Re: The Problem with Probability Theory



 Science > Physics > Re: The Problem with Probability Theory

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "A N Niel"
Date: 13 Sep 2005 07:44:58 AM
Object: Re: The Problem with Probability Theory

For instance, atomic radioactive decay is usually called random
but of course it is a causal process.

According to quantum mechanics?
.

User: "Mh"

Title: Re: The Problem with Probability Theory 13 Sep 2005 09:11:15 AM
"A N Niel" <anniel@nym.alias.net.invalid> wrote in message
news:130920050844585950%anniel@nym.alias.net.invalid...

For instance, atomic radioactive decay is usually called random
but of course it is a causal process.


According to quantum mechanics?

If it is not random, can you predict when the next ray or particle will be
emitted?
.

User: "Evgenij Barsukov"

Title: Re: The Problem with Probability Theory 13 Sep 2005 08:23:01 AM
A N Niel wrote:

For instance, atomic radioactive decay is usually called random
but of course it is a causal process.



According to quantum mechanics?

Quantum mechanics is the funniest thing. Because it only deals with
probability amplitudes applied to the smallest known properties, it
implies that random events are fundamental in their nature and not a
result of multiple causal events that average themselfs.
You might like it or not but that is how it is. Personaly, I like it
because I believe infinity (and correspondingly, fundamental randomness)
are inherent and most basic properties (and even reasons of existance)
of our reality. QM is fundamentaly consistent with this worldview.
Regards,
Evgenij
.
User: "Ian Parker"

Title: Re: The Problem with Probability Theory 13 Sep 2005 09:58:28 AM
Look, you don't need to go to Quantum mechanics to play dice as
Einstein put it. In fact chaos theory produces a need for more and more
accurate measurement, which is tantamount to a continuous inflow of
information.
Quantum mechanics simply states a probability. There may be a deeper
theory which makes a particular radioactive atom decay at a particular
time, but it is not quantum theory. Certainly not in its present form.
If you postulate time travel and self consistent Feynman diagrams you
would then have a theory that might be able to do such a thing. It is
not however classical Quantum Theory.
.
User: "Orion"

Title: Re: The Problem with Probability Theory 13 Sep 2005 12:21:44 PM
Not everything is mathematical. Decay is one of the physical processes
which cannot be explained by mathematics.
.
User: "Puppet_Sock"

Title: Re: The Problem with Probability Theory 13 Sep 2005 01:33:38 PM
Orion wrote:

Not everything is mathematical. Decay is one of the physical processes
which cannot be explained by mathematics.

Try as I might I can't seem to assign any meaning to your
statement. Can you rephrase?
Socks
.





  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Another problem with Maxwells theory
String theory is a symptom of a deep problem
Whats wrong with the theory... The horizon problem!
Experts Assemble to Test New Theory of Relativity
New Theory of Stars and Formation of Planets
salvaging the small morsel of truth in String Theory; Critique of TV-show on String Theory versus AtomTotality
Articles] Standard Lightening theory challanged; BEC made from molecules
Theory of Anything
the essence of science: propose a theory, then test it eh!
Re: Basilar membrane mathematics of place theory
The Smart Model Theory -----News Group -----
Finite Temperature Field Theory For Computing Particle Scattering Amplitudes
The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity
correcting Landau & Lifschitz in "The Classical Theory of Fields" onMaxwell derivation
Nested mathematical forms of Maxwell theory and Unification of Forces
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER