"Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@deletethishia.no> wrote in message
news:cuvg0q$2oh$1@dolly.uninett.no...
Sue... wrote:
Answering a question about what is impossible sounds like an
invitation
to prove a negative condition so I think I'll pass.
The whole notion of "time dilation" is based on a metaphysical
interpretation of how a hypothetical light-clock would behave moving
through a hypothetical ether which could blow the bouncing beam onto
a
longer diagonal course.
The common view synchronization technique is just one of many
examples
that show the interpretation leads to illogical or causality
violating
conditions.
Sue...
So whenever real clocks prove that they may measure different
elapsed time between the same two events, your claim is
that the clocks are broken?
No, the relativists reading the clocks are broken. Well, psychotic,
anyway,
and there may well be a broken clock or two.
So all the clocks in Hafele & Keating, Alley, Vessot, GPS,
and a number of other experiments were broken?
No, Hafele & Keating, Alley, Vessot, GPS,
and a number of other experimenters are broken.
All relativists are broken, or they wouldn't be relativists.
Being psychotic, you don't know you are broken, Paul.
Poe amd McCullough are psychotic and Schwartz is psychopathic, along
with boortel.
Can you explain why broken clocks invariably confirm
the predictions of GR?
Becasue they are broken, of course.
Coincidence?
Nah. It's quite deliberate.
All clocks are part of The Great Conspiracy?
A cult isn't a conspiracy, Paul. Actually the relativists are vying with
each
other for acclaim. You don't imagine it is them against us, do you?
Hmm... perhaps you do...
Androcles
Paul
.
|
