| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
30 Mar 2006 06:39:10 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
SHERMLOCK SHOMES! wrote:
SHERMLOCK SHOMES! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv> wrote in message
<442c7105$0$9579$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>...
Me? Insane? You're on the right track.
No, you're working for or are a behavioral scientist, studying those
with "psi" abilities, or some unique skill, and doing so in an
inhumane, barbaric manner.
Who the ***** are you to destroy anyone's life, game any child's life?
This is simply reprehensible.
It's an evil beyond comprehension, and if you're not a sociopathic, you
are in serious denial.
Do you go home at night, Jerry, to your wife and kids, knowing no one
is going to break apart your marriage or read post hypnotic suggestions
to your kid while she is sleeping, simply because you have the luck to
have a phd from Harvard, or Princeton.
How to you justify these experiments in behavioral science?
Is it classism?
A marine from West Virginia has less value than a Harvard phd from
Swampscott?
And that's why I lose my family, marine, and your kid gets cancer,
induced by a biology doctorate from Harvard, say, to study the
medicinal effects of an experimental therapy on your kid and the
behavioral effects on your wife and other child, on behalf of some
nameless entity in the US government, who couldn't care less about the
Harvard guys work, but who needs to allocate a certain amount from his
budget, to maintain funding from Congress.
We have less value than a PHD from Harvard, you being from west
virginia and me being blue collar and not finishing college, or
achieving something brilliant, like inducing luekemia on a three year
old to study the behavioral efects of cancer on a "typical" marine corp
family.
Seriously.
And this is it, that's the only reason I'm being gamed adn you're not
-- education and social staus.
You extend professional courtesy to your friends, you won't game a
colleagues kid, will you Hunter?
You broke my marriage apart, you game my kids, you have your little
cockslappers read post hypnotic suggestions to my kids, how do you, or
Frank, or Hunter, justify this?
Really.
Answer, please, behavioral scientists, tell me how you justify it.
The American marine wants to know, too.
.
|
|
| User: "Kadaitcha Man" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
30 Mar 2006 07:56:03 PM |
|
|
<>, the derelict
shopping-bag man and hardcore fribble who likes debauched load dropping
with dogs, and whose partner is a screw with an engorged bunny, wrote in
<1143765550.761579.208600@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>:
No, you're working for or are a behavioral scientist, studying those
with "psi" abilities, or some unique skill, and doing so in an
inhumane, barbaric manner.
Who the ***** are you to destroy anyone's life, game any child's life?
This is simply reprehensible.
It's an evil beyond comprehension, and if you're not a sociopathic,
you are in serious denial.
Do you go home at night, Jerry, to your wife and kids, knowing no one
is going to break apart your marriage or read post hypnotic
suggestions to your kid while she is sleeping, simply because you
have the luck to have a phd from Harvard, or Princeton.
How to you justify these experiments in behavioral science?
Is it classism?
A marine from West Virginia has less value than a Harvard phd from
Swampscott?
And that's why I lose my family, marine, and your kid gets cancer,
induced by a biology doctorate from Harvard, say, to study the
medicinal effects of an experimental therapy on your kid and the
behavioral effects on your wife and other child, on behalf of some
nameless entity in the US government, who couldn't care less about the
Harvard guys work, but who needs to allocate a certain amount from his
budget, to maintain funding from Congress.
We have less value than a PHD from Harvard, you being from west
virginia and me being blue collar and not finishing college, or
achieving something brilliant, like inducing luekemia on a three year
old to study the behavioral efects of cancer on a "typical" marine
corp family.
Seriously.
And this is it, that's the only reason I'm being gamed adn you're not
-- education and social staus.
You extend professional courtesy to your friends, you won't game a
colleagues kid, will you Hunter?
You broke my marriage apart, you game my kids, you have your little
cockslappers read post hypnotic suggestions to my kids, how do you, or
Frank, or Hunter, justify this?
Really.
Answer, please, behavioral scientists, tell me how you justify it.
The American marine wants to know, too.
/BEHAVIOURAL PROFILER ON/
Start psychological profiling
POSTER: <>
Fog Index and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level Calculations
=====================================================
Word Count: 343
Full Stops: 11
Exclamations: 0
Questions: 6
Total Sentences: 17
Long Words: 72
Average Sentence Length: 20
Percentage of Long Words: 20.99%
========================:
Gunning Fog Index: 16.40
Flesch-Kincaid Score: 5
Analysing 8 keywords of 72:
* working
* behavioral
* scientist
* studying
* abilities
* inhumane
* barbaric
* destroy
64 keywords will not be analysed.
Performing Keyword Analysis:
Keyword 1 of 72:
* working:
is (or suffers from) one or more or all of:
* Self-justifying
* Hyperactive
* Angry
* Punctual 'to a t'
* Excessively pedantic
is predisposed to have a severe disturbance of
his constitution with associated problematic behavioural tendencies.
Keyword 2 of 72:
* behavioral:
is prone to prefer to have sex with the lights
off.
Keyword 3 of 72:
* scientist:
Expect to be inclined to be in flight from
himself and prone to acting out impulses rather than dealing with
anxieties and frustrations.
Keyword 4 of 72:
* studying:
Anticipate to have sex with someone he
despises if the other person offered him an overseas trip.
Keyword 5 of 72:
* abilities:
is susceptible to have a "can't do" attitude
and be lacking in inner drive.
Keyword 6 of 72:
* inhumane:
Expect to do 'whatever it takes' to preserve
the illusion of his superiority.
Keyword 7 of 72:
* barbaric:
is susceptible to experience red skin flushes
with associated hot, sweaty episodes when conflicts occur.
Keyword 8 of 72:
* destroy:
is likely to lack belief in himself.
conforms to Antisocial personality disorder
with Factitious subtype tendencies.
Primary Motivation: to avoid missing out on worthwhile experiences.
Secondary Motivation: to avoid conflicts and tension at all costs.
*** Fog Index within normal tolerance ***
*** PROLIX TIT ALERT ***
======================
has an average sentence length of 20. This
person is fatiguing, boring and banal. may
believe he is writing an essay or epic.
*** ARSE BURGLAR ALERT ***
==========================
referenced nether regions and/or bodily functions 1 times in 343 words.
Detected the following references:
1: *****
This person should be suspected of being one or more of the following:
* back-door commando
* KY-queen
* chocolate-lumberjack
* capon
* bruce
Also analysing for disposition to display striking self-centeredness.
*** IGNORANT PIG ALERT ***
==========================
has a Flesch-Kincaid score equivalent to that
of a child of age 5. This person is simple-minded, brainless and
insensible. This person is highly likely to let others make important
decisions for him and jump from relationship to relationship. Also
expect to have a severe disturbance of his
constitution with associated problematic behavioural tendencies.
*** NARCISSISTIC SELF-ABSORBTION ALERT ***
==========================================
referenced himself 8 times in 343 words.
Detected the following overblown self-references:
1: I
2: my
3: me
4: I
5: my
6: my
7: my
8: me
This person has an enduring, abnormal behaviour pattern of being
self-absorbed, bombastic and domineering. Expect this person to block
out awareness of anything that could affect him, as well as being likely
to only have friends because of his compromising nature. Additionally
the person is emotionally unstable and immature. Psychoneurotic
personality disorder is likely; he is prone to full of his own 'good
intentions' about everything.
Also analysing for disposition to display unreasonable insistence that
others submit to exactly his way of doing things.
*** Fastidiousness indicators not measurable ***
Calculation results are suspect. Additional input text is required to
determine this attribute.
*** Sycophancy indicators scarcely within tolerance ***
Calculation results are unconfirmed. Additional input text is required
to determine this attribute.
*** Infantilism indicators barely within tolerance ***
Calculation results are indeterminate. Additional input text is required
to determine this attribute.
The following questions are recommended to make
fume and flip:
1: Your future father-in-law has the worst sense of humor. Do you laugh
at all his jokes until you are married?
2: Do the drugs you're taking lower your sex drive?
3: Do you wait for someone to tell you that you've done a good job
before you feel proud?
Personality Summary (Part A):
1: easily excitable and highly responsive to suggestion
2: dishonorable
3: presumptuous
Personality Summary (Part B):
4: wearying, mouldering, malarial flunkey
5: moralising, wrong-side-up, thickheaded gorilla
6: hoveling, gasping, do-nothing knicker-sniffer
Challenge/Response Predictors
=============================
Challenge 1: Have you ever hung up the phone on a family member?
Expected Response 1: Anticipate to be
contradictory, giving mixed signals.
Challenge 2: If you accidentally scratched someone's car, would you
drive off regardless of the damage?
Expected Response 2: is likely to live alone.
Challenge 3: Have you been cured of your genital acne yet?
Expected Response 3: Expect to be overly
concerned with physical appearance.
End psychological profiling for <>
--
http://xp-crack.kadaitcha.cx
.
|
|
|
| User: "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ!" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
30 Mar 2006 09:15:32 PM |
|
|
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
<>, the derelict
shopping-bag man and hardcore fribble who likes debauched load dropping
with dogs, and whose partner is a screw with an engorged bunny, wrote in
<1143765550.761579.208600@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>:
No, you're working for or are a behavioral scientist, studying those
with "psi" abilities, or some unique skill, and doing so in an
inhumane, barbaric manner.
Who the ***** are you to destroy anyone's life, game any child's life?
This is simply reprehensible.
It's an evil beyond comprehension, and if you're not a sociopathic,
you are in serious denial.
Do you go home at night, Jerry, to your wife and kids, knowing no one
is going to break apart your marriage or read post hypnotic
suggestions to your kid while she is sleeping, simply because you
have the luck to have a phd from Harvard, or Princeton.
How to you justify these experiments in behavioral science?
Is it classism?
A marine from West Virginia has less value than a Harvard phd from
Swampscott?
And that's why I lose my family, marine, and your kid gets cancer,
induced by a biology doctorate from Harvard, say, to study the
medicinal effects of an experimental therapy on your kid and the
behavioral effects on your wife and other child, on behalf of some
nameless entity in the US government, who couldn't care less about the
Harvard guys work, but who needs to allocate a certain amount from his
budget, to maintain funding from Congress.
We have less value than a PHD from Harvard, you being from west
virginia and me being blue collar and not finishing college, or
achieving something brilliant, like inducing luekemia on a three year
old to study the behavioral efects of cancer on a "typical" marine
corp family.
Seriously.
And this is it, that's the only reason I'm being gamed adn you're not
-- education and social staus.
You extend professional courtesy to your friends, you won't game a
colleagues kid, will you Hunter?
You broke my marriage apart, you game my kids, you have your little
cockslappers read post hypnotic suggestions to my kids, how do you, or
Frank, or Hunter, justify this?
Really.
Answer, please, behavioral scientists, tell me how you justify it.
The American marine wants to know, too.
/BEHAVIOURAL PROFILER ON/
Start psychological profiling
POSTER: <>
Fog Index and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level Calculations
=====================================================
Word Count: 343
Full Stops: 11
Exclamations: 0
Questions: 6
Total Sentences: 17
Long Words: 72
Average Sentence Length: 20
Percentage of Long Words: 20.99%
========================:
Gunning Fog Index: 16.40
Flesch-Kincaid Score: 5
Analysing 8 keywords of 72:
* working
* behavioral
* scientist
* studying
* abilities
* inhumane
* barbaric
* destroy
64 keywords will not be analysed.
Performing Keyword Analysis:
Keyword 1 of 72:
* working:
is (or suffers from) one or more or all of:
* Self-justifying
* Hyperactive
* Angry
* Punctual 'to a t'
* Excessively pedantic
is predisposed to have a severe disturbance of
his constitution with associated problematic behavioural tendencies.
Keyword 2 of 72:
* behavioral:
is prone to prefer to have sex with the lights
off.
Keyword 3 of 72:
* scientist:
Expect to be inclined to be in flight from
himself and prone to acting out impulses rather than dealing with
anxieties and frustrations.
Keyword 4 of 72:
* studying:
Anticipate to have sex with someone he
despises if the other person offered him an overseas trip.
Keyword 5 of 72:
* abilities:
is susceptible to have a "can't do" attitude
and be lacking in inner drive.
Keyword 6 of 72:
* inhumane:
Expect to do 'whatever it takes' to preserve
the illusion of his superiority.
Keyword 7 of 72:
* barbaric:
is susceptible to experience red skin flushes
with associated hot, sweaty episodes when conflicts occur.
Keyword 8 of 72:
* destroy:
is likely to lack belief in himself.
conforms to Antisocial personality disorder
with Factitious subtype tendencies.
Primary Motivation: to avoid missing out on worthwhile experiences.
Secondary Motivation: to avoid conflicts and tension at all costs.
*** Fog Index within normal tolerance ***
*** PROLIX TIT ALERT ***
======================
has an average sentence length of 20. This
person is fatiguing, boring and banal. may
believe he is writing an essay or epic.
*** ARSE BURGLAR ALERT ***
==========================
referenced nether regions and/or bodily functions
1 times in 343 words.
Detected the following references:
1: *****
This person should be suspected of being one or more of the following:
* back-door commando
* KY-queen
* chocolate-lumberjack
* capon
* bruce
Also analysing for disposition to display striking self-centeredness.
*** IGNORANT PIG ALERT ***
==========================
has a Flesch-Kincaid score equivalent to that
of a child of age 5. This person is simple-minded, brainless and
insensible. This person is highly likely to let others make important
decisions for him and jump from relationship to relationship. Also
expect to have a severe disturbance of his
constitution with associated problematic behavioural tendencies.
*** NARCISSISTIC SELF-ABSORBTION ALERT ***
==========================================
referenced himself 8 times in 343 words.
Detected the following overblown self-references:
1: I
2: my
3: me
4: I
5: my
6: my
7: my
8: me
This person has an enduring, abnormal behaviour pattern of being
self-absorbed, bombastic and domineering. Expect this person to block
out awareness of anything that could affect him, as well as being likely
to only have friends because of his compromising nature. Additionally
the person is emotionally unstable and immature. Psychoneurotic
personality disorder is likely; he is prone to full of his own 'good
intentions' about everything.
Also analysing for disposition to display unreasonable insistence that
others submit to exactly his way of doing things.
*** Fastidiousness indicators not measurable ***
Calculation results are suspect. Additional input text is required to
determine this attribute.
*** Sycophancy indicators scarcely within tolerance ***
Calculation results are unconfirmed. Additional input text is required
to determine this attribute.
*** Infantilism indicators barely within tolerance ***
Calculation results are indeterminate. Additional input text is required
to determine this attribute.
The following questions are recommended to make
fume and flip:
1: Your future father-in-law has the worst sense of humor. Do you laugh
at all his jokes until you are married?
2: Do the drugs you're taking lower your sex drive?
3: Do you wait for someone to tell you that you've done a good job
before you feel proud?
Personality Summary (Part A):
1: easily excitable and highly responsive to suggestion
2: dishonorable
3: presumptuous
Personality Summary (Part B):
4: wearying, mouldering, malarial flunkey
5: moralising, wrong-side-up, thickheaded gorilla
6: hoveling, gasping, do-nothing knicker-sniffer
Challenge/Response Predictors
=============================
Challenge 1: Have you ever hung up the phone on a family member?
Expected Response 1: Anticipate to be
contradictory, giving mixed signals.
Challenge 2: If you accidentally scratched someone's car, would you
drive off regardless of the damage?
Expected Response 2: is likely to live alone.
Challenge 3: Have you been cured of your genital acne yet?
Expected Response 3: Expect to be overly
concerned with physical appearance.
End psychological profiling for
<>
hey, check your email.
--
Roberta "Foxymopjockeychickenwrist" Wolfe
"The talk of the sekret AUK
off-newsgroup listserves!"
<insert pied piper song here>
Hi! I'm the .sig virus that will destroy Usenet. Please add me to your sig.
- END USENET NOW http://www.bedoper.com/usenet
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
.
|
|
|
| User: "Art Deco" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
30 Mar 2006 09:33:35 PM |
|
|
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv> wrote:
hey, chec
mop jockey has morphed again.
[mop jockey filter readjusted]
--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Official Agent of Deception
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005
"Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting
renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum."
-- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kadaitcha Man" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
30 Mar 2006 09:52:14 PM |
|
|
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the constipated grandpa and bitchy
rimadonna who likes lewd goob loobin' with piglets, and whose partner is
a fancy lady with a withering hootchie, wrote in
<300320062033354159%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
"Art Deco" <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:300320062033354159%art_deco@127.0.0.1...
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv> wrote:
hey, chec
mop jockey has morphed again.
[mop jockey filter readjusted]
Mop jockey is using the services of...
rob@www.genetics.pitt.edu
http://www.genetics.pitt.edu/
I wonder what the LART cost would be.
--
http://xp-crack.kadaitcha.cx
.
|
|
|
| User: "Art Deco" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
30 Mar 2006 11:18:49 PM |
|
|
Kadaitcha Man <*****-you.ya.*****@kiss-my-big-black-*****.com> wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the constipated grandpa and bitchy
rimadonna who likes lewd goob loobin' with piglets, and whose partner is
a fancy lady with a withering hootchie, wrote in
<300320062033354159%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
"Art Deco" <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:300320062033354159%art_deco@127.0.0.1...
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv> wrote:
hey, chec
mop jockey has morphed again.
[mop jockey filter readjusted]
Mop jockey is using the services of...
rob@www.genetics.pitt.edu
http://www.genetics.pitt.edu/
I wonder what the LART cost would be.
Whatever the cost is, mop jockey won't understand what happened.
--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Official Agent of Deception
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005
"Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting
renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum."
-- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kadaitcha Man" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
30 Mar 2006 11:32:28 PM |
|
|
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the fat deadbeat and lusty lavender
cowboy who likes gross dishonourable discharges with pythons, and whose
partner is a red-lighter with a slippery flesh tuxedo, wrote in
<300320062218492997%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
Kadaitcha Man <*****-you.ya.*****@kiss-my-big-black-*****.com> wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the constipated grandpa and bitchy
rimadonna who likes lewd goob loobin' with piglets, and whose
partner is a fancy lady with a withering hootchie, wrote in
<300320062033354159%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
"Art Deco" <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:300320062033354159%art_deco@127.0.0.1...
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv> wrote:
hey, chec
mop jockey has morphed again.
[mop jockey filter readjusted]
Mop jockey is using the services of...
rob@www.genetics.pitt.edu
http://www.genetics.pitt.edu/
I wonder what the LART cost would be.
Whatever the cost is, mop jockey won't understand what happened.
He seems to think that he's going to "laugh at [my] pathetic attempt,
reading each of [my] emails as they pour in from [his] friends." Now, how is
he going to do that when the snail mail address for every member of the
university senate is available on www.pitt.edu?
What do you suppose the reaction might be should all those people learn
about how the University of Pittsburgh as been dragged into disrepute?
--
http://xp-crack.kadaitcha.cx
.
|
|
|
| User: "Art Deco" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
30 Mar 2006 11:37:56 PM |
|
|
Kadaitcha Man <*****-you.ya.*****@kiss-my-big-black-*****.com> wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the fat deadbeat and lusty lavender
cowboy who likes gross dishonourable discharges with pythons, and whose
partner is a red-lighter with a slippery flesh tuxedo, wrote in
<300320062218492997%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
Kadaitcha Man <*****-you.ya.*****@kiss-my-big-black-*****.com> wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the constipated grandpa and bitchy
rimadonna who likes lewd goob loobin' with piglets, and whose
partner is a fancy lady with a withering hootchie, wrote in
<300320062033354159%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
"Art Deco" <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:300320062033354159%art_deco@127.0.0.1...
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv> wrote:
hey, chec
mop jockey has morphed again.
[mop jockey filter readjusted]
Mop jockey is using the services of...
rob@www.genetics.pitt.edu
http://www.genetics.pitt.edu/
I wonder what the LART cost would be.
Whatever the cost is, mop jockey won't understand what happened.
He seems to think that he's going to "laugh at [my] pathetic attempt,
reading each of [my] emails as they pour in from [his] friends." Now, how is
he going to do that when the snail mail address for every member of the
university senate is available on www.pitt.edu?
What do you suppose the reaction might be should all those people learn
about how the University of Pittsburgh as been dragged into disrepute?
I can hear a small bird singing right now...
--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Official Agent of Deception
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005
"Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting
renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum."
-- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kadaitcha Man" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
30 Mar 2006 11:44:18 PM |
|
|
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the haggard itinerant and overbold jam
duff who likes lecherous pity-fucks with domestic cats, and whose
partner is a comfort woman with a voluminous tutu, wrote in
<300320062237561859%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
Kadaitcha Man <*****-you.ya.*****@kiss-my-big-black-*****.com> wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the fat deadbeat and lusty lavender
cowboy who likes gross dishonourable discharges with pythons, and
whose partner is a red-lighter with a slippery flesh tuxedo, wrote in
<300320062218492997%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
Kadaitcha Man <*****-you.ya.*****@kiss-my-big-black-*****.com> wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the constipated grandpa and bitchy
rimadonna who likes lewd goob loobin' with piglets, and whose
partner is a fancy lady with a withering hootchie, wrote in
<300320062033354159%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
"Art Deco" <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:300320062033354159%art_deco@127.0.0.1...
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv> wrote:
hey, chec
mop jockey has morphed again.
[mop jockey filter readjusted]
Mop jockey is using the services of...
rob@www.genetics.pitt.edu
http://www.genetics.pitt.edu/
I wonder what the LART cost would be.
Whatever the cost is, mop jockey won't understand what happened.
He seems to think that he's going to "laugh at [my] pathetic attempt,
reading each of [my] emails as they pour in from [his] friends."
Now, how is he going to do that when the snail mail address for
every member of the university senate is available on www.pitt.edu?
What do you suppose the reaction might be should all those people
learn about how the University of Pittsburgh as been dragged into
disrepute?
I can hear a small bird singing right now...
Wait until you hear the fat lady singing.
--
http://xp-crack.kadaitcha.cx
.
|
|
|
| User: "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ!" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
31 Mar 2006 12:02:23 AM |
|
|
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the haggard itinerant and overbold jam
duff who likes lecherous pity-fucks with domestic cats, and whose
partner is a comfort woman with a voluminous tutu, wrote in
<300320062237561859%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
Kadaitcha Man <*****-you.ya.*****@kiss-my-big-black-*****.com> wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the fat deadbeat and lusty lavender
cowboy who likes gross dishonourable discharges with pythons, and
whose partner is a red-lighter with a slippery flesh tuxedo, wrote in
<300320062218492997%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
Kadaitcha Man <*****-you.ya.*****@kiss-my-big-black-*****.com> wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the constipated grandpa and bitchy
rimadonna who likes lewd goob loobin' with piglets, and whose
partner is a fancy lady with a withering hootchie, wrote in
<300320062033354159%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
"Art Deco" <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:300320062033354159%art_deco@127.0.0.1...
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv> wrote:
hey, chec
mop jockey has morphed again.
[mop jockey filter readjusted]
Mop jockey is using the services of...
rob@www.genetics.pitt.edu
http://www.genetics.pitt.edu/
I wonder what the LART cost would be.
Whatever the cost is, mop jockey won't understand what happened.
He seems to think that he's going to "laugh at [my] pathetic attempt,
reading each of [my] emails as they pour in from [his] friends."
Now, how is he going to do that when the snail mail address for
every member of the university senate is available on www.pitt.edu?
What do you suppose the reaction might be should all those people
learn about how the University of Pittsburgh as been dragged into
disrepute?
I can hear a small bird singing right now...
Wait until you hear the fat lady singing.
wait until you explain why "fuckwit" got you all "aboosed" but yet you admit
to constructing posts such as:
<7fqy$5qz.kfux@newsread1.news.pasearth1ink.nut>
"Re: SHERMLOCK SHOMES!, Delicious Innocent Gay 1st Time Deepthroat"
in which you craft a "false" attribution using my usenet nym's information:
"SHERMLOCK SHOMES! <fart_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
<122p824f7a7fb50@news.supernews.com>..."
and leave false abuse addresses for people to complain about your robot-spew
obscene messages:
news-abuse@zig-zag.net
pretty twisted "game" you're playing, there.
--
Roberta "Foxymopjockeychickenwrist" Wolfe
"The talk of the sekret AUK
off-newsgroup listserves!"
<insert pied piper song here>
Hi! I'm the .sig virus that will destroy Usenet. Please add me to your sig.
- END USENET NOW http://www.bedoper.com/usenet
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kadaitcha Man" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
31 Mar 2006 12:36:11 AM |
|
|
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the senile idler and
teapot-shaped culero who likes indelicate ham ramming with whales, and
whose partner is a woman of pleasure with hairless breakfast of
champions, wrote in <442cc6fe$0$22963$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the haggard itinerant and overbold jam
duff who likes lecherous pity-fucks with domestic cats, and whose
partner is a comfort woman with a voluminous tutu, wrote in
<300320062237561859%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
Kadaitcha Man <*****-you.ya.*****@kiss-my-big-black-*****.com> wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the fat deadbeat and lusty lavender
cowboy who likes gross dishonourable discharges with pythons, and
whose partner is a red-lighter with a slippery flesh tuxedo, wrote
in <300320062218492997%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
Kadaitcha Man <*****-you.ya.*****@kiss-my-big-black-*****.com> wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the constipated grandpa and bitchy
rimadonna who likes lewd goob loobin' with piglets, and whose
partner is a fancy lady with a withering hootchie, wrote in
<300320062033354159%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
"Art Deco" <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:300320062033354159%art_deco@127.0.0.1...
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv> wrote:
hey, chec
mop jockey has morphed again.
[mop jockey filter readjusted]
Mop jockey is using the services of...
rob@www.genetics.pitt.edu
http://www.genetics.pitt.edu/
I wonder what the LART cost would be.
Whatever the cost is, mop jockey won't understand what happened.
He seems to think that he's going to "laugh at [my] pathetic
attempt, reading each of [my] emails as they pour in from [his]
friends." Now, how is he going to do that when the snail mail
address for every member of the university senate is available on
www.pitt.edu?
What do you suppose the reaction might be should all those people
learn about how the University of Pittsburgh as been dragged into
disrepute?
I can hear a small bird singing right now...
Wait until you hear the fat lady singing.
wait until you explain why "fuckwit" got you all "aboosed" but yet
you admit to constructing posts such as:
Oh, but you misunderstand. This about you and how you have misused the
University of Pittsburgh's resources to send abusive and offensive email
thereby bringing them into disrepute. It isn't about anyone else. No matter
which way you look at it, it was you who misused the University of
Pittsburgh's mail system. Nevertheless, please feel free to keep trying to
delude yourself into believing that someone other than you is culpable for
your own actions.
<7fqy$5qz.kfux@newsread1.news.pasearth1ink.nut>
"Re: SHERMLOCK SHOMES!, Delicious Innocent Gay 1st Time Deepthroat"
in which you craft a "false" attribution using my usenet nym's
information:
"SHERMLOCK SHOMES! <fart_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
<122p824f7a7fb50@news.supernews.com>..."
In that case, I'll include your admission there with all the posts you've
made. Not only will you be explaining words and phrases like "stupid fukz",
"you fjukwit", "mindfuck" and "circle jerk", you'll be explaining why you
were writing things like that on company time using company resources.
and leave false abuse addresses
I told you about the legal requirement for that address. What did you fail
to understand about what you were told?
for people to complain about your robot-spew obscene messages:
news-abuse@zig-zag.net
pretty twisted "game" you're playing, there.
Said the mop jockey as he suddenly forgot about the need to change his
underwear.
PS: Do you suppose they might also be interested in your now confirmed
direct involvement in publishing lists of links to child sex and bestiality
groups?
http://www.bedoper.com/usenet
Seeing that you continue to post on usenet there is enough empirical
evidence to support the argument that you post those links for other than
altruistic purposes.
Hi! I'm the .sig virus that will destroy Usenet. Please add me to
your sig. - END USENET NOW http://www.bedoper.com/usenet
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from
http://www.SecureIX.com ***
--
http://xp-crack.kadaitcha.cx
.
|
|
|
| User: "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ!" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
31 Mar 2006 12:43:45 AM |
|
|
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the senile idler and
teapot-shaped culero who likes indelicate ham ramming with whales, and
whose partner is a woman of pleasure with hairless breakfast of
champions, wrote in <442cc6fe$0$22963$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the haggard itinerant and overbold jam
duff who likes lecherous pity-fucks with domestic cats, and whose
partner is a comfort woman with a voluminous tutu, wrote in
<300320062237561859%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
Kadaitcha Man <*****-you.ya.*****@kiss-my-big-black-*****.com> wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the fat deadbeat and lusty lavender
cowboy who likes gross dishonourable discharges with pythons, and
whose partner is a red-lighter with a slippery flesh tuxedo, wrote
in <300320062218492997%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
Kadaitcha Man <*****-you.ya.*****@kiss-my-big-black-*****.com> wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the constipated grandpa and bitchy
rimadonna who likes lewd goob loobin' with piglets, and whose
partner is a fancy lady with a withering hootchie, wrote in
<300320062033354159%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
"Art Deco" <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:300320062033354159%art_deco@127.0.0.1...
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv> wrote:
hey, chec
mop jockey has morphed again.
[mop jockey filter readjusted]
Mop jockey is using the services of...
rob@www.genetics.pitt.edu
http://www.genetics.pitt.edu/
I wonder what the LART cost would be.
Whatever the cost is, mop jockey won't understand what happened.
He seems to think that he's going to "laugh at [my] pathetic
attempt, reading each of [my] emails as they pour in from [his]
friends." Now, how is he going to do that when the snail mail
address for every member of the university senate is available on
www.pitt.edu?
What do you suppose the reaction might be should all those people
learn about how the University of Pittsburgh as been dragged into
disrepute?
I can hear a small bird singing right now...
Wait until you hear the fat lady singing.
wait until you explain why "fuckwit" got you all "aboosed" but yet
you admit to constructing posts such as:
Oh, but you misunderstand. This about you and how you have misused the
University of Pittsburgh's resources to send abusive and offensive email
thereby bringing them into disrepute. It isn't about anyone else. No matter
which way you look at it, it was you who misused the University of
Pittsburgh's mail system. Nevertheless, please feel free to keep trying to
delude yourself into believing that someone other than you is culpable for
your own actions.
<7fqy$5qz.kfux@newsread1.news.pasearth1ink.nut>
"Re: SHERMLOCK SHOMES!, Delicious Innocent Gay 1st Time Deepthroat"
in which you craft a "false" attribution using my usenet nym's
information:
"SHERMLOCK SHOMES! <fart_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
<122p824f7a7fb50@news.supernews.com>..."
In that case, I'll include your admission there with all the posts you've
made. Not only will you be explaining words and phrases like "stupid fukz",
"you fjukwit", "mindfuck" and "circle jerk", you'll be explaining why you
were writing things like that on company time using company resources.
and leave false abuse addresses
I told you about the legal requirement for that address. What did you fail
to understand about what you were told?
for people to complain about your robot-spew obscene messages:
news-abuse@zig-zag.net
pretty twisted "game" you're playing, there.
Said the mop jockey as he suddenly forgot about the need to change his
underwear.
PS: Do you suppose they might also be interested in your now confirmed
direct involvement in publishing lists of links to child sex and bestiality
groups?
well, that would surely add to the frivolty fo your whines, since as a person
who was abused as a child, i don't participate in such things... only efforts
to stop internet providers and NSP's from distributing illegal content.
http://www.bedoper.com/usenet
yup. ISP's should be punished for carrying such content and ordered to stop,
as that website clearly explains. (if you can read)
Seeing that you continue to post on usenet there is enough empirical
evidence to support the argument that you post those links for other than
altruistic purposes.
what a tiny brain you have.
--
Roberta "Foxymopjockeychickenwrist" Wolfe
"The talk of the sekret AUK
off-newsgroup listserves!"
<insert pied piper song here>
Hi! I'm the .sig virus that will destroy Usenet. Please add me to your sig.
- END USENET NOW http://www.bedoper.com/usenet
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kadaitcha Man" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
31 Mar 2006 01:13:52 AM |
|
|
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the filthy sponger
and insatiable margery who likes hardhearted load lightening with
roadkill, and whose partner is a whorelet with a drenched coont, wrote
in <442cd0b0$0$16365$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the senile idler
and teapot-shaped culero who likes indelicate ham ramming with
whales, and whose partner is a woman of pleasure with hairless
breakfast of
champions, wrote in
<442cc6fe$0$22963$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the haggard itinerant and overbold
jam duff who likes lecherous pity-fucks with domestic cats, and
whose partner is a comfort woman with a voluminous tutu, wrote in
<300320062237561859%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
Kadaitcha Man <*****-you.ya.*****@kiss-my-big-black-*****.com> wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the fat deadbeat and lusty
lavender cowboy who likes gross dishonourable discharges with
pythons, and whose partner is a red-lighter with a slippery
flesh tuxedo, wrote in <300320062218492997%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
Kadaitcha Man <*****-you.ya.*****@kiss-my-big-black-*****.com>
wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the constipated grandpa and
bitchy rimadonna who likes lewd goob loobin' with piglets, and
whose partner is a fancy lady with a withering hootchie, wrote
in <300320062033354159%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
"Art Deco" <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:300320062033354159%art_deco@127.0.0.1...
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv> wrote:
hey, chec
mop jockey has morphed again.
[mop jockey filter readjusted]
Mop jockey is using the services of...
rob@www.genetics.pitt.edu
http://www.genetics.pitt.edu/
I wonder what the LART cost would be.
Whatever the cost is, mop jockey won't understand what happened.
He seems to think that he's going to "laugh at [my] pathetic
attempt, reading each of [my] emails as they pour in from [his]
friends." Now, how is he going to do that when the snail mail
address for every member of the university senate is available on
www.pitt.edu?
What do you suppose the reaction might be should all those people
learn about how the University of Pittsburgh as been dragged into
disrepute?
I can hear a small bird singing right now...
Wait until you hear the fat lady singing.
wait until you explain why "fuckwit" got you all "aboosed" but yet
you admit to constructing posts such as:
Oh, but you misunderstand. This about you and how you have misused
the University of Pittsburgh's resources to send abusive and
offensive email thereby bringing them into disrepute. It isn't about
anyone else. No matter which way you look at it, it was you who
misused the University of Pittsburgh's mail system. Nevertheless,
please feel free to keep trying to delude yourself into believing
that someone other than you is culpable for your own actions.
<7fqy$5qz.kfux@newsread1.news.pasearth1ink.nut>
"Re: SHERMLOCK SHOMES!, Delicious Innocent Gay 1st Time Deepthroat"
in which you craft a "false" attribution using my usenet nym's
information:
"SHERMLOCK SHOMES! <fart_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
<122p824f7a7fb50@news.supernews.com>..."
In that case, I'll include your admission there with all the posts
you've made. Not only will you be explaining words and phrases like
"stupid fukz", "you fjukwit", "mindfuck" and "circle jerk", you'll
be explaining why you were writing things like that on company time
using company resources.
and leave false abuse addresses
I told you about the legal requirement for that address. What did
you fail to understand about what you were told?
for people to complain about your robot-spew obscene messages:
news-abuse@zig-zag.net
pretty twisted "game" you're playing, there.
Said the mop jockey as he suddenly forgot about the need to change
his underwear.
PS: Do you suppose they might also be interested in your now
confirmed direct involvement in publishing lists of links to child
sex and bestiality groups?
well, that would surely add to the frivolty fo your whines, since as
a person who was abused as a child, i don't participate in such
things... only efforts to stop internet providers and NSP's from
distributing illegal content.
Real meaning: "*BLEAT* *BLEAT*"
http://www.bedoper.com/usenet
yup. ISP's should be punished for carrying such content and ordered
to stop, as that website clearly explains. (if you can read)
Seeing that you continue to post on usenet there is enough empirical
evidence to support the argument that you post those links for other
than altruistic purposes.
what a tiny brain you have.
And still, it is you who is posting to usenet on the one hand and demanding
it be shut down on the other. I suppose that's as good a cover as any for
all those links you publish.
Hi! I'm the .sig virus that will destroy Usenet. Please add me to
your sig. - END USENET NOW http://www.bedoper.com/usenet
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from
http://www.SecureIX.com ***
--
http://xp-crack.kadaitcha.cx
.
|
|
|
| User: "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ!" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
31 Mar 2006 01:19:59 AM |
|
|
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the filthy sponger
and insatiable margery who likes hardhearted load lightening with
roadkill, and whose partner is a whorelet with a drenched coont, wrote
in <442cd0b0$0$16365$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the senile idler
and teapot-shaped culero who likes indelicate ham ramming with
whales, and whose partner is a woman of pleasure with hairless
breakfast of
champions, wrote in
<442cc6fe$0$22963$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the haggard itinerant and overbold
jam duff who likes lecherous pity-fucks with domestic cats, and
whose partner is a comfort woman with a voluminous tutu, wrote in
<300320062237561859%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
Kadaitcha Man <*****-you.ya.*****@kiss-my-big-black-*****.com> wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the fat deadbeat and lusty
lavender cowboy who likes gross dishonourable discharges with
pythons, and whose partner is a red-lighter with a slippery
flesh tuxedo, wrote in <300320062218492997%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
Kadaitcha Man <*****-you.ya.*****@kiss-my-big-black-*****.com>
wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the constipated grandpa and
bitchy rimadonna who likes lewd goob loobin' with piglets, and
whose partner is a fancy lady with a withering hootchie, wrote
in <300320062033354159%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
"Art Deco" <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:300320062033354159%art_deco@127.0.0.1...
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv> wrote:
hey, chec
mop jockey has morphed again.
[mop jockey filter readjusted]
Mop jockey is using the services of...
rob@www.genetics.pitt.edu
http://www.genetics.pitt.edu/
I wonder what the LART cost would be.
Whatever the cost is, mop jockey won't understand what happened.
He seems to think that he's going to "laugh at [my] pathetic
attempt, reading each of [my] emails as they pour in from [his]
friends." Now, how is he going to do that when the snail mail
address for every member of the university senate is available on
www.pitt.edu?
What do you suppose the reaction might be should all those people
learn about how the University of Pittsburgh as been dragged into
disrepute?
I can hear a small bird singing right now...
Wait until you hear the fat lady singing.
wait until you explain why "fuckwit" got you all "aboosed" but yet
you admit to constructing posts such as:
Oh, but you misunderstand. This about you and how you have misused
the University of Pittsburgh's resources to send abusive and
offensive email thereby bringing them into disrepute. It isn't about
anyone else. No matter which way you look at it, it was you who
misused the University of Pittsburgh's mail system. Nevertheless,
please feel free to keep trying to delude yourself into believing
that someone other than you is culpable for your own actions.
<7fqy$5qz.kfux@newsread1.news.pasearth1ink.nut>
"Re: SHERMLOCK SHOMES!, Delicious Innocent Gay 1st Time Deepthroat"
in which you craft a "false" attribution using my usenet nym's
information:
"SHERMLOCK SHOMES! <fart_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
<122p824f7a7fb50@news.supernews.com>..."
In that case, I'll include your admission there with all the posts
you've made. Not only will you be explaining words and phrases like
"stupid fukz", "you fjukwit", "mindfuck" and "circle jerk", you'll
be explaining why you were writing things like that on company time
using company resources.
and leave false abuse addresses
I told you about the legal requirement for that address. What did
you fail to understand about what you were told?
for people to complain about your robot-spew obscene messages:
news-abuse@zig-zag.net
pretty twisted "game" you're playing, there.
Said the mop jockey as he suddenly forgot about the need to change
his underwear.
PS: Do you suppose they might also be interested in your now
confirmed direct involvement in publishing lists of links to child
sex and bestiality groups?
well, that would surely add to the frivolty fo your whines, since as
a person who was abused as a child, i don't participate in such
things... only efforts to stop internet providers and NSP's from
distributing illegal content.
Real meaning: "*BLEAT* *BLEAT*"
http://www.bedoper.com/usenet
yup. ISP's should be punished for carrying such content and ordered
to stop, as that website clearly explains. (if you can read)
Seeing that you continue to post on usenet there is enough empirical
evidence to support the argument that you post those links for other
than altruistic purposes.
what a tiny brain you have.
And still, it is you who is posting to usenet on the one hand and demanding
it be shut down on the other. I suppose that's as good a cover as any for
all those links you publish.
you mean the links that prove that most ISPs serve out illegal content?
okay. Don't you have stamps to lick?
--
Roberta "Foxymopjockeychickenwrist" Wolfe
"The talk of the sekret AUK
off-newsgroup listserves!"
<insert pied piper song here>
Hi! I'm the .sig virus that will destroy Usenet. Please add me to your sig.
- END USENET NOW http://www.bedoper.com/usenet
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kadaitcha Man" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
31 Mar 2006 01:33:13 AM |
|
|
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the belching cadger
and apprenticed jessie who likes aberrant non-orthogenic sex with fruit
bats, and whose partner is a dolly-mop with a dreadful ***** hole, wrote
in <442cd92d$0$20263$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the filthy
sponger
and insatiable margery who likes hardhearted load lightening with
roadkill, and whose partner is a whorelet with a drenched coont,
wrote
in <442cd0b0$0$16365$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the senile
idler and teapot-shaped culero who likes indelicate ham ramming
with whales, and whose partner is a woman of pleasure with hairless
breakfast of
champions, wrote in
<442cc6fe$0$22963$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the haggard itinerant and overbold
jam duff who likes lecherous pity-fucks with domestic cats, and
whose partner is a comfort woman with a voluminous tutu, wrote in
<300320062237561859%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
Kadaitcha Man <*****-you.ya.*****@kiss-my-big-black-*****.com>
wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the fat deadbeat and lusty
lavender cowboy who likes gross dishonourable discharges with
pythons, and whose partner is a red-lighter with a slippery
flesh tuxedo, wrote in <300320062218492997%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
Kadaitcha Man <*****-you.ya.*****@kiss-my-big-black-*****.com>
wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the constipated grandpa and
bitchy rimadonna who likes lewd goob loobin' with piglets,
and whose partner is a fancy lady with a withering hootchie,
wrote in <300320062033354159%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
"Art Deco" <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:300320062033354159%art_deco@127.0.0.1...
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv> wrote:
hey, chec
mop jockey has morphed again.
[mop jockey filter readjusted]
Mop jockey is using the services of...
rob@www.genetics.pitt.edu
http://www.genetics.pitt.edu/
I wonder what the LART cost would be.
Whatever the cost is, mop jockey won't understand what
happened.
He seems to think that he's going to "laugh at [my] pathetic
attempt, reading each of [my] emails as they pour in from [his]
friends." Now, how is he going to do that when the snail mail
address for every member of the university senate is available
on www.pitt.edu?
What do you suppose the reaction might be should all those
people learn about how the University of Pittsburgh as been
dragged into disrepute?
I can hear a small bird singing right now...
Wait until you hear the fat lady singing.
wait until you explain why "fuckwit" got you all "aboosed" but yet
you admit to constructing posts such as:
Oh, but you misunderstand. This about you and how you have misused
the University of Pittsburgh's resources to send abusive and
offensive email thereby bringing them into disrepute. It isn't
about anyone else. No matter which way you look at it, it was you
who misused the University of Pittsburgh's mail system.
Nevertheless, please feel free to keep trying to delude yourself
into believing that someone other than you is culpable for your
own actions.
<7fqy$5qz.kfux@newsread1.news.pasearth1ink.nut>
"Re: SHERMLOCK SHOMES!, Delicious Innocent Gay 1st Time
Deepthroat"
in which you craft a "false" attribution using my usenet nym's
information:
"SHERMLOCK SHOMES! <fart_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
<122p824f7a7fb50@news.supernews.com>..."
In that case, I'll include your admission there with all the posts
you've made. Not only will you be explaining words and phrases like
"stupid fukz", "you fjukwit", "mindfuck" and "circle jerk", you'll
be explaining why you were writing things like that on company time
using company resources.
and leave false abuse addresses
I told you about the legal requirement for that address. What did
you fail to understand about what you were told?
for people to complain about your robot-spew obscene messages:
news-abuse@zig-zag.net
pretty twisted "game" you're playing, there.
Said the mop jockey as he suddenly forgot about the need to change
his underwear.
PS: Do you suppose they might also be interested in your now
confirmed direct involvement in publishing lists of links to child
sex and bestiality groups?
well, that would surely add to the frivolty fo your whines, since as
a person who was abused as a child, i don't participate in such
things... only efforts to stop internet providers and NSP's from
distributing illegal content.
Real meaning: "*BLEAT* *BLEAT*"
http://www.bedoper.com/usenet
yup. ISP's should be punished for carrying such content and ordered
to stop, as that website clearly explains. (if you can read)
Seeing that you continue to post on usenet there is enough
empirical evidence to support the argument that you post those
links for other than altruistic purposes.
what a tiny brain you have.
And still, it is you who is posting to usenet on the one hand and
demanding it be shut down on the other. I suppose that's as good a
cover as any for all those links you publish.
you mean the links that prove that most ISPs serve out illegal
content?
okay. Don't you have stamps to lick?
Real meaning: "Contrive, feint, parry, duck, dodge, evade, weave, elude,
equivocate, escape, circumlocute, fudge, shift, shuffle, sidestep, swerve,
weasel, deflect, divert..."
--
http://xp-crack.kadaitcha.cx
.
|
|
|
| User: "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ!" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
31 Mar 2006 01:37:39 AM |
|
|
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the belching cadger
and apprenticed jessie who likes aberrant non-orthogenic sex with fruit
bats, and whose partner is a dolly-mop with a dreadful ***** hole, wrote
in <442cd92d$0$20263$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the filthy
sponger
and insatiable margery who likes hardhearted load lightening with
roadkill, and whose partner is a whorelet with a drenched coont,
wrote
in <442cd0b0$0$16365$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the senile
idler and teapot-shaped culero who likes indelicate ham ramming
with whales, and whose partner is a woman of pleasure with hairless
breakfast of
champions, wrote in
<442cc6fe$0$22963$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the haggard itinerant and overbold
jam duff who likes lecherous pity-fucks with domestic cats, and
whose partner is a comfort woman with a voluminous tutu, wrote in
<300320062237561859%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
Kadaitcha Man <*****-you.ya.*****@kiss-my-big-black-*****.com>
wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the fat deadbeat and lusty
lavender cowboy who likes gross dishonourable discharges with
pythons, and whose partner is a red-lighter with a slippery
flesh tuxedo, wrote in <300320062218492997%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
Kadaitcha Man <*****-you.ya.*****@kiss-my-big-black-*****.com>
wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the constipated grandpa and
bitchy rimadonna who likes lewd goob loobin' with piglets,
and whose partner is a fancy lady with a withering hootchie,
wrote in <300320062033354159%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
"Art Deco" <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:300320062033354159%art_deco@127.0.0.1...
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv> wrote:
hey, chec
mop jockey has morphed again.
[mop jockey filter readjusted]
Mop jockey is using the services of...
rob@www.genetics.pitt.edu
http://www.genetics.pitt.edu/
I wonder what the LART cost would be.
Whatever the cost is, mop jockey won't understand what
happened.
He seems to think that he's going to "laugh at [my] pathetic
attempt, reading each of [my] emails as they pour in from [his]
friends." Now, how is he going to do that when the snail mail
address for every member of the university senate is available
on www.pitt.edu?
What do you suppose the reaction might be should all those
people learn about how the University of Pittsburgh as been
dragged into disrepute?
I can hear a small bird singing right now...
Wait until you hear the fat lady singing.
wait until you explain why "fuckwit" got you all "aboosed" but yet
you admit to constructing posts such as:
Oh, but you misunderstand. This about you and how you have misused
the University of Pittsburgh's resources to send abusive and
offensive email thereby bringing them into disrepute. It isn't
about anyone else. No matter which way you look at it, it was you
who misused the University of Pittsburgh's mail system.
Nevertheless, please feel free to keep trying to delude yourself
into believing that someone other than you is culpable for your
own actions.
<7fqy$5qz.kfux@newsread1.news.pasearth1ink.nut>
"Re: SHERMLOCK SHOMES!, Delicious Innocent Gay 1st Time
Deepthroat"
in which you craft a "false" attribution using my usenet nym's
information:
"SHERMLOCK SHOMES! <fart_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
<122p824f7a7fb50@news.supernews.com>..."
In that case, I'll include your admission there with all the posts
you've made. Not only will you be explaining words and phrases like
"stupid fukz", "you fjukwit", "mindfuck" and "circle jerk", you'll
be explaining why you were writing things like that on company time
using company resources.
and leave false abuse addresses
I told you about the legal requirement for that address. What did
you fail to understand about what you were told?
for people to complain about your robot-spew obscene messages:
news-abuse@zig-zag.net
pretty twisted "game" you're playing, there.
Said the mop jockey as he suddenly forgot about the need to change
his underwear.
PS: Do you suppose they might also be interested in your now
confirmed direct involvement in publishing lists of links to child
sex and bestiality groups?
well, that would surely add to the frivolty fo your whines, since as
a person who was abused as a child, i don't participate in such
things... only efforts to stop internet providers and NSP's from
distributing illegal content.
Real meaning: "*BLEAT* *BLEAT*"
http://www.bedoper.com/usenet
yup. ISP's should be punished for carrying such content and ordered
to stop, as that website clearly explains. (if you can read)
Seeing that you continue to post on usenet there is enough
empirical evidence to support the argument that you post those
links for other than altruistic purposes.
what a tiny brain you have.
And still, it is you who is posting to usenet on the one hand and
demanding it be shut down on the other. I suppose that's as good a
cover as any for all those links you publish.
you mean the links that prove that most ISPs serve out illegal
content?
okay. Don't you have stamps to lick?
Real meaning: "Contrive, feint, parry, duck, dodge, evade, weave, elude,
equivocate, escape, circumlocute, fudge, shift, shuffle, sidestep, swerve,
weasel, deflect, divert..."
Real Meaning: "Oh *****, how do I get out of being so obviously trolled this
HARD in front of all of my cool buddies! Oooh, I know... I'll post some
speculative lunacy!"
--
Roberta "Foxymopjockeychickenwrist" Wolfe
"The talk of the sekret AUK
off-newsgroup listserves!"
<insert pied piper song here>
Hi! I'm the .sig virus that will destroy Usenet. Please add me to your sig.
- END USENET NOW http://www.bedoper.com/usenet
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kadaitcha Man" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
31 Mar 2006 01:49:11 AM |
|
|
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the deviant pauper
and hirsute dung-puncher who likes undignified boot knocking with rat
snakes, and whose partner is a hot-lay with a moist woollen bivalve,
wrote in <442cdd50$0$20263$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the belching
cadger and apprenticed jessie who likes aberrant non-orthogenic sex
with fruit bats, and whose partner is a dolly-mop with a dreadful
***** hole, wrote
in <442cd92d$0$20263$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the filthy
sponger
and insatiable margery who likes hardhearted load lightening with
roadkill, and whose partner is a whorelet with a drenched coont,
wrote
in <442cd0b0$0$16365$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the senile
idler and teapot-shaped culero who likes indelicate ham ramming
with whales, and whose partner is a woman of pleasure with
hairless breakfast of
champions, wrote in
<442cc6fe$0$22963$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the haggard itinerant and
overbold jam duff who likes lecherous pity-fucks with domestic
cats, and whose partner is a comfort woman with a voluminous
tutu, wrote in <300320062237561859%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
Kadaitcha Man <*****-you.ya.*****@kiss-my-big-black-*****.com>
wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the fat deadbeat and lusty
lavender cowboy who likes gross dishonourable discharges with
pythons, and whose partner is a red-lighter with a slippery
flesh tuxedo, wrote in
<300320062218492997%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
Kadaitcha Man <*****-you.ya.*****@kiss-my-big-black-*****.com>
wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the constipated grandpa and
bitchy rimadonna who likes lewd goob loobin' with piglets,
and whose partner is a fancy lady with a withering
hootchie, wrote in <300320062033354159%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
"Art Deco" <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:300320062033354159%art_deco@127.0.0.1...
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv> wrote:
hey, chec
mop jockey has morphed again.
[mop jockey filter readjusted]
Mop jockey is using the services of...
rob@www.genetics.pitt.edu
http://www.genetics.pitt.edu/
I wonder what the LART cost would be.
Whatever the cost is, mop jockey won't understand what
happened.
He seems to think that he's going to "laugh at [my] pathetic
attempt, reading each of [my] emails as they pour in from
[his] friends." Now, how is he going to do that when the
snail mail address for every member of the university senate
is available on www.pitt.edu?
What do you suppose the reaction might be should all those
people learn about how the University of Pittsburgh as been
dragged into disrepute?
I can hear a small bird singing right now...
Wait until you hear the fat lady singing.
wait until you explain why "fuckwit" got you all "aboosed" but
yet you admit to constructing posts such as:
Oh, but you misunderstand. This about you and how you have
misused the University of Pittsburgh's resources to send abusive
and offensive email thereby bringing them into disrepute. It
isn't about anyone else. No matter which way you look at it, it
was you who misused the University of Pittsburgh's mail system.
Nevertheless, please feel free to keep trying to delude yourself
into believing that someone other than you is culpable for your
own actions.
<7fqy$5qz.kfux@newsread1.news.pasearth1ink.nut>
"Re: SHERMLOCK SHOMES!, Delicious Innocent Gay 1st Time
Deepthroat"
in which you craft a "false" attribution using my usenet nym's
information:
"SHERMLOCK SHOMES! <fart_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
<122p824f7a7fb50@news.supernews.com>..."
In that case, I'll include your admission there with all the
posts you've made. Not only will you be explaining words and
phrases like "stupid fukz", "you fjukwit", "mindfuck" and
"circle jerk", you'll be explaining why you were writing things
like that on company time using company resources.
and leave false abuse addresses
I told you about the legal requirement for that address. What did
you fail to understand about what you were told?
for people to complain about your robot-spew obscene messages:
news-abuse@zig-zag.net
pretty twisted "game" you're playing, there.
Said the mop jockey as he suddenly forgot about the need to
change his underwear.
PS: Do you suppose they might also be interested in your now
confirmed direct involvement in publishing lists of links to
child sex and bestiality groups?
well, that would surely add to the frivolty fo your whines, since
as a person who was abused as a child, i don't participate in such
things... only efforts to stop internet providers and NSP's from
distributing illegal content.
Real meaning: "*BLEAT* *BLEAT*"
http://www.bedoper.com/usenet
yup. ISP's should be punished for carrying such content and
ordered to stop, as that website clearly explains. (if you can
read)
Seeing that you continue to post on usenet there is enough
empirical evidence to support the argument that you post those
links for other than altruistic purposes.
what a tiny brain you have.
And still, it is you who is posting to usenet on the one hand and
demanding it be shut down on the other. I suppose that's as good a
cover as any for all those links you publish.
you mean the links that prove that most ISPs serve out illegal
content?
okay. Don't you have stamps to lick?
Real meaning: "Contrive, feint, parry, duck, dodge, evade, weave,
elude, equivocate, escape, circumlocute, fudge, shift, shuffle,
sidestep, swerve, weasel, deflect, divert..."
Real Meaning:
Monkey see, monkey do.
"Oh *****, how do I get out of being so obviously
trolled this HARD in front of all of my cool buddies! Oooh,
I know... I'll post some speculative lunacy!"
Real Meaning: "Yes, I was trolling and sending offensive emails using the
University of Pittsburgh's resources when I'm supposed to be getting paid
for doing a job."
--
http://xp-crack.kadaitcha.cx
.
|
|
|
| User: "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ!" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
31 Mar 2006 01:58:11 AM |
|
|
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the deviant pauper
and hirsute dung-puncher who likes undignified boot knocking with rat
snakes, and whose partner is a hot-lay with a moist woollen bivalve,
wrote in <442cdd50$0$20263$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the belching
cadger and apprenticed jessie who likes aberrant non-orthogenic sex
with fruit bats, and whose partner is a dolly-mop with a dreadful
***** hole, wrote
in <442cd92d$0$20263$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the filthy
sponger
and insatiable margery who likes hardhearted load lightening with
roadkill, and whose partner is a whorelet with a drenched coont,
wrote
in <442cd0b0$0$16365$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the senile
idler and teapot-shaped culero who likes indelicate ham ramming
with whales, and whose partner is a woman of pleasure with
hairless breakfast of
champions, wrote in
<442cc6fe$0$22963$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the haggard itinerant and
overbold jam duff who likes lecherous pity-fucks with domestic
cats, and whose partner is a comfort woman with a voluminous
tutu, wrote in <300320062237561859%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
Kadaitcha Man <*****-you.ya.*****@kiss-my-big-black-*****.com>
wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the fat deadbeat and lusty
lavender cowboy who likes gross dishonourable discharges with
pythons, and whose partner is a red-lighter with a slippery
flesh tuxedo, wrote in
<300320062218492997%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
Kadaitcha Man <*****-you.ya.*****@kiss-my-big-black-*****.com>
wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the constipated grandpa and
bitchy rimadonna who likes lewd goob loobin' with piglets,
and whose partner is a fancy lady with a withering
hootchie, wrote in <300320062033354159%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
"Art Deco" <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:300320062033354159%art_deco@127.0.0.1...
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv> wrote:
hey, chec
mop jockey has morphed again.
[mop jockey filter readjusted]
Mop jockey is using the services of...
rob@www.genetics.pitt.edu
http://www.genetics.pitt.edu/
I wonder what the LART cost would be.
Whatever the cost is, mop jockey won't understand what
happened.
He seems to think that he's going to "laugh at [my] pathetic
attempt, reading each of [my] emails as they pour in from
[his] friends." Now, how is he going to do that when the
snail mail address for every member of the university senate
is available on www.pitt.edu?
What do you suppose the reaction might be should all those
people learn about how the University of Pittsburgh as been
dragged into disrepute?
I can hear a small bird singing right now...
Wait until you hear the fat lady singing.
wait until you explain why "fuckwit" got you all "aboosed" but
yet you admit to constructing posts such as:
Oh, but you misunderstand. This about you and how you have
misused the University of Pittsburgh's resources to send abusive
and offensive email thereby bringing them into disrepute. It
isn't about anyone else. No matter which way you look at it, it
was you who misused the University of Pittsburgh's mail system.
Nevertheless, please feel free to keep trying to delude yourself
into believing that someone other than you is culpable for your
own actions.
<7fqy$5qz.kfux@newsread1.news.pasearth1ink.nut>
"Re: SHERMLOCK SHOMES!, Delicious Innocent Gay 1st Time
Deepthroat"
in which you craft a "false" attribution using my usenet nym's
information:
"SHERMLOCK SHOMES! <fart_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
<122p824f7a7fb50@news.supernews.com>..."
In that case, I'll include your admission there with all the
posts you've made. Not only will you be explaining words and
phrases like "stupid fukz", "you fjukwit", "mindfuck" and
"circle jerk", you'll be explaining why you were writing things
like that on company time using company resources.
and leave false abuse addresses
I told you about the legal requirement for that address. What did
you fail to understand about what you were told?
for people to complain about your robot-spew obscene messages:
news-abuse@zig-zag.net
pretty twisted "game" you're playing, there.
Said the mop jockey as he suddenly forgot about the need to
change his underwear.
PS: Do you suppose they might also be interested in your now
confirmed direct involvement in publishing lists of links to
child sex and bestiality groups?
well, that would surely add to the frivolty fo your whines, since
as a person who was abused as a child, i don't participate in such
things... only efforts to stop internet providers and NSP's from
distributing illegal content.
Real meaning: "*BLEAT* *BLEAT*"
http://www.bedoper.com/usenet
yup. ISP's should be punished for carrying such content and
ordered to stop, as that website clearly explains. (if you can
read)
Seeing that you continue to post on usenet there is enough
empirical evidence to support the argument that you post those
links for other than altruistic purposes.
what a tiny brain you have.
And still, it is you who is posting to usenet on the one hand and
demanding it be shut down on the other. I suppose that's as good a
cover as any for all those links you publish.
you mean the links that prove that most ISPs serve out illegal
content?
okay. Don't you have stamps to lick?
Real meaning: "Contrive, feint, parry, duck, dodge, evade, weave,
elude, equivocate, escape, circumlocute, fudge, shift, shuffle,
sidestep, swerve, weasel, deflect, divert..."
Real Meaning:
Monkey see, monkey do.
"Oh *****, how do I get out of being so obviously
trolled this HARD in front of all of my cool buddies! Oooh,
I know... I'll post some speculative lunacy!"
Real Meaning: "Yes, I was trolling and sending offensive emails using the
University of Pittsburgh's resources when I'm supposed to be getting paid
for doing a job."
couple things:
i wasn't "on the clock" and my superiors will know it by the timestamps.
you admitted to posting offensive material meant to appear as tho it was
posted to usenet by me.
the incident response team surely deals with clowns like you all the time.
you can't take a joke.
--
Roberta "Foxymopjockeychickenwrist" Wolfe
"The talk of the sekret AUK
off-newsgroup listserves!"
<insert pied piper song here>
Hi! I'm the .sig virus that will destroy Usenet. Please add me to your sig.
- END USENET NOW http://www.bedoper.com/usenet
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kadaitcha Man" |
|
| Title: Re: Unhealthy Obsessions? |
31 Mar 2006 02:11:39 AM |
|
|
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the fat-assed
ne'er-do-well and impudent heterosexual who likes hideous weed whacking
with porcupines, and whose partner is a gigsy with a hulking finger
warmer, wrote in <442ce222$0$11950$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the deviant
pauper
and hirsute dung-puncher who likes undignified boot knocking with rat
snakes, and whose partner is a hot-lay with a moist woollen bivalve,
wrote in <442cdd50$0$20263$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the belching
cadger and apprenticed jessie who likes aberrant non-orthogenic sex
with fruit bats, and whose partner is a dolly-mop with a dreadful
***** hole, wrote
in <442cd92d$0$20263$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the filthy
sponger
and insatiable margery who likes hardhearted load lightening with
roadkill, and whose partner is a whorelet with a drenched coont,
wrote
in <442cd0b0$0$16365$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ! <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv>, the senile
idler and teapot-shaped culero who likes indelicate ham ramming
with whales, and whose partner is a woman of pleasure with
hairless breakfast of
champions, wrote in
<442cc6fe$0$22963$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the haggard itinerant and
overbold jam duff who likes lecherous pity-fucks with
domestic cats, and whose partner is a comfort woman with a
voluminous tutu, wrote in
<300320062237561859%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
Kadaitcha Man <*****-you.ya.*****@kiss-my-big-black-*****.com>
wrote:
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1>, the fat deadbeat and lusty
lavender cowboy who likes gross dishonourable discharges
with pythons, and whose partner is a red-lighter with a
slippery flesh tuxedo, wrote in
<300320062218492997%art_deco@127.0.0.1>:
Kadaitcha Man <*****-you.ya.*****@kiss-my-big-blac | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
