| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Dr. Flonkenstein" |
| Date: |
30 Dec 2003 06:55:18 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Positive and Negative Energy |
Being tired of lurking, on Mon, 29 Dec 2003 20:18:44 -0800, Edmond
Wollmann posted:
The universe is precisely balanced between negative and positive energy.
This is, from the physical point of view total *****. Energy is always
measured with respect to an arbitrary zero Energy level. Maybe you are
referring to Entropy, and the "Third Law of Thermodynamics", but you're
way too stupid to even understand what that is all about!!
--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.
.
|
|
| User: "AaronB" |
|
| Title: Re: Positive and Negative Energy |
31 Dec 2003 03:21:24 AM |
|
|
"Dr. Flonkenstein" <gregoriy_raspoutine_no_spam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<pan.2003.12.31.00.55.03.791551@hotmail.com>...
Being tired of lurking, on Mon, 29 Dec 2003 20:18:44 -0800, Edmond
Wollmann posted:
The universe is precisely balanced between negative and positive energy.
This is, from the physical point of view total *****. Energy is always
measured with respect to an arbitrary zero Energy level. Maybe you are
referring to Entropy, and the "Third Law of Thermodynamics", but you're
way too stupid to even understand what that is all about!!
Actually, there is some validity to this type of thinking. Consider it
in this way: all of the particles that we can interact with have
positive mass, and thus, by E=mc^2, or even K=1/2mv^2, must have some
amount of positive energy. Now, suppose you have another particle that
has a negative mass. This particle would then, obviously, have a
negative energy. A theoretical particle that could travel faster than
c would have imaginary energy. What the above is suggesting is that
the amount of positive energy in positive particles exactly equals the
amount of negative energy in negative particles. This hypothesis
presents some interesting results regarding the formation of the
universe.
A.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Edmond Wollmann" |
|
| Title: Re: Positive and Negative Energy |
31 Dec 2003 12:53:40 PM |
|
|
(AaronB) wrote in message news:<9f8a9f42.0312310121.6d8261d9@posting.google.com>...
"Dr. Flonkenstein" <gregoriy_raspoutine_no_spam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<pan.2003.12.31.00.55.03.791551@hotmail.com>...
Being tired of lurking, on Mon, 29 Dec 2003 20:18:44 -0800, Edmond
Wollmann posted:
The universe is precisely balanced between negative and positive energy.
This is, from the physical point of view total *****. Energy is always
measured with respect to an arbitrary zero Energy level. Maybe you are
referring to Entropy, and the "Third Law of Thermodynamics", but you're
way too stupid to even understand what that is all about!!
Actually, there is some validity to this type of thinking. Consider it
in this way: all of the particles that we can interact with have
positive mass, and thus, by E=mc^2, or even K=1/2mv^2, must have some
amount of positive energy. Now, suppose you have another particle that
has a negative mass. This particle would then, obviously, have a
negative energy. A theoretical particle that could travel faster than
c would have imaginary energy. What the above is suggesting is that
the amount of positive energy in positive particles exactly equals the
amount of negative energy in negative particles. This hypothesis
presents some interesting results regarding the formation of the
universe.
A.
Thanks for your comments:-)
Happy New Year!
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2003 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
AOL http://hometown.aol.com/ehwollmann/myhomepage/business.html
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "S. Enterprize Company" |
|
| Title: Re: Positive and Negative Energy |
30 Dec 2003 08:21:26 PM |
|
|
Being tired of lurking, on Mon, 29 Dec 2003 20:18:44 -0800, Edmond
Wollmann posted:
The universe is precisely balanced between negative and positive energy.
This is, from the physical point of view total *****. Energy is always
measured with respect to an arbitrary zero Energy level. Maybe you are
referring to Entropy, and the "Third Law of Thermodynamics", but you're
way too stupid to even understand what that is all about!!
--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.
No this isn't correct. According to the Smart Model Theory negative energy
has to do with anti-matter, positive energy has to do with matter. Matter and
anti-matter annihilate like adding negative with positive numbers.
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Ghost In The Machine" |
|
| Title: Re: Positive and Negative Energy |
31 Dec 2003 11:00:14 AM |
|
|
In sci.physics, S. Enterprize Company
<smart1234@aol.com>
wrote
on 31 Dec 2003 02:21:26 GMT
<20031230212126.07934.00001931@mb-m16.aol.com>:
Being tired of lurking, on Mon, 29 Dec 2003 20:18:44 -0800, Edmond
Wollmann posted:
The universe is precisely balanced between negative and positive energy.
This is, from the physical point of view total *****. Energy is always
measured with respect to an arbitrary zero Energy level. Maybe you are
referring to Entropy, and the "Third Law of Thermodynamics", but you're
way too stupid to even understand what that is all about!!
--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.
No this isn't correct. According to the Smart Model Theory
negative energy has to do with anti-matter, positive energy
has to do with matter. Matter and anti-matter annihilate
like adding negative with positive numbers.
[1] What happens when 4 antiprotons join?
[2] The annihilation of matter (electron) and antimatter (proton) generates
at least one (two?) gamma ray. Why?
[.sigsnip]
--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
|
|
|
| User: "S. Enterprize Company" |
|
| Title: Re: Positive and Negative Energy |
03 Jan 2004 08:05:29 AM |
|
|
In sci.physics, S. Enterprize Company
<smart1234@aol.com>
wrote
on 31 Dec 2003 02:21:26 GMT
<20031230212126.07934.00001931@mb-m16.aol.com>:
Being tired of lurking, on Mon, 29 Dec 2003 20:18:44 -0800, Edmond
Wollmann posted:
The universe is precisely balanced between negative and positive energy.
This is, from the physical point of view total *****. Energy is always
measured with respect to an arbitrary zero Energy level. Maybe you are
referring to Entropy, and the "Third Law of Thermodynamics", but you're
way too stupid to even understand what that is all about!!
--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.
No this isn't correct. According to the Smart Model Theory
negative energy has to do with anti-matter, positive energy
has to do with matter. Matter and anti-matter annihilate
like adding negative with positive numbers.
[1] What happens when 4 antiprotons join?
They eventually decay into nothing.
[2] The annihilation of matter (electron) and antimatter (proton) generates
at least one (two?) gamma ray. Why?
Mass is annihilated and the gamma rays eventually decay into nothing.
[.sigsnip]
--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Ghost In The Machine" |
|
| Title: Re: Positive and Negative Energy |
03 Jan 2004 06:57:09 PM |
|
|
In sci.physics, S. Enterprize Company
<smart1234@aol.com>
wrote
on 03 Jan 2004 14:05:29 GMT
<20040103090529.16291.00001356@mb-m22.aol.com>:
In sci.physics, S. Enterprize Company
<smart1234@aol.com>
wrote
on 31 Dec 2003 02:21:26 GMT
<20031230212126.07934.00001931@mb-m16.aol.com>:
Being tired of lurking, on Mon, 29 Dec 2003 20:18:44 -0800, Edmond
Wollmann posted:
The universe is precisely balanced between negative and positive energy.
This is, from the physical point of view total *****. Energy is always
measured with respect to an arbitrary zero Energy level. Maybe you are
referring to Entropy, and the "Third Law of Thermodynamics", but you're
way too stupid to even understand what that is all about!!
--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.
No this isn't correct. According to the Smart Model Theory
negative energy has to do with anti-matter, positive energy
has to do with matter. Matter and anti-matter annihilate
like adding negative with positive numbers.
[1] What happens when 4 antiprotons join?
They eventually decay into nothing.
Is this the same as when 4 protons join?
[2] The annihilation of matter (electron) and antimatter (proton) generates
at least one (two?) gamma ray. Why?
Mass is annihilated and the gamma rays eventually decay into nothing.
Why do gamma rays decay into nothing?
[.sigsnip]
--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
|
|
|
| User: "S. Enterprize Company" |
|
| Title: Re: Positive and Negative Energy |
03 Jan 2004 10:20:18 PM |
|
|
In sci.physics, S. Enterprize Company
<smart1234@aol.com>
wrote
on 03 Jan 2004 14:05:29 GMT
<20040103090529.16291.00001356@mb-m22.aol.com>:
In sci.physics, S. Enterprize Company
<smart1234@aol.com>
wrote
on 31 Dec 2003 02:21:26 GMT
<20031230212126.07934.00001931@mb-m16.aol.com>:
Being tired of lurking, on Mon, 29 Dec 2003 20:18:44 -0800, Edmond
Wollmann posted:
The universe is precisely balanced between negative and positive
energy.
This is, from the physical point of view total *****. Energy is always
measured with respect to an arbitrary zero Energy level. Maybe you are
referring to Entropy, and the "Third Law of Thermodynamics", but you're
way too stupid to even understand what that is all about!!
--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.
No this isn't correct. According to the Smart Model Theory
negative energy has to do with anti-matter, positive energy
has to do with matter. Matter and anti-matter annihilate
like adding negative with positive numbers.
[1] What happens when 4 antiprotons join?
They eventually decay into nothing.
Is this the same as when 4 protons join?
4 protons never stay joined.
[2] The annihilation of matter (electron) and antimatter (proton) generates
at least one (two?) gamma ray. Why?
Mass is annihilated and the gamma rays eventually decay into nothing.
Why do gamma rays decay into nothing?
They run into to something that turns them into aether.
[.sigsnip]
--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Ghost In The Machine" |
|
| Title: Re: Positive and Negative Energy |
04 Jan 2004 03:02:00 PM |
|
|
In sci.physics, S. Enterprize Company
<smart1234@aol.com>
wrote
on 04 Jan 2004 04:20:18 GMT
<20040103232018.14343.00002001@mb-m14.aol.com>:
In sci.physics, S. Enterprize Company
<smart1234@aol.com>
wrote
on 03 Jan 2004 14:05:29 GMT
<20040103090529.16291.00001356@mb-m22.aol.com>:
In sci.physics, S. Enterprize Company
<smart1234@aol.com>
wrote
on 31 Dec 2003 02:21:26 GMT
<20031230212126.07934.00001931@mb-m16.aol.com>:
Being tired of lurking, on Mon, 29 Dec 2003 20:18:44 -0800, Edmond
Wollmann posted:
The universe is precisely balanced between negative and positive
energy.
This is, from the physical point of view total *****. Energy is always
measured with respect to an arbitrary zero Energy level. Maybe you are
referring to Entropy, and the "Third Law of Thermodynamics", but you're
way too stupid to even understand what that is all about!!
--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.
No this isn't correct. According to the Smart Model Theory
negative energy has to do with anti-matter, positive energy
has to do with matter. Matter and anti-matter annihilate
like adding negative with positive numbers.
[1] What happens when 4 antiprotons join?
They eventually decay into nothing.
Is this the same as when 4 protons join?
4 protons never stay joined.
They don't stay protons. Two of them convert into neutrons,
with positrons and some neutrinos wandering off.
BTW: can you compute the Main Sequence from your model?
[2] The annihilation of matter (electron) and antimatter (proton) generates
at least one (two?) gamma ray. Why?
Mass is annihilated and the gamma rays eventually decay into nothing.
Why do gamma rays decay into nothing?
They run into to something that turns them into aether.
That's not decay, that's running into something.
Q: Why does a car eventually fall apart?
A: Because it runs into a tree.
[.sigsnip]
--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
