a look at Poincar=E9 disk :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_disk_model
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_metric#The_punctured_disk_model
If he said "space is hyperbolic" he would not be nearly as wrong. At
least one could make an argument for space being hyperbolic. Except one
of the arguments would be special relativity, which would probably make
his brain explode due to cognitive dissonance.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Wilson" |
|
| Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. |
10 Sep 2006 06:27:02 AM |
|
|
On 8 Sep 2006 18:12:51 -0700, "Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote:
YBM wrote:
Henri Wilson a écrit :
Ah! the log function is not as straightforward as you might think.
I'd guess you've just dicovered the Log function two days ago...
It certaintly is amazing how often the "applied mathematican" learns
about a brand new topic that I already know and then thinks he did the
impossible by learning it.
Anyway, you could have a look at Poincaré disk :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_disk_model
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_metric#The_punctured_disk_model
If he said "space is hyperbolic" he would not be nearly as wrong. At
least one could make an argument for space being hyperbolic. Except one
of the arguments would be special relativity, which would probably make
his brain explode due to cognitive dissonance.
....poor boy...... hasn't improved.....
HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
You can burn all yer books!
Space is logarithmic.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. |
10 Sep 2006 09:12:57 AM |
|
|
Henri Wilson wrote:
On 8 Sep 2006 18:12:51 -0700, "Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote:
YBM wrote:
Henri Wilson a =E9crit :
Ah! the log function is not as straightforward as you might think.
I'd guess you've just dicovered the Log function two days ago...
It certaintly is amazing how often the "applied mathematican" learns
about a brand new topic that I already know and then thinks he did the
impossible by learning it.
Anyway, you could have a look at Poincar=E9 disk :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_disk_model
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_metric#The_punctured_disk_m=
odel
If he said "space is hyperbolic" he would not be nearly as wrong. At
least one could make an argument for space being hyperbolic. Except one
of the arguments would be special relativity, which would probably make
his brain explode due to cognitive dissonance.
...poor boy...... hasn't improved.....
You know what is funny, Henri?
When I first started towards my degree, you were in this newsgroup
posting dumb stuff.
You are still posting dumb stuff. Routinely, your latest 'inspiration'
is something I have already seen before (The Poincare disc is the
latest example) and understand much better than you do.
When I graduate, you will STILL be on this newsgroup...posting dumb
*****.
Unlike yourself I am actually dedicating serious time to learning
physics. Unlike yourself, I can actually do it! Isn't that funny?
Oh I'm sure you think highly of yourself regardless.
You say you have a degree in applied mathematics, yet my knowledge of
mathematics is superior to yours and I'm not even done with my BS yet -
why is that?
You were all proud of your 3 dimensions of time...what happened to
those, Henri?
In all the years you have been posting to this newsgroup, has one
person taken one of these 'big ideas' you love to believe you have and
made something out of them? An experiment, or at least an article
published in a peer reviewed journal crediting you?
Have you yet learned special relativity, or does the concept still
..=2E.elude... you? Does the idea of learning enough mathematics to have a
shot at learning general relativity still daunt you? Have you given up
completely on quantum mechanics?
Is Androcles still the only person on this newsgroup who even
approaches 'taking you seriously' ?
Hasn't improved, indeed. This is me laughing at you, Henri.
HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
=20
You can burn all yer books!=20
Space is logarithmic.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Wilson" |
|
| Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. |
10 Sep 2006 06:31:16 PM |
|
|
On 10 Sep 2006 07:12:57 -0700, "Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote:
Henri Wilson wrote:
On 8 Sep 2006 18:12:51 -0700, "Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_metric#The_punctured_disk_model
If he said "space is hyperbolic" he would not be nearly as wrong. At
least one could make an argument for space being hyperbolic. Except one
of the arguments would be special relativity, which would probably make
his brain explode due to cognitive dissonance.
...poor boy...... hasn't improved.....
You know what is funny, Henri?
When I first started towards my degree, you were in this newsgroup
posting dumb stuff.
You are still posting dumb stuff.
...and you'r still starting towards your degree, Geesey....
Routinely, your latest 'inspiration'
is something I have already seen before (The Poincare disc is the
latest example) and understand much better than you do.
When I graduate, you will STILL be on this newsgroup...posting dumb
*****.
When you graduate, Geesey, pigs and green elephants will be flying through the
sky...
Unlike yourself I am actually dedicating serious time to learning
physics. Unlike yourself, I can actually do it! Isn't that funny?
Oh I'm sure you think highly of yourself regardless.
You say you have a degree in applied mathematics, yet my knowledge of
mathematics is superior to yours and I'm not even done with my BS yet -
why is that?
You have never written an equation here Geesey.
It is obvious you don't have any natural maths ability.
You were all proud of your 3 dimensions of time...what happened to
those, Henri?
That's right. There are three time subdimensions.
You wont find that in a book..and they wont teach it at universities....yet!
In all the years you have been posting to this newsgroup, has one
person taken one of these 'big ideas' you love to believe you have and
made something out of them? An experiment, or at least an article
published in a peer reviewed journal crediting you?
Have you yet learned special relativity, or does the concept still
...elude... you? Does the idea of learning enough mathematics to have a
shot at learning general relativity still daunt you? Have you given up
completely on quantum mechanics?
Is Androcles still the only person on this newsgroup who even
approaches 'taking you seriously' ?
Geesey, haven't you noticed? There are more people on this NG opposing Einstein
than supporting him.
Hasn't improved, indeed. This is me laughing at you, Henri.
geesey you would probably laugh if you stumbled on a nude woman in the dark....
HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
You can burn all yer books!
Space is logarithmic.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. |
10 Sep 2006 07:13:15 PM |
|
|
Henri Wilson wrote:
On 10 Sep 2006 07:12:57 -0700, "Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote:
Henri Wilson wrote:
On 8 Sep 2006 18:12:51 -0700, "Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_metric#The_punctured_disk_model
If he said "space is hyperbolic" he would not be nearly as wrong. At
least one could make an argument for space being hyperbolic. Except one
of the arguments would be special relativity, which would probably make
his brain explode due to cognitive dissonance.
...poor boy...... hasn't improved.....
You know what is funny, Henri?
When I first started towards my degree, you were in this newsgroup
posting dumb stuff.
You are still posting dumb stuff.
..and you'r still starting towards your degree, Geesey....
Incorrect, Henri. I'm well on my way.
Routinely, your latest 'inspiration'
is something I have already seen before (The Poincare disc is the
latest example) and understand much better than you do.
When I graduate, you will STILL be on this newsgroup...posting dumb
*****.
When you graduate, Geesey, pigs and green elephants will be flying through the
sky...
Think so?
Unlike yourself I am actually dedicating serious time to learning
physics. Unlike yourself, I can actually do it! Isn't that funny?
Oh I'm sure you think highly of yourself regardless.
You say you have a degree in applied mathematics, yet my knowledge of
mathematics is superior to yours and I'm not even done with my BS yet -
why is that?
Well, Henri?
You have never written an equation here Geesey.
It is obvious you don't have any natural maths ability.
That a fact, Henri? Why is it my knowledge of mathematics is superior
to yours?
I have tried many times to get you to participate in that little
pissing contest and you always refuse.
When I ask you to reconcile your belief that Maxwell's equations are
valid and your belief that it is possible for EM waves to propogate
with a speed c+v, you sputter and fail. Why?
When I ask you to provide the working equations to your theory, you
refuse. Why?
When I ask you to substantiate your assertion that you have a degree in
applied mathematics you always change the subject. Why?
Why don't you tell us how you decided space is logarithmic. What
precipitated your latest 'discovery'?
You were all proud of your 3 dimensions of time...what happened to
those, Henri?
That's right. There are three time subdimensions.
You wont find that in a book..and they wont teach it at universities....yet!
Since you hail yourself as captain amazing for being the discoverer of
the "3 dimensions of time", I would have thought you would talk about
it a little more often. You never talk about that theory
anymore....why?
Did you stop posting about it in the vain hope that nobody would
remember all the bluster?
In all the years you have been posting to this newsgroup, has one
person taken one of these 'big ideas' you love to believe you have and
made something out of them? An experiment, or at least an article
published in a peer reviewed journal crediting you?
Well, Henri?
What efforts have you made to that end?
Have you yet learned special relativity, or does the concept still
...elude... you? Does the idea of learning enough mathematics to have a
shot at learning general relativity still daunt you? Have you given up
completely on quantum mechanics?
Apparently relativity still eludes your understanding.
Is Androcles still the only person on this newsgroup who even
approaches 'taking you seriously' ?
Geesey, haven't you noticed? There are more people on this NG opposing Einstein
than supporting him.
Yet the people opposing relativity have shown on many occasions they do
not understand relativity. You think relativity is wrong, yet you
ignore the experimental evidence for it and refuse to learn the theory.
You didn't answer my question, either. Is Androcles still the only one
on this newsgroup who supports you in any way? I think he is.
Hasn't improved, indeed. This is me laughing at you, Henri.
geesey you would probably laugh if you stumbled on a nude woman in the dark....
It is called "having a sense of humor".
HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
You can burn all yer books!
Space is logarithmic.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Wilson" |
|
| Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. |
11 Sep 2006 02:36:44 AM |
|
|
On 10 Sep 2006 17:13:15 -0700, "Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote:
Henri Wilson wrote:
On 10 Sep 2006 07:12:57 -0700, "Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote:
Henri Wilson wrote:
On 8 Sep 2006 18:12:51 -0700, "Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_metric#The_punctured_disk_model
If he said "space is hyperbolic" he would not be nearly as wrong. At
least one could make an argument for space being hyperbolic. Except one
of the arguments would be special relativity, which would probably make
his brain explode due to cognitive dissonance.
...poor boy...... hasn't improved.....
You know what is funny, Henri?
When I first started towards my degree, you were in this newsgroup
posting dumb stuff.
You are still posting dumb stuff.
..and you'r still starting towards your degree, Geesey....
Incorrect, Henri. I'm well on my way.
What, repeating physics 101 for the third time?
Routinely, your latest 'inspiration'
is something I have already seen before (The Poincare disc is the
latest example) and understand much better than you do.
When I graduate, you will STILL be on this newsgroup...posting dumb
*****.
When you graduate, Geesey, pigs and green elephants will be flying through the
sky...
Think so?
Geesey, sorry but you simply don't have what it takes. There's plenty of work
for plumbers around here. Why don't you take that up?
You say you have a degree in applied mathematics, yet my knowledge of
mathematics is superior to yours and I'm not even done with my BS yet -
why is that?
Well, Henri?
You have never written an equation here Geesey.
It is obvious you don't have any natural maths ability.
That a fact, Henri? Why is it my knowledge of mathematics is superior
to yours?
I have tried many times to get you to participate in that little
pissing contest and you always refuse.
When I ask you to reconcile your belief that Maxwell's equations are
valid and your belief that it is possible for EM waves to propogate
with a speed c+v, you sputter and fail. Why?
Geesey, being able to copy what a mathematician created from a text book
doesn't make YOU a mathematician. Solving Maxwell's equations might be
difficult but understanding what they mean is a bloody cinch.
When I ask you to provide the working equations to your theory, you
refuse. Why?
Which theory? I have many...
When I ask you to substantiate your assertion that you have a degree in
applied mathematics you always change the subject. Why?
Because I don't give a stuff whether YOU believe me or not , Geesey.
Why don't you tell us how you decided space is logarithmic. What
precipitated your latest 'discovery'?
I wanted to shut Androcles up. Sometimes he's dumber than you...
You were all proud of your 3 dimensions of time...what happened to
those, Henri?
That's right. There are three time subdimensions.
You wont find that in a book..and they wont teach it at universities....yet!
Since you hail yourself as captain amazing for being the discoverer of
the "3 dimensions of time", I would have thought you would talk about
it a little more often. You never talk about that theory
anymore....why?
I am not hte firsrt person to propose three time dimensions. Other geniuses
exist too, you know Geesey.
Did you stop posting about it in the vain hope that nobody would
remember all the bluster?
You prove there are NOT three time dimensions Geesey.
How fast does time 'move', Geesey?
How do YOU define time movement?
In all the years you have been posting to this newsgroup, has one
person taken one of these 'big ideas' you love to believe you have and
made something out of them? An experiment, or at least an article
published in a peer reviewed journal crediting you?
Well, Henri?
I have more fun here...and more constructive.
There wont be any establishment rigged journals in ten years.
What efforts have you made to that end?
Have you yet learned special relativity, or does the concept still
...elude... you? Does the idea of learning enough mathematics to have a
shot at learning general relativity still daunt you? Have you given up
completely on quantum mechanics?
Apparently relativity still eludes your understanding.
I sincerely hope that ***** will always elude me.
Is Androcles still the only person on this newsgroup who even
approaches 'taking you seriously' ?
Geesey, haven't you noticed? There are more people on this NG opposing Einstein
than supporting him.
Yet the people opposing relativity have shown on many occasions they do
not understand relativity. You think relativity is wrong, yet you
ignore the experimental evidence for it and refuse to learn the theory.
When have I ever ignored believable experimental evidence?
You didn't answer my question, either. Is Androcles still the only one
on this newsgroup who supports you in any way? I think he is.
He's a silly old pommie engineer. I don't need his support.
HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
You can burn all yer books!
Space is logarithmic.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. |
11 Sep 2006 11:44:18 PM |
|
|
Henri Wilson wrote:
[...]
I have tried many times to get you to participate in that little
pissing contest and you always refuse.
When I ask you to reconcile your belief that Maxwell's equations are
valid and your belief that it is possible for EM waves to propogate
with a speed c+v, you sputter and fail. Why?
Geesey, being able to copy what a mathematician created from a text book
doesn't make YOU a mathematician. Solving Maxwell's equations might be
difficult but understanding what they mean is a bloody cinch.
Since by your standards I am uneducated, why don't you show me how
Maxwell's equations allow a photon to travel at a speed c+v.
Or are you going to run away again after calling me some names, like
Androcles does?
[...]
.
|
|
|
| User: "Y.Porat" |
|
| Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. |
11 Sep 2006 11:52:34 PM |
|
|
Eric Gisse wrote:
Henri Wilson wrote:
[...]
Since by your standards I am uneducated, why don't you show me how
Maxwell's equations allow a photon to travel at a speed c+v.
Or are you going to run away again after calling me some names, like
Androcles does?
[...]
------------------------
to anyone who still dont know who is Eric Gisse
he is a 22 years old student
and going to winn the Nobel
Nobel for what ?? may be you can guess ???
Y.P
---------------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. |
12 Sep 2006 12:56:20 AM |
|
|
Y.Porat wrote:
Eric Gisse wrote:
Henri Wilson wrote:
[...]
Since by your standards I am uneducated, why don't you show me how
Maxwell's equations allow a photon to travel at a speed c+v.
Or are you going to run away again after calling me some names, like
Androcles does?
[...]
------------------------
to anyone who still dont know who is Eric Gisse
he is a 22 years old student
and going to winn the Nobel
Nobel for what ?? may be you can guess ???
Stop pouting. You aren't impressing anyone.
Y.P
---------------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "Y.Porat" |
|
| Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. |
12 Sep 2006 03:30:07 AM |
|
|
Eric Gisse wrote:
Y.Porat wrote:
Eric Gisse wrote:
Henri Wilson wrote:
[...]
Since by your standards I am uneducated, why don't you show me how
Maxwell's equations allow a photon to travel at a speed c+v.
Or are you going to run away again after calling me some names, like
Androcles does?
[...]
------------------------
to anyone who still dont know who is Eric Gisse
he is a 22 years old student
and going to winn the Nobel
Nobel for what ?? may be you can guess ???
Stop pouting. You aren't impressing anyone.
------------------
sorry sorry i forgot that youare the super commander here
actually a nice achievement for a 22 years old student !!! (:-)
but btw whay such a noble commander like you is diverting the
posts from the orriginal destination??
not nice for a noble man like you of 22 yreas old
it fits betetr a 60 years old crook !!
ATB
Y.Porat
--------------------------
Y.P
---------------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. |
12 Sep 2006 04:10:09 AM |
|
|
Y.Porat wrote:
Eric Gisse wrote:
Y.Porat wrote:
Eric Gisse wrote:
Henri Wilson wrote:
[...]
Since by your standards I am uneducated, why don't you show me how
Maxwell's equations allow a photon to travel at a speed c+v.
Or are you going to run away again after calling me some names, like
Androcles does?
[...]
------------------------
to anyone who still dont know who is Eric Gisse
he is a 22 years old student
and going to winn the Nobel
Nobel for what ?? may be you can guess ???
Stop pouting. You aren't impressing anyone.
------------------
sorry sorry i forgot that youare the super commander here
actually a nice achievement for a 22 years old student !!! (:-)
but btw whay such a noble commander like you is diverting the
posts from the orriginal destination??
....because you fall for it so fucking often.
not nice for a noble man like you of 22 yreas old
it fits betetr a 60 years old crook !!
ATB
Y.Porat
--------------------------
Y.P
---------------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "Y.Porat" |
|
| Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. |
12 Sep 2006 05:46:27 AM |
|
|
------------------------
to anyone who still dont know who is Eric Gisse
he is a 22 years old student
and going to winn the Nobel
Nobel for what ?? may be you can guess ???
Stop pouting. You aren't impressing anyone.
------------------
sorry sorry i forgot that youare the super commander here
actually a nice achievement for a 22 years old student !!! (:-)
but btw whay such a noble commander like you is diverting the
posts from the orriginal destination??
...because you fall for it so fucking often.
-----------------
Hi the new commander of this ng
a 22 years old student
how about a Nobel prize for impertinance ?? (:-)
(and the little ***** crook keeps diverting the posts to other
placesjust to prove that he is a 22 years disturbed crook *****
Y.P
--------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "G=EMC^2 Glazier" |
|
| Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. |
12 Sep 2006 07:21:23 AM |
|
|
Y Porat Albert Einstein gave space a concave curve for attraction.
Herbert Glazier gave it a convex curve for repulsion. It fits well with
natures balancing act. It fits well in explaining space expansion.
Bert
.
|
|
|
| User: "hanson" |
|
| Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. |
12 Sep 2006 11:18:36 AM |
|
|
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" <herbertglazier@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:21480-4506A643-723@storefull-3333.bay.webtv.net...
Albert Einstein gave space a concave curve for attraction.
Herbert Glazier gave it a convex curve for repulsion. It fits well with
natures balancing act. It fits well in explaining space expansion.
Bert
[hanson]
Now, since you, Herbert Glazier have put yourself right next
to Albert Einstein you surely must be able to explain without
any other balancing acts, the reoccurring question raised
in any of the links below, especially since you said:
::B:: "I do know how every thing works,
::B:: and pass this information on"
::B:: "Why.. am I not loved by all?" Bert
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/361966daabbdeca0
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/c3b5d5eee8257ba9
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/4a3cb02c3d67cadf
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/18b84fb4ddef0f14
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/9d139adf24f425c5
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/9cb92f51ade500ae
......you' will be lowed if you answer it, Herbie
ahahaha... ahahahanson
.
|
|
|
| User: "G=EMC^2 Glazier" |
|
| Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. |
12 Sep 2006 01:33:04 PM |
|
|
hanson I not only know how every think worksI can improve on everything.
I know the cosmos before BB I know how the first universe was created,I
know how mini-universes came out of this parent universe.. I even know
what makes a bigoted low life insult to humankind hanson like piece of
turd ticks. Bert
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sorcerer" |
|
| Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. |
12 Sep 2006 04:35:20 PM |
|
|
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" <herbertglazier@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:27185-4506FD60-759@storefull-3332.bay.webtv.net...
| hanson I not only know how every think worksI can improve on everything.
| I know the cosmos before BB I know how the first universe was created,I
| know how mini-universes came out of this parent universe.. I even know
| what makes a bigoted low life insult to humankind hanson like piece of
| turd ticks. Bert
Wow... You DO know a lot. Prove to me there was a BB.
Androcles
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "hanson" |
|
| Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. |
12 Sep 2006 05:55:44 PM |
|
|
oye-weh-Zion Glaser aka "G=EMC^2 Glazier" <herbertglazier@webtv.net>
aka Herbie, your display of your cultural values here are truly impressive:
news:27185-4506FD60-759@storefull-3332.bay.webtv.net...
hanson I not only know how every think worksI can improve
on everything. I know the cosmos before BB I know how the
first universe was created,I know how mini-universes came
out of this parent universe.. I even know what makes a bigoted
low life insult to humankind hanson like piece of turd ticks.
Bert [.....you should have added "go figure"]
[hanson]
..... ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ahahahaha... ...however Herbie,
you would not be such an embarrassment to your own ilk and you
would make a far better impression if you were to answer my
question, instead of you trying to create the impression that you are
NOT a Zionist Jew. So answer my question instead of ejaculating
your desperate diversion attempts with your banal and pedestrian
loud- & badmouthing while you have been caught with your pants
down. Herbie, simply answer:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/c6dee513388f68a6
All the links cited therein have the common denominator which says:
*** ... oye-weh-Zion Glaser's God is Israel. *** He is one of those
kikes who live in the US, but who do live & operate by the belief of
----- "Israel First, then maybe, just maybe, the USA 2nd" ------
oye-weh-Zion Glaser's own whinings stated in HIS own words that:
::B::"Go Figure" .... Jews use that term".
::B:: "Being Jewish I know this is so very true".
::B:: "We do need the help of Israel to help us"
::B:: "I stuck up for Israel"
::B:: "I do know how every thing works,
::B:: and pass this information on"
::B:: "Why.. am I not loved by all?" Bert
Now then Bert, since you "know" and you yearn to be "loved",
I think you perhaps will be so, AFTER you "pass on" the
------ answer to why ------
"...the USA, which is paying to Israel 3-7 Billion $$$US tax
money each year for the last 60 years & an equal $ amount
to the muslim *****-venters to placate and pacify them so that
they don't continue to kick Jew *****, does beg the question:
==== What are all these BILLIONS of US tax-payer dollars
buying the American public, besides continuous terrorism,
mayhem and war where Jews are being connected to or
involved in ? --- What good or benefit has come in return to
the American taxpayers from Israel for all that tax money that
came off the tables from poor American families?"
------- answer that, oye-weh-Bert -------
hanson
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mike" |
|
| Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. |
09 Sep 2006 04:26:51 AM |
|
|
Henri Wilson wrote:
On 8 Sep 2006 07:05:29 -0700, "Mike" <eleatis@yahoo.gr> wrote:
Henri Wilson wrote:
This is just a theory.
Our concept of space is linear. Is it possible that distances we measure are
really logarithmic?
Impossible and easily refuted by simple experimentation. If that was
the case, for instance, the INS (Inertial navigation System) 747's used
for a long time would not work at all.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_guidance_system
You are an empirical fool.
Mike
Ah! the log function is not as straightforward as you might think.
A function has a domain and a range. In this particular case you are
talking about, what is the domain and what is the range?
Mike
HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
You can burn all yer books!
Space is logarithmic.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Wilson" |
|
| Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. |
10 Sep 2006 06:26:28 AM |
|
|
On 9 Sep 2006 02:26:51 -0700, "Mike" <eleatis@yahoo.gr> wrote:
Henri Wilson wrote:
On 8 Sep 2006 07:05:29 -0700, "Mike" <eleatis@yahoo.gr> wrote:
Henri Wilson wrote:
This is just a theory.
Our concept of space is linear. Is it possible that distances we measure are
really logarithmic?
Impossible and easily refuted by simple experimentation. If that was
the case, for instance, the INS (Inertial navigation System) 747's used
for a long time would not work at all.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_guidance_system
You are an empirical fool.
Mike
Ah! the log function is not as straightforward as you might think.
A function has a domain and a range. In this particular case you are
talking about, what is the domain and what is the range?
Are you aware that all human senses are logarithmic (regarding magnitudes)?
Why not our concept of space?
Mike
HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
You can burn all yer books!
Space is logarithmic.
HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
You can burn all yer books!
Space is logarithmic.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. |
08 Sep 2006 08:07:48 PM |
|
|
Henri Wilson wrote:
On 8 Sep 2006 07:05:29 -0700, "Mike" <eleatis@yahoo.gr> wrote:
Henri Wilson wrote:
This is just a theory.
Our concept of space is linear. Is it possible that distances we measure are
really logarithmic?
Impossible and easily refuted by simple experimentation. If that was
the case, for instance, the INS (Inertial navigation System) 747's used
for a long time would not work at all.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_guidance_system
You are an empirical fool.
Mike
Ah! the log function is not as straightforward as you might think.
Oh this is going to be fun. Henri just read about the log function and
had this great epiphany. A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.
Tell us Henri, tell us about the log function.
When you say "space is logarithmatic", do you mean the real valued log
or the complex valued log? How do you address branch points? Do you
even understand what I just said?
HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
You can burn all yer books!
Space is logarithmic.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
