The famous singer in magazine People with a guy whose name I know
personally as a family name from Mexico, friends, and are, as a family and
people, his exact OPPOSITES? Pictures of her do seem to differ, but then
photographs are always unreliable. I fear the same pattern here,
impersonation and Sterens. I truly think that __I__ should meet the singer
and have some professional activity with her! The Toxic song now I know
refers to the homeless, though it seemed to refer to an addicted Lu is...
early 2004... I hope THAT guy didnt use either MY NAME or the name of LU
IS BI STRAIN. Defamation? My music and instruments are still ROBBED and I
am STILL a PRISONER in the STREET effectively DEVOID of HUMAN RIGHTS and
recognition and so many things taht it should be obvious my effort at
exposing people with **criminal intent**.
Problem with Lu is is that in 2002 the news of a parricide of last name
Bistrain were broadcasted nationally, and the guy has or had my general
phenotype. Could be confused lightly with my family though I had no idead
of his existence. I was counting him as another case in a selective,
generation genocide, people who knew of me. But then the test, that I
would undergo real difficulty in the US, was centered on Lu is! It means I
dont know who is or was that Lu is! Sterens, member of an extended family
being played by some external influence, the difference being that he at
least played the **game** while I refused because I did see those
consequences. It makes sense from the point of view of the algorythm to
reserve one of the implied as a big criminal, supercriminal in the
terminology of previous posts. Obviously, that supercriminal has to be
turned totally out of suspicious, in other words, a _priest_. But then the
algorythm was corrupted! _I_ dont want to play, even less now that _I_ am
living _as_if_ I was a priest! I understand why there was pressure on my
having sex: to prove I was not some kind of priest, as some guys do
understand the role of the priestly figure... That I was becoming famous
was unacceptable to that algorythm meant to keep people anonymous and
sordidly connected... And it was prepared for decades! Lu is was meant to
be the supercriminal and I was meant to be the _middle_ sacrifice. Roles
were changed, which shouldnt be understood in the Spanish sense of
paperwork exchanged (papeles cambiados) but in the sense of function
within an architecture, the religious architecture of the Steren
algorythm. That way the Church keeps control of goverment, then also by
creating parallel lives. But the World changed. There is a different
communication model the Church has to defeat (TV, radio, internet,
airplanes, transatlantics, satellites...); to keep same characters as
roles in a simultanous play is much more difficult! Problem is that Lu is
truly had the will to become a real supercriminal while I dont! I can
imagine how somebody would be able to impersonate a recently inscribed
student in the UIA... but our introduction was contrived. There was no
other way I could arrange my second semester schedule while having time to
attend AGAIN the class of that teacher my age that was driving me love
crazy! And Lu is appeared in the **excentric** course, a good moment to
have the evening busy with a friend... This may have happened more than
once in different countries! It must be a JOKE or an ironic mockery of a
free minded thinker seeking scientific objectivity and artistic freedom to
make the course we attended together be precisely LAW. And a good
principle-oriented law course!
By now Rodriguez is NOT THE SAME RODRIGUEZ. IT may mean that he changed as
a person, but more likely that somebody else is inm his place playing
Rodriguez, what I think was called the **theory** of multiple organisms,
or a rationalization of the will to murder schizophrenics based on the
notion that they share minds and are the **same person**, without
recognizing that it is a false assumption UNLESS they are utter morons,
mediums, devoid of real rationality like people I ve found among the
homeless and whose moronity seems to come from the use of real destructive
drugs (not precisely commercial underground recreative drugs). Just
because some _information_ is shared on a partially continuous basis (many
mathematical concepts do have their genesis on the phenomenon), including
sensations and feelings, doesnt mean different bodies are the SAME person!
Each one of us is an individuality. NOte that I have been using Sterens
ambiguously. The word seems to come from Sterenzy, the name of a Russian
translator of a book dealing with gulags... jail. So by Steren I (maybe
them too) mean the population religious policy AND the use of a gradation
of family and genotypes to convince people of the effectiveness of some
secret that can incriminate for sure or turn into sacrificeable psychosis,
like the belief in metamorphing... All of it is of course based on the
possibilities of telepathy and its consequences.
The army doesnt have a Church structure, neither democratic government,
but police, syndicates, political parties and some criminality do.
Mindworms can be confused with schizophrenia, but are just another
manifestation of telepathy though nearer to what is commonly understood as
the schizophrenic disorder... without being it.
We can now characterize NORMALITY in terms of telepathy and schizophrenia
as people who:

a) dont slip words nor phrases in normal speech, though they may still
have sporadic and rather notorious freudian lapsus, or even have apparent
dislexyc traumas with very particular word pairs

b) cant hear other people s voices in his mind, though very basic
sensations like unexpected odours and falling sensations may still be
present, as well as hunches, premonitions, sudden mood changes but not in
such frequency that the person may believe he / she is a psychic or has
special abilities (ESP) [SOME mind possibilities may STILL characterize
ESP and other phenomena not necessarily connected to telepathy;
photographic memory being one of them, though it can be simulated by a
pair of telepaths in connivance]

c) cant hear people shouting in the street or far calls, though
occasionally hearing somebody call his or her name should be considered
normal as the concept of individuality and self would be very well
affirmed, ready to answer to any personal, i.e., named, call, and some
transmissions would have a very strong (well ordered and determined)
**personal** hook or concept of the target.

d) would experience few coincidences in common life, few recurrent
encounters with the same people except when linked to time, to the clock
or to routine; also would experience very few anticipations of his acts
and desires as well, and unless the individual assumes a routine a sense
of spontaneity would be characteristic; obviously, precious few
manifestation of concordance between thoughts and external real life would
be present, though, of course, the older somebody is, the more accumulated
cases would make sense as expressions of telepathy and would be understood
as such

e) all rational **input** comes from very determined outer sources

Note that here normality is most desirable! But SOME abnormality is not SO
UNDESIRABLE. The concept of resonance is most significative here, since
the nearer are several people in terms of affection, experiences, thought
patterns (language being the objective basic pattern), the more probable
is they will experience telepathy even on a normal basis. Resonate,
reason-ate, reason was eaten: so people who resonate lose their reason, it
is eaten away! Hence the cliche of people going **mad** of love: they
become akin to schizophrenics because they resonate, their reason is ate,
they want to have a life in common as a single being, not individualities,
etc. A pretty good reason for some institutionalized, historical haters to
hate lovers! Like poetry or being drugged: fear of being a telepath... or
being schizophrenic! EVEN IF THE PHENOMENON MAY BE VERY PRIVATE WITHIN A
PARTICULAR GROUP. THe distinction between schizo and schizophrenic holds,
as some people would be in touch mainly with relatives and friendly
people, schizos, while others would be in touch with malevolent,
destabilizing telepaths, hence under the danger of becoming
schizophren(et)ics. Note that failing the a) charecteristic, that is, to
fall into lapsus or even t obe unable to speak MUST BE CONSIDERED A REAL
MENTAL DEFECT POINTING TO SUBNORMAL INTELLIGENCE OR POOR BRAIN PROCESSSING
that may be related to neurochemistry defficiencies or perhaps to
insufficiently exercised thought processes... a posture that can be better
understood from the point of view of synamic systems (animations here
would be the obvious illustration). [Some theoretical circumstances are
not clear and need empirical research]
TELEPATHS MUST NOT BE KILLED NOR MADE DISEASED. The solution will be
always technology. We are all different because of the Heideggerian
insight: HERE and now will always differ even in totally resonant
telepaths.
I think my drawings have commercial possibilities if properly processed. I
cant think of some possiblities, which need some capital. THEY still have
some very precious drawings, and maybe that is why the guy who stole my
copmuter was found and placed among a group of rather aggressive,
perturbed guys... I am supposed to think they were reduced to fat and
spread on the floor? Or those marks on the subway station s floor mean
GLUED? If so, then who has the computer he burglarized? Still the same
question, how did they come here to the US being so difficult to get a
visa? Or was just needed to use my name? Or...?
Historicity has now a different meaning than before because of the growing
accumulation in human productions... no excuse to keep me ostracized nor
to block me nor to rob me...