Science > Physics > Re: There is no global temperature! -- Haven't heard this lie in two years.
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
17 Mar 2007 10:45:01 PM |
| Object: |
Re: There is no global temperature! -- Haven't heard this lie in two years. |
On Mar 17, 3:38 pm, "consensually challenged" <ell...@msn.com> wrote:
No one is precluding simple averaging, just questioning why it is chosen as
compared with other averaging techniques. Since there is no physical
equation for temperature in a non-equilibrium setting there is no valid
reason to choose or to not choose any one method for arriving at an average
You are right that means for determining average temperatures are
subjective and generally cultured for the desired result. Computer
models for temperature only read out what is programed in.
The averages for temperature and solar insolation are invalid for
AGW's averaging of energy which is a fouth power to temperature. This
is a total joke, that their intitial theory is so invalid, and they
cannot quantify the effect of existing GHG's. They don't care. They
rely on their consensus for moral support in the lack of any valid
mathematics.
hahahahahahahahah
Temperature can be defined by the properties of a gas.
Temperature is directly proportional to pressure or volume.
P/V = nRT
This means that combined effect of the velocities of the gas molecules
on the sides of a vessel increases directly proportional to
temperature. From this Boltzman developed his constant kT, which is
the mean kinetic energy of the molecules of a gas and when multiplied
by Avagadros number, is RT.
A gas also has a heat capacity. If a radiation field is introduced to
a gas, the gas absorbs a specific quantity of this energy in order to
attain the kinetic energy of the motions of the molecules. The
molecules also absorb kinetic energy as the rotation of the molecules.
If the heat source is removed, this kinetic energy is lost as
radiation by the gas, and the molecular motions are lost. This is in
maintaining the law of the conservation of energy. The heat capacity
of a monatomic gas is 3/2R at constant volume and 5/2R at expanding
volume. This energy that is absorbed, is the kinetic energy for the
motions of the molecules.
Solids absorb kinetic energy as vibrations of the molecules and have
generally the heat capacity of 3R or about 26 Joules per mol per deg.
But temperature is better defined as the energy density of the
radiation field in a specific volume. This density was quantified by
Stefan, Boltzman and Planck. A substance must be within this density
of radiation field for the kinetic energy of it's motions of it's heat
capacity to be maintained.
According to Planck's law, the statistics of probability define the
distribution. The probablities for the electron oscillator to be in
any given energy state and to emit a photon of that energy is defined
by his law for an equilibrium state. The density of energy field
determines the highest probability of the energy of the electron
oscillator and most common energy of a photon for temperature as,,
hvmax = 4.96kT.
The density of the solar energy at earth's distance produces a
temperature of 394K or 121C. This is evident in the temperatures of
the moon with the sun at zenith. This temperature is 123C and the
average temperature of the lit side of the moon is 107C. It is the
density of this energy of the radiation that develops a temperature
more than it is the 'equilibrium' developed of this quantity
Deatherage
.
|
|
| User: "Eric Swanson" |
|
| Title: Re: There is no global temperature! -- Haven't heard this lie in two years. |
18 Mar 2007 09:42:46 AM |
|
|
In article <1174189501.705686.81940@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, says...
The density of the solar energy at earth's distance produces a
temperature of 394K or 121C.
Your repeated posting of this claim is actually an assumption of
the surface radiant properties, i.e., the emissivity, of a body in
free space. Differences in shape and emissivity vs. temperature
will produce different equilibrium temperatures. Your claim is thus
meaningless.
.....This is evident in the temperatures of
the moon with the sun at zenith. This temperature is 123C and the
average temperature of the lit side of the moon is 107C. It is the
density of this energy of the radiation that develops a temperature
more than it is the 'equilibrium' developed of this quantity
But, mankind doesn't live on the moon and the Earth's energy flows are
vastly different than that of the Moon, where there is no atmosphere.
--
Eric Swanson --- E-mail address: e_swanson(at)skybest.com :-)
--------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Citizen Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: There is no global temperature! -- Haven't heard this lie in two years. |
18 Mar 2007 01:12:12 AM |
|
|
On 17 Mar 2007 20:45:01 -0700, wrote:
Temperature is directly proportional to pressure or volume.
P/V = nRT
That's valid only for a so-called Ideal Gases, like monotonic gases.
--
Ban Dihydrogen Monoxide (DHMO)!
Primary Cause of Global Warming!
The DHMO Institute
Houston, Texas
http://home.houston.rr.com/rkba/dhmo.html
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Why DONT You Want Energy Security?" |
|
| Title: Crackpot Death-Rag, Ignore. |
17 Mar 2007 10:48:26 PM |
|
|
On Mar 17, 7:45 pm, wrote:
hahahahahahahahah
Deatherage
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: There is no global temperature! -- Haven't heard this lie in two years. |
18 Mar 2007 12:17:43 AM |
|
|
On Mar 17, 7:45 pm, wrote:
[...]
I find it amusing that you basically say the same exact blurb about
thermodynamics every time.
It is as if all you know about thermo is from an introductory physics
course....
.
|
|
|
| User: "Citizen Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: There is no global temperature! -- Haven't heard this lie in two years. |
18 Mar 2007 09:38:32 AM |
|
|
On 17 Mar 2007 22:17:43 -0700, "Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote:
I find it amusing that you basically say the same exact blurb about
thermodynamics every time.
What exact blurb are you referring to?
It is as if all you know about thermo is from an introductory physics
course....
I have a Ph.D. in Physics from a top American university and over a
dozen articles of original research in quantum mechanics, both
theoretical and experimental, in mainstream refereed physics journals
like Physical Review, Review of Scientific Instruments, Physics
Letters, etc. plus abstracts in the Bulletin of the American Physical
Society for presentations at APS meetings.
I want you to tell me the temperature of Earth at this moment. How
would you do it? Assume that you have accurate thermometry everywhere
you want and you can make instantaneous readings of each temperature
with high accuracy.
1) How do you know if the measurement you make actually represents the
thermodynamic temperature for that locale?
2) How do you plan on constructing the single value for the
temperature I am asking for, namely the temperature of Earth at this
moment?
To show you how screwed up this all is, consider the current temps for
the various reporting stations scattered all over the Houston Metro
area.
Houston Intercontinental Airport 55F
Houston Hobby Airport 58F
Houston Hooks Memorial Airport 54F
Houston Ellington Air Force Base 59F
Pearland Regional Airport 58F
Houston Hull Field Airport 58F
Galveston Scholes Airport 62F
All of these are in the Houston Metropolitan Area, which is a 6
country area about 100 miles in diameter (yes, Houston does sprall).
Taking these readings we get an arithmetic mean of 57.7F. The standard
deviaton (std dev) is 2.6F using the sample method (dividing by N-1
instead of N). So our temp is
T = 57.7F +/- 2.6F
If temps are distributed according to the Normal Distribution, there
is a 95% chance that the actual temp falls into a region of +/- 2 std
dev, which means the temperature of the Houston Metro Area with 95%
confidence is somewhere between:
T = 62.9F to 52.2F
Notice that this range includes all the data above, so it appears to
be a good estimate.
Also notice that the ecosystem of Houston Metro Area is not in
equilibrium, otherwise the fluctuations in temp would only be due to
measurement imprecision. Modern measurement instruments can do far
better than +/- 2.6F.
So, you tell me which temp I should use when calculating the warming
or cooling of Metro Houston over time? If I use averages like the AGW
loons use, and I come up with 1F temp rise, do you now see how absurd
that figure is, both theoretically and experimentally? I can't justify
taking averages of temps in a data series where the individual temps
have such wide fluctuations as this example illustrates.
Put another way, the temp arrived at by this kind of experiment is
meaningless in terms of thermodynamics. Indeed when the TV weather
forecaster tells you that the current temp is 70F, you know it's just
an approximation. You will very likely get a different reading from
your backyard weather station.
1) Temp measurements like those have no thermodynamic significance in
non-equilibrium systems, and therefore cannot be used in thermodynamic
models. They are just a fiction created by TV weather forecasters.
2) The models that the AGW loons propose are hoaxes, just like the
models proposed by the Club of Rome and by the Cold Fusion advocates
of years past.
3) Temp has no meaning if the measurements fluctuate widely from one
measurement to the next over the region of interest.
4) Warming/cooling by small amounts (as claimed by AGW loons) is much
smaller than the fluctuations in temperature measurements (which are
not valid for thermodynamic calculations to begin with) and has no
meaning because Earth's ecosystem is not an equilibrium system. In
case anyone noticed, there is a huge difference between the alleged
temps of the poles vs the equator. That's about as non-equilibrium as
it gets.
How's that for introductory physics.
--
Ban Dihydrogen Monoxide (DHMO)!
Primary Cause of Global Warming!
The DHMO Institute
Houston, Texas
http://home.houston.rr.com/rkba/dhmo.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "Vendicar Decarian" |
|
| Title: Re: There is no global temperature! -- Haven't heard this lie in two years. |
24 Mar 2007 01:42:46 AM |
|
|
"Citizen Bob" <spam@uce.gov> wrote
I have a Ph.D. in Physics from a top American university and over a
dozen articles of original research in quantum mechanics, both
theoretical and experimental, in mainstream refereed physics journals
like Physical Review, Review of Scientific Instruments, Physics
Letters, etc. plus abstracts in the Bulletin of the American Physical
Society for presentations at APS meetings.
Really. Then you won't mind giving us your real name.
I also have a simple question for you to answer in your stated field of
expertise.
How does the spectral distribution of quantum vacuum fluctuations scale with
length, and what is the power function for this distribution as a function
of length.
I await your answers with anticipatory Laughter...
Ahahahahahahahaha......
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Swanson" |
|
| Title: Re: There is no global temperature! -- Haven't heard this lie in two years. |
18 Mar 2007 12:34:40 PM |
|
|
In article <45fd4bad.174873125@news-server.houston.rr.com>, says...
On 17 Mar 2007 22:17:43 -0700, "Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote:
I find it amusing that you basically say the same exact blurb about
thermodynamics every time.
What exact blurb are you referring to?
It is as if all you know about thermo is from an introductory physics
course....
I have a Ph.D. in Physics from a top American university and over a
dozen articles of original research in quantum mechanics, both
theoretical and experimental, in mainstream refereed physics journals
like Physical Review, Review of Scientific Instruments, Physics
Letters, etc. plus abstracts in the Bulletin of the American Physical
Society for presentations at APS meetings.
Since you are such an accomplished guy, maybe you should identify yourself.
All your web site is full of boasts about use of guns, natural law, guns
defending freedom, etc, yet, you are not willing to put your life where
your "mouth" is, sockhead.
I want you to tell me the temperature of Earth at this moment. How
would you do it? Assume that you have accurate thermometry everywhere
you want and you can make instantaneous readings of each temperature
with high accuracy.
What about the satellite data, Mister Wizzard?
1) How do you know if the measurement you make actually represents the
thermodynamic temperature for that locale?
2) How do you plan on constructing the single value for the
temperature I am asking for, namely the temperature of Earth at this
moment?
What about the satellite data, Mister Wizzard?
To show you how screwed up this all is, consider the current temps for
the various reporting stations scattered all over the Houston Metro
area.
Houston Intercontinental Airport 55F
Houston Hobby Airport 58F
Houston Hooks Memorial Airport 54F
Houston Ellington Air Force Base 59F
Pearland Regional Airport 58F
Houston Hull Field Airport 58F
Galveston Scholes Airport 62F
All of these are in the Houston Metropolitan Area, which is a 6
country area about 100 miles in diameter (yes, Houston does sprall).
Taking these readings we get an arithmetic mean of 57.7F. The standard
deviaton (std dev) is 2.6F using the sample method (dividing by N-1
instead of N). So our temp is
T = 57.7F +/- 2.6F
If temps are distributed according to the Normal Distribution, there
is a 95% chance that the actual temp falls into a region of +/- 2 std
dev, which means the temperature of the Houston Metro Area with 95%
confidence is somewhere between:
T = 62.9F to 52.2F
Your claims are completely off. Certainly, there is local variation due
to local factors, like rain storms and frontal passages. Now, do the
same calculation using daily maximum and minimum temperatures, like the
pros do. And, include only sites which use WMO qualified instruments and
enclosures, with instruments calibrated using the appropriate standard.
Then, compare the monthly averages of these data. How much variation
do you end up with on a larger scale, say for the whole State of Texas?
--
Eric Swanson --- E-mail address: e_swanson(at)skybest.com :-)
--------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "Citizen Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: There is no global temperature! -- Haven't heard this lie in two years. |
19 Mar 2007 08:44:55 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 17:34:40 +0000 (UTC),
(Eric Swanson) wrote:
Houston Intercontinental Airport 55F
Houston Hobby Airport 58F
Houston Hooks Memorial Airport 54F
Houston Ellington Air Force Base 59F
Pearland Regional Airport 58F
Houston Hull Field Airport 58F
Galveston Scholes Airport 62F
include only sites which use WMO qualified instruments and
enclosures, with instruments calibrated using the appropriate standard.
You need to learn how to read.
--
Ban Dihydrogen Monoxide (DHMO)!
Primary Cause of Global Warming!
The DHMO Institute
Houston, Texas
http://home.houston.rr.com/rkba/dhmo.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Swanson" |
|
| Title: Re: There is no global temperature! -- Haven't heard this lie in two years. |
19 Mar 2007 08:39:27 AM |
|
|
In article <45fe93a3.258830609@news-server.houston.rr.com>,
says...
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 17:34:40 +0000 (UTC),
(Eric Swanson) wrote:
Houston Intercontinental Airport 55F
Houston Hobby Airport 58F
Houston Hooks Memorial Airport 54F
Houston Ellington Air Force Base 59F
Pearland Regional Airport 58F
Houston Hull Field Airport 58F
Galveston Scholes Airport 62F
include only sites which use WMO qualified instruments and
enclosures, with instruments calibrated using the appropriate standard.
You need to learn how to read.
Lack of reply to issues raised is noted .
Continued unwillingness to accept responsibility also noted.
--
Eric Swanson --- E-mail address: e_swanson(at)skybest.com :-)
--------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Randy Poe" |
|
| Title: Re: There is no global temperature! -- Haven't heard this lie in two years. |
21 Mar 2007 05:01:07 PM |
|
|
On Mar 18, 10:38 am, (Citizen Bob) wrote:
On 17 Mar 2007 22:17:43 -0700, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:
I find it amusing that you basically say the same exact blurb about
thermodynamics every time.
What exact blurb are you referring to?
It is as if all you know about thermo is from an introductory physics
course....
I have a Ph.D. in Physics from a top American university and over a
dozen articles of original research in quantum mechanics, both
theoretical and experimental, in mainstream refereed physics journals
like Physical Review, Review of Scientific Instruments, Physics
Letters, etc. plus abstracts in the Bulletin of the American Physical
Society for presentations at APS meetings.
I want you to tell me the temperature of Earth at this moment. How
would you do it? Assume that you have accurate thermometry everywhere
you want and you can make instantaneous readings of each temperature
with high accuracy.
1) How do you know if the measurement you make actually represents the
thermodynamic temperature for that locale?
2) How do you plan on constructing the single value for the
temperature I am asking for, namely the temperature of Earth at this
moment?
To show you how screwed up this all is, consider the current temps for
the various reporting stations scattered all over the Houston Metro
area.
Houston Intercontinental Airport 55F
Houston Hobby Airport 58F
Houston Hooks Memorial Airport 54F
Houston Ellington Air Force Base 59F
Pearland Regional Airport 58F
Houston Hull Field Airport 58F
Galveston Scholes Airport 62F
All of these are in the Houston Metropolitan Area, which is a 6
country area about 100 miles in diameter (yes, Houston does sprall).
Taking these readings we get an arithmetic mean of 57.7F. The standard
deviaton (std dev) is 2.6F using the sample method (dividing by N-1
instead of N). So our temp is
T = 57.7F +/- 2.6F
If temps are distributed according to the Normal Distribution, there
is a 95% chance that the actual temp falls into a region of +/- 2 std
dev, which means the temperature of the Houston Metro Area with 95%
confidence is somewhere between:
T = 62.9F to 52.2F
Notice that this range includes all the data above, so it appears to
be a good estimate.
Also notice that the ecosystem of Houston Metro Area is not in
equilibrium, otherwise the fluctuations in temp would only be due to
measurement imprecision. Modern measurement instruments can do far
better than +/- 2.6F.
So, you tell me which temp I should use when calculating the warming
or cooling of Metro Houston over time? If I use averages like the AGW
loons use, and I come up with 1F temp rise, do you now see how absurd
that figure is, both theoretically and experimentally?
Conclusion: It is impossible to detect a trend in noisy data. For
instance, it is impossible to say that there is a long-term bull
or bear trend for any stock.
Is that really your position?
- Randy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Ward" |
|
| Title: Re: There is no global temperature! -- Haven't heard this lie in two years. |
21 Mar 2007 06:06:07 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:01:07 -0700, Randy Poe wrote:
On Mar 18, 10:38 am, (Citizen Bob) wrote:
On 17 Mar 2007 22:17:43 -0700, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:
I find it amusing that you basically say the same exact blurb about
thermodynamics every time.
What exact blurb are you referring to?
It is as if all you know about thermo is from an introductory physics
course....
I have a Ph.D. in Physics from a top American university and over a
dozen articles of original research in quantum mechanics, both
theoretical and experimental, in mainstream refereed physics journals
like Physical Review, Review of Scientific Instruments, Physics Letters,
etc. plus abstracts in the Bulletin of the American Physical Society for
presentations at APS meetings.
I want you to tell me the temperature of Earth at this moment. How would
you do it? Assume that you have accurate thermometry everywhere you want
and you can make instantaneous readings of each temperature with high
accuracy.
1) How do you know if the measurement you make actually represents the
thermodynamic temperature for that locale?
2) How do you plan on constructing the single value for the temperature
I am asking for, namely the temperature of Earth at this moment?
To show you how screwed up this all is, consider the current temps for
the various reporting stations scattered all over the Houston Metro
area.
Houston Intercontinental Airport 55F
Houston Hobby Airport 58F
Houston Hooks Memorial Airport 54F
Houston Ellington Air Force Base 59F
Pearland Regional Airport 58F
Houston Hull Field Airport 58F
Galveston Scholes Airport 62F
All of these are in the Houston Metropolitan Area, which is a 6 country
area about 100 miles in diameter (yes, Houston does sprall).
Taking these readings we get an arithmetic mean of 57.7F. The standard
deviaton (std dev) is 2.6F using the sample method (dividing by N-1
instead of N). So our temp is
T = 57.7F +/- 2.6F
If temps are distributed according to the Normal Distribution, there is
a 95% chance that the actual temp falls into a region of +/- 2 std dev,
which means the temperature of the Houston Metro Area with 95%
confidence is somewhere between:
T = 62.9F to 52.2F
Notice that this range includes all the data above, so it appears to be
a good estimate.
Also notice that the ecosystem of Houston Metro Area is not in
equilibrium, otherwise the fluctuations in temp would only be due to
measurement imprecision. Modern measurement instruments can do far
better than +/- 2.6F.
So, you tell me which temp I should use when calculating the warming or
cooling of Metro Houston over time? If I use averages like the AGW loons
use, and I come up with 1F temp rise, do you now see how absurd that
figure is, both theoretically and experimentally?
Conclusion: It is impossible to detect a trend in noisy data. For
instance, it is impossible to say that there is a long-term bull or bear
trend for any stock.
Is that really your position?
He's pretty close. You might want to read up on chaos theory.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hanson the Trained Dancing Monkey" |
|
| Title: Crackpot Bill Ward in a Nuts hell, well read up on chaos theory, and how to cause it. |
21 Mar 2007 06:14:51 PM |
|
|
On Mar 21, 3:06 pm, Bill Ward <b...@REMOVETHISix.netcom.com> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:01:07 -0700, Randy Poe wrote:
On Mar 18, 10:38 am, (Citizen Bob) wrote:
On 17 Mar 2007 22:17:43 -0700, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:
I find it amusing that you basically say the same exact blurb about
thermodynamics every time.
What exact blurb are you referring to?
It is as if all you know about thermo is from an introductory physics
course....
I have a Ph.D. in Physics from a top American university and over a
dozen articles of original research in quantum mechanics, both
theoretical and experimental, in mainstream refereed physics journals
like Physical Review, Review of Scientific Instruments, Physics Letters,
etc. plus abstracts in the Bulletin of the American Physical Society for
presentations at APS meetings.
I want you to tell me the temperature of Earth at this moment. How would
you do it? Assume that you have accurate thermometry everywhere you want
and you can make instantaneous readings of each temperature with high
accuracy.
1) How do you know if the measurement you make actually represents the
thermodynamic temperature for that locale?
2) How do you plan on constructing the single value for the temperature
I am asking for, namely the temperature of Earth at this moment?
To show you how screwed up this all is, consider the current temps for
the various reporting stations scattered all over the Houston Metro
area.
Houston Intercontinental Airport 55F
Houston Hobby Airport 58F
Houston Hooks Memorial Airport 54F
Houston Ellington Air Force Base 59F
Pearland Regional Airport 58F
Houston Hull Field Airport 58F
Galveston Scholes Airport 62F
All of these are in the Houston Metropolitan Area, which is a 6 country
area about 100 miles in diameter (yes, Houston does sprall).
Taking these readings we get an arithmetic mean of 57.7F. The standard
deviaton (std dev) is 2.6F using the sample method (dividing by N-1
instead of N). So our temp is
T = 57.7F +/- 2.6F
If temps are distributed according to the Normal Distribution, there is
a 95% chance that the actual temp falls into a region of +/- 2 std dev,
which means the temperature of the Houston Metro Area with 95%
confidence is somewhere between:
T = 62.9F to 52.2F
Notice that this range includes all the data above, so it appears to be
a good estimate.
Also notice that the ecosystem of Houston Metro Area is not in
equilibrium, otherwise the fluctuations in temp would only be due to
measurement imprecision. Modern measurement instruments can do far
better than +/- 2.6F.
So, you tell me which temp I should use when calculating the warming or
cooling of Metro Houston over time? If I use averages like the AGW loons
use, and I come up with 1F temp rise, do you now see how absurd that
figure is, both theoretically and experimentally?
Conclusion: It is impossible to detect a trend in noisy data. For
instance, it is impossible to say that there is a long-term bull or bear
trend for any stock.
Is that really your position?
He's pretty close. You might want to read up on chaos theory.
Crackpot Bill Ward in a Nuts hell, well read up on chaos theory, and
how to cause it.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: There is no global temperature! -- Haven't heard this lie in two years. |
19 Mar 2007 11:19:00 AM |
|
|
On Mar 18, 6:38 am, (Citizen Bob) wrote:
On 17 Mar 2007 22:17:43 -0700, "EricGisse" <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:
I find it amusing that you basically say the same exact blurb about
thermodynamics every time.
What exact blurb are you referring to?
[...]
Not you. Death-rage.
Take a careful look at his arguments over the course of time. You will
notice a theme.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Roger Coppock" |
|
| Title: Re: There is no global temperature! -- Haven't heard this lie in two years. |
21 Mar 2007 04:39:23 PM |
|
|
On Mar 18, 7:38 am, (Citizen Bob) wrote:
I have a Ph.D. in Physics from a top American university and over a
dozen articles of original research in quantum mechanics, both
theoretical and experimental, in mainstream refereed physics journals
like Physical Review, Review of Scientific Instruments, Physics
Letters, etc. plus abstracts in the Bulletin of the American Physical
Society for presentations at APS meetings.
Why do these anonymous fossil fool fuckheads
always claim such inflated curriculum vitae?
The last liar claimed to be an internationally
renowned expert on practically everything.
It probably would take a clinical psychologist
to fathom this out.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Peter B. P." |
|
| Title: Re: There is no global temperature! -- Haven't heard this lie in two years. |
24 Mar 2007 12:43:30 AM |
|
|
Roger Coppock <rcoppock@adnc.com> wrote:
On Mar 18, 7:38 am, (Citizen Bob) wrote:
I have a Ph.D. in Physics from a top American university and over a
dozen articles of original research in quantum mechanics, both
theoretical and experimental, in mainstream refereed physics journals
like Physical Review, Review of Scientific Instruments, Physics
Letters, etc. plus abstracts in the Bulletin of the American Physical
Society for presentations at APS meetings.
Why do these anonymous fossil fool fuckheads
always claim such inflated curriculum vitae?
Why is people like Roger Coppock unable to wash his mouth thoroughly
with soap and produce a civilized argument against those he disagrees
with?
--
regards , Peter B. P. - http://titancity.com/blog , http://macplanet.dk
If guns kill, do pencils cause spelling errors?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Androcles" |
|
| Title: Re: There is no global temperature! -- Haven't heard this lie in two years. |
24 Mar 2007 03:20:46 AM |
|
|
"Peter B. P." <peter@DIESPAMMERDIE.dk> wrote in message =
news:1hvgvy0.1d77m4m1in5n8qN%peter@DIESPAMMERDIE.dk...
Roger Coppock <rcoppock@adnc.com> wrote:
=20
On Mar 18, 7:38 am, (Citizen Bob) wrote:
I have a Ph.D. in Physics from a top American university and over a
dozen articles of original research in quantum mechanics, both
theoretical and experimental, in mainstream refereed physics =
journals
like Physical Review, Review of Scientific Instruments, Physics
Letters, etc. plus abstracts in the Bulletin of the American =
Physical
Society for presentations at APS meetings.
=20
Why do these anonymous fossil fool fuckheads
always claim such inflated curriculum vitae?
=20
Why is people like Roger Coppock unable to wash his mouth thoroughly
with soap and produce a civilized argument against those he disagrees
with?
Why ***ARE*** hypocrites such as "Peter B. P." unaware of the correct =
use of English when complaining of its use by others?=20
http://www.edufind.com/english/grammar/
What does soap have to do with civility and why should debate
comply with your prudish notions of diplomacy, *****?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Peter B. P." |
|
| Title: Re: There is no global temperature! -- Haven't heard this lie in two years. |
25 Mar 2007 02:00:06 PM |
|
|
Androcles <Engineer@hogwarts.physics.co.uk> wrote:
"Peter B. P." <peter@DIESPAMMERDIE.dk> wrote in message
news:1hvgvy0.1d77m4m1in5n8qN%peter@DIESPAMMERDIE.dk... > Roger Coppock
<rcoppock@adnc.com> wrote: > >> On Mar 18, 7:38 am, (Citizen
Bob) wrote: >> > I have a Ph.D. in Physics from a top American university
and over a >> > dozen articles of original research in quantum mechanics,
both >> > theoretical and experimental, in mainstream refereed physics
journals >> > like Physical Review, Review of Scientific Instruments,
Physics >> > Letters, etc. plus abstracts in the Bulletin of the American
Physical >> > Society for presentations at APS meetings. >> >> Why do
these anonymous fossil fool fuckheads >> always claim such inflated
curriculum vitae? > > Why is people like Roger Coppock unable to wash his
mouth thoroughly > with soap and produce a civilized argument against
those he disagrees > with?
Why ***ARE*** hypocrites such as "Peter B. P." unaware of the correct use
of English when complaining of its use by others?
http://www.edufind.com/english/grammar/
What does soap have to do with civility and why should debate comply with
your prudish notions of diplomacy, *****?
The irony is strong with this one.
-- regards , Peter B. P. http://titancity.com/blog , http://macplanet.dk
.
|
|
|
| User: "Androcles" |
|
| Title: Re: There is no global temperature! -- Haven't heard this lie in two years. |
25 Mar 2007 03:04:16 PM |
|
|
"Peter B. P." <peter@DIESPAMMERSCUM.dk> wrote in message =
news:1hvjuad.12x57nlo061j4N%peter@DIESPAMMERSCUM.dk...
Androcles <Engineer@hogwarts.physics.co.uk> wrote:
=20
"Peter B. P." <peter@DIESPAMMERDIE.dk> wrote in message
news:1hvgvy0.1d77m4m1in5n8qN%peter@DIESPAMMERDIE.dk... > Roger =
Coppock
<rcoppock@adnc.com> wrote: > >> On Mar 18, 7:38 am, =
(Citizen
Bob) wrote: >> > I have a Ph.D. in Physics from a top American =
university
and over a >> > dozen articles of original research in quantum =
mechanics,
both >> > theoretical and experimental, in mainstream refereed =
physics
journals >> > like Physical Review, Review of Scientific Instruments,
Physics >> > Letters, etc. plus abstracts in the Bulletin of the =
American
Physical >> > Society for presentations at APS meetings. >> >> Why do
these anonymous fossil fool fuckheads >> always claim such inflated
curriculum vitae? > > Why is people like Roger Coppock unable to wash =
his
mouth thoroughly > with soap and produce a civilized argument against
those he disagrees > with?
=20
=20
Why ***ARE*** hypocrites such as "Peter B. P." unaware of the =
correct use
of English when complaining of its use by others?
http://www.edufind.com/english/grammar/
=20
What does soap have to do with civility and why should debate comply =
with
your prudish notions of diplomacy, *****?
=20
The irony is strong with this one.
=20
-- regards , Peter B. P. http://titancity.com/blog , =
http://macplanet.dk
Yes, it is rather ironic that you whine so hypocritically and add =
nothing=20
of value save flames to the discussion.=20
Oh, and shove your regards up your arse; you know, I know and=20
the world knows you don't mean them, you fuckin' sanctimonious
*****.
*plonk*
.
|
|
|
| User: "QuantumDot" |
|
| Title: Re: There is no global temperature! -- Haven't heard this lie in two years. |
25 Mar 2007 03:24:56 PM |
|
|
On 2007-03-25 22:04:16 +0200, "Androcles"
<Engineer@hogwarts.physics.co.uk> said:
"Peter B. P." <peter@DIESPAMMERSCUM.dk> wrote in message
news:1hvjuad.12x57nlo061j4N%peter@DIESPAMMERSCUM.dk...
Androcles <Engineer@hogwarts.physics.co.uk> wrote:
"Peter B. P." <peter@DIESPAMMERDIE.dk> wrote in message
news:1hvgvy0.1d77m4m1in5n8qN%peter@DIESPAMMERDIE.dk... > Roger
Coppock
<rcoppock@adnc.com> wrote: > >> On Mar 18, 7:38 am,
(Citizen
Bob) wrote: >> > I have a Ph.D. in Physics from a top American
university
and over a >> > dozen articles of original research in quantum
mechanics,
both >> > theoretical and experimental, in mainstream refereed
physics
journals >> > like Physical Review, Review of Scientific Instruments,
Physics >> > Letters, etc. plus abstracts in the Bulletin of the
American
Physical >> > Society for presentations at APS meetings. >> >> Why do
these anonymous fossil fool fuckheads >> always claim such inflated
curriculum vitae? > > Why is people like Roger Coppock unable to wash
his
mouth thoroughly > with soap and produce a civilized argument against
those he disagrees > with?
Why ***ARE*** hypocrites such as "Peter B. P." unaware of the
correct use
of English when complaining of its use by others?
http://www.edufind.com/english/grammar/
What does soap have to do with civility and why should debate comply
with
your prudish notions of diplomacy, *****?
The irony is strong with this one.
-- regards , Peter B. P. http://titancity.com/blog ,
http://macplanet.dk
Yes, it is rather ironic that you whine so hypocritically and add
nothing of value save flames to the discussion. Oh, and shove your
regards up your arse; you know, I know and the world knows you don't
mean them, you fuckin' sanctimonious
*****.
*plonk*
Thank you, and goodbye.
PS: Please dispose of your rotten carcass on the manure heap, where it belongs.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Androcles" |
|
| Title: Re: There is no global temperature! -- Haven't heard this lie in two years. |
25 Mar 2007 04:17:42 PM |
|
|
"QuantumDot" <dot@ohnoyoudont.co.za> wrote in message =
news:200703252224567987-dot@ohnoyoudontcoza...
On 2007-03-25 22:04:16 +0200, "Androcles"=20
<Engineer@hogwarts.physics.co.uk> said:
=20
=20
"Peter B. P." <peter@DIESPAMMERSCUM.dk> wrote in message =20
news:1hvjuad.12x57nlo061j4N%peter@DIESPAMMERSCUM.dk...
Androcles <Engineer@hogwarts.physics.co.uk> wrote:
=20
"Peter B. P." <peter@DIESPAMMERDIE.dk> wrote in message
news:1hvgvy0.1d77m4m1in5n8qN%peter@DIESPAMMERDIE.dk... > Roger
Coppock
<rcoppock@adnc.com> wrote: > >> On Mar 18, 7:38 am,
(Citizen
Bob) wrote: >> > I have a Ph.D. in Physics from a top American
university
and over a >> > dozen articles of original research in quantum
mechanics,
both >> > theoretical and experimental, in mainstream refereed
physics
journals >> > like Physical Review, Review of Scientific =
Instruments,
Physics >> > Letters, etc. plus abstracts in the Bulletin of the
American
Physical >> > Society for presentations at APS meetings. >> >> Why =
do
these anonymous fossil fool fuckheads >> always claim such inflated
curriculum vitae? > > Why is people like Roger Coppock unable to =
wash
his
mouth thoroughly > with soap and produce a civilized argument =
against
those he disagrees > with?
=20
=20
Why ***ARE*** hypocrites such as "Peter B. P." unaware of the
correct use
of English when complaining of its use by others?
http://www.edufind.com/english/grammar/
=20
What does soap have to do with civility and why should debate =
comply
with
your prudish notions of diplomacy, *****?
=20
The irony is strong with this one.
=20
-- regards , Peter B. P. http://titancity.com/blog ,
http://macplanet.dk
=20
Yes, it is rather ironic that you whine so hypocritically and add =20
nothing of value save flames to the discussion. Oh, and shove your=20
regards up your arse; you know, I know and the world knows you don't=20
mean them, you fuckin' sanctimonious
*****.
*plonk*
=20
Thank you, and goodbye.
=20
PS: Please dispose of your rotten carcass on the manure heap, where it =
belongs.
Thank you and go ***** in the sink.
PS: Please shut the ***** up, nymshifting useless fuckhead.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: .. |
25 Mar 2007 05:28:37 PM |
|
|
...
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Its Sparky" |
|
| Title: . |
24 Mar 2007 12:57:18 AM |
|
|
..
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
