josephus <dogbird@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:<4LAOd.4679$mG6.1587@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
SDR wrote:
"westa" <alanwest@softhome.net> wrote in message
news:<1107933948.929098.304710@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>...
Your response demonstrates your intellect so clearly... I rest my
argument.
So: I have a clear intellect, and you have a lazy argument...?
I can live with that. Thank you.
S D Rodrian
http://poems.sdrorian.com
http://physics.sdrodrian.com
http://ar.sdrodrian.com
http://music.sdrodrian.com
you guys remind me of some kung fu arts. The threat is all that
matters. So one threatens to quit while they are ahead.
But, isn't the threat to quit when one's behind cowardice?
I think that makes us two really brave and noble dudes.
both of you are dishonest.
Well, I don't know about the other guy, but I know I am:
The other day some girl turned to me and asked me: "You
think I'm pretty, don't you?" Well, I assured her she was
an angel! (In reality, she was such a monster she put me off
my food that evening. I told people I had a stomach virus.)
I cant verify or refute anything SDR says
Try reading the damned text; I wrote it so that even a child
could follow the argument. I wrote it specifically for people
like you--I even posted it in big letters and within a setting
which would be as easy on your eyes as possible:
http://physics.sdrodrian.com
but I wonder why he cannot publish in a more sensible journaled place
where they have the resources and general training to do with things
like this.
Try remembering Galileo's experience. He looked through his
telescope and SAW that the "heavens" were not "perfect" (as
the authorities of his time insisted they were). Hell, he even
had the POPE look through his telescope, and even though the
Pope had seen it with his own eyes himself HE STILL had Gali
refute all his claims on pain of horrific torture...!
No, dear josephus, every single person I give the chance
to thwart the publication of my paper... will take it. It's human
nature from way, way back. One just has to know when to
avoid a pointless battle.
What I am presenting in my paper is like saying, "Look, there's
a mountain over there!" Eventually people will see the mountain.
But it would be silly of me to try to force them to look before
they're good & ready to look. I just don't have that much life left
to waste.
Tel me why you cant publish elsewhere.
I just told you. I am publishing it were I can
and NOT where I can not. Simple as that.
If you have. let me
have the references and I will check them out.
josephus
Sure, check out:
http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?selm=58087ec7.0502091128.4c8acdef%40posting.google.com&output=gplain
This will perhaps inform you of the relevance of what I
am revealing to you (note for whom the "publication" is
intended). Behold the mountain! (Or, do so when you're
ready.)
S D Rodrian
http://poems.sdrodrian.com
http://physics.sdrodrian.com
http://ar.sdrodrian.com
http://music.sdrodrian.com
.
