Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.



 Science > Physics > Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 2 of 3

1

 

2

 

3

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "PD"
Date: 19 Sep 2006 10:43:51 AM
Object: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
Henri Wilson wrote:

This is just a theory.

Our concept of space is linear. Is it possible that distances we measure are
really logarithmic?


A logarithm is a function. Distance is a logarithmic function of what?
And if that "what" is zero between two events, what is the logarithm of
that "what"?
PD
.

User: "Sorcerer"

Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. 30 Sep 2006 07:30:05 AM
"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
news:dudsh29oj1s5nvl6bpbg5ffcqll8r8f7in@4ax.com...
| On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:42:02 GMT, "Sorcerer"
<Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_b>
| wrote:
|
| >
| >"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote in message
| >news:CnfTg.35$If3.16@trnddc07...
| >| Awe... ...Henry, don't press so hard (!!!!) on account of me. You
| >| might pop a hemmie and you, as a devout Einstein Dingleberry,
| >| might fall off the sphincter locus at/on your role model Einstein.
| >| While I feel empathy for your plight, I truly thank you for the
laughs...
| >| ahahahaha... ...
| >| -----------------------------
| >| Andro 1 : Hen 0
| >| -----------------------------
| >
| >Aww... Give H ln(0.3) = -1.204 of a point, I enjoy his ribbing.
| >I feel a tad sorry for him, he's well past 70 and got his B.Sc. in 1970.
| >Not too bright, but tries hard. Senile dementia is setting in now.
| >The reason for his logarithmic distances is that he models
| >all his worbits edge-on ( worbits are Wilson orbits ) and so
| >he reproduces real light curves from stars that are 0.3 light
| >years away. By claiming the distance is logarithmic he can
| >arrange for a reasonable value and save face.
| >Poor old chap... little does he realize just how transparent he is.
| >He longs for a theory of his own, you see, but only got
| >its logarithm.
| >I expect the world shattering announcement will be that he's
| >discovered the exp() function.
|
| Useless pommie engineer.... doesn't know anything about optics.
| His car's odometer stil reads zero because it is returned to the same
place
| every day. ie., it has travelled zero distance according to the pommie
| engineer who never studied optics.
Stupid ozzy black abo Einstein dingleberry thinks he can find the
height of Everest with altimeters at the base on each side by
averaging their readings.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/DominoEffect.GIF
|
| >| [Hen]
| >| > (another world-shattering announcement coming soon)
| >| >
| >| [hanson]
| >| ahahaha... what?... That you, the Einstein Dingleberry, fell
| >| off your master's rectal hair strand?.... ahahahaha....
| >| Hen, you really should truly pity yourself if you believe
| >| that you are not mad. You are a candidate for Ravencrag.
| >| Thanks for the laughs, Hen!!!!! ...ahahaha... ahahanson
|
| Most geniuses throughout history have been considered mad at some stage.
Yep. Pity you are not one of them and are just mad.
Androcles
.
User: "Wilson"

Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. 30 Sep 2006 04:34:26 PM
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:30:05 GMT, "Sorcerer" <Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_b>
wrote:


"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
news:dudsh29oj1s5nvl6bpbg5ffcqll8r8f7in@4ax.com...
| On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:42:02 GMT, "Sorcerer"
<Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_b>
| wrote:
|
| >
| >"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote in message
| >news:CnfTg.35$If3.16@trnddc07...
| >| Awe... ...Henry, don't press so hard (!!!!) on account of me. You
| >| might pop a hemmie and you, as a devout Einstein Dingleberry,
| >| might fall off the sphincter locus at/on your role model Einstein.
| >| While I feel empathy for your plight, I truly thank you for the
laughs...
| >| ahahahaha... ...
| >| -----------------------------
| >| Andro 1 : Hen 0
| >| -----------------------------
| >
| >Aww... Give H ln(0.3) = -1.204 of a point, I enjoy his ribbing.
| >I feel a tad sorry for him, he's well past 70 and got his B.Sc. in 1970.
| >Not too bright, but tries hard. Senile dementia is setting in now.
| >The reason for his logarithmic distances is that he models
| >all his worbits edge-on ( worbits are Wilson orbits ) and so
| >he reproduces real light curves from stars that are 0.3 light
| >years away. By claiming the distance is logarithmic he can
| >arrange for a reasonable value and save face.
| >Poor old chap... little does he realize just how transparent he is.
| >He longs for a theory of his own, you see, but only got
| >its logarithm.
| >I expect the world shattering announcement will be that he's
| >discovered the exp() function.
|
| Useless pommie engineer.... doesn't know anything about optics.
| His car's odometer stil reads zero because it is returned to the same
place
| every day. ie., it has travelled zero distance according to the pommie
| engineer who never studied optics.


Stupid ozzy black abo Einstein dingleberry thinks he can find the
height of Everest with altimeters at the base on each side by
averaging their readings.

If that's typical of pommie engineering logic it's no wonder Concorde crashed.

http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/DominoEffect.GIF



|
| >| [Hen]
| >| > (another world-shattering announcement coming soon)
| >| >
| >| [hanson]
| >| ahahaha... what?... That you, the Einstein Dingleberry, fell
| >| off your master's rectal hair strand?.... ahahahaha....
| >| Hen, you really should truly pity yourself if you believe
| >| that you are not mad. You are a candidate for Ravencrag.
| >| Thanks for the laughs, Hen!!!!! ...ahahaha... ahahanson
|
| Most geniuses throughout history have been considered mad at some stage.

Yep. Pity you are not one of them and are just mad.

Pot.... Kettle..black...

Androcles



HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
(another world-shattering announcement coming soon)
.
User: "Sorcerer"

Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. 30 Sep 2006 05:45:57 PM
"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
news:r4oth2de56qcj0spfe1ojbo8o9r91hjmkl@4ax.com...
| On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:30:05 GMT, "Sorcerer"
<Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_b>
| wrote:
|
| >
| >"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
| >news:dudsh29oj1s5nvl6bpbg5ffcqll8r8f7in@4ax.com...
| >| On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:42:02 GMT, "Sorcerer"
| ><Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_b>
| >| wrote:
| >|
| >| >
| >| >"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote in message
| >| >news:CnfTg.35$If3.16@trnddc07...
| >| >| Awe... ...Henry, don't press so hard (!!!!) on account of me. You
| >| >| might pop a hemmie and you, as a devout Einstein Dingleberry,
| >| >| might fall off the sphincter locus at/on your role model Einstein.
| >| >| While I feel empathy for your plight, I truly thank you for the
| >laughs...
| >| >| ahahahaha... ...
| >| >| -----------------------------
| >| >| Andro 1 : Hen 0
| >| >| -----------------------------
| >| >
| >| >Aww... Give H ln(0.3) = -1.204 of a point, I enjoy his ribbing.
| >| >I feel a tad sorry for him, he's well past 70 and got his B.Sc. in
1970.
| >| >Not too bright, but tries hard. Senile dementia is setting in now.
| >| >The reason for his logarithmic distances is that he models
| >| >all his worbits edge-on ( worbits are Wilson orbits ) and so
| >| >he reproduces real light curves from stars that are 0.3 light
| >| >years away. By claiming the distance is logarithmic he can
| >| >arrange for a reasonable value and save face.
| >| >Poor old chap... little does he realize just how transparent he is.
| >| >He longs for a theory of his own, you see, but only got
| >| >its logarithm.
| >| >I expect the world shattering announcement will be that he's
| >| >discovered the exp() function.
| >|
| >| Useless pommie engineer.... doesn't know anything about optics.
| >| His car's odometer stil reads zero because it is returned to the same
| >place
| >| every day. ie., it has travelled zero distance according to the pommie
| >| engineer who never studied optics.
| >
| >
| >Stupid ozzy black abo Einstein dingleberry thinks he can find the
| >height of Everest with altimeters at the base on each side by
| >averaging their readings.
|
| If that's typical of pommie engineering logic it's no wonder Concorde
crashed.
That was the French Concorde. We wanted to call it Concord.
Never get in bed with a Frenchman. French woman, ok.
Anyway, moron, 1000 feet up and the altimeter reads 1000 ft.
How high is Everest?
| > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/DominoEffect.GIF
| >
| >
| >
| >|
| >| >| [Hen]
| >| >| > (another world-shattering announcement coming soon)
| >| >| >
| >| >| [hanson]
| >| >| ahahaha... what?... That you, the Einstein Dingleberry, fell
| >| >| off your master's rectal hair strand?.... ahahahaha....
| >| >| Hen, you really should truly pity yourself if you believe
| >| >| that you are not mad. You are a candidate for Ravencrag.
| >| >| Thanks for the laughs, Hen!!!!! ...ahahaha... ahahanson
| >|
| >| Most geniuses throughout history have been considered mad at some
stage.
| >
| >Yep. Pity you are not one of them and are just mad.
|
| Pot.... Kettle..black...
I've never claimed to be a genius or to have a theory.
(Bright shiny pot to mad black abo kettle).

.



User: "Wilson"

Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. 29 Sep 2006 04:28:44 PM
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:30:26 GMT, "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote:

Awe... ...Henry, don't press so hard (!!!!) on account of me. You
might pop a hemmie and you, as a devout Einstein Dingleberry,
might fall off the sphincter locus at/on your role model Einstein.
While I feel empathy for your plight, I truly thank you for the laughs...
ahahahaha... ...

I thought so...
Hanson = Androcles..


"Hen" aka "Henri Wilson" a grievelously cranked Einstein's Dingleberry
<HW@..> w/i news:6lnph2l0pj88b3o7a1sgevodoe3ol6hsfd@4ax.com...

"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message to Andro
news:lggoh21mhtd2fm11isfvkbdliiiv6csahs@4ax.com...
| >| ....you silly old drunken pommie gentleman.....
| >|

[Andro]

| >Fucking stupid old black wino abo doesn't know what constant means.


[Hen]

| Racist remarks are no longer accepted in this country.

[Andro]

Too bad, I'm not IN your country, and cricket is just another
dumb ball game (Newtonian rules).
The time for a ball to go from bowler to batsman
does NOT equal the time for it to go from batsman to
be caught at silly mid off.
Fucking senile old black wino abo ***** is an Einstein
supporter, hahahanson calls your kind "Einstein dingleberries"
'cause you all kiss his arse.


[Hen]

Hanson!!! hanson!!! You quote HANSON!!!!!
He's madder than YOU!!!!!
Louis Savain's ghost.....
HW.

[hanson]
-----------------------------
Andro 1 : Hen 0
-----------------------------

[Hen]

(another world-shattering announcement coming soon)

[hanson]
ahahaha... what?... That you, the Einstein Dingleberry, fell
off your master's rectal hair strand?.... ahahahaha....
Hen, you really should truly pity yourself if you believe
that you are not mad. You are a candidate for Ravencrag.
Thanks for the laughs, Hen!!!!! ...ahahaha... ahahanson

Don't call me an Einstein dingleberry or I'll smash your monitor...
Einstein was the greatest hoaxer since jesus christ...
HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
(another world-shattering announcement coming soon)
.
User: "hanson"

Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. 29 Sep 2006 05:57:29 PM
Hen aka "Henri Wilson" <HW@..> rectified misconceptions in
news:1d3rh29fhq9e1jed5qk7fl58qv0e88iqls@4ax.com...
"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote:

Awe... ...Henry, don't press so hard (!!!!) on account of me. You
might pop a hemmie and you, as a devout Einstein Dingleberry,
might fall off the sphincter locus at/on your role model Einstein.
While I feel empathy for your plight, I truly thank you for the laughs...
ahahahaha... ...


[Hen]

I thought so...
Hanson = Androcles..

[hanson]
ahahahaha... I hope your theory is more accuate then your
guess here. Andro is in the UK, and I am not too far from
you in Rarotonga... ahahhaha



"Hen" aka "Henri Wilson" a grievelously cranked Einstein's Dingleberry
<HW@..> w/i news:6lnph2l0pj88b3o7a1sgevodoe3ol6hsfd@4ax.com...

"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message to Andro
news:lggoh21mhtd2fm11isfvkbdliiiv6csahs@4ax.com...
| >| ....you silly old drunken pommie gentleman.....
| >|

[Andro]

| >Fucking stupid old black wino abo doesn't know what constant means.


[Hen]

| Racist remarks are no longer accepted in this country.

[Andro]

Too bad, I'm not IN your country, and cricket is just another
dumb ball game (Newtonian rules).
The time for a ball to go from bowler to batsman
does NOT equal the time for it to go from batsman to
be caught at silly mid off.
Fucking senile old black wino abo ***** is an Einstein
supporter, hahahanson calls your kind "Einstein dingleberries"
'cause you all kiss his arse.


[Hen]

Hanson!!! hanson!!! You quote HANSON!!!!!
He's madder than YOU!!!!!
Louis Savain's ghost.....
HW.

[hanson]
-----------------------------
Andro 1 : Hen 0
-----------------------------

[Hen]

(another world-shattering announcement coming soon)

[hanson]
ahahaha... what?... That you, the Einstein Dingleberry, fell
off your master's rectal hair strand?.... ahahahaha....
Hen, you really should truly pity yourself if you believe
that you are not mad. You are a candidate for Ravencrag.
Thanks for the laughs, Hen!!!!! ...ahahaha... ahahanson


[Hen]

Don't call me an Einstein dingleberry or I'll smash your monitor...
Einstein was the greatest hoaxer since jesus christ...

[hanson]
ahahaha... OK, then your are of the same general opinion
as is Andro and myself. So, what are you arguing about then,
calling him and me names for?.... ahahaha.... That sounds like
you are mad... even without a set of (!!!!).... ahahaha....


[Hen]

HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
(another world-shattering announcement coming soon)

.
User: "Wilson"

Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. 30 Sep 2006 04:31:05 AM
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:57:29 GMT, "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote:

Hen aka "Henri Wilson" <HW@..> rectified misconceptions in
news:1d3rh29fhq9e1jed5qk7fl58qv0e88iqls@4ax.com...
"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote:

Awe... ...Henry, don't press so hard (!!!!) on account of me. You
might pop a hemmie and you, as a devout Einstein Dingleberry,
might fall off the sphincter locus at/on your role model Einstein.
While I feel empathy for your plight, I truly thank you for the laughs...
ahahahaha... ...


[Hen]

I thought so...
Hanson = Androcles..

[hanson]
ahahahaha... I hope your theory is more accuate then your
guess here. Andro is in the UK, and I am not too far from
you in Rarotonga... ahahhaha

Raratonga????
You don't have internet in Raratonga do you?

[Hen]

(another world-shattering announcement coming soon)

[hanson]
ahahaha... what?... That you, the Einstein Dingleberry, fell
off your master's rectal hair strand?.... ahahahaha....
Hen, you really should truly pity yourself if you believe
that you are not mad. You are a candidate for Ravencrag.
Thanks for the laughs, Hen!!!!! ...ahahaha... ahahanson


[Hen]

Don't call me an Einstein dingleberry or I'll smash your monitor...
Einstein was the greatest hoaxer since jesus christ...

[hanson]
ahahaha... OK, then your are of the same general opinion
as is Andro and myself. So, what are you arguing about then,
calling him and me names for?.... ahahaha.... That sounds like
you are mad... even without a set of (!!!!).... ahahaha....

Androcles is a drunken old pommie *****. He is jealous of me because my
variable star program is 100 times better than his. He also owes me 1 dozen
bottles of red.
.....but we will still unite against the common enemy...
HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
(another world-shattering announcement coming soon)
.
User: "Sorcerer"

Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. 30 Sep 2006 07:10:03 AM
"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
news:1ldsh2l4gjgiqj8ucii804f39obj82um2h@4ax.com...
| On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:57:29 GMT, "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote:
|
| >Hen aka "Henri Wilson" <HW@..> rectified misconceptions in
| >news:1d3rh29fhq9e1jed5qk7fl58qv0e88iqls@4ax.com...
| > "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote:
| >>>Awe... ...Henry, don't press so hard (!!!!) on account of me. You
| >>>might pop a hemmie and you, as a devout Einstein Dingleberry,
| >>>might fall off the sphincter locus at/on your role model Einstein.
| >>>While I feel empathy for your plight, I truly thank you for the
laughs...
| >>>ahahahaha... ...
| >>
| >[Hen]
| >> I thought so...
| >> Hanson = Androcles..
| >>
| >[hanson]
| >ahahahaha... I hope your theory is more accuate then your
| >guess here. Andro is in the UK, and I am not too far from
| >you in Rarotonga... ahahhaha
|
| Raratonga????
| You don't have internet in Raratonga do you?
Egads... I thought all you South Sea islanders had heard of satellites.
We North Sea islanders use 'em all the time.
|
|
| >>>[Hen]
| >>>> (another world-shattering announcement coming soon)
| >>>>
| >>>[hanson]
| >>>ahahaha... what?... That you, the Einstein Dingleberry, fell
| >>>off your master's rectal hair strand?.... ahahahaha....
| >>>Hen, you really should truly pity yourself if you believe
| >>>that you are not mad. You are a candidate for Ravencrag.
| >>>Thanks for the laughs, Hen!!!!! ...ahahaha... ahahanson
| >>
| >[Hen]
| >> Don't call me an Einstein dingleberry or I'll smash your monitor...
| >> Einstein was the greatest hoaxer since jesus christ...
| >>
| >[hanson]
| >ahahaha... OK, then your are of the same general opinion
| >as is Andro and myself. So, what are you arguing about then,
| >calling him and me names for?.... ahahaha.... That sounds like
| >you are mad... even without a set of (!!!!).... ahahaha....
|
| Androcles is a drunken old pommie *****. He is jealous of me because my
| variable star program is 100 times better than his. He also owes me 1
dozen
| bottles of red.
|
I'll let an independent third party be the judge.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Copernicus/LightCurveVariations.htm| ....but we will still unite against the common enemy...|Henri owe me three cases of Glenlivet, AU$4000. I'd give himhis dozen bottles of cheap ozzy Sherez plonk if he paid up.You are an Einstein dingleberry that doesn't know what a constantvelocity is and has never heard of calculus. http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/DominoEffect.GIF(I've redrawn the gif to make it easier for you)How the ***** can you find the slope?
.
User: "Wilson"

Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. 30 Sep 2006 04:32:01 PM
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:10:03 GMT, "Sorcerer" <Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_b>
wrote:


"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
news:1ldsh2l4gjgiqj8ucii804f39obj82um2h@4ax.com...
| On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:57:29 GMT, "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote:
| >[hanson]
| >ahahaha... OK, then your are of the same general opinion
| >as is Andro and myself. So, what are you arguing about then,
| >calling him and me names for?.... ahahaha.... That sounds like
| >you are mad... even without a set of (!!!!).... ahahaha....
|
| Androcles is a drunken old pommie *****. He is jealous of me because my
| variable star program is 100 times better than his. He also owes me 1
dozen
| bottles of red.
|
I'll let an independent third party be the judge.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Copernicus/LightCurveVariations.htm| ....but we will still unite against the common enemy...|Henri owe me three cases of Glenlivet, AU$4000. I'd give himhis dozen bottles of cheap ozzy Sherez plonk if he paid up.You are an Einstein dingleberry that doesn't know what a constantvelocity is and has never heard of calculus. http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/DominoEffect.GIF(I've redrawn the gif to make it easier for you)How the ***** can you find the slope?

You are still bogged down in aether theory. Has Seto finally converted you?
According to the BaTh, tB-tA=tA'-tB.
HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
(another world-shattering announcement coming soon)
.
User: "Sorcerer"

Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. 30 Sep 2006 05:38:27 PM
"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
news:punth29bptrd5q2gdlumd02d2vqo9oa6bb@4ax.com...
| According to the BaTh, tB-tA=tA'-tB.
That's why you are an Einstein dingleberry.
According to any mathematician, tB is not defined.
According to Einstein, tB-tA = 16, t'A-tB = 4.
Half of tau(16+4) = 16, the other half is 4.
tau(16) = 8,
tau(4) = 8,
tau(20) = 16,
tau (0) = 0.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Smart/Smart.htm
Androcles
.
User: "Wilson"

Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. 01 Oct 2006 05:02:20 PM
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 22:38:27 GMT, "Sorcerer" <Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_b>
wrote:


"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
news:punth29bptrd5q2gdlumd02d2vqo9oa6bb@4ax.com...

| According to the BaTh, tB-tA=tA'-tB.

That's why you are an Einstein dingleberry.
According to any mathematician, tB is not defined.
According to Einstein, tB-tA = 16, t'A-tB = 4.
Half of tau(16+4) = 16, the other half is 4.
tau(16) = 8,
tau(4) = 8,
tau(20) = 16,
tau (0) = 0.

http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Smart/Smart.htm

You are the dingleberry.
According to the BaTh,
tB-tA=AB/c
tA'-tB=AB/c
Einstein merely redefined clock synching and fluked the correct answer. He
found a way to absolutely synchronise both clocks and simultaneity.
He was able to maintain his lucrative deception and, at the same time, satisfy
Ritz..

Androcles

HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
(another world-shattering announcement coming soon)
.
User: "Sorcerer"

Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. 01 Oct 2006 05:29:28 PM
"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
news:pqd0i298thl2i8r1n12nk9nsmqdj9enfu0@4ax.com...
| On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 22:38:27 GMT, "Sorcerer"
<Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_b>
| wrote:
|
| >
| >"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
| >news:punth29bptrd5q2gdlumd02d2vqo9oa6bb@4ax.com...
| >
| >| According to the BaTh, tB-tA=tA'-tB.
| >
| >That's why you are an Einstein dingleberry.
| >According to any mathematician, tB is not defined.
| >According to Einstein, tB-tA = 16, t'A-tB = 4.
| >Half of tau(16+4) = 16, the other half is 4.
| > tau(16) = 8,
| > tau(4) = 8,
| >tau(20) = 16,
| >tau (0) = 0.
| >
| > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Smart/Smart.htm
|
| You are the dingleberry.
Not according to Hanson.
| According to the BaTh,
| tB-tA=AB/c
| tA'-tB=AB/c
HAHAHAHA!
According to a physicist, which you are NOT,
tA'-tB= BA/-c
You must have missed velocity class... I'm glad I don't have
an upside down ozzie sheepskin, your U had dreadful lecturers,
probably from Norway or Belgium.
http://www.answers.com/topic/velocity
So much for the bathwater.
[crap snipped]
.
User: "Wilson"

Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. 02 Oct 2006 03:36:35 AM
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:29:28 GMT, "Sorcerer" <Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_b>
wrote:


"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
news:pqd0i298thl2i8r1n12nk9nsmqdj9enfu0@4ax.com...
| On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 22:38:27 GMT, "Sorcerer"
| >"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
| >news:punth29bptrd5q2gdlumd02d2vqo9oa6bb@4ax.com...
| >
| >| According to the BaTh, tB-tA=tA'-tB.
| >
| >That's why you are an Einstein dingleberry.
| >According to any mathematician, tB is not defined.
| >According to Einstein, tB-tA = 16, t'A-tB = 4.
| >Half of tau(16+4) = 16, the other half is 4.
| > tau(16) = 8,
| > tau(4) = 8,
| >tau(20) = 16,
| >tau (0) = 0.
| >
| > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Smart/Smart.htm
|
| You are the dingleberry.

Not according to Hanson.

| According to the BaTh,
| tB-tA=AB/c
| tA'-tB=AB/c

HAHAHAHA!
According to a physicist, which you are NOT,
tA'-tB= BA/-c
You must have missed velocity class... I'm glad I don't have
an upside down ozzie sheepskin, your U had dreadful lecturers,
probably from Norway or Belgium.
http://www.answers.com/topic/velocity

So much for the bathwater.

I don't know why you continue to argue about this. It is bloody obvious enough.
The velocity of litght is c wrt its source and everything in the source frame.
It reflects from the mirror at c in the opposite direction. It obviously takes
the same time to travel from A to B as it does from B to A.
What aspect of this simple situation is the source of your mental block?


[crap snipped]

HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
(another world-shattering announcement coming soon)
.
User: "Sorcerer"

Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. 02 Oct 2006 04:07:40 AM
"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
news:s6j1i2pvuvuvhh27v4j7c9vhkmsno66paj@4ax.com...
| On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:29:28 GMT, "Sorcerer"
<Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_b>
| wrote:
|
| >
| >"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
| >news:pqd0i298thl2i8r1n12nk9nsmqdj9enfu0@4ax.com...
| >| On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 22:38:27 GMT, "Sorcerer"
|
| >| >"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
| >| >news:punth29bptrd5q2gdlumd02d2vqo9oa6bb@4ax.com...
| >| >
| >| >| According to the BaTh, tB-tA=tA'-tB.
| >| >
| >| >That's why you are an Einstein dingleberry.
| >| >According to any mathematician, tB is not defined.
| >| >According to Einstein, tB-tA = 16, t'A-tB = 4.
| >| >Half of tau(16+4) = 16, the other half is 4.
| >| > tau(16) = 8,
| >| > tau(4) = 8,
| >| >tau(20) = 16,
| >| >tau (0) = 0.
| >| >
| >| > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Smart/Smart.htm
| >|
| >| You are the dingleberry.
| >
| >Not according to Hanson.
| >
| >| According to the BaTh,
| >| tB-tA=AB/c
| >| tA'-tB=AB/c
| >
| >HAHAHAHA!
| >According to a physicist, which you are NOT,
| >tA'-tB= BA/-c
| >You must have missed velocity class... I'm glad I don't have
| >an upside down ozzie sheepskin, your U had dreadful lecturers,
| >probably from Norway or Belgium.
| > http://www.answers.com/topic/velocity
| >
| >So much for the bathwater.
|
| I don't know why you continue to argue about this. It is bloody obvious
enough.
|
| The velocity of litght is c wrt its source and everything in the source
frame.
Velocity has direction as well as magnitude. Look it up in fucking
dictionary.
I do know why you continue to argue about this. You are not a mathematician
or even a physicist, you are an Einstein dingleberry.
| It reflects
Then it is no longer a constant velocity, the direction has changed.
I do know why you continue to argue about this. You are not a mathematician
or even a physicist, you are an Einstein dingleberry.
| from the mirror at c in the opposite direction.
Ok, in the opposite direction is -c.
I do know why you continue to argue about this. You are not a mathematician
or even a physicist, you are an Einstein dingleberry.
| It obviously takes
| the same time to travel from A to B as it does from B to A.
Then fucking write it algebraically, moron.
AB/c = BA/-c. OBVIOUSLY!
According to the Wilson bathwater, it takes the same time to travel from A
to B as it does from A to B. Big fucking deal, so does everything else.
|
| What aspect of this simple situation is the source of your mental block?
Your fucking mental block, you don't know what a fucking "minus" sign means.
You have understood what goes on but you don't know how to write
it algebraically, fucking stupid Einstein dingleberry.
AB/c = BA/-c OBVIOUSLY!
I do know why you continue to argue about this. You are not a mathematician
or even a physicist, you are an Einstein dingleberry.
Androcles
.
User: "Wilson"

Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. 02 Oct 2006 04:41:40 PM
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 09:07:40 GMT, "Sorcerer" <Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_b>
wrote:


"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
news:s6j1i2pvuvuvhh27v4j7c9vhkmsno66paj@4ax.com...
| On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:29:28 GMT, "Sorcerer"
| >| >
| >| > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Smart/Smart.htm
| >|
| >| You are the dingleberry.
| >
| >Not according to Hanson.
| >
| >| According to the BaTh,
| >| tB-tA=AB/c
| >| tA'-tB=AB/c
| >
| >HAHAHAHA!
| >According to a physicist, which you are NOT,
| >tA'-tB= BA/-c
| >You must have missed velocity class... I'm glad I don't have
| >an upside down ozzie sheepskin, your U had dreadful lecturers,
| >probably from Norway or Belgium.
| > http://www.answers.com/topic/velocity
| >
| >So much for the bathwater.
|
| I don't know why you continue to argue about this. It is bloody obvious
enough.
|

| The velocity of litght is c wrt its source and everything in the source
frame.


Velocity has direction as well as magnitude. Look it up in fucking
dictionary.
I do know why you continue to argue about this. You are not a mathematician
or even a physicist, you are an Einstein dingleberry.


| It reflects

Then it is no longer a constant velocity, the direction has changed.
I do know why you continue to argue about this. You are not a mathematician
or even a physicist, you are an Einstein dingleberry.


| from the mirror at c in the opposite direction.

Ok, in the opposite direction is -c.
I do know why you continue to argue about this. You are not a mathematician
or even a physicist, you are an Einstein dingleberry.



| It obviously takes
| the same time to travel from A to B as it does from B to A.

Then fucking write it algebraically, moron.
AB/c = BA/-c. OBVIOUSLY!

According to the Wilson bathwater, it takes the same time to travel from A
to B as it does from A to B. Big fucking deal, so does everything else.

|
| What aspect of this simple situation is the source of your mental block?

Your fucking mental block, you don't know what a fucking "minus" sign means.
You have understood what goes on but you don't know how to write
it algebraically, fucking stupid Einstein dingleberry.
AB/c = BA/-c OBVIOUSLY!

I do know why you continue to argue about this. You are not a mathematician
or even a physicist, you are an Einstein dingleberry.

You fucking stoopid engineer. You are confusing velocity with speed.
Why do you think we physicists talk about OWLS and TWLS and not OWLV or TWLV??

Androcles


HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
(another world-shattering announcement coming soon)
.
User: "Sorcerer"

Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. 02 Oct 2006 05:57:04 PM
"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
news:p913i2ds1b19jqsthhoqd0gm7oa39sj0at@4ax.com...
| On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 09:07:40 GMT, "Sorcerer"
<Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_b>
| wrote:
|
| >
| >"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
| >news:s6j1i2pvuvuvhh27v4j7c9vhkmsno66paj@4ax.com...
| >| On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:29:28 GMT, "Sorcerer"
|
| >| >| >
| >| >| > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Smart/Smart.htm
| >| >|
| >| >| You are the dingleberry.
| >| >
| >| >Not according to Hanson.
| >| >
| >| >| According to the BaTh,
| >| >| tB-tA=AB/c
| >| >| tA'-tB=AB/c
| >| >
| >| >HAHAHAHA!
| >| >According to a physicist, which you are NOT,
| >| >tA'-tB= BA/-c
| >| >You must have missed velocity class... I'm glad I don't have
| >| >an upside down ozzie sheepskin, your U had dreadful lecturers,
| >| >probably from Norway or Belgium.
| >| > http://www.answers.com/topic/velocity
| >| >
| >| >So much for the bathwater.
| >|
| >| I don't know why you continue to argue about this. It is bloody obvious
| >enough.
| >|
| >
| >| The velocity of litght is c wrt its source and everything in the
source
| >frame.
| >
| >
| >Velocity has direction as well as magnitude. Look it up in fucking
| >dictionary.
| >I do know why you continue to argue about this. You are not a
mathematician
| >or even a physicist, you are an Einstein dingleberry.
| >
| >
| >| It reflects
| >
| >Then it is no longer a constant velocity, the direction has changed.
| >I do know why you continue to argue about this. You are not a
mathematician
| >or even a physicist, you are an Einstein dingleberry.
| >
| >
| >| from the mirror at c in the opposite direction.
| >
| >Ok, in the opposite direction is -c.
| >I do know why you continue to argue about this. You are not a
mathematician
| >or even a physicist, you are an Einstein dingleberry.
| >
| >
| >
| >| It obviously takes
| >| the same time to travel from A to B as it does from B to A.
| >
| >Then fucking write it algebraically, moron.
| >AB/c = BA/-c. OBVIOUSLY!
| >
| >According to the Wilson bathwater, it takes the same time to travel from
A
| >to B as it does from A to B. Big fucking deal, so does everything else.
| >
| >|
| >| What aspect of this simple situation is the source of your mental
block?
| >
| >Your fucking mental block, you don't know what a fucking "minus" sign
means.
| >You have understood what goes on but you don't know how to write
| >it algebraically, fucking stupid Einstein dingleberry.
| >AB/c = BA/-c OBVIOUSLY!
| >
| >I do know why you continue to argue about this. You are not a
mathematician
| >or even a physicist, you are an Einstein dingleberry.
|
| You fucking stoopid engineer. You are confusing velocity with speed.
If you want speed, fuckwit, write ABS(c) or |c| otherwise even your VBasic
will give you velocity.
I do know why you continue to argue about this. You are not a physicist
or even a programmer, you are an Einstein dingleberry.
|
| Why do you think we physicists talk about OWLS and TWLS and not OWLV or
TWLV??
Because you are all incompetent useless fuckwits, of course.
I do know why you continue to argue about this. You are not a physicist
or even a programmer, you are an Einstein dingleberry.
Androcles.
.
User: "Wilson"

Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. 03 Oct 2006 01:57:01 AM
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 22:57:04 GMT, "Sorcerer" <Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_b>
wrote:


"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
news:p913i2ds1b19jqsthhoqd0gm7oa39sj0at@4ax.com...
| On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 09:07:40 GMT, "Sorcerer"
<Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_b>
| >Your fucking mental block, you don't know what a fucking "minus" sign
means.
| >You have understood what goes on but you don't know how to write
| >it algebraically, fucking stupid Einstein dingleberry.
| >AB/c = BA/-c OBVIOUSLY!
| >
| >I do know why you continue to argue about this. You are not a
mathematician
| >or even a physicist, you are an Einstein dingleberry.
|
| You fucking stoopid engineer. You are confusing velocity with speed.

If you want speed, fuckwit, write ABS(c) or |c| otherwise even your VBasic
will give you velocity.
I do know why you continue to argue about this. You are not a physicist
or even a programmer, you are an Einstein dingleberry.
|
| Why do you think we physicists talk about OWLS and TWLS and not OWLV or
TWLV??

Because you are all incompetent useless fuckwits, of course.
I do know why you continue to argue about this. You are not a physicist
or even a programmer, you are an Einstein dingleberry.
Androcles.

You silly old goat...you just cannot grasp it can you?
HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
(another world-shattering announcement coming soon)
.
User: "Sorcerer"

Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. 03 Oct 2006 05:14:56 AM
"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
news:fs14i218otnq5muv0419b8j5cg5c9og7u1@4ax.com...
| On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 22:57:04 GMT, "Sorcerer"
<Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_b>
| wrote:
|
| >
| >"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
| >news:p913i2ds1b19jqsthhoqd0gm7oa39sj0at@4ax.com...
| >| On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 09:07:40 GMT, "Sorcerer"
| ><Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_b>
|
| >| >Your fucking mental block, you don't know what a fucking "minus" sign
| >means.
| >| >You have understood what goes on but you don't know how to write
| >| >it algebraically, fucking stupid Einstein dingleberry.
| >| >AB/c = BA/-c OBVIOUSLY!
| >| >
| >| >I do know why you continue to argue about this. You are not a
| >mathematician
| >| >or even a physicist, you are an Einstein dingleberry.
| >|
| >| You fucking stoopid engineer. You are confusing velocity with speed.
| >
| >If you want speed, fuckwit, write ABS(c) or |c| otherwise even your
VBasic
| >will give you velocity.
| >I do know why you continue to argue about this. You are not a physicist
| >or even a programmer, you are an Einstein dingleberry.
| >|
| >| Why do you think we physicists talk about OWLS and TWLS and not OWLV or
| >TWLV??
| >
| >Because you are all incompetent useless fuckwits, of course.
| >I do know why you continue to argue about this. You are not a physicist
| >or even a programmer, you are an Einstein dingleberry.
| >Androcles.
|
| You silly old goat...you just cannot grasp it can you?
I grasp it very well. It is anathema to you to admit you've lost
your argument and resort to insult just as Dork Van de merde would.
You can't stand losing, but you have lost. That's why you continue
to argue, desperately trying to convince yourself that you are right,
but you'll never convince anyone else except another Einstein
dingleberry.
Tough *****, dingleberry, you are not a physicist, never were a
physicist and never will be a physicist.
The man that never made a mistake never made anything.
I shall continue to pummel you against the ropes until you
say "uncle".
Androcles
.
User: "G=EMC^2 Glazier"

Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. 03 Oct 2006 08:14:05 AM
Einstein gave space a concave curve for attraction. My theory adds this,
"Space curves convex for inflation" Bert
.
User: "hanson"

Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. 03 Oct 2006 08:52:20 AM
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" <herbertglazier@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:3963-4522621D-203@storefull-3334.bay.webtv.net...

Einstein gave space a concave curve for attraction.
My theory adds this, "Space curves convex for inflation" Bert

..... but in reality you curve both ways when you take a *****
or open your mouth.... ahahahaha....
.
User: "Sorcerer"

Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. 03 Oct 2006 09:17:58 AM
"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote in message
news:oWtUg.4849$753.155@trnddc05...
|
| "G=EMC^2 Glazier" <herbertglazier@webtv.net> wrote in message
| news:3963-4522621D-203@storefull-3334.bay.webtv.net...
| > Einstein gave space a concave curve for attraction.
| > My theory adds this, "Space curves convex for inflation" Bert
| >
| .... but in reality you curve both ways when you take a *****
| or open your mouth.... ahahahaha....
What do you mean, "or"?
Herbie shits every time he opens his mouth.
.


User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=80=A6Relf?="

Title: Over cosmological time ( the fifth spatial dimension ), spacetime accrues. 08 Oct 2006 09:00:31 PM
Hi Bert, At any moment in cosmological time, spacetime is flat, euclidian.
At cosmic scales ( mega parsecs ), there is no center of gravity;
spacetime ( i.e. the distribution of mass-energy ) is homogenous and isotrpic.
But, over cosmological time ( the fifth spatial dimension ), spacetime accrues,
like money collecting interest in a bank.
Picture it as a ( 3D ) horn with an infinitely long flange and mouthpiece,
or as a ( 2D ) hyperbola, with negative ( open ) curvature.
.
User: "T Wake"

Title: Re: Over cosmological time ( the fifth spatial dimension ), spacetime accrues. 09 Oct 2006 12:54:03 PM
"Jeff.Relf" <Jeff_Relf@Yahoo.COM> wrote in message
news:Jeff_Relf_2006_Oct_8_DavI@Cotse.NET...

But, over cosmological time ( the fifth spatial dimension ),

Contradicted by pretty much all current physics. Look at the standard model
for a starting point. Have a look as to how an extra spatial dimension (let
alone two) would change things.
I suspect you are not even capable of understanding what I am saying to you,
let alone investigating it.
.

User: "Eric Gisse"

Title: Re: Over cosmological time ( the fifth spatial dimension ), spacetime accrues. 08 Oct 2006 09:17:58 PM
Jeff...Relf wrote:

Hi Bert, At any moment in cosmological time, spacetime is flat, euclidian.

Contradicted by observation, fuckwit.
Stop posting in sci.physics until you actually learn some physics.
[...]
.



User: "Wilson"

Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. 03 Oct 2006 04:42:29 PM
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 10:14:56 GMT, "Sorcerer" <Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_b>
wrote:


"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
news:fs14i218otnq5muv0419b8j5cg5c9og7u1@4ax.com...
| On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 22:57:04 GMT, "Sorcerer"
| >Because you are all incompetent useless fuckwits, of course.
| >I do know why you continue to argue about this. You are not a physicist
| >or even a programmer, you are an Einstein dingleberry.
| >Androcles.
|
| You silly old goat...you just cannot grasp it can you?

I grasp it very well. It is anathema to you to admit you've lost
your argument and resort to insult just as Dork Van de merde would.
You can't stand losing, but you have lost. That's why you continue
to argue, desperately trying to convince yourself that you are right,
but you'll never convince anyone else except another Einstein
dingleberry.

Tough *****, dingleberry, you are not a physicist, never were a
physicist and never will be a physicist.
The man that never made a mistake never made anything.
I shall continue to pummel you against the ropes until you
say "uncle".

Fucking stoopid pommie engineer! No wonder the Concord (no E) crashed.
It was the English part that failed.

Androcles



HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
(another world-shattering announcement coming soon)
.
User: "Sorcerer"

Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. 03 Oct 2006 05:12:03 PM
"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
news:vol5i2laaganpvv51epfskhjjaph842rkg@4ax.com...
| On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 10:14:56 GMT, "Sorcerer"
<Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_b>
| wrote:
|
| >
| >"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
| >news:fs14i218otnq5muv0419b8j5cg5c9og7u1@4ax.com...
| >| On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 22:57:04 GMT, "Sorcerer"
|
| >| >Because you are all incompetent useless fuckwits, of course.
| >| >I do know why you continue to argue about this. You are not a
physicist
| >| >or even a programmer, you are an Einstein dingleberry.
| >| >Androcles.
| >|
| >| You silly old goat...you just cannot grasp it can you?
| >
| >I grasp it very well. It is anathema to you to admit you've lost
| >your argument and resort to insult just as Dork Van de merde would.
| > You can't stand losing, but you have lost. That's why you continue
| >to argue, desperately trying to convince yourself that you are right,
| >but you'll never convince anyone else except another Einstein
| >dingleberry.
| >
| >Tough *****, dingleberry, you are not a physicist, never were a
| >physicist and never will be a physicist.
| >The man that never made a mistake never made anything.
| >I shall continue to pummel you against the ropes until you
| >say "uncle".
|
| Fucking stoopid pommie engineer! No wonder the Concord (no E) crashed.
| It was the English part that failed.
<yawn>
Fucking stoopid bath from an Einstein dingleberry who thinks all
orbits are seen edge on.
You are not a physicist, never were a physicist and never will be a
physicist.
That scrap of 36 year old sheepskin is a forgery.
How old were you when you bought that from Tusselad?
.
User: "Wilson"

Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. 04 Oct 2006 04:21:45 PM
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 22:12:03 GMT, "Sorcerer" <Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_b>
wrote:


"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
news:vol5i2laaganpvv51epfskhjjaph842rkg@4ax.com...
| On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 10:14:56 GMT, "Sorcerer"
<Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_b>
| wrote:
|
| >Tough *****, dingleberry, you are not a physicist, never were a
| >physicist and never will be a physicist.
| >The man that never made a mistake never made anything.
| >I shall continue to pummel you against the ropes until you
| >say "uncle".
|
| Fucking stoopid pommie engineer! No wonder the Concord (no E) crashed.
| It was the English part that failed.

<yawn>
Fucking stoopid bath from an Einstein dingleberry who thinks all
orbits are seen edge on.
You are not a physicist, never were a physicist and never will be a
physicist.
That scrap of 36 year old sheepskin is a forgery.
How old were you when you bought that from Tusselad?

Dopey old pommie engineer.
Take any edge on orbit. Rotate it around an axis in the orbit plane and
perpendicular to your LOS.
ALL its radial velocities are multiplied by the same factor, cos(pitch).
.....So introducing pitch has the same efect on brightness curves as does
increasing distance or maximum orbital velocity.
The measured values of radial velocity already INCLUDE the cos(pitch)
factor....SO I DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT IT IN THE PROGRAM.
NOW SHUT UP ABOUT THIS.!!!!!!!!
YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!!!!!!!
HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
(another world-shattering announcement coming soon)
.
User: "Sorcerer"

Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. 04 Oct 2006 05:17:59 PM
"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
news:ok88i2tkn6ckiue5lo5587b485jq66jb03@4ax.com...
| On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 22:12:03 GMT, "Sorcerer"
<Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_b>
| wrote:
|
| >
| >"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
| >news:vol5i2laaganpvv51epfskhjjaph842rkg@4ax.com...
| >| On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 10:14:56 GMT, "Sorcerer"
| ><Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_b>
| >| wrote:
| >|
|
| >| >Tough *****, dingleberry, you are not a physicist, never were a
| >| >physicist and never will be a physicist.
| >| >The man that never made a mistake never made anything.
| >| >I shall continue to pummel you against the ropes until you
| >| >say "uncle".
| >|
| >| Fucking stoopid pommie engineer! No wonder the Concord (no E) crashed.
| >| It was the English part that failed.
| >
| ><yawn>
| >Fucking stoopid bath from an Einstein dingleberry who thinks all
| >orbits are seen edge on.
| >You are not a physicist, never were a physicist and never will be a
| >physicist.
| >That scrap of 36 year old sheepskin is a forgery.
| >How old were you when you bought that from Tusselad?
|
| Dopey old pommie engineer.
I never touch dope, abo.
All blacks in my country are unimportant imports.
All whites in your country are self-important exports.
New South Wales isn't anything like Old North Wales,
and Old South Wales is coal and iron country.
No British U. would give you a degree, our kids
know what velocity is by the age of 8.
|
| Take any edge on orbit.
Not many of those, but ok.
| Rotate it around an axis in the orbit plane and
| perpendicular to your LOS.
In an edge-on orbit all anyone can see is a straight line.
_____________________________
^ ^
periastron apastron.
What axis should I rotate it about?
| ALL its radial velocities are multiplied by the same factor, cos(pitch).
That's right. Well done.
| ....So introducing pitch has the same efect on brightness curves as does
| increasing distance or maximum orbital velocity.
Yes, that's right. Well done.
|
| The measured values of radial velocity already INCLUDE the cos(pitch)
| factor....
And cos(89) = 0.017452406437283512819418978516316,
so the max radial velocity is the observed max radial velocity * 57.3
| SO I DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT IT IN THE PROGRAM.
Why not? Introducing pitch has the same effect on brightness
curves as does increasing distance or maximum orbital velocity.
You compute 0.3 LY instead of 0.3 * 57.3 = 17 LY.
That's pretty bad, but 57.3 times better than your result.
cos (89.9) = 0.0017 and that gives 573 * 0.3 = 171 LY,
far more realistic.
Let's say it again, since these are your words:
PITCH HAS THE SAME EFFECT ON BRIGHTNESS CURVES AS
INCREASING DISTANCE.
Now we'll add my words:
YOU FUCKIN' STUPID OLD WABO! WAKE UP!
Maybe you've woken up at last.
| NOW SHUT UP ABOUT THIS.!!!!!!!!
No.
| YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!!!!!!!
Yes I do, pitch has the same effect on brightness curves as does
increasing distance.
You are not a physicist, never were a physicist and
never will be a physicist. That scrap of 36-year-old NSW lamb
is a forgery, but the mutton was good with Sherez to wash it
down with. Hope you enjoyed it.
How old were you when you bought that from Tusselad?
2AB/(t'A-tA) = c is a bath fuckup. Say "uncle".
ROFLMAO!
Androcles
.
User: "Wilson"

Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. 05 Oct 2006 05:12:01 PM
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 22:17:59 GMT, "Sorcerer" <Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_b>
wrote:


"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
news:ok88i2tkn6ckiue5lo5587b485jq66jb03@4ax.com...
| On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 22:12:03 GMT, "Sorcerer"
<Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_b>
| wrote:
|
| >| Fucking stoopid pommie engineer! No wonder the Concord (no E) crashed.
| >| It was the English part that failed.
| >
| ><yawn>
| >Fucking stoopid bath from an Einstein dingleberry who thinks all
| >orbits are seen edge on.
| >You are not a physicist, never were a physicist and never will be a
| >physicist.
| >That scrap of 36 year old sheepskin is a forgery.
| >How old were you when you bought that from Tusselad?
|
| Dopey old pommie engineer.


I never touch dope, abo.
All blacks in my country are unimportant imports.
All whites in your country are self-important exports.
New South Wales isn't anything like Old North Wales,
and Old South Wales is coal and iron country.
No British U. would give you a degree, our kids
know what velocity is by the age of 8.




|
| Take any edge on orbit.

Not many of those, but ok.

| Rotate it around an axis in the orbit plane and
| perpendicular to your LOS.

In an edge-on orbit all anyone can see is a straight line.
_____________________________
^ ^
periastron apastron.
What axis should I rotate it about?

Didn't they teach pommie engineers how to read?
There is only one axis in the orbit plane that it perpendicular to your LOS.

| ALL its radial velocities are multiplied by the same factor, cos(pitch).

That's right. Well done.

Well, it's not all that difficult, (for us anyway)

| ....So introducing pitch has the same efect on brightness curves as does
| increasing distance or maximum orbital velocity.

Yes, that's right. Well done.

Well, it's not all that difficult, (for us anyway)

| The measured values of radial velocity already INCLUDE the cos(pitch)
| factor....

And cos(89) = 0.017452406437283512819418978516316,
so the max radial velocity is the observed max radial velocity * 57.3

You are confusing 'peripheral velocity' with 'radial velocity'.
The maximum 'peripheral velocity' is the (max observed velocity)/cos(pitch)
...but since all you need to know is the radial velocity, there is no point in
dividing by cos pitch then multiplying by it again to get the figure you
already have from the observations.
Of course, a silly old engineer might want to do that for reasons known only to
himself.


| SO I DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT IT IN THE PROGRAM.

Why not? Introducing pitch has the same effect on brightness
curves as does increasing distance or maximum orbital velocity.
You compute 0.3 LY instead of 0.3 * 57.3 = 17 LY.
That's pretty bad, but 57.3 times better than your result.
cos (89.9) = 0.0017 and that gives 573 * 0.3 = 171 LY,
far more realistic.

The pitch is already included in the observed velocity figures.


Let's say it again, since these are your words:
PITCH HAS THE SAME EFFECT ON BRIGHTNESS CURVES AS
INCREASING DISTANCE.

Now we'll add my words:
YOU FUCKIN' STUPID OLD WABO! WAKE UP!

Maybe you've woken up at last.

The pitch is already included in the observed velocity figures.
You include it twice to fiddle your results.
That's cheating.
I face the facts ...and accept light speed unification..

| NOW SHUT UP ABOUT THIS.!!!!!!!!

No.

| YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!!!!!!!

Yes I do, pitch has the same effect on brightness curves as does
increasing distance.

The pitch is already included in the observed velocity figures.

You are not a physicist, never were a physicist and
never will be a physicist. That scrap of 36-year-old NSW lamb
is a forgery, but the mutton was good with Sherez to wash it
down with. Hope you enjoyed it.
How old were you when you bought that from Tusselad?

Tell me the pitch of a point source, engineer.....

2AB/(t'A-tA) = c is a bath fuckup. Say "uncle".
ROFLMAO!

You don't even understand your own theory. You are really an aetherist....why
don't you join Seto....

Androcles

HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
(another world-shattering announcement coming soon)
.
User: "Sorcerer"

Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. 05 Oct 2006 05:55:31 PM
"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
news:7mvai25vbahh15asgqf3qmshehk7f4s4kb@4ax.com...
| On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 22:17:59 GMT, "Sorcerer"
<Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_b>
| wrote:
|
| >
| >"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
| >news:ok88i2tkn6ckiue5lo5587b485jq66jb03@4ax.com...
| >| On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 22:12:03 GMT, "Sorcerer"
| ><Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_b>
| >| wrote:
| >|
|
| >| >| Fucking stoopid pommie engineer! No wonder the Concord (no E)
crashed.
| >| >| It was the English part that failed.
| >| >
| >| ><yawn>
| >| >Fucking stoopid bath from an Einstein dingleberry who thinks all
| >| >orbits are seen edge on.
| >| >You are not a physicist, never were a physicist and never will be a
| >| >physicist.
| >| >That scrap of 36 year old sheepskin is a forgery.
| >| >How old were you when you bought that from Tusselad?
| >|
| >| Dopey old pommie engineer.
| >
| >
| >I never touch dope, abo.
| >All blacks in my country are unimportant imports.
| >All whites in your country are self-important exports.
| >New South Wales isn't anything like Old North Wales,
| >and Old South Wales is coal and iron country.
| >No British U. would give you a degree, our kids
| >know what velocity is by the age of 8.
| >
| >
| >
| >
| >|
| >| Take any edge on orbit.
| >
| >Not many of those, but ok.
| >
| >| Rotate it around an axis in the orbit plane and
| >| perpendicular to your LOS.
| >
| >In an edge-on orbit all anyone can see is a straight line.
| >_____________________________
| > ^ ^
| > periastron apastron.
| >What axis should I rotate it about?
|
| Didn't they teach pommie engineers how to read?
| There is only one axis in the orbit plane that it perpendicular to your
LOS.
"Take any edge on orbit." - Fuckwit Wilson.
Didn't they teach you fuckwit ozzies what edge on means?
The axis that is perpendicular to my line of sight leaves the orbit
still edge on, you stupid old *****, and as you say, there is only one.
|
| >| ALL its radial velocities are multiplied by the same factor,
cos(pitch).
| >
| >That's right. Well done.
|
| Well, it's not all that difficult, (for us anyway)
I've been telling you that for a year.
|
| >| ....So introducing pitch has the same efect on brightness curves as
does
| >| increasing distance or maximum orbital velocity.
| >
| >Yes, that's right. Well done.
|
| Well, it's not all that difficult, (for us anyway)
I've been telling you that for a year.
|
| >| The measured values of radial velocity already INCLUDE the cos(pitch)
| >| factor....
| >
| >And cos(89) = 0.017452406437283512819418978516316,
| >so the max radial velocity is the observed max radial velocity * 57.3
|
| You are confusing 'peripheral velocity' with 'radial velocity'.
You've been confused for years.
| The maximum 'peripheral velocity' is the (max observed
velocity)/cos(pitch)
That's what I've been telling you for years.
The maximum 'peripheral velocity' is the (max observed velocity)/cos(pitch),
got that, Wilson?
| ..but since all you need to know is the radial velocity, there is no point
in
| dividing by cos pitch then multiplying by it again to get the figure you
| already have from the observations.
The maximum 'peripheral velocity' is the (max observed velocity)/cos(pitch),
got that, Wilson?
So if you want to know the true maximum 'peripheral velocity' you
divide the (max observed velocity) by cos(pitch), you don't need to
multiply by cos(pitch) because you've found the value you need, FUCKWIT!
| Of course, a silly old engineer might want to do that for reasons known
only to
| himself.
I wouldn't do it, I know the true peripheral velocity.
|
| >
| >| SO I DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT IT IN THE PROGRAM.
| >
| >Why not? Introducing pitch has the same effect on brightness
| >curves as does increasing distance or maximum orbital velocity.
| >You compute 0.3 LY instead of 0.3 * 57.3 = 17 LY.
| >That's pretty bad, but 57.3 times better than your result.
| >cos (89.9) = 0.0017 and that gives 573 * 0.3 = 171 LY,
| >far more realistic.
|
| The pitch is already included in the observed velocity figures.
"The maximum 'peripheral velocity' is the (max observed
velocity)/cos(pitch)" - Fuckwit Wilson.
|
| >
| >Let's say it again, since these are your words:
| >PITCH HAS THE SAME EFFECT ON BRIGHTNESS CURVES AS
| >INCREASING DISTANCE.
| >
| >Now we'll add my words:
| >YOU FUCKIN' STUPID OLD WABO! WAKE UP!
| >
| >Maybe you've woken up at last.
|
| The pitch is already included in the observed velocity figures.
"The maximum 'peripheral velocity' is the (max observed
velocity)/cos(pitch)" - Fuckwit Wilson.
|
| You include it twice to fiddle your results.
Nope, just once, stupid old wabo.
| That's cheating.
*****.
| I face the facts ...and accept light speed unification..
"The maximum 'peripheral velocity' is the (max observed
velocity)/cos(pitch)" - Fuckwit Wilson.
|
| >| NOW SHUT UP ABOUT THIS.!!!!!!!!
| >
| >No.
| >
| >| YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!!!!!!!
| >
| >Yes I do, pitch has the same effect on brightness curves as does
| >increasing distance.
|
| The pitch is already included in the observed velocity figures.
"The maximum 'peripheral velocity' is the (max observed
velocity)/cos(pitch)" - Fuckwit Wilson.
|
|
| >You are not a physicist, never were a physicist and
| >never will be a physicist. That scrap of 36-year-old NSW lamb
| >is a forgery, but the mutton was good with Sherez to wash it
| >down with. Hope you enjoyed it.
| >How old were you when you bought that from Tusselad?
|
| Tell me the pitch of a point source, engineer.....
"The maximum 'peripheral velocity' is the (max observed
velocity)/cos(pitch)" - Fuckwit Wilson.
|
| >2AB/(t'A-tA) = c is a bath fuckup. Say "uncle".
| >ROFLMAO!
|
| You don't even understand your own theory. You are really an
aetherist....why
| don't you join Seto....
"The maximum 'peripheral velocity' is the (max observed
velocity)/cos(pitch)" - Fuckwit Wilson.
Androcles
.
User: "Wilson"

Title: Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic. 06 Oct 2006 03:25:09 PM
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 22:55:31 GMT, "Sorcerer" <Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_b>
wrote:


"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
news:7mvai25vbahh15asgqf3qmshehk7f4s4kb@4ax.com...
| On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 22:17:59 GMT, "Sorcerer"
<Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_b>
| >|
| >| Take any edge on orbit.
| >
| >Not many of those, but ok.
| >
| >| Rotate it around an axis in the orbit plane and
| >| perpendicular to your LOS.
| >
| >In an edge-on orbit all anyone can see is a straight line.
| >_____________________________
| > ^ ^
| > periastron apastron.
| >What axis should I rotate it about?
|
| Didn't they teach pommie engineers how to read?
| There is only one axis in the orbit plane that it perpendicular to your
LOS.

"Take any edge on orbit." - Fuckwit Wilson.
Didn't they teach you fuckwit ozzies what edge on means?
The axis that is perpendicular to my line of sight leaves the orbit
still edge on, you stupid old *****, and as you say, there is only one.

That's right. There is ONE axis which is perpendicular to your LOS and lies in
the orbit plane. It doesn't move. That is the axis around which you rotate the
ellipse, so that all peripheral velocity components in your direction are
multiplied by cos(pitch)

| >| ALL its radial velocities are multiplied by the same factor,
cos(pitch).
| >
| >That's right. Well done.
|
| Well, it's not all that difficult, (for us anyway)

I've been telling you that for a year.
|
| >| The measured values of radial velocity already INCLUDE the cos(pitch)
| >| factor....
| >
| >And cos(89) = 0.017452406437283512819418978516316,
| >so the max radial velocity is the observed max radial velocity * 57.3
|
| You are confusing 'peripheral velocity' with 'radial velocity'.

You've been confused for years.
| The maximum 'peripheral velocity' is the (max observed
velocity)/cos(pitch)

That's what I've been telling you for years.
The maximum 'peripheral velocity' is the (max observed velocity)/cos(pitch),
got that, Wilson?

I knew that.
What YOU don't understand is that you can never know the pitch angle of a point
source.

| ..but since all you need to know is the radial velocity, there is no point
in
| dividing by cos pitch then multiplying by it again to get the figure you
| already have from the observations.

The maximum 'peripheral velocity' is the (max observed velocity)/cos(pitch),
got that, Wilson?

It is irrelevant to the determination of light curves.

So if you want to know the true maximum 'peripheral velocity' you
divide the (max observed velocity) by cos(pitch), you don't need to
multiply by cos(pitch) because you've found the value you need, FUCKWIT!

I don't need to know the maximum PERIPHERAL velocity. I need the OBSERVED
VALUE.

| Of course, a silly old engineer might want to do that for reasons known
only to
| himself.

I wouldn't do it, I know the true peripheral velocity.

No you don't. You merely pluck a figure out of the air to make your distance
appear correct. You are cheating.
I DON'T NEED THE PERIPHERAL VELOCITY.

| >| SO I DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT IT IN THE PROGRAM.
| >
| >Why not? Introducing pitch has the same effect on brightness
| >curves as does increasing distance or maximum orbital velocity.
| >You compute 0.3 LY instead of 0.3 * 57.3 = 17 LY.
| >That's pretty bad, but 57.3 times better than your result.
| >cos (89.9) = 0.0017 and that gives 573 * 0.3 = 171 LY,
| >far more realistic.
|
| The pitch is already included in the observed velocity figures.

"The maximum 'peripheral velocity' is the (max observed
velocity)/cos(pitch)" - Fuckwit Wilson.

That's obvioous. ...it is also irrelevant.

| >Let's say it again, since these are your words:
| >PITCH HAS THE SAME EFFECT ON BRIGHTNESS CURVES AS
| >INCREASING DISTANCE.
| >
| >Now we'll add my words:
| >YOU FUCKIN' STUPID OLD WABO! WAKE UP!
| >
| >Maybe you've woken up at last.
|
| The pitch is already included in the observed velocity figures.

"The maximum 'peripheral velocity' is the (max observed
velocity)/cos(pitch)" - Fuckwit Wilson.

*****! No wonder the concord went down...

| You include it twice to fiddle your results.


Nope, just once, stupid old wabo.


| That's cheating.
*****.

Cheat. You would make a better hoaxer than Einstein.

| I face the facts ...and accept light speed unification..

"The maximum 'peripheral velocity' is the (max observed
velocity)/cos(pitch)" - Fuckwit Wilson.

*****! No wonder the concord went down...

| >| NOW SHUT UP ABOUT THIS.!!!!!!!!
| >
| >No.
| >
| >| YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!!!!!!!
| >
| >Yes I do, pitch has the same effect on brightness curves as does
| >increasing distance.
|
| The pitch is already included in the observed velocity figures.
"The maximum 'peripheral velocity' is the (max observed
velocity)/cos(pitch)" - Fuckwit Wilson.

*****! No wonder the concord went down...

| >You are not a physicist, never were a physicist and
| >never will be a physicist. That scrap of 36-year-old NSW lamb
| >is a forgery, but the mutton was good with Sherez to wash it
| >down with. Hope you enjoyed it.
| >How old were you when you bought that from Tusselad?
|
| Tell me the pitch of a point source, engineer.....
"The maximum 'peripheral velocity' is the (max observed
velocity)/cos(pitch)" - Fuckwit Wilson.

How do you determine the pitch angle of a point source, engineer?

| >2AB/(t'A-tA) = c is a bath fuckup. Say "uncle".
| >ROFLMAO!
|
| You don't even understand your own theory. You are really an
aetherist....why
| don't you join Seto....

"The maximum 'peripheral velocity' is the (max observed
velocity)/cos(pitch)" - Fuckwit Wilson.

*****! No wonder the concord went down...

Androcles

HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
(another world-shattering announcement coming soon)
.






















  Page 2 of 3

1

 

2

 

3

 


Related Articles
Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
New clues in search for theory of superconductivity
New Thermodynamic Theory Will Help Engineers 'Go With the Flow'
IRT: A New Theory of Relativity
A New Take on the Big Bang Theory
IRT: A New Theory of Relativity
New Physics Theory
The New York Times Reports: Leading String Theorists Admit String Theory is a Government-Funded Hoax--A Faith Based Initiative With No Science To show For It. Moving Dimesnion Theory Will Replace It
Article: Evangelical Scientists Refute Gravity With New 'Intelligent Falling' Theory
New theory vs. Big Bang
New Forums: PhysicsMathForums.com allow physicists to think independently!! Moving beyond the String Theory Hoax
Moving Dimensions Theory Explains Length Contraction and Entanglement With a New Model, thusly unifiying Relativity & QM