| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"TomGee" |
| Date: |
29 Aug 2005 08:56:34 AM |
| Object: |
Re: newton's first law |
TERRORIST ALERT!!! This village idiot sends your replies to
alt.local.village.idiot!
Bilge wrote:
TomGee:
External forces accelerate objects, but objects must have a force which
keeps them moving as described by Newt's 1st.
GeeTom, if I launch a rocket which reaches escape velocity and
after leaving the atmosphere, I turn off the engines, how far will
the rocket ``coast'' before it ``stops?'' After it ``stops,'' what
will happen? Does it just sit there so that we here on earth pass
by it every year or are you assuming the earth is the center of the
universe so that the rocket just sits there at some fixed distance,
forever? Or, do you think it falls back to earth (which sort of makes
the term escape velocity a major misnomer)? Hurry up and send your
corrections to halliday & resnick before another generation has
been bullied into falling for newton's charade.
Well, Mr. Idiot Terrorist Bilge, AFAIK, Newton did not say how far nor for how long it would go. Another miscomprehension on your part, no? Wrote all that nonsense without understanding what I said. Tsk! Tsk! tsk! What a maroon!
.
|
|
| User: "PD" |
|
| Title: Re: newton's first law |
31 Aug 2005 02:46:52 PM |
|
|
TomGee wrote:
TERRORIST ALERT!!! This village idiot sends your replies to
alt.local.village.idiot!
Bilge wrote:
TomGee:
External forces accelerate objects, but objects must have a force which
keeps them moving as described by Newt's 1st.
GeeTom, if I launch a rocket which reaches escape velocity and
after leaving the atmosphere, I turn off the engines, how far will
the rocket ``coast'' before it ``stops?'' After it ``stops,'' what
will happen? Does it just sit there so that we here on earth pass
by it every year or are you assuming the earth is the center of the
universe so that the rocket just sits there at some fixed distance,
forever? Or, do you think it falls back to earth (which sort of makes
the term escape velocity a major misnomer)? Hurry up and send your
corrections to halliday & resnick before another generation has
been bullied into falling for newton's charade.
Well, Mr. Idiot Terrorist Bilge, AFAIK, Newton did not say how far nor for how long it would go. Another
miscomprehension on your part, no? Wrote all that nonsense without understanding what I said. Tsk! Tsk! tsk!
What a maroon!
On the contrary, Newton accepted what Galileo had to say in the matter,
and Galileo was quite explicit about what happens to objects without
any net external force being impressed upon them. However, you haven't
found any of Galileo's writings condensed to 12 lines on the web for
your benefit, and you won't go to the library to read, so it's not much
of a surprise.
PD
.
|
|
|
| User: "TomGee" |
|
| Title: Re: newton's first law |
31 Aug 2005 02:59:22 PM |
|
|
More personal opinions, eh, PD? Wild claims with no support. Carry
on....
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bilge" |
|
| Title: Re: newton's first law |
19 Sep 2005 03:07:22 AM |
|
|
TomGee:
More personal opinions, eh, PD? Wild claims with no support. Carry
on....
On the contrary, newtonian mechanics has a great deal of support.
.
|
|
|
| User: "TomGee" |
|
| Title: Re: newton's first law |
19 Sep 2005 09:12:18 PM |
|
|
TERRORIST ALERT!!! This moron sends your replies to alt.moron.
Bilge wrote:
TomGee:
More personal opinions, eh, PD? Wild claims with no support. Carry
on....
On the contrary, newtonian mechanics has a great deal of support.
The fact that you're a moron gives your opinions a great deal of
support.
.
|
|
|
| User: "PD" |
|
| Title: Re: newton's first law |
20 Sep 2005 12:55:35 AM |
|
|
TomGee wrote:
TERRORIST ALERT!!! This moron sends your replies to alt.moron.
Bilge wrote:
TomGee:
More personal opinions, eh, PD? Wild claims with no support. Carry
on....
On the contrary, newtonian mechanics has a great deal of support.
The fact that you're a moron gives your opinions a great deal of
support.
You know, for someone who objects to teachers making students feel
stupid, you sure are free with terms like "moron". Bilge made a
statement of fact, without any judgement placed on you personally at
all, and you respond by calling him "moron". Would it be fair to call
this hypocritical behavior?
PD
.
|
|
|
| User: "TomGee" |
|
| Title: Re: newton's first law |
20 Sep 2005 05:45:01 PM |
|
|
No. You're just jealous cause I haven't called you a moron in the last
five minutes, idiot. Still waiting for your response to my post about
all that ***** you fell into, moron.
There, feel better now?
Read Bilgy's crap below to see why he rates one moron more than you.
He has attributed a quote to me which he made up himself. He thinks
he's so slick with all that pigshit on him.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "PD" |
|
| Title: Re: newton's first law |
01 Sep 2005 10:30:57 AM |
|
|
TomGee wrote:
More personal opinions, eh, PD? Wild claims with no support. Carry
on....
Nah. I just refuse to cut and paste for your edification.
You go right on ahead waving your hands and scoffing, "Won't cut and
paste so I can read it? Wild claims, then."
PD
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
