Pmb:
"Bilge" <dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> wrote in message
news:slrnbq06v9.t0o.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net...
Pmb:
"Bilge" <dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> wrote in message
How? By posting yet another reference which demonstrates
relativistic
mass is not used by default and the author defines it as something
other
than mass?
So sad. Tell me bilge - What part of this
------------------------------------------------
The relativistic momentum is sometimes written as
(10) p = m(v)v
where m(v) is a "velocity-dependant-mass" defined as
(11) m(v) = m/sqrt[1-(v/c)^2]
------------------------------------------------
are you having trouble understanding this time?
The part where you think writing m(v) and defining it as a velocity-
dependent mass is justification for your assertion that phycicists
just write `m' and assume it to mean "relativistic mass" by default.
In this case, the author even steered clear of the term "relativistic
mass".
Well it seems that I'll be proving you and little davy waite wrong yet once
more tonight.
Oh good. I can't wait to have you post some additional "proof" just
as good as above. Aren't you satisfied with just handing over your
head on a silver platter?
[*plonk*]
.
