Hoggle wrote:
Tim Murphy wrote:
It was not a genuine question, you really are a wothless troll.
Have you read any of Aloha's threads? (s)he posts frequent news
articles of interest which are both relevant and relatively unbiased.
Hardly the act of a troll. The number of trolls on here is very small
(death rag, banana and davee being the most obvious examples) and it
devalues the general disdain for their stupidity to apply the term to
ordinary posters with genuine points to make or information to impart.
If a person takes a volume area of any ordinary sized room and does
experiments with different concentrations of CO2 in the air, it is
impossible to detect any effect from CO2 on the temperature. You
yourself Hoogle have refered to 'IR transparent' glass, with which one
can detect different temperatures with small changes of concentrations
of CO2.
Your glass experiment is a hoax. If CO2 could retain thermal
frequencies it would be evident in the grater volume. O2 and N2 radiate
well at the same frequencies that the glass radiates. These thermal
frequencies do not pass through the glass but are absorbed and
re-emited. The heat loss is greater with the O2 and N2 and the glass.
CO2 is not retaining any heat. But a chump like you is not interested
in science or determination of facts by scientific method.
You are not a scientist. You are not even a rational or intelligent
person that can define science. By promoting a false postulation that
affects others, you are guilty of criminal fraud. Those that oppose
'global warming by CO2', realize what a crime you psuedo scientists
perpetrate. Even in your posts, you cannot defend yourself with
science. You cannot defend your psuedo science. You are inept in ,
radiation law, kinetic theory of gases, and also laboratory data of CO2
and it's properties. You are inept in thermodynamics and calcualtion of
energy transmitted by radiation and calcualtion of temperature and
energy of radiation field and heat capacity.
I have quotes from you saying that Planck's radiation law does not
apply to gases. And then I have quotes from other CO2Phobiacs that
point to instruments that measure the blackbody radiation field of the
atmosphere as evidence of glaobal warming. Someday, we may get to go
over all of this in a courtroom with proper documentation.
CO2Phobia is a dangerous disease like rabies.
Hydrophobia, the advanced stage of rabies, causes constriction of the
throat in an animal. As the animal is dying of thirst it is compulsed
to bite other animals to get to the fluid of their blood. It is a very
dangerous and fatal disease.
KD
.
|
