On 23 mai, 13:44, "Jeckyl" <n...@nowhere.com> wrote:
"Pentcho Valev" <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1179899523.225459.179550@q66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
Almost all relativity hypnotists teach that the speed of light varies
with the gravitational potential. But they do not go beyond some
qualitative analysis: relativity hypnotists deeply hate the
quantitative expression of this variation, although it is an equation
Einstein discovered in 1911:
c' = c(1 + V/c^2) /1/
You're obsessed .. get a life
Of course I am obsessed - Master Tom Roberts exposed my obsession:
Master Tom Roberts: "Valev attempts to give his personal
hallucinations the appearance of validity by ascribing them to others,
and by quoting crackpot websites. For some unknown reason he has an
unnatural fetish for an equation Einstein wrote in 1911, while on the
rocky and difficult road from SR to GR. In GR it is quite clear that
"gravitational time dilation" applies to appropriate physical
situations, and also that the speed of light is c in any locally
inertial frame (independent of "gravitational potential"), and also
that the 1911 equation Valev obsesses about is not generally valid.
<shrug>"
Note that "not generally valid" was the initial verdict of Master Tom
Roberts, then Master Tom Roberts declared Einstein's 1911 equation
c'=c(1+V/c^2) wrong, and now the equation I am obsessed by is "not
generally valid" again, according to Master Tom Roberts. Being
obsessed, I think Einstein's 1911 equation c'=c(1+V/c^2) is just
valid. What do you think: Einstein's 1911 equation c'=c(1+V/c^2) is
"not generally valid", "wrong" or just valid?
Pentcho Valev
.
|
