| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Hatto von Aquitanien" |
| Date: |
05 Feb 2008 04:48:17 PM |
| Object: |
Re: P/V = NRT disproves theory of grenhouse gases |
Eric Gisse wrote:
On Feb 5, 12:19 pm, wrote:
On Feb 5, 2:46 pm, "hhc...@yahoo.com" <hhc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Feb 5, 2:40 pm, wrote:
P/V = NRT is the perfect gas law. It is derived from the fact that at
low pressures, all gases obey this relationship of temperature,
pressure and volume. In this formula, N is the number of moles.
OK, let's try this again. When you take a course in any of the hard
sciences, you either work the homework problems, or you ended up
ignorant.
I will bet you never worked any of the homework problems at the end of
each chapter. .
Harry C.
That is cute. So let's see your homework. You are only indoctrinated
with a bunch of information you can repeat. Your education gives you
no ability to review and rationally analyse problems.
So do you want to talk about my education? Just a diversion for
someone who does not understand his psuedo scientific indoctrination
and cannot discuss this very simple topic.
Oh, so when you only take the introductory courses it is enlightening,
but when you take the more advanced courses it is indoctrination?
Or are you seriously claiming you didn't learn things like PV=nkT and
Wein's law in a classroom?
[...]
I sure didn't. I learned PV=NRT in (not P/V=NRT) in a classroom. But the
rest of thermo and stat-mech I learned on my own. I have to laugh at the
knuckle-dragging goons who call themselves physicist, but cannot comprehend
the fact that the WTC was destroyed by controlled demolition.
http://books.google.com/books?id=vIw5m2XuvpIC&printsec=frontcover#PPA485,M1
--
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1ek5w_wtc7-the-smoking-gun-of-911-updated
http://911research.wtc7.net
http://vehme.blogspot.com
Virtus Tutissima Cassis
.
|
|
| User: "Androcles" |
|
| Title: Re: P/V = NRT disproves theory of grenhouse gases |
05 Feb 2008 05:29:57 PM |
|
|
"Hatto von Aquitanien" <abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote in message
news:Kf2dnWAHrcYuejXanZ2dnUVZ_ternZ2d@speakeasy.net...
| Eric Gisse wrote:
|
| > On Feb 5, 12:19 pm, wrote:
| >> On Feb 5, 2:46 pm, "hhc...@yahoo.com" <hhc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
| >>
| >> > On Feb 5, 2:40 pm, wrote:
| >>
| >> > > P/V = NRT is the perfect gas law. It is derived from the fact that
at
| >> > > low pressures, all gases obey this relationship of temperature,
| >> > > pressure and volume. In this formula, N is the number of moles.
| >>
| >> > OK, let's try this again. When you take a course in any of the hard
| >> > sciences, you either work the homework problems, or you ended up
| >> > ignorant.
| >>
| >> > I will bet you never worked any of the homework problems at the end
of
| >> > each chapter. .
| >>
| >> > Harry C.
| >>
| >> That is cute. So let's see your homework. You are only indoctrinated
| >> with a bunch of information you can repeat. Your education gives you
| >> no ability to review and rationally analyse problems.
| >>
| >> So do you want to talk about my education? Just a diversion for
| >> someone who does not understand his psuedo scientific indoctrination
| >> and cannot discuss this very simple topic.
| >
| > Oh, so when you only take the introductory courses it is enlightening,
| > but when you take the more advanced courses it is indoctrination?
| >
| > Or are you seriously claiming you didn't learn things like PV=nkT and
| > Wein's law in a classroom?
| >
| > [...]
|
| I sure didn't. I learned PV=NRT in (not P/V=NRT) in a classroom. But the
| rest of thermo and stat-mech I learned on my own. I have to laugh at the
| knuckle-dragging goons who call themselves physicist, but cannot
comprehend
| the fact that the WTC was destroyed by controlled demolition.
Well yeah, anyone that hurtles a fuel-laden airliner into a building
is controlling the demolition of that building... and themselves,
you knuckle-dragging fuckheaded *****.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Hatto von Aquitanien" |
|
| Title: Re: P/V = NRT disproves theory of grenhouse gases |
05 Feb 2008 10:09:53 PM |
|
|
Eric Gisse wrote:
On Feb 5, 1:48 pm, Hatto von Aquitanien <ab...@AugiaDives.hre> wrote:
Eric Gisse wrote:
On Feb 5, 12:19 pm, wrote:
On Feb 5, 2:46 pm, "hhc...@yahoo.com" <hhc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Feb 5, 2:40 pm, wrote:
P/V = NRT is the perfect gas law. It is derived from the fact that
at low pressures, all gases obey this relationship of temperature,
pressure and volume. In this formula, N is the number of moles.
OK, let's try this again. When you take a course in any of the hard
sciences, you either work the homework problems, or you ended up
ignorant.
I will bet you never worked any of the homework problems at the end
of each chapter. .
Harry C.
That is cute. So let's see your homework. You are only indoctrinated
with a bunch of information you can repeat. Your education gives you
no ability to review and rationally analyse problems.
So do you want to talk about my education? Just a diversion for
someone who does not understand his psuedo scientific indoctrination
and cannot discuss this very simple topic.
Oh, so when you only take the introductory courses it is enlightening,
but when you take the more advanced courses it is indoctrination?
Or are you seriously claiming you didn't learn things like PV=nkT and
Wein's law in a classroom?
[...]
I sure didn't. I learned PV=NRT in (not P/V=NRT) in a classroom. But
the
rest of thermo and stat-mech I learned on my own. I have to laugh at the
knuckle-dragging goons who call themselves physicist, but cannot
comprehend the fact that the WTC was destroyed by controlled demolition.
"fact"
A curious word to use for the repeatedly disproven and now comical
assertion that the WTC was destroyed by "controlled demolition."
This is the proof:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liouville's_theorem_(Hamiltonian)
http://vehme.blogspot.com/2007/12/glaring-proof-of-something-hotter-than.html
--
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1ek5w_wtc7-the-smoking-gun-of-911-updated
http://911research.wtc7.net
http://vehme.blogspot.com
Virtus Tutissima Cassis
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Whata Fool" |
|
| Title: Re: P/V = NRT disproves theory of grenhouse gases |
05 Feb 2008 07:40:12 PM |
|
|
Hatto von Aquitanien <abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote:
I sure didn't. I learned PV=NRT in (not P/V=NRT) in a classroom. But the
rest of thermo and stat-mech I learned on my own. I have to laugh at the
knuckle-dragging goons who call themselves physicist, but cannot comprehend
the fact that the WTC was destroyed by controlled demolition.
That shows you are not only a whacko nut, but don't know
enough about steel skyscrapers to know that once the rivets get
red hot, they shear like taffy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Talk-n-Dog" |
|
| Title: Re: P/V = NRT disproves theory of grenhouse gases |
05 Feb 2008 10:21:02 PM |
|
|
Whata Fool wrote:
Hatto von Aquitanien <abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote:
I sure didn't. I learned PV=NRT in (not P/V=NRT) in a classroom. But the
rest of thermo and stat-mech I learned on my own. I have to laugh at the
knuckle-dragging goons who call themselves physicist, but cannot comprehend
the fact that the WTC was destroyed by controlled demolition.
That shows you are not only a whacko nut, but don't know
enough about steel skyscrapers to know that once the rivets get
red hot, they shear like taffy.
I saw a new story of a local parking garage(concrete) that collapsed
kinda like the WTC... the weight from the floor above hitting the one
below worked like dominoes and it all went straight down like WTC.
They weld and bolt more than riveting these days. Riveting went out a
number of years ago.
Toss a piece of steel rebar in a fire, after a while you can bend it
like a pretzel. I had an OutDoor wood burning Boiler I built and the
logs would bend the rebar I made the wood log rack out of... I had to
use some scrap stainless bar to take the heat. It was that or Cast iron
which holds it's shape when hot.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
