| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
30 Mar 2006 06:39:10 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
SHERMLOCK SHOMES! wrote:
SHERMLOCK SHOMES! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv> wrote in message
<442c7105$0$9579$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>...
Me? Insane? You're on the right track.
No, you're working for or are a behavioral scientist, studying those
with "psi" abilities, or some unique skill, and doing so in an
inhumane, barbaric manner.
Who the ***** are you to destroy anyone's life, game any child's life?
This is simply reprehensible.
It's an evil beyond comprehension, and if you're not a sociopathic, you
are in serious denial.
Do you go home at night, Jerry, to your wife and kids, knowing no one
is going to break apart your marriage or read post hypnotic suggestions
to your kid while she is sleeping, simply because you have the luck to
have a phd from Harvard, or Princeton.
How to you justify these experiments in behavioral science?
Is it classism?
A marine from West Virginia has less value than a Harvard phd from
Swampscott?
And that's why I lose my family, marine, and your kid gets cancer,
induced by a biology doctorate from Harvard, say, to study the
medicinal effects of an experimental therapy on your kid and the
behavioral effects on your wife and other child, on behalf of some
nameless entity in the US government, who couldn't care less about the
Harvard guys work, but who needs to allocate a certain amount from his
budget, to maintain funding from Congress.
We have less value than a PHD from Harvard, you being from west
virginia and me being blue collar and not finishing college, or
achieving something brilliant, like inducing luekemia on a three year
old to study the behavioral efects of cancer on a "typical" marine corp
family.
Seriously.
And this is it, that's the only reason I'm being gamed adn you're not
-- education and social staus.
You extend professional courtesy to your friends, you won't game a
colleagues kid, will you Hunter?
You broke my marriage apart, you game my kids, you have your little
cockslappers read post hypnotic suggestions to my kids, how do you, or
Frank, or Hunter, justify this?
Really.
Answer, please, behavioral scientists, tell me how you justify it.
The American marine wants to know, too.
.
|
|
| User: "platopes" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
31 Mar 2006 03:21:27 AM |
|
|
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
| Everyone who has tried it has ended up getting blamed for all my posts and
| has never been seen on usenet again.
No one has ever been "seen" on usenet. We've all heard a lot from you
though. Heck, even you have -
http://groups.google.ca/group/sci.physics/msg/52253e024f2be810
Feel free to start talking to yourself again.
p
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kadaitcha Man" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
31 Mar 2006 03:26:32 AM |
|
|
platopes <platopes@yahoo.com>, the geriatric vagabond and tinpot
call-boy who likes untamed copulation with vultures, and whose partner
is a bit of mutton with an unnatural puter, wrote in
<1143796887.864101.236650@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Everyone who has tried it has ended up getting blamed for all my
posts and has never been seen on usenet again.
No one has ever been "seen" on usenet.
Metaphor's not your strong suit, eh.
We've all heard a lot from you
Nobody has ever been "heard" on usenet.
though. Heck, even you have -
http://groups.google.ca/group/sci.physics/msg/52253e024f2be810
Feel free to start talking to yourself again.
p
--
http://xp-crack.kadaitcha.cx
.
|
|
|
| User: "platopes" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
31 Mar 2006 11:42:58 AM |
|
|
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
platopes <platopes@yahoo.com>
| We've all heard a lot from you
| Nobody has ever been "heard" on usenet.
Metaphor's not your strong suit then ,eh?
p
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kadaitcha Man" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
31 Mar 2006 06:25:10 PM |
|
|
platopes <platopes@yahoo.com>, the enfeebled floater and yeasty meat
manager who likes hellish poundcake scoffing with monkeys, and whose
partner is a grass-back with a dreadful welly-boot top, wrote in
<1143826977.964367.55090@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
platopes <platopes@yahoo.com>
We've all heard a lot from you
Nobody has ever been "heard" on usenet.
Metaphor's not your strong suit then ,eh?
And you are yet another in a long line of fuckwits who wouldn't know
incongruity if it ripped your head of and shat down your neck.
Here, ponder this for an eternity...
*plonk*
--
http://xp-crack.kadaitcha.cx
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cabbagitcha Man pwned" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
01 Apr 2006 11:42:36 AM |
|
|
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
platopes <platopes@yahoo.com>, the enfeebled floater and yeasty meat
manager who likes hellish poundcake scoffing with monkeys, and whose
partner is a grass-back with a dreadful welly-boot top, wrote in
<1143826977.964367.55090@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
platopes <platopes@yahoo.com>
We've all heard a lot from you
Nobody has ever been "heard" on usenet.
Metaphor's not your strong suit then ,eh?
And you are yet another in a long line of fuckwits who wouldn't know
incongruity if it ripped your head of and shat down your neck.
Here, ponder this for an eternity...
*plonk*
*plank*
--
Roberta "Foxymopjockeychickenwrist" Wolfe
"The talk of the sekret AUK
off-newsgroup listserves!"
<insert pied piper song here>
Abraham Lincoln was a bonehead
he shouldla turned around
and punched John Wilkes Booth
in the eye.
But I guess he preferred
to watcha stupid ***** play
with some guy dressed up as a tree
in it.
How the hell did he win the civil war
and build a log cabin
with his bare hands
(as the legend says)?
He didn't even have the instinct
to know he was about to get shot from behind:
I hope the next president won't be enshrined
he's got two eyes in the back of his head instead of
two holes... [realer - by Feller Quentin and "the latter"]
Hi! I'm the .sig virus that will destroy Usenet. Please add me to your sig.
- END USENET NOW http://www.bedoper.com/usenet
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cabbagitcha Man pwned" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
03 Apr 2006 02:39:07 PM |
|
|
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
platopes <platopes@yahoo.com>, the enfeebled floater and yeasty meat
manager who likes hellish poundcake scoffing with monkeys, and whose
partner is a grass-back with a dreadful welly-boot top, wrote in
<1143826977.964367.55090@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
platopes <platopes@yahoo.com>
We've all heard a lot from you
Nobody has ever been "heard" on usenet.
Metaphor's not your strong suit then ,eh?
And you are yet another in a long line of fuckwits who wouldn't know
incongruity if it ripped your head of and shat down your neck.
Here, ponder this for an eternity...
*plonk*
Wasn't "femme" enough for you?
--
Roberta "Foxymopjockeychickenwrist" Wolfe
"The talk of the sekret AUK
off-newsgroup listserves!"
<insert pied piper song here>
Abraham Lincoln was a bonehead
he shouldla turned around
and punched John Wilkes Booth
in the eye.
But I guess he preferred
to watcha stupid ***** play
with some guy dressed up as a tree
in it.
How the hell did he win the civil war
and build a log cabin
with his bare hands
(as the legend says)?
He didn't even have the instinct
to know he was about to get shot from behind:
I hope the next president won't be enshrined
he's got two eyes in the back of his head instead of
two holes... [realer - by Feller Quentin and "the latter"]
Hi! I'm the .sig virus that will destroy Usenet. Please add me to your sig.
- END USENET NOW http://www.bedoper.com/usenet
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kadaitcha Man" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
03 Apr 2006 05:30:18 PM |
|
|
Cabbagitcha Man (pwned) <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the sloppy floater and
blunt ki-ki who likes vicious hose humping with quails, and whose
partner is a bint with an ample ham sandwich, wrote in
<44316c36$0$28336$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
platopes <platopes@yahoo.com>, the enfeebled floater and yeasty meat
manager who likes hellish poundcake scoffing with monkeys, and whose
partner is a grass-back with a dreadful welly-boot top, wrote in
<1143826977.964367.55090@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
platopes <platopes@yahoo.com>
We've all heard a lot from you
Nobody has ever been "heard" on usenet.
Metaphor's not your strong suit then ,eh?
And you are yet another in a long line of fuckwits who wouldn't know
incongruity if it ripped your head of and shat down your neck.
Here, ponder this for an eternity...
*plonk*
Wasn't "femme" enough for you?
Can you be any more obtuse than you already are?
--
http://xp-crack.kadaitcha.cx
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cabbagitcha Man pwned" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
03 Apr 2006 10:33:00 PM |
|
|
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Cabbagitcha Man (pwned) <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the sloppy floater and
blunt ki-ki who likes vicious hose humping with quails, and whose
partner is a bint with an ample ham sandwich, wrote in
<44316c36$0$28336$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
platopes <platopes@yahoo.com>, the enfeebled floater and yeasty meat
manager who likes hellish poundcake scoffing with monkeys, and whose
partner is a grass-back with a dreadful welly-boot top, wrote in
<1143826977.964367.55090@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
platopes <platopes@yahoo.com>
We've all heard a lot from you
Nobody has ever been "heard" on usenet.
Metaphor's not your strong suit then ,eh?
And you are yet another in a long line of fuckwits who wouldn't know
incongruity if it ripped your head of and shat down your neck.
Here, ponder this for an eternity...
*plonk*
Wasn't "femme" enough for you?
Can you be any more obtuse than you already are?
You mustn't have visited my OKCupid dating profile, yet like the rest of AUK.
:]
So no, I'm not obtuse, you just need the right person to explain it to you.
they'll chime in eventually.
--
Roberta "Foxymopjockeychickenwrist" Wolfe
"The talk of the sekret AUK
off-newsgroup listserves!"
<insert pied piper song here>
Abraham Lincoln was a bonehead
he shouldla turned around
and punched John Wilkes Booth
in the eye.
But I guess he preferred
to watcha stupid ***** play
with some guy dressed up as a tree
in it.
How the hell did he win the civil war
and build a log cabin
with his bare hands
(as the legend says)?
He didn't even have the instinct
to know he was about to get shot from behind:
I hope the next president won't be enshrined
he's got two eyes in the back of his head instead of
two holes... [realer - by Feller Quentin and "the latter"]
Hi! I'm the .sig virus that will destroy Usenet. Please add me to your sig.
- END USENET NOW http://www.bedoper.com/usenet
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kadaitcha Man" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
03 Apr 2006 11:01:41 PM |
|
|
X-Yes-Archive: No Cabbagitcha Man (pwned) <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the
slouching down-and-out and trilling hock who likes hard-hitting munchkin
punchin' with reptiles, and whose partner is a scarlet-lady with a damp
bajingo, wrote in <4431db47$0$28446$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Cabbagitcha Man (pwned) <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the sloppy floater
and blunt ki-ki who likes vicious hose humping with quails, and whose
partner is a bint with an ample ham sandwich, wrote in
<44316c36$0$28336$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
platopes <platopes@yahoo.com>, the enfeebled floater and yeasty
meat manager who likes hellish poundcake scoffing with monkeys,
and whose partner is a grass-back with a dreadful welly-boot top,
wrote in <1143826977.964367.55090@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
platopes <platopes@yahoo.com>
We've all heard a lot from you
Nobody has ever been "heard" on usenet.
Metaphor's not your strong suit then ,eh?
And you are yet another in a long line of fuckwits who wouldn't
know incongruity if it ripped your head of and shat down your neck.
Here, ponder this for an eternity...
*plonk*
Wasn't "femme" enough for you?
Can you be any more obtuse than you already are?
You mustn't have visited my OKCupid dating profile, yet like the rest
of AUK. :]
As if I cared, right? And as if anything would change an already low opinion
of you?
So no, I'm not obtuse, you just need the right person to explain it
to you. they'll chime in eventually.
You are obtuse. You made the reference that needed explaining, not anyone
else.
--
http://xp-crack.kadaitcha.cx
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "platopes" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
31 Mar 2006 09:04:03 PM |
|
|
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
platopes <platopes@yahoo.com>, the enfeebled floater and yeasty meat
manager who likes hellish poundcake scoffing with monkeys, and whose
partner is a grass-back with a dreadful welly-boot top, wrote in
<1143826977.964367.55090@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
platopes <platopes@yahoo.com>
We've all heard a lot from you
Nobody has ever been "heard" on usenet.
Metaphor's not your strong suit then ,eh?
And you are yet another in a long line of fuckwits who wouldn't know
incongruity if it ripped your head of and shat down your neck.
I don't have a head of and.
Here, ponder this for an eternity...
*plonk*
Indeed.
p
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cabbagitcha Man pwned" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
01 Apr 2006 11:47:24 AM |
|
|
platopes wrote:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
platopes <platopes@yahoo.com>, the enfeebled floater and yeasty meat
manager who likes hellish poundcake scoffing with monkeys, and whose
partner is a grass-back with a dreadful welly-boot top, wrote in
<1143826977.964367.55090@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
platopes <platopes@yahoo.com>
We've all heard a lot from you
Nobody has ever been "heard" on usenet.
Metaphor's not your strong suit then ,eh?
And you are yet another in a long line of fuckwits who wouldn't know
incongruity if it ripped your head of and shat down your neck.
I don't have a head of and.
Here, ponder this for an eternity...
*plonk*
Indeed.
p
oh, no! are you going to be ok? :-/
--
Roberta "Foxymopjockeychickenwrist" Wolfe
"The talk of the sekret AUK
off-newsgroup listserves!"
<insert pied piper song here>
Abraham Lincoln was a bonehead
he shouldla turned around
and punched John Wilkes Booth
in the eye.
But I guess he preferred
to watcha stupid ***** play
with some guy dressed up as a tree
in it.
How the hell did he win the civil war
and build a log cabin
with his bare hands
(as the legend says)?
He didn't even have the instinct
to know he was about to get shot from behind:
I hope the next president won't be enshrined
he's got two eyes in the back of his head instead of
two holes... [realer - by Feller Quentin and "the latter"]
Hi! I'm the .sig virus that will destroy Usenet. Please add me to your sig.
- END USENET NOW http://www.bedoper.com/usenet
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ!" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
31 Mar 2006 06:00:59 AM |
|
|
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
platopes <platopes@yahoo.com>, the geriatric vagabond and tinpot
call-boy who likes untamed copulation with vultures, and whose partner
is a bit of mutton with an unnatural puter, wrote in
<1143796887.864101.236650@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Everyone who has tried it has ended up getting blamed for all my
posts and has never been seen on usenet again.
No one has ever been "seen" on usenet.
Metaphor's not your strong suit, eh.
We've all heard a lot from you
Nobody has ever been "heard" on usenet.
well then, metaphors aren't your strong suit. perhaps this could be solved if
you cried about it much in the same way that a baby would.
though. Heck, even you have -
http://groups.google.ca/group/sci.physics/msg/52253e024f2be810
--
Roberta "Foxymopjockeychickenwrist" Wolfe
"The talk of the sekret AUK
off-newsgroup listserves!"
<insert pied piper song here>
Hi! I'm the .sig virus that will destroy Usenet. Please add me to your sig.
- END USENET NOW http://www.bedoper.com/usenet
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kadaitcha Man" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
31 Mar 2006 06:07:03 AM |
|
|
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the *****-stained
gypsy and vomit-inducing cross-dresser who likes vicious cajun-clown
fucking with sharks, and whose partner is a willing-bit with a messy
smackey, wrote in <442d1b09$0$19435$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
platopes <platopes@yahoo.com>, the geriatric vagabond and tinpot
call-boy who likes untamed copulation with vultures, and whose
partner
is a bit of mutton with an unnatural puter, wrote in
<1143796887.864101.236650@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Everyone who has tried it has ended up getting blamed for all my
posts and has never been seen on usenet again.
No one has ever been "seen" on usenet.
Metaphor's not your strong suit, eh.
We've all heard a lot from you
Nobody has ever been "heard" on usenet.
well then, metaphors aren't your strong suit.
Discerning incongruity obviously isn't yours.
perhaps this could be solved if you cried about it much in
the same way that a baby would.
You shouldn't be so sensitive about your tenuous hold on your job at the
University of Pittsburgh. You may not have it much longer.
--
http://xp-crack.kadaitcha.cx
.
|
|
|
| User: "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ!" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
31 Mar 2006 06:16:04 AM |
|
|
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the *****-stained
gypsy and vomit-inducing cross-dresser who likes vicious cajun-clown
fucking with sharks, and whose partner is a willing-bit with a messy
smackey, wrote in <442d1b09$0$19435$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
platopes <platopes@yahoo.com>, the geriatric vagabond and tinpot
call-boy who likes untamed copulation with vultures, and whose
partner
is a bit of mutton with an unnatural puter, wrote in
<1143796887.864101.236650@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Everyone who has tried it has ended up getting blamed for all my
posts and has never been seen on usenet again.
No one has ever been "seen" on usenet.
Metaphor's not your strong suit, eh.
We've all heard a lot from you
Nobody has ever been "heard" on usenet.
well then, metaphors aren't your strong suit.
Discerning incongruity obviously isn't yours.
perhaps this could be solved if you cried about it much in
the same way that a baby would.
You shouldn't be so sensitive about your tenuous hold on your job at the
University of Pittsburgh. You may not have it much longer.
yeah yeah yeah...
got those envelopes all labeled, do you?
--
Roberta "Foxymopjockeychickenwrist" Wolfe
"The talk of the sekret AUK
off-newsgroup listserves!"
<insert pied piper song here>
Hi! I'm the .sig virus that will destroy Usenet. Please add me to your sig.
- END USENET NOW http://www.bedoper.com/usenet
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kadaitcha Man" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
31 Mar 2006 06:40:18 AM |
|
|
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the mature cadger
and supple sea-fairy who likes fierce rude bits rubbing with bacteria,
and whose partner is a jizz-babe with an untidy fuzzy taco, wrote in
<442d1e92$0$22853$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the *****-stained
gypsy and vomit-inducing cross-dresser who likes vicious cajun-clown
fucking with sharks, and whose partner is a willing-bit with a messy
smackey, wrote in <442d1b09$0$19435$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
platopes <platopes@yahoo.com>, the geriatric vagabond and tinpot
call-boy who likes untamed copulation with vultures, and whose
partner
is a bit of mutton with an unnatural puter, wrote in
<1143796887.864101.236650@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Everyone who has tried it has ended up getting blamed for all my
posts and has never been seen on usenet again.
No one has ever been "seen" on usenet.
Metaphor's not your strong suit, eh.
We've all heard a lot from you
Nobody has ever been "heard" on usenet.
well then, metaphors aren't your strong suit.
Discerning incongruity obviously isn't yours.
perhaps this could be solved if you cried about it much in
the same way that a baby would.
You shouldn't be so sensitive about your tenuous hold on your job at
the University of Pittsburgh. You may not have it much longer.
yeah yeah yeah...
got those envelopes all labeled, do you?
Say, that reminds me...
In news:442cb8fc$0$32073$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com, you wrote:
best case is i get to laugh at your pathetic attempt, reading each of
your emails as they pour in from my friends.
Is unauthorised mail interception legal in the US?
According to United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit (No.
03-1383) it isn't.
"Evidence in Criminal Investigations" § IV(d) (2002) ("Since its
enactment in 1968 and amendment in 1986, [the Wiretap Act] has
provided the statutory framework that governs real-time electronic
surveillance of the contents of communications.")"
"The parties stipulated to the following facts relevant to
the transfer of electronic messages by the Interloc systems. An email
message, which is composed using an e-mail program, is
transferred from one computer to another on its way to its final
destination, the addressee. Building on the principle of store and
forward, the message is handed to a Message Transfer Agent ("MTA")
which stores the message locally. The message is routed through
the network from one MTA to another until it reaches the
recipient's mail server, which accepts it and stores it in a
location accessible to the recipient. Once the e-mail is
accessible to the recipient, final delivery has been completed...
According to the Indictment, on or about January 1998, defendant
directed Interloc employees to... intercept and copy all incoming
communications from Amazon.com... The Interloc systems administrator
wrote a revision to the mail processing code... designed to intercept,
copy, and store, all incoming messages from Amazon.com before they
were delivered to the members' e-mail, and therefore, before
the e-mail was read by the intended recipient. Defendant was charged
with using the procmail to intercept... messages."
And if more than one of you is involved, is the mail fraud then a
wider conspiracy?
--
http://xp-crack.kadaitcha.cx
.
|
|
|
| User: "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ!" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
31 Mar 2006 07:29:32 AM |
|
|
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the mature cadger
and supple sea-fairy who likes fierce rude bits rubbing with bacteria,
and whose partner is a jizz-babe with an untidy fuzzy taco, wrote in
<442d1e92$0$22853$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the *****-stained
gypsy and vomit-inducing cross-dresser who likes vicious cajun-clown
fucking with sharks, and whose partner is a willing-bit with a messy
smackey, wrote in <442d1b09$0$19435$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
platopes <platopes@yahoo.com>, the geriatric vagabond and tinpot
call-boy who likes untamed copulation with vultures, and whose
partner
is a bit of mutton with an unnatural puter, wrote in
<1143796887.864101.236650@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Everyone who has tried it has ended up getting blamed for all my
posts and has never been seen on usenet again.
No one has ever been "seen" on usenet.
Metaphor's not your strong suit, eh.
We've all heard a lot from you
Nobody has ever been "heard" on usenet.
well then, metaphors aren't your strong suit.
Discerning incongruity obviously isn't yours.
perhaps this could be solved if you cried about it much in
the same way that a baby would.
You shouldn't be so sensitive about your tenuous hold on your job at
the University of Pittsburgh. You may not have it much longer.
yeah yeah yeah...
got those envelopes all labeled, do you?
Say, that reminds me...
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%22news-abuse%40zig-zag.net%22
reminds me too. reminds me that you clearly don't have a grasp on how obvious
it is that you have a "loose screw" regardless of whether you /think/ running
around playing this "escalating to real life" game of yours is appropriate
behaviour or not.
--
Roberta "Foxymopjockeychickenwrist" Wolfe
"The talk of the sekret AUK
off-newsgroup listserves!"
<insert pied piper song here>
Hi! I'm the .sig virus that will destroy Usenet. Please add me to your sig.
- END USENET NOW http://www.bedoper.com/usenet
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kadaitcha Man" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
31 Mar 2006 07:50:08 AM |
|
|
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the pudgy hobo and
toad-spotted mollycot who likes merciless anal brutality with jellyfish,
and whose partner is a bag-bride with a hideous ***** tub, wrote in
<442d2fcb$0$11950$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the mature cadger
and supple sea-fairy who likes fierce rude bits rubbing with
bacteria,
and whose partner is a jizz-babe with an untidy fuzzy taco, wrote in
<442d1e92$0$22853$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the
*****-stained gypsy and vomit-inducing cross-dresser who likes
vicious cajun-clown fucking with sharks, and whose partner is a
willing-bit with a messy smackey, wrote in
<442d1b09$0$19435$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
platopes <platopes@yahoo.com>, the geriatric vagabond and tinpot
call-boy who likes untamed copulation with vultures, and whose
partner
is a bit of mutton with an unnatural puter, wrote in
<1143796887.864101.236650@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Everyone who has tried it has ended up getting blamed for all
my posts and has never been seen on usenet again.
No one has ever been "seen" on usenet.
Metaphor's not your strong suit, eh.
We've all heard a lot from you
Nobody has ever been "heard" on usenet.
well then, metaphors aren't your strong suit.
Discerning incongruity obviously isn't yours.
perhaps this could be solved if you cried about it much in
the same way that a baby would.
You shouldn't be so sensitive about your tenuous hold on your job
at the University of Pittsburgh. You may not have it much longer.
yeah yeah yeah...
got those envelopes all labeled, do you?
Say, that reminds me...
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%22news-abuse%40zig-zag.net%22
reminds me too. reminds me that you clearly don't have a grasp on
how obvious it is that you have a "loose screw" regardless of
? whether you /think/ running around playing this "escalating to
real life" game of yours is appropriate behaviour or not.
And there you go yet again, trying to blame the other guy for your own
culpability. You utterly sad *****. You even replied to same message twice, a
whole quarter of an hour or more apart. That smacks of not just compulsion
and obsession, but also of fear.
You fucked up big time, flapping your fat lips about. It's your problem
entirely that someone now chooses to pull your bottom lip over your head and
kick you fair in the balls.
Hi! I'm the .sig virus that will destroy Usenet. Please add me to
your sig. - END USENET NOW http://www.bedoper.com/usenet
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from
http://www.SecureIX.com ***
--
http://xp-crack.kadaitcha.cx
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cabbagitcha Man pwned" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
03 Apr 2006 02:44:52 PM |
|
|
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the pudgy hobo and
toad-spotted mollycot who likes merciless anal brutality with jellyfish,
and whose partner is a bag-bride with a hideous ***** tub, wrote in
<442d2fcb$0$11950$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the mature cadger
and supple sea-fairy who likes fierce rude bits rubbing with
bacteria,
and whose partner is a jizz-babe with an untidy fuzzy taco, wrote in
<442d1e92$0$22853$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the
*****-stained gypsy and vomit-inducing cross-dresser who likes
vicious cajun-clown fucking with sharks, and whose partner is a
willing-bit with a messy smackey, wrote in
<442d1b09$0$19435$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
platopes <platopes@yahoo.com>, the geriatric vagabond and tinpot
call-boy who likes untamed copulation with vultures, and whose
partner
is a bit of mutton with an unnatural puter, wrote in
<1143796887.864101.236650@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Everyone who has tried it has ended up getting blamed for all
my posts and has never been seen on usenet again.
No one has ever been "seen" on usenet.
Metaphor's not your strong suit, eh.
We've all heard a lot from you
Nobody has ever been "heard" on usenet.
well then, metaphors aren't your strong suit.
Discerning incongruity obviously isn't yours.
perhaps this could be solved if you cried about it much in
the same way that a baby would.
You shouldn't be so sensitive about your tenuous hold on your job
at the University of Pittsburgh. You may not have it much longer.
yeah yeah yeah...
got those envelopes all labeled, do you?
Say, that reminds me...
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%22news-abuse%40zig-zag.net%22
reminds me too. reminds me that you clearly don't have a grasp on
how obvious it is that you have a "loose screw" regardless of
? whether you /think/ running around playing this "escalating to
real life" game of yours is appropriate behaviour or not.
And there you go yet again, trying to blame the other guy for your own
culpability.
I'm not blaming you for anything i may have done. that would be stupid. i
was pointing out kooky ***** that you do that just happens to be archived.
You utterly sad *****. You even replied to same message twice, a
whole quarter of an hour or more apart. That smacks of not just compulsion
and obsession, but also of fear.
I'm sorry, but the fact that you're counting the minutes until i respond to
your posts and hypocritically wailing about "compulstion and obsession" has
me figuratively ROTFLMAO...
You fucked up big time, flapping your fat lips about. It's your problem
entirely that someone now chooses to pull your bottom lip over your head and
kick you fair in the balls.
you are very vengeful. from where does this uncontrollable anger of yours
arise?
--
Roberta "Foxymopjockeychickenwrist" Wolfe
"The talk of the sekret AUK
off-newsgroup listserves!"
<insert pied piper song here>
Abraham Lincoln was a bonehead
he shouldla turned around
and punched John Wilkes Booth
in the eye.
But I guess he preferred
to watcha stupid ***** play
with some guy dressed up as a tree
in it.
How the hell did he win the civil war
and build a log cabin
with his bare hands
(as the legend says)?
He didn't even have the instinct
to know he was about to get shot from behind:
I hope the next president won't be enshrined
he's got two eyes in the back of his head instead of
two holes... [realer - by Feller Quentin and "the latter"]
Hi! I'm the .sig virus that will destroy Usenet. Please add me to your sig.
- END USENET NOW http://www.bedoper.com/usenet
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kadaitcha Man" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
03 Apr 2006 05:28:57 PM |
|
|
Cabbagitcha Man (pwned) <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the paunchy street bum
and yapping arse-goblin who likes lewd bone honing with green turtles,
and whose partner is a meandering mamma with a quivering pink petaled
posie, wrote in <44316d90$0$28487$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the pudgy hobo
and toad-spotted mollycot who likes merciless anal brutality with
jellyfish, and whose partner is a bag-bride with a hideous ***** tub,
wrote in <442d2fcb$0$11950$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the mature
cadger and supple sea-fairy who likes fierce rude bits rubbing with
bacteria,
and whose partner is a jizz-babe with an untidy fuzzy taco, wrote
in <442d1e92$0$22853$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the
*****-stained gypsy and vomit-inducing cross-dresser who likes
vicious cajun-clown fucking with sharks, and whose partner is a
willing-bit with a messy smackey, wrote in
<442d1b09$0$19435$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
platopes <platopes@yahoo.com>, the geriatric vagabond and
tinpot call-boy who likes untamed copulation with vultures,
and whose partner
is a bit of mutton with an unnatural puter, wrote in
<1143796887.864101.236650@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Everyone who has tried it has ended up getting blamed for
all my posts and has never been seen on usenet again.
No one has ever been "seen" on usenet.
Metaphor's not your strong suit, eh.
We've all heard a lot from you
Nobody has ever been "heard" on usenet.
well then, metaphors aren't your strong suit.
Discerning incongruity obviously isn't yours.
perhaps this could be solved if you cried about it much in
the same way that a baby would.
You shouldn't be so sensitive about your tenuous hold on your job
at the University of Pittsburgh. You may not have it much longer.
yeah yeah yeah...
got those envelopes all labeled, do you?
Say, that reminds me...
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%22news-abuse%40zig-zag.net%22
reminds me too. reminds me that you clearly don't have a grasp on
how obvious it is that you have a "loose screw" regardless of
? whether you /think/ running around playing this "escalating to
real life" game of yours is appropriate behaviour or not.
And there you go yet again, trying to blame the other guy for your
own culpability.
I'm not blaming you for anything i may have done. that would be
stupid. i was pointing out kooky ***** that you do that just happens
to be archived.
What 'kooky *****' do you imagine it is that 'I do'?
You utterly sad *****. You even replied to same message twice, a
whole quarter of an hour or more apart. That smacks of not just
compulsion and obsession, but also of fear.
I'm sorry, but the fact that you're counting the minutes until i
respond to your posts and hypocritically wailing about "compulstion
and obsession"
Please provide evidence to support your claim that I am "counting the
minutes until [you] respond to [my] posts". Thanks.
has me figuratively ROTFLMAO...
So you're not really ROTFLYAO then, only pretending?
You fucked up big time, flapping your fat lips about. It's your
problem entirely that someone now chooses to pull your bottom lip
over your head and kick you fair in the balls.
you are very vengeful. from where does this uncontrollable anger of
yours arise?
You poor sod, you've scored another double whammy; you are American
therefore, by definition, metaphor is an alien concept to you, and you are
delusional.
Hi! I'm the .sig virus that will destroy Usenet. Please add me to
your sig. - END USENET NOW http://www.bedoper.com/usenet
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from
http://www.SecureIX.com ***
--
http://xp-crack.kadaitcha.cx
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ!" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
31 Mar 2006 07:12:37 AM |
|
|
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the mature cadger
and supple sea-fairy who likes fierce rude bits rubbing with bacteria,
and whose partner is a jizz-babe with an untidy fuzzy taco, wrote in
<442d1e92$0$22853$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the *****-stained
gypsy and vomit-inducing cross-dresser who likes vicious cajun-clown
fucking with sharks, and whose partner is a willing-bit with a messy
smackey, wrote in <442d1b09$0$19435$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
platopes <platopes@yahoo.com>, the geriatric vagabond and tinpot
call-boy who likes untamed copulation with vultures, and whose
partner
is a bit of mutton with an unnatural puter, wrote in
<1143796887.864101.236650@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Everyone who has tried it has ended up getting blamed for all my
posts and has never been seen on usenet again.
No one has ever been "seen" on usenet.
Metaphor's not your strong suit, eh.
We've all heard a lot from you
Nobody has ever been "heard" on usenet.
well then, metaphors aren't your strong suit.
Discerning incongruity obviously isn't yours.
perhaps this could be solved if you cried about it much in
the same way that a baby would.
You shouldn't be so sensitive about your tenuous hold on your job at
the University of Pittsburgh. You may not have it much longer.
yeah yeah yeah...
got those envelopes all labeled, do you?
Say, that reminds me...
In news:442cb8fc$0$32073$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com, you wrote:
best case is i get to laugh at your pathetic attempt, reading each of
your emails as they pour in from my friends.
Is unauthorised mail interception legal in the US?
According to United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit (No.
03-1383) it isn't.
"Evidence in Criminal Investigations" IV(d) (2002) ("Since its
enactment in 1968 and amendment in 1986, [the Wiretap Act] has
provided the statutory framework that governs real-time electronic
surveillance of the contents of communications.")"
"The parties stipulated to the following facts relevant to
the transfer of electronic messages by the Interloc systems. An email
message, which is composed using an e-mail program, is
transferred from one computer to another on its way to its final
destination, the addressee. Building on the principle of store and
forward, the message is handed to a Message Transfer Agent ("MTA")
which stores the message locally. The message is routed through
the network from one MTA to another until it reaches the
recipient's mail server, which accepts it and stores it in a
location accessible to the recipient. Once the e-mail is
accessible to the recipient, final delivery has been completed...
According to the Indictment, on or about January 1998, defendant
directed Interloc employees to... intercept and copy all incoming
communications from Amazon.com... The Interloc systems administrator
wrote a revision to the mail processing code... designed to intercept,
copy, and store, all incoming messages from Amazon.com before they
were delivered to the members' e-mail, and therefore, before
the e-mail was read by the intended recipient. Defendant was charged
with using the procmail to intercept... messages."
And if more than one of you is involved, is the mail fraud then a
wider conspiracy?
so you *are* a looney toon!
alt.conspiracy.paranoid.retards added.
--
Roberta "Foxymopjockeychickenwrist" Wolfe
"The talk of the sekret AUK
off-newsgroup listserves!"
<insert pied piper song here>
Hi! I'm the .sig virus that will destroy Usenet. Please add me to your sig.
- END USENET NOW http://www.bedoper.com/usenet
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tommy" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
30 Jul 2006 04:56:16 AM |
|
|
"ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ!" <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv> wrote in message
news:442d2bd4$0$20689$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com...
: Kadaitcha Man wrote:
:
: > ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the mature
cadger
: > and supple sea-fairy who likes fierce rude bits rubbing with
bacteria,
: > and whose partner is a jizz-babe with an untidy fuzzy taco, wrote in
: > <442d1e92$0$22853$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
: >
: >> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
: >>
: >>> ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the
*****-stained
: >>> gypsy and vomit-inducing cross-dresser who likes vicious
cajun-clown
: >>> fucking with sharks, and whose partner is a willing-bit with a
messy
: >>> smackey, wrote in
<442d1b09$0$19435$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
: >>>
: >>>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
: >>>>
: >>>>> platopes <platopes@yahoo.com>, the geriatric vagabond and tinpot
: >>>>> call-boy who likes untamed copulation with vultures, and whose
: >>>>> partner
: >>>>> is a bit of mutton with an unnatural puter, wrote in
: >>>>> <1143796887.864101.236650@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>:
: >>>>>
: >>>>>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
: >>>>>>>
: >>>>>>>
: >>>>>>>> Everyone who has tried it has ended up getting blamed for all
my
: >>>>>>>> posts and has never been seen on usenet again.
: >>>>>>>
: >>>>>> No one has ever been "seen" on usenet.
: >>>>>
: >>>>> Metaphor's not your strong suit, eh.
: >>>>>
: >>>>>> We've all heard a lot from you
: >>>>>
: >>>>> Nobody has ever been "heard" on usenet.
: >>>>
: >>>> well then, metaphors aren't your strong suit.
: >>>
: >>> Discerning incongruity obviously isn't yours.
: >>>
: >>>> perhaps this could be solved if you cried about it much in
: >>>> the same way that a baby would.
: >>>
: >>> You shouldn't be so sensitive about your tenuous hold on your job
at
: >>> the University of Pittsburgh. You may not have it much longer.
: >>>
: >> yeah yeah yeah...
: >>
: >> got those envelopes all labeled, do you?
: >
: > Say, that reminds me...
: >
: > In news:442cb8fc$0$32073$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com, you wrote:
: >
: >> best case is i get to laugh at your pathetic attempt, reading each
of
: >> your emails as they pour in from my friends.
: >
: > Is unauthorised mail interception legal in the US?
: >
: > According to United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
(No.
: > 03-1383) it isn't.
: >
: > "Evidence in Criminal Investigations" IV(d) (2002) ("Since its
: > enactment in 1968 and amendment in 1986, [the Wiretap Act] has
: > provided the statutory framework that governs real-time electronic
: > surveillance of the contents of communications.")"
: >
: > "The parties stipulated to the following facts relevant to
: > the transfer of electronic messages by the Interloc systems. An
email
: > message, which is composed using an e-mail program, is
: > transferred from one computer to another on its way to its final
: > destination, the addressee. Building on the principle of store and
: > forward, the message is handed to a Message Transfer Agent ("MTA")
: > which stores the message locally. The message is routed through
: > the network from one MTA to another until it reaches the
: > recipient's mail server, which accepts it and stores it in a
: > location accessible to the recipient. Once the e-mail is
: > accessible to the recipient, final delivery has been completed...
: >
: > According to the Indictment, on or about January 1998, defendant
: > directed Interloc employees to... intercept and copy all incoming
: > communications from Amazon.com... The Interloc systems administrator
: > wrote a revision to the mail processing code... designed to
intercept,
: > copy, and store, all incoming messages from Amazon.com before they
: > were delivered to the members' e-mail, and therefore, before
: > the e-mail was read by the intended recipient. Defendant was charged
: > with using the procmail to intercept... messages."
: >
: > And if more than one of you is involved, is the mail fraud then a
: > wider conspiracy?
: >
:
: so you *are* a looney toon!
:
: alt.conspiracy.paranoid.retards added.
:
: --
: Roberta "Foxymopjockeychickenwrist" Wolfe
: "The talk of the sekret AUK
: off-newsgroup listserves!"
: <insert pied piper song here>
: > Hi! I'm the .sig virus that will destroy Usenet. Please add me to
your sig.
: > - END USENET NOW http://www.bedoper.com/usenet
: *** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
: *** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from
http://www.SecureIX.com ***
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kadaitcha Man" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
31 Mar 2006 07:38:21 AM |
|
|
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the gibbering
moocher and quailing joy boy who likes disgustful heel lifting with
bacteria, and whose partner is a fancy-girl with a defective meat
wallet, wrote in <442d2bd4$0$20689$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the mature cadger
and supple sea-fairy who likes fierce rude bits rubbing with
bacteria,
and whose partner is a jizz-babe with an untidy fuzzy taco, wrote in
<442d1e92$0$22853$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the
*****-stained gypsy and vomit-inducing cross-dresser who likes
vicious cajun-clown fucking with sharks, and whose partner is a
willing-bit with a messy smackey, wrote in
<442d1b09$0$19435$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
platopes <platopes@yahoo.com>, the geriatric vagabond and tinpot
call-boy who likes untamed copulation with vultures, and whose
partner
is a bit of mutton with an unnatural puter, wrote in
<1143796887.864101.236650@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Everyone who has tried it has ended up getting blamed for all
my posts and has never been seen on usenet again.
No one has ever been "seen" on usenet.
Metaphor's not your strong suit, eh.
We've all heard a lot from you
Nobody has ever been "heard" on usenet.
well then, metaphors aren't your strong suit.
Discerning incongruity obviously isn't yours.
perhaps this could be solved if you cried about it much in
the same way that a baby would.
You shouldn't be so sensitive about your tenuous hold on your job
at the University of Pittsburgh. You may not have it much longer.
yeah yeah yeah...
got those envelopes all labeled, do you?
Say, that reminds me...
In news:442cb8fc$0$32073$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com, you wrote:
best case is i get to laugh at your pathetic attempt, reading each
of your emails as they pour in from my friends.
Is unauthorised mail interception legal in the US?
According to United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
(No. 03-1383) it isn't.
"Evidence in Criminal Investigations" IV(d) (2002) ("Since its
enactment in 1968 and amendment in 1986, [the Wiretap Act] has
provided the statutory framework that governs real-time electronic
surveillance of the contents of communications.")"
"The parties stipulated to the following facts relevant to
the transfer of electronic messages by the Interloc systems. An email
message, which is composed using an e-mail program, is
transferred from one computer to another on its way to its final
destination, the addressee. Building on the principle of store and
forward, the message is handed to a Message Transfer Agent ("MTA")
which stores the message locally. The message is routed through
the network from one MTA to another until it reaches the
recipient's mail server, which accepts it and stores it in a
location accessible to the recipient. Once the e-mail is
accessible to the recipient, final delivery has been completed...
According to the Indictment, on or about January 1998, defendant
directed Interloc employees to... intercept and copy all incoming
communications from Amazon.com... The Interloc systems administrator
wrote a revision to the mail processing code... designed to
intercept, copy, and store, all incoming messages from Amazon.com
before they
were delivered to the members' e-mail, and therefore, before
the e-mail was read by the intended recipient. Defendant was charged
with using the procmail to intercept... messages."
And if more than one of you is involved, is the mail fraud then a
wider conspiracy?
so you *are* a looney toon!
alt.conspiracy.paranoid.retards added.
I asked two direct questiona. I'll dumb them down for you. Is it legal in
the US to intercept email in the manner that you indicated you would
intercept it?
Hi! I'm the .sig virus that will destroy Usenet. Please add me to
your sig. - END USENET NOW http://www.bedoper.com/usenet
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from
http://www.SecureIX.com ***
--
http://xp-crack.kadaitcha.cx
.
|
|
|
| User: "platopes" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
31 Mar 2006 12:29:04 PM |
|
|
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
| I asked two direct questiona. I'll dumb them down for you. Is it legal in
| the US to intercept email in the manner that you indicated you would
| intercept it?
You forgot to dumb down one of your questiona.
p
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ!" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
31 Mar 2006 07:42:52 AM |
|
|
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the gibbering
moocher and quailing joy boy who likes disgustful heel lifting with
bacteria, and whose partner is a fancy-girl with a defective meat
wallet, wrote in <442d2bd4$0$20689$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the mature cadger
and supple sea-fairy who likes fierce rude bits rubbing with
bacteria,
and whose partner is a jizz-babe with an untidy fuzzy taco, wrote in
<442d1e92$0$22853$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the
*****-stained gypsy and vomit-inducing cross-dresser who likes
vicious cajun-clown fucking with sharks, and whose partner is a
willing-bit with a messy smackey, wrote in
<442d1b09$0$19435$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
platopes <platopes@yahoo.com>, the geriatric vagabond and tinpot
call-boy who likes untamed copulation with vultures, and whose
partner
is a bit of mutton with an unnatural puter, wrote in
<1143796887.864101.236650@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Everyone who has tried it has ended up getting blamed for all
my posts and has never been seen on usenet again.
No one has ever been "seen" on usenet.
Metaphor's not your strong suit, eh.
We've all heard a lot from you
Nobody has ever been "heard" on usenet.
well then, metaphors aren't your strong suit.
Discerning incongruity obviously isn't yours.
perhaps this could be solved if you cried about it much in
the same way that a baby would.
You shouldn't be so sensitive about your tenuous hold on your job
at the University of Pittsburgh. You may not have it much longer.
yeah yeah yeah...
got those envelopes all labeled, do you?
Say, that reminds me...
In news:442cb8fc$0$32073$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com, you wrote:
best case is i get to laugh at your pathetic attempt, reading each
of your emails as they pour in from my friends.
Is unauthorised mail interception legal in the US?
According to United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
(No. 03-1383) it isn't.
"Evidence in Criminal Investigations" IV(d) (2002) ("Since its
enactment in 1968 and amendment in 1986, [the Wiretap Act] has
provided the statutory framework that governs real-time electronic
surveillance of the contents of communications.")"
"The parties stipulated to the following facts relevant to
the transfer of electronic messages by the Interloc systems. An email
message, which is composed using an e-mail program, is
transferred from one computer to another on its way to its final
destination, the addressee. Building on the principle of store and
forward, the message is handed to a Message Transfer Agent ("MTA")
which stores the message locally. The message is routed through
the network from one MTA to another until it reaches the
recipient's mail server, which accepts it and stores it in a
location accessible to the recipient. Once the e-mail is
accessible to the recipient, final delivery has been completed...
According to the Indictment, on or about January 1998, defendant
directed Interloc employees to... intercept and copy all incoming
communications from Amazon.com... The Interloc systems administrator
wrote a revision to the mail processing code... designed to
intercept, copy, and store, all incoming messages from Amazon.com
before they
were delivered to the members' e-mail, and therefore, before
the e-mail was read by the intended recipient. Defendant was charged
with using the procmail to intercept... messages."
And if more than one of you is involved, is the mail fraud then a
wider conspiracy?
so you *are* a looney toon!
alt.conspiracy.paranoid.retards added.
I asked two direct questiona. I'll dumb them down for you. Is it legal in
the US to intercept email in the manner that you indicated you would
intercept it?
oh, it's "email" now? you were vaguely "threatening" to snail mail the
"entire pitt senate", if i recall correctly. you had me confused.
--
Roberta "Foxymopjockeychickenwrist" Wolfe
"The talk of the sekret AUK
off-newsgroup listserves!"
<insert pied piper song here>
Hi! I'm the .sig virus that will destroy Usenet. Please add me to your sig.
- END USENET NOW http://www.bedoper.com/usenet
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kadaitcha Man" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
31 Mar 2006 08:05:28 AM |
|
|
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the skin-headed
transient and tightfisted hitchhiker on the Hershey highway who likes
fierce bone greasing with marmots, and whose partner is a
woman-of-accomodating-morals with a malignant pooty poo, wrote in
<442d32ea$0$944$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the gibbering
moocher and quailing joy boy who likes disgustful heel lifting with
bacteria, and whose partner is a fancy-girl with a defective meat
wallet, wrote in <442d2bd4$0$20689$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the mature
cadger and supple sea-fairy who likes fierce rude bits rubbing with
bacteria,
and whose partner is a jizz-babe with an untidy fuzzy taco, wrote
in <442d1e92$0$22853$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the
*****-stained gypsy and vomit-inducing cross-dresser who likes
vicious cajun-clown fucking with sharks, and whose partner is a
willing-bit with a messy smackey, wrote in
<442d1b09$0$19435$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
platopes <platopes@yahoo.com>, the geriatric vagabond and
tinpot call-boy who likes untamed copulation with vultures,
and whose partner
is a bit of mutton with an unnatural puter, wrote in
<1143796887.864101.236650@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Everyone who has tried it has ended up getting blamed for
all my posts and has never been seen on usenet again.
No one has ever been "seen" on usenet.
Metaphor's not your strong suit, eh.
We've all heard a lot from you
Nobody has ever been "heard" on usenet.
well then, metaphors aren't your strong suit.
Discerning incongruity obviously isn't yours.
perhaps this could be solved if you cried about it much in
the same way that a baby would.
You shouldn't be so sensitive about your tenuous hold on your job
at the University of Pittsburgh. You may not have it much longer.
yeah yeah yeah...
got those envelopes all labeled, do you?
Say, that reminds me...
In news:442cb8fc$0$32073$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com, you wrote:
best case is i get to laugh at your pathetic attempt, reading each
of your emails as they pour in from my friends.
Is unauthorised mail interception legal in the US?
According to United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
(No. 03-1383) it isn't.
"Evidence in Criminal Investigations" IV(d) (2002) ("Since its
enactment in 1968 and amendment in 1986, [the Wiretap Act] has
provided the statutory framework that governs real-time electronic
surveillance of the contents of communications.")"
"The parties stipulated to the following facts relevant to
the transfer of electronic messages by the Interloc systems. An
email message, which is composed using an e-mail program, is
transferred from one computer to another on its way to its final
destination, the addressee. Building on the principle of store and
forward, the message is handed to a Message Transfer Agent ("MTA")
which stores the message locally. The message is routed through
the network from one MTA to another until it reaches the
recipient's mail server, which accepts it and stores it in a
location accessible to the recipient. Once the e-mail is
accessible to the recipient, final delivery has been completed...
According to the Indictment, on or about January 1998, defendant
directed Interloc employees to... intercept and copy all incoming
communications from Amazon.com... The Interloc systems
administrator wrote a revision to the mail processing code...
designed to intercept, copy, and store, all incoming messages from
Amazon.com before they
were delivered to the members' e-mail, and therefore, before
the e-mail was read by the intended recipient. Defendant was
charged with using the procmail to intercept... messages."
And if more than one of you is involved, is the mail fraud then a
wider conspiracy?
so you *are* a looney toon!
alt.conspiracy.paranoid.retards added.
I asked two direct questiona. I'll dumb them down for you. Is it
legal in the US to intercept email in the manner that you indicated
you would intercept it?
oh, it's "email" now? you were vaguely "threatening" to snail mail
the "entire pitt senate", if i recall correctly.
So, first it was a threat and now it's a vague threat, yes?
Anyway, that aside, please turn your exceedingly short attention span to the
question, which stands unanswered. Is it legal in the US to intercept email
in the manner that you indicated you would intercept it?
you had me confused.
It's not difficult to do.
Hi! I'm the .sig virus that will destroy Usenet. Please add me to
your sig. - END USENET NOW http://www.bedoper.com/usenet
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from
http://www.SecureIX.com ***
--
http://xp-crack.kadaitcha.cx
.
|
|
|
| User: "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ!" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
31 Mar 2006 08:41:33 AM |
|
|
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the skin-headed
transient and tightfisted hitchhiker on the Hershey highway who likes
fierce bone greasing with marmots, and whose partner is a
woman-of-accomodating-morals with a malignant pooty poo, wrote in
<442d32ea$0$944$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the gibbering
moocher and quailing joy boy who likes disgustful heel lifting with
bacteria, and whose partner is a fancy-girl with a defective meat
wallet, wrote in <442d2bd4$0$20689$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the mature
cadger and supple sea-fairy who likes fierce rude bits rubbing with
bacteria,
and whose partner is a jizz-babe with an untidy fuzzy taco, wrote
in <442d1e92$0$22853$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the
*****-stained gypsy and vomit-inducing cross-dresser who likes
vicious cajun-clown fucking with sharks, and whose partner is a
willing-bit with a messy smackey, wrote in
<442d1b09$0$19435$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
platopes <platopes@yahoo.com>, the geriatric vagabond and
tinpot call-boy who likes untamed copulation with vultures,
and whose partner
is a bit of mutton with an unnatural puter, wrote in
<1143796887.864101.236650@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Everyone who has tried it has ended up getting blamed for
all my posts and has never been seen on usenet again.
No one has ever been "seen" on usenet.
Metaphor's not your strong suit, eh.
We've all heard a lot from you
Nobody has ever been "heard" on usenet.
well then, metaphors aren't your strong suit.
Discerning incongruity obviously isn't yours.
perhaps this could be solved if you cried about it much in
the same way that a baby would.
You shouldn't be so sensitive about your tenuous hold on your job
at the University of Pittsburgh. You may not have it much longer.
yeah yeah yeah...
got those envelopes all labeled, do you?
Say, that reminds me...
In news:442cb8fc$0$32073$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com, you wrote:
best case is i get to laugh at your pathetic attempt, reading each
of your emails as they pour in from my friends.
Is unauthorised mail interception legal in the US?
According to United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
(No. 03-1383) it isn't.
"Evidence in Criminal Investigations" IV(d) (2002) ("Since its
enactment in 1968 and amendment in 1986, [the Wiretap Act] has
provided the statutory framework that governs real-time electronic
surveillance of the contents of communications.")"
"The parties stipulated to the following facts relevant to
the transfer of electronic messages by the Interloc systems. An
email message, which is composed using an e-mail program, is
transferred from one computer to another on its way to its final
destination, the addressee. Building on the principle of store and
forward, the message is handed to a Message Transfer Agent ("MTA")
which stores the message locally. The message is routed through
the network from one MTA to another until it reaches the
recipient's mail server, which accepts it and stores it in a
location accessible to the recipient. Once the e-mail is
accessible to the recipient, final delivery has been completed...
According to the Indictment, on or about January 1998, defendant
directed Interloc employees to... intercept and copy all incoming
communications from Amazon.com... The Interloc systems
administrator wrote a revision to the mail processing code...
designed to intercept, copy, and store, all incoming messages from
Amazon.com before they
were delivered to the members' e-mail, and therefore, before
the e-mail was read by the intended recipient. Defendant was
charged with using the procmail to intercept... messages."
And if more than one of you is involved, is the mail fraud then a
wider conspiracy?
so you *are* a looney toon!
alt.conspiracy.paranoid.retards added.
I asked two direct questiona. I'll dumb them down for you. Is it
legal in the US to intercept email in the manner that you indicated
you would intercept it?
oh, it's "email" now? you were vaguely "threatening" to snail mail
the "entire pitt senate", if i recall correctly.
So, first it was a threat and now it's a vague threat, yes?
so you aren't arguing that it's a "threat"?
Anyway, that aside, please turn your exceedingly short attention span to the
question, which stands unanswered. Is it legal in the US to intercept email
in the manner that you indicated you would intercept it?
if you "believe" that i'd "intercept" your hypothetically submitted and
"laughed at" kook complaints, then you believe too much stuff that you read
on usenet.
so if you really *must* know... YHBT
bigtime.
you had me confused.
It's not difficult to do.
you are very predictable.
--
Roberta "Foxymopjockeychickenwrist" Wolfe
"The talk of the sekret AUK
off-newsgroup listserves!"
<insert pied piper song here>
Hi! I'm the .sig virus that will destroy Usenet. Please add me to your sig.
- END USENET NOW http://www.bedoper.com/usenet
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kadaitcha Man" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
31 Mar 2006 08:59:37 AM |
|
|
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the broken down bag
man and fat mole who likes inventive manhood touching with Burmese cats,
and whose partner is a woman-of-loose-morals with an ample silk igloo,
wrote in <442d40ab$0$10364$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the skin-headed
transient and tightfisted hitchhiker on the Hershey highway who likes
fierce bone greasing with marmots, and whose partner is a
woman-of-accomodating-morals with a malignant pooty poo, wrote in
<442d32ea$0$944$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the gibbering
moocher and quailing joy boy who likes disgustful heel lifting with
bacteria, and whose partner is a fancy-girl with a defective meat
wallet, wrote in <442d2bd4$0$20689$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the mature
cadger and supple sea-fairy who likes fierce rude bits rubbing
with bacteria,
and whose partner is a jizz-babe with an untidy fuzzy taco, wrote
in <442d1e92$0$22853$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the
*****-stained gypsy and vomit-inducing cross-dresser who likes
vicious cajun-clown fucking with sharks, and whose partner is a
willing-bit with a messy smackey, wrote in
<442d1b09$0$19435$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
platopes <platopes@yahoo.com>, the geriatric vagabond and
tinpot call-boy who likes untamed copulation with vultures,
and whose partner
is a bit of mutton with an unnatural puter, wrote in
<1143796887.864101.236650@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Everyone who has tried it has ended up getting blamed for
all my posts and has never been seen on usenet again.
No one has ever been "seen" on usenet.
Metaphor's not your strong suit, eh.
We've all heard a lot from you
Nobody has ever been "heard" on usenet.
well then, metaphors aren't your strong suit.
Discerning incongruity obviously isn't yours.
perhaps this could be solved if you cried about it much in
the same way that a baby would.
You shouldn't be so sensitive about your tenuous hold on your
job at the University of Pittsburgh. You may not have it much
longer.
yeah yeah yeah...
got those envelopes all labeled, do you?
Say, that reminds me...
In news:442cb8fc$0$32073$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com, you
wrote:
best case is i get to laugh at your patheti | | | | | | | | | | | | |
