"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote
in message news:fS0Kg.53642$gZ1.788591@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
|
| "Barry" <sasalobo@squaw.ca> wrote in message
news:O10Kg.1608$352.0@newsfe20.lga...
| > Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
| >
| >> "Barry" wrote
| >
| > If you don't know how to answer, that's fine.
| >
| > The ideas are not very complex, but if you can't debate them that's
fine.
|
| So you're looking for a debate then?
|
| >
| > I'm a very understanding person.
|
| Oh yes, we've seen that process of understanding in action :-)
|
| >
| > And if you don't think I understand what I write, and yet can't identify
an error, "not even wrong" is a safe phrase.
|
| I'd say you're 'not even "not even wrong"'.
|
| >
| > You don't have to defend it's use, because the phrase itself is "not
even wrong".
| >
| > If you had thought it up yourself, I would have been impressed.
|
| I think you're only capable of being impressed by what you
| are about to flush.
|
| >
| > But you didn't, it was just knee jerk wasn't it.
| >
| > Or, more accurately, "finger-on-the-keyboard-jerk".
| >
| >
| > Barry
|
| Surely you must be related to Mingst.
|
1) What is this?
2) Some kind of quote of some post?
Clarification:
Something you want us to believe you invented?
Something you found somewhere?
Something you want to tell us?
Something you want to tell us something about?
Something you forgot to delete when you started?
3) An introduction to the ***** you produce later on?
4) ***** that you expect someone will bother reading?
Clarification:
The '*****' in question 4 is a reprise of the '*****' in
question 3. This is what we call a 'style figure'.
Didn't they teach you to write English in Belgium?
How old are you?
Androcles
.
|
