Re: The Definition of Points



 Science > Physics > Re: The Definition of Points

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Tony Lance"
Date: 24 Mar 2007 11:45:11 AM
Object: Re: The Definition of Points
Big Bertha Thing positron
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/positron.html
Access page JPG 56K Image
Astrophysics net ring Access site
Newsgroup Reviews including talk.politics.guns

Round photographic plates.
Caption;-
Another pair of tracks, arising simultaneously,
from a common point. The two particles responsible,
for these tracks, produce equal specific ionizations.
The one leaving the track of greater curvature is an electron
of 27 MeV energy. The one leaving the track of smaller curvature
was apparently left, by a particle not then known to exist,
a particle identical with the electron,
except that it carries a positive charge. It is a 450 MeV positron.
From a book by
J.D.Stranathan Ph.D.,
Professor of Physics and Chairman of
Department, University of Kansas.
The "Particles" of Modern Physics.
(C) Copyright The Blakston Co. 1942
Big Bertha Thing forward
Friends and family postings are included in the category,
forwarded by you from the internet, to the internet,
First Class users or conferences.
The same terms and conditions apply.
There is no student or accademic only exclusion clause,
written or implied in them. You are personaly responsible for them.
On the question of from address, a new mail item,
in reply with quote format, either from you or the conference moderator
will do. For the subject line use Fwd: prefix.
Occams' Razor says the simplest explanation is usually right.
(C) Copyright Tony Lance 1997.
To comply with my copyright,
please distribute complete copies, free of charge.
Tony Lance
judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk
Newsgroups: sci.chem
From: Tony Lance <joehorace@bigberthathing.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:24:28 +0000
Local: Tues, Jan 23 2007 5:24 pm
Subject: Big Bertha Thing tactics
Big Bertha Thing tactics
To whom it may concern. (Newsgroup: sci.chem)
To defend against a denial of service attack on a newsgroup,
use the same tactics that Big Bertha Thing uses
on the most wanted list guys.
1. All threads are one posting long.
2. All replies are posted to one thread.
3. No postings of most wanted are read.
4. No replies to most wanted.
5. No direct criticism of most wanted.
6. All criticism should be pictorial, literate, allegorical
anecdotal and out of copyright.
7. It is a defense in English law that something which is not
libelous in one context, cannot be read in another
context as libelous.
8. This is also true of English universities, where the guy has tenure.
9. Corporate branding can reinforce trust, as well as irritation.
10. A group of guys posting across several newsgroups,
can have strategic reasons for their choice of newsgroups.
11. Three battles have been won so far. (39 family jewels)
12. The fourth battle is now on. (Asian Rim)
13. So I posted a picture of historical scientific interest,
which looked like a shell hole. (Virtual artillary shell)
14. Use double pass newsreader software to download headers,
before the rest of the postings. (NNTP)
.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER