It's comforting to know that you
have the correct answer, Looie,
even though you don't want to share
it with the rest of us :-)

Not a good start, Looie.

There is preponderant evidence that ... the Jun Luo group in Huazhong
University in Wuhan, PR China academic group is now attempting to
change its public position as a pair of hands performing Uncle Al's
reduction to practice of Uncle Al's proposed and mathematically
modeled theory.
They will fail.
Uncle Al

"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote :

Let them try to publish a non-null result as their own.
Let there be blood filling the gutters.

[hanson]
... ahahaha... Al, you are a MASTER in DESTROYING the
fruits of your labor but an abject failure in harvesting them.
You are better at this than anyone I have ever encountered.
To boot you are .....

Why are you having so much trouble with basic algebra?
Let L_1 = distance light travels in going from Sam to Joe, as
measured in the stationary frame.
1) L_1 = cL/(c-v)

<> >><> >><> >><> >><>

General Relativity is empirically falsified, as is Lorentz
Invariance. Uncle Al on one 11 December, "Bra, tack s=E5 myck=

http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acropolis/1290/tacksaam.wav

Why do you claim that Lorentz Invariance is falsified? It's not c=

to me how this could be concluded from your experiment.

Chirality (handedness) is spatial anisotropy. Parity is chirality
along all coordinate axes with no directional bias. If opposite
parity single crystal test masses of identical chemical composition=
vacuum free fall nonidentically, it can only be a diastereotopic
interaction with space itself - the relative geometry of opposite
parity nuclear mass positions incommensurably imbedded in the geome=

of anisotropic chiral space.

Okay, then I guess my next questions make sense. In a locally Minkows=

region, if they both have velocity v, what can you say about their
comparative relativistic mass, kinetic energy, momentum, and total
energy content? Also, same question about the energy content when v =3D=
0. I'm not asking about the comparative rest mass, because obviously
you must have carefully tested that they both have the same exact res=

mass.

=
There is no Equivalence Principle test within Minkowski space, below.
Local opposite parity test masses (maximally non-superposable
geometric parity inversions of mass distribution in bodies with finite
moments of inertia) will pursue minimum energy (minimum action) free
fall paths in vacuum. However, those paths will not be identical and
only the geomerically left-handed test mass will have a path that
approximates a General Relativity geodesic. The geometrically
right-handed extremal parity test mass will evince the anomaly.
=
The Eotvos rotor is balanced to within a microgram or so over about
100 grams overall total. Test masses' mass is irrelevant except as
experimental convenience. Only the ratio of inertial to gravitational
mass is active. Local gee cancels. The Earth's inertial acceleration
as it spins about its axis vs. the Earth's gravitational acceleration
as it falls around the sun are active. The phase angle between the
two 24-hr modulates the Eotvos balance's output (if any) to
phase-locked detection. Modern rigs put the apparatus upon a slow
precision turntable that gives better signal amplification for its
faster phase angle rotation and uncouples coincident resonances by
altering its angular velocity.
=
You cannot falsify Euclidean geometry within Euclidean geometry - it
contains no mistakes. The problem is in one of its founding
postulates - the Fifth (Parallel) Postulate. Riemann and
Bolyai/Lobechevsky made hash of Euclid, then Thurston made hash of
them all,
=
WP Thurston, "Three-dimensional manifolds, Kleinian groups and
hyperbolic geometry," Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 6 357-381 (1982)
WP Thurston, "Three-dimensional geometry and topology," Vol. 1.
Princeton Mathematical Press, Princeton, NJ, 1997
=
You cannot falsify General Relativity within General Relativity - it
contains no mistakes. The problem is in one of its founding
postulates - the Equivalence Principle. Minkowski space is irrelevant
to the discussion, as below. External symmetry-derived properties
(e.g., parity) act on spacetime. A Poincar=E9 group gauge theory can b=

equivalent to the Einstein-Cartan theory of gravitation.
=
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/cite.htm#a13
=
Einstein-Cartan theory operates in Riemann-Cartan spacetime U4 - a
paracompact, Hausdorff, connected, C^(infinity), and oriented
four-dimensional manifold on which are defined a local Lorentz metric
"g" and a linear affine connection "capital gamma." Curvature and
torsion tensors can be obtained from "capital gamma" on U^4:
=
1. If the torsion tensor vanishes, Riemann-Cartan spacetime becomes
pseudo-Riemannian spacetime, V^4 (General Relativity; metric
gravitation overall; EP postulated);
=
2. If the curvature tensor vanishes, it becomes Weitzenb=F6ck
spacetime, A^4 (in which the teleparallel gravitational
energy-momentum pseudotensor is anti-symmetric to parity
transformation; EP is irrelevant);
=
3. If both tensors vanish, it becomes Minkowski spacetime, M^4.
Minkowski space has no bearing on Equivalence Principle testing.
=
Looking back at the various threads about the parity Eotvos
experiment, what do we see? We see critic trolls trisecting angles
and squaring circles. We see idiots assuming the Equivalence
Principle and then "proving" that it is true. We see flat-oput
psychotics picking their asses in public. We see Richard Schultz,
KING OF THE CARBONYLS
=
<http://www.biu.ac.il/ESC/ch/faculty/schultz/schulint.html>
<http://www.sibeliusmusic.com/cgi-bin/user_page.pl?url=3Drschultz>
=
and his various aliases erecting a Senior Lecturer pseudo-scholarly
hard-on demanding that the parity Eotvos experiment never be performed
because it would offend Yahweh and Richard Schultz. Hey Schultzy -
greed is masculine, envy is feminine. Just how much backbonding can
you contain in a day?
=
There is preponderant evidence that the Jun Luo group in Huazhong
University in Wuhan, PR China has performed the full parity Eotvos
experiment in quartz to full 10^(-13) difference/average sensitivity
and has obtained a net signal on the close order of 10^(-12)
difference/average. Said academic group is now attempting to change
its public position as a pair of hands performing Uncle Al's reduction
to practice of Uncle Al's proposed and mathematically modeled theory.
They will fail.
=
There is preponderant evidence that space is anisiotropic toward
extremal parity bodies. The Equivalence Principle is empirically
violated at will and angular momentum will not be conserved for
geometrically right-handed extremal parity bodies. The size of the
anomaly (about a part-per-trillion difference/average) and the
extremal conditions under which it is obtained (geometrically
right-handed solid convex single crystals with equal moments of
inertia) render it undetectable except in specialized
instrumentation. This could change given more observations and better
theory therefrom. Uncoupling gravitational and inertial mass has
profound engineering applications.
=
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf

There is preponderant evidence that the Jun Luo group in Huazhong
University in Wuhan, PR China has performed the full parity Eotvos
experiment in quartz to full 10^(-13) difference/average sensitivity
and has obtained a net signal on the close order of 10^(-12)
difference/average. Said academic group is now attempting to change
its public position as a pair of hands performing Uncle Al's reduction
to practice of Uncle Al's proposed and mathematically modeled theory.
They will fail.

There is preponderant evidence that space is anisiotropic toward
extremal parity bodies. The Equivalence Principle is empirically
violated at will and angular momentum will not be conserved for
geometrically right-handed extremal parity bodies. The size of the
anomaly (about a part-per-trillion difference/average) and the
extremal conditions under which it is obtained (geometrically
right-handed solid convex single crystals with equal moments of
inertia) render it undetectable except in specialized
instrumentation. This could change given more observations and better
theory therefrom. Uncoupling gravitational and inertial mass has
profound engineering applications.

--
Uncle Al