Re: Vajk's potential energy "blunder"?



 Science > Physics > Re: Vajk's potential energy "blunder"?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 3

1

 

2

 

3

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Mu-Pi"
Date: 29 Dec 2003 05:46:15 PM
Object: Re: Vajk's potential energy "blunder"?
"Bill Vajk" <bill9north@hotmail.DITCHTHIS.com> wrote in message
news:8bYHb.69159$VB2.135348@attbi_s51...

JWMeritt wrote:

PMB wrote:


<lbudney@pobox.com> wrote in message news:vfo0hivi.fsf@pobox.com...


All,


Since Bill can't bother, can anyone else explain Bill's assertion
that potential energy increases as an object falls? He gives one
"clarification" here: <http://tinyurl.com/32w7k>


I don't seem him stating that in that thread. However it was kind of a

vauge

conversation.


Did it explain what "falling" meant? To my understanding of the term,

it is

the motion of a _unrestricted_ body in a gravitational field, which

would have

both distance from the grav source, velocity,... pretty much irrelevant.

An

object in orbit may be viewed as continuously falling but with no change

in

speed (though its velocity vector is continuously changing) or altitude.

A

ballistic object in the first part of its trajectory is losing kinetic

energy

while it gains in potential energy. But a glance at Webster contains

the

direction "downward" in most of its definitions. With that restriction

the

potential energy would, in my vioew by definition, decrease.


Jim, they're so into the micro that they completely miss any
possibilities that exist in taking a macro view.

Here's a question that *might* bring some perspective to the
questions (if the presently blind miraculously recover some
vision.)

Under what circumstance can a person move a 2 ton boulder
over a 1 mile course and have done no work. We're talking
about a rock in a field here, nothing fancy other than
concepts.

That is not the subject. You already tried to weasel out of your blunder
before and were shot down. Time to petition for another immortal fumble
entry.
.

User: "Franz Heymann"

Title: Re: Vajk's potential energy "blunder"? 30 Dec 2003 10:19:44 AM
"Mu-Pi" <Mu-Pi@greekletter.net> wrote in message
news:VtGdnQ5LcpNUIW2iRVn-hg@comcast.com...
[snip]
,


Since Bill can't bother, can anyone else explain Bill's assertion
that potential energy increases as an object falls? He gives one
"clarification" here: <http://tinyurl.com/32w7k>

The page appears to be unavailable.
Franz
.
User: "Dirk Van de moortel"

Title: Re: Vajk's potential energy "blunder"? 30 Dec 2003 10:24:23 AM
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message news:bss8iv$10m$3@sparta.btinternet.com...


"Mu-Pi" <Mu-Pi@greekletter.net> wrote in message
news:VtGdnQ5LcpNUIW2iRVn-hg@comcast.com...

[snip]
,


Since Bill can't bother, can anyone else explain Bill's assertion
that potential energy increases as an object falls? He gives one
"clarification" here: <http://tinyurl.com/32w7k>


The page appears to be unavailable.

It comes through for me, Franz...
Anyway, here's a working (somewhat less tiny) pointer:
http://groups.google.com/groups?&threadm=3E98B94E.1080501@hotmail.com
Dirk Vdm
.
User: "Franz Heymann"

Title: Re: Vajk's potential energy "blunder"? 30 Dec 2003 04:43:23 PM
"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote
in message news:XEhIb.105123$uD2.4784194@phobos.telenet-ops.be...


"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message

news:bss8iv$10m$3@sparta.btinternet.com...


"Mu-Pi" <Mu-Pi@greekletter.net> wrote in message
news:VtGdnQ5LcpNUIW2iRVn-hg@comcast.com...

[snip]
,


Since Bill can't bother, can anyone else explain Bill's assertion
that potential energy increases as an object falls? He gives one
"clarification" here: <http://tinyurl.com/32w7k>


The page appears to be unavailable.


It comes through for me, Franz...
Anyway, here's a working (somewhat less tiny) pointer:
http://groups.google.com/groups?&threadm=3E98B94E.1080501@hotmail.com

Goeie naand, Dirk,
I got the page now, thanks. There must have been a temporary glitsh
somewhere.
Having looked at it, all I can say is that I bet Bill wishes he had not
responded in that way. How much easier it would have been to say he was
sleepy, or even perhaps drunk at the time he dropped the original booby.
I guess he will now have to suffer the consequences for ever and a day.
Franz
.
User: "Mu-Pi"

Title: Re: Vajk's potential energy "blunder"? 30 Dec 2003 06:00:32 PM
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:bssv2b$et7$3@titan.btinternet.com...


"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote
in message news:XEhIb.105123$uD2.4784194@phobos.telenet-ops.be...


"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message

news:bss8iv$10m$3@sparta.btinternet.com...


"Mu-Pi" <Mu-Pi@greekletter.net> wrote in message
news:VtGdnQ5LcpNUIW2iRVn-hg@comcast.com...

[snip]
,


Since Bill can't bother, can anyone else explain Bill's

assertion

that potential energy increases as an object falls? He gives

one

"clarification" here: <http://tinyurl.com/32w7k>


The page appears to be unavailable.


It comes through for me, Franz...
Anyway, here's a working (somewhat less tiny) pointer:
http://groups.google.com/groups?&threadm=3E98B94E.1080501@hotmail.com


Goeie naand, Dirk,
I got the page now, thanks. There must have been a temporary glitsh
somewhere.
Having looked at it, all I can say is that I bet Bill wishes he had not
responded in that way. How much easier it would have been to say he was
sleepy, or even perhaps drunk at the time he dropped the original booby.
I guess he will now have to suffer the consequences for ever and a day.

No doubt. If you check out the thread you see that many posters tried to
give him the benefit of the doubt, but he steadfastly refused to take it.
Thus he
was granted a place in the Immortal fumbles page.
.

User: "Dirk Van de moortel"

Title: Re: Vajk's potential energy "blunder"? 30 Dec 2003 04:53:00 PM
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message news:bssv2b$et7$3@titan.btinternet.com...


"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote
in message news:XEhIb.105123$uD2.4784194@phobos.telenet-ops.be...


"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message

news:bss8iv$10m$3@sparta.btinternet.com...


"Mu-Pi" <Mu-Pi@greekletter.net> wrote in message
news:VtGdnQ5LcpNUIW2iRVn-hg@comcast.com...

[snip]
,


Since Bill can't bother, can anyone else explain Bill's assertion
that potential energy increases as an object falls? He gives one
"clarification" here: <http://tinyurl.com/32w7k>


The page appears to be unavailable.


It comes through for me, Franz...
Anyway, here's a working (somewhat less tiny) pointer:
http://groups.google.com/groups?&threadm=3E98B94E.1080501@hotmail.com


Goeie naand, Dirk,

Hey, 'Goeie naand' is that perhaps your official expr. for our
'Goede avond' (Good evening)? If so, yours sounds exactly
the same as ours when we are talking fast - and in dialect.
Bizarre how some expressions in our drifted apart languages
still sound almost exactly the same when spoken... Nice.
Goeie nacht!
Dirk Vdm
.
User: "Franz Heymann"

Title: Re: Vajk's potential energy "blunder"? 31 Dec 2003 11:34:23 AM
"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote
in message news:glnIb.106113$QO2.4927589@phobos.telenet-ops.be...


"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message

news:bssv2b$et7$3@titan.btinternet.com...


"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com>

wrote

in message news:XEhIb.105123$uD2.4784194@phobos.telenet-ops.be...


"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message

news:bss8iv$10m$3@sparta.btinternet.com...


"Mu-Pi" <Mu-Pi@greekletter.net> wrote in message
news:VtGdnQ5LcpNUIW2iRVn-hg@comcast.com...

[snip]
,


Since Bill can't bother, can anyone else explain Bill's

assertion

that potential energy increases as an object falls? He gives

one

"clarification" here: <http://tinyurl.com/32w7k>


The page appears to be unavailable.


It comes through for me, Franz...
Anyway, here's a working (somewhat less tiny) pointer:

http://groups.google.com/groups?&threadm=3E98B94E.1080501@hotmail.com


Goeie naand, Dirk,


Hey, 'Goeie naand' is that perhaps your official expr. for our
'Goede avond' (Good evening)?

Ja.

If so, yours sounds exactly
the same as ours when we are talking fast - and in dialect.
Bizarre how some expressions in our drifted apart languages
still sound almost exactly the same when spoken... Nice.

Goeie nacht!

Another example of the same thing
Goeie nag!
En 'n voorspoedige nuwe jaar
Franz
.
User: "Jeffrey Meyer"

Title: Re: Vajk's potential energy "blunder"? 01 Jan 2004 10:27:40 AM
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:bsv1au$e49$17@hercules.btinternet.com...


"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote
in message news:glnIb.106113$QO2.4927589@phobos.telenet-ops.be...


"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message

news:bssv2b$et7$3@titan.btinternet.com...


"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com>

wrote

in message news:XEhIb.105123$uD2.4784194@phobos.telenet-ops.be...


"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message

news:bss8iv$10m$3@sparta.btinternet.com...


"Mu-Pi" <Mu-Pi@greekletter.net> wrote in message
news:VtGdnQ5LcpNUIW2iRVn-hg@comcast.com...

[snip]
,


Since Bill can't bother, can anyone else explain Bill's

assertion

that potential energy increases as an object falls? He

gives

one

"clarification" here: <http://tinyurl.com/32w7k>


The page appears to be unavailable.


It comes through for me, Franz...
Anyway, here's a working (somewhat less tiny) pointer:

http://groups.google.com/groups?&threadm=3E98B94E.1080501@hotmail.com


Goeie naand, Dirk,


Hey, 'Goeie naand' is that perhaps your official expr. for our
'Goede avond' (Good evening)?


Ja.

If so, yours sounds exactly
the same as ours when we are talking fast - and in dialect.
Bizarre how some expressions in our drifted apart languages
still sound almost exactly the same when spoken... Nice.

Goeie nacht!


Another example of the same thing

Goeie nag!

En 'n voorspoedige nuwe jaar

Franz

Van Suid Afrika Franz?
--
Jeffrey



.
User: "Franz Heymann"

Title: Re: Vajk's potential energy "blunder"? 01 Jan 2004 04:10:47 PM
"Jeffrey Meyer" <merlot@icon.co.za> wrote in message
news:3ff44a1c$0$216@hades.is.co.za...


[snip]

Van Suid Afrika Franz?

Gebore en opgegvoed.
Maar ek bly in Engeland sedert 1947
Franz
.
User: "Jeffrey Meyer"

Title: Re: Vajk's potential energy "blunder"? 02 Jan 2004 11:33:46 AM
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:bt25t7$ess$1@titan.btinternet.com...


"Jeffrey Meyer" <merlot@icon.co.za> wrote in message
news:3ff44a1c$0$216@hades.is.co.za...



[snip]

Van Suid Afrika Franz?


Gebore en opgegvoed.
Maar ek bly in Engeland sedert 1947

Ek is in Johannesburg.
--
Jeffrey


Franz



.
User: "Franz Heymann"

Title: Re: Vajk's potential energy "blunder"? 08 Jan 2004 01:52:32 PM
"Jeffrey Meyer" <merlot@icon.co.za> wrote in message
news:3ff5aabc$0$222@hades.is.co.za...


"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:bt25t7$ess$1@titan.btinternet.com...


"Jeffrey Meyer" <merlot@icon.co.za> wrote in message
news:3ff44a1c$0$216@hades.is.co.za...



[snip]

Van Suid Afrika Franz?


Gebore en opgegvoed.
Maar ek bly in Engeland sedert 1947


Ek is in Johannesburg.

By Wits? Indien so, staf lid of student?
Franz
.
User: "Jeffrey Meyer"

Title: Re: Vajk's potential energy "blunder"? 10 Jan 2004 04:55:47 AM
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:btkce0$jcc$11@titan.btinternet.com...


"Jeffrey Meyer" <merlot@icon.co.za> wrote in message
news:3ff5aabc$0$222@hades.is.co.za...


"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:bt25t7$ess$1@titan.btinternet.com...


"Jeffrey Meyer" <merlot@icon.co.za> wrote in message
news:3ff44a1c$0$216@hades.is.co.za...



[snip]

Van Suid Afrika Franz?


Gebore en opgegvoed.
Maar ek bly in Engeland sedert 1947


Ek is in Johannesburg.


By Wits? Indien so, staf lid of student?

Neither. Sorry, my Afrikaans is kak. I'm an optometrist in private
practice. You?
--
Jeffrey


Franz


.
User: "Franz Heymann"

Title: Re: Vajk's potential energy "blunder"? 10 Jan 2004 10:42:32 AM
"Jeffrey Meyer" <merlot@icon.co.za> wrote in message
news:3fffda48$0$217@hades.is.co.za...


"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:btkce0$jcc$11@titan.btinternet.com...


"Jeffrey Meyer" <merlot@icon.co.za> wrote in message
news:3ff5aabc$0$222@hades.is.co.za...


"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:bt25t7$ess$1@titan.btinternet.com...


"Jeffrey Meyer" <merlot@icon.co.za> wrote in message
news:3ff44a1c$0$216@hades.is.co.za...



[snip]

Van Suid Afrika Franz?


Gebore en opgegvoed.
Maar ek bly in Engeland sedert 1947


Ek is in Johannesburg.


By Wits? Indien so, staf lid of student?


Neither. Sorry, my Afrikaans is kak. I'm an optometrist in private
practice. You?

I used to be a physics professor of London University physics professor, now
in my second childhood, since I retired in 1989
Franz
.
User: "Edward Green"

Title: Re: Vajk's potential energy "blunder"? 10 Jan 2004 08:18:04 PM
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message news:<btpa1n$sdh$3@hercules.btinternet.com>...

"Jeffrey Meyer" <merlot@icon.co.za> wrote in message
news:3fffda48$0$217@hades.is.co.za...


"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:btkce0$jcc$11@titan.btinternet.com...


"Jeffrey Meyer" <merlot@icon.co.za> wrote in message
news:3ff5aabc$0$222@hades.is.co.za...


"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:bt25t7$ess$1@titan.btinternet.com...


"Jeffrey Meyer" <merlot@icon.co.za> wrote in message
news:3ff44a1c$0$216@hades.is.co.za...



[snip]

Van Suid Afrika Franz?


Gebore en opgegvoed.
Maar ek bly in Engeland sedert 1947


Ek is in Johannesburg.


By Wits? Indien so, staf lid of student?


Neither. Sorry, my Afrikaans is kak. I'm an optometrist in private
practice. You?


I used to be a physics professor of London University physics professor, now
in my second childhood, since I retired in 1989

You two gentlemen will forgive me ... or maybe not ... but these
snippets of Afrikaans remind me of the English of Robert Burns or the
anonymous contemporary of Chaucer who wrote Sir Gawain and the Green
Knight: a made-up sounding creole at times oddly comprehensible.
What is a creole? It's a nice word I chose to use instead of "pidgin"
;-) It is also, I think, distinguished from a pidgin by being an
invented hybrid spawned in the brains of larva exposed to two tongues
at some critical formative period, when the brain is ripe to create
language from babble; a "pidgin" is something made up by adults
desperate to communicate but exposed too late.
I was thinking of this recently ... God knows why ... and listed
Creole itself and Afrikaans as candidate creoles, then wondered why
English and Spanish don't seem to have formed one. Is it a cultural
thing, something best made in a smaller pot, or are my ideas kak?
Oh yeah ... Yiddish: I've heard it described as Hebrew written in
German, but it has that weirdly semi-comprehensible made-up quality
which makes it sound more like a creole.
.
User: "Franz Heymann"

Title: Re: Vajk's potential energy "blunder"? 11 Jan 2004 09:24:18 AM
"Edward Green" <nulldev00@aol.com> wrote in message
news:2a0cceff.0401101818.69417173@posting.google.com...

"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message

news:<btpa1n$sdh$3@hercules.btinternet.com>...

"Jeffrey Meyer" <merlot@icon.co.za> wrote in message
news:3fffda48$0$217@hades.is.co.za...


"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:btkce0$jcc$11@titan.btinternet.com...


"Jeffrey Meyer" <merlot@icon.co.za> wrote in message
news:3ff5aabc$0$222@hades.is.co.za...


"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in

message

news:bt25t7$ess$1@titan.btinternet.com...


"Jeffrey Meyer" <merlot@icon.co.za> wrote in message
news:3ff44a1c$0$216@hades.is.co.za...



[snip]

Van Suid Afrika Franz?


Gebore en opgegvoed.
Maar ek bly in Engeland sedert 1947


Ek is in Johannesburg.


By Wits? Indien so, staf lid of student?


Neither. Sorry, my Afrikaans is kak. I'm an optometrist in private
practice. You?


I used to be a physics professor of London University physics professor,

now

in my second childhood, since I retired in 1989


You two gentlemen will forgive me ... or maybe not ... but these
snippets of Afrikaans remind me of the English of Robert Burns or the
anonymous contemporary of Chaucer who wrote Sir Gawain and the Green
Knight: a made-up sounding creole at times oddly comprehensible.

What is a creole? It's a nice word I chose to use instead of "pidgin"
;-)

What is nasty about pidgin.
Before Afrikaans got its name it was referred to as "kombuis Hollands" which
translates into "kitchen Dutch".

It is also, I think, distinguished from a pidgin by being an
invented hybrid spawned in the brains of larva exposed to two tongues
at some critical formative period, when the brain is ripe to create
language from babble; a "pidgin" is something made up by adults
desperate to communicate but exposed too late.

I was thinking of this recently ... God knows why ... and listed
Creole itself and Afrikaans as candidate creoles, then wondered why
English and Spanish don't seem to have formed one. Is it a cultural
thing, something best made in a smaller pot, or are my ideas kak?

Possibly. You have not expressed them clearly and simply enough for me to
judge.
The essence of Afrikaans is that it was developed from Dutch by the Dutch
settlers in South Africa. Those folk had only minimal, if any, formal
education, and Afrikaans developed essentially as a spoken means of
communication. Later, its was enriched by words provided by the French
Huguenots who settled there, as well as a selection of Malay words and
expressions inherited from the Malay slave population of the Cape. Much
later, it began to acquire a few words adapted from English. This last
accretion was (and probably still is) strenuously resisted by the guardians
of the language. At present it is a fully fledged language with a well
defined grammar, a wide vocabularly (I did my first-year physics and applied
maths in Afrikaans at Cape Town University) and an extensive literature. It
might interest you to know that one of the foremost Afrikaans authors, C.J.
Langenhoven, was very prolific. He was a fully fledged alcoholic. One day
the leading local brethren of his home town decided to remonstrate him about
his public drunkenness. He pointed his fingers at a long stretch of books
on his bookshelf and said: "Gentlemen, you are quite right. I wrote all
those books when I was inebriated. Now please point to all the books you
have written when you were sober."
Afrikaans is an extremely simple language. All but the essential vestiges
of grammar have been shorn off, and its spelling is totally phonetic. It
does, however have one or two joke words arising from the practice of
concatenation, like "seeeend" (sea gull) and
"besturendekommitteejaarvergaderingsverslagopsommingsformaat". (I hasten to
say that nobody actually uses these!)
Now you might be in a position to tell me whether Afrikaans is a creole or a
pidgin.

Oh yeah ... Yiddish: I've heard it described as Hebrew written in
German, but it has that weirdly semi-comprehensible made-up quality
which makes it sound more like a creole.

Franz
.
User: "Franz Heymann"

Title: Re: Vajk's potential energy "blunder"? 11 Jan 2004 09:47:54 AM
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:btrpr1$n58$7@sparta.btinternet.com...


"Edward Green" <nulldev00@aol.com> wrote in message
news:2a0cceff.0401101818.69417173@posting.google.com...

"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message

news:<btpa1n$sdh$3@hercules.btinternet.com>...

"Jeffrey Meyer" <merlot@icon.co.za> wrote in message
news:3fffda48$0$217@hades.is.co.za...


"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:btkce0$jcc$11@titan.btinternet.com...


"Jeffrey Meyer" <merlot@icon.co.za> wrote in message
news:3ff5aabc$0$222@hades.is.co.za...


"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in

message

news:bt25t7$ess$1@titan.btinternet.com...


"Jeffrey Meyer" <merlot@icon.co.za> wrote in message
news:3ff44a1c$0$216@hades.is.co.za...



[snip]

Van Suid Afrika Franz?


Gebore en opgegvoed.
Maar ek bly in Engeland sedert 1947


Ek is in Johannesburg.


By Wits? Indien so, staf lid of student?


Neither. Sorry, my Afrikaans is kak. I'm an optometrist in private
practice. You?


I used to be a physics professor of London University physics

professor,

now

in my second childhood, since I retired in 1989


You two gentlemen will forgive me ... or maybe not ... but these
snippets of Afrikaans remind me of the English of Robert Burns or the
anonymous contemporary of Chaucer who wrote Sir Gawain and the Green
Knight: a made-up sounding creole at times oddly comprehensible.

What is a creole? It's a nice word I chose to use instead of "pidgin"
;-)


What is nasty about pidgin.

Before Afrikaans got its name it was referred to as "kombuis Hollands"

which

translates into "kitchen Dutch".


It is also, I think, distinguished from a pidgin by being an
invented hybrid spawned in the brains of larva exposed to two tongues
at some critical formative period, when the brain is ripe to create
language from babble; a "pidgin" is something made up by adults
desperate to communicate but exposed too late.

I was thinking of this recently ... God knows why ... and listed
Creole itself and Afrikaans as candidate creoles, then wondered why
English and Spanish don't seem to have formed one. Is it a cultural
thing, something best made in a smaller pot, or are my ideas kak?


Possibly. You have not expressed them clearly and simply enough for me to
judge.
The essence of Afrikaans is that it was developed from Dutch by the Dutch
settlers in South Africa. Those folk had only minimal, if any, formal
education, and Afrikaans developed essentially as a spoken means of
communication. Later, its was enriched by words provided by the French
Huguenots who settled there, as well as a selection of Malay words and
expressions inherited from the Malay slave population of the Cape. Much
later, it began to acquire a few words adapted from English. This last
accretion was (and probably still is) strenuously resisted by the

guardians

of the language. At present it is a fully fledged language with a well
defined grammar, a wide vocabularly (I did my first-year physics and

applied

maths in Afrikaans at Cape Town University) and an extensive literature.

It

might interest you to know that one of the foremost Afrikaans authors,

C.J.

Langenhoven, was very prolific. He was a fully fledged alcoholic. One

day

the leading local brethren of his home town decided to remonstrate him

about

his public drunkenness. He pointed his fingers at a long stretch of books
on his bookshelf and said: "Gentlemen, you are quite right. I wrote all
those books when I was inebriated. Now please point to all the books you
have written when you were sober."

Afrikaans is an extremely simple language. All but the essential vestiges
of grammar have been shorn off, and its spelling is totally phonetic. It
does, however have one or two joke words arising from the practice of
concatenation, like "seeeend" (sea gull) and
"besturendekommitteejaarvergaderingsverslagopsommingsformaat". (I hasten

to

say that nobody actually uses these!)

Now you might be in a position to tell me whether Afrikaans is a creole or

a

pidgin.

Oh, I forgot to say that it uses only 22 letters of the alphabet. C, Q, X
and Z are not used
Franz


Oh yeah ... Yiddish: I've heard it described as Hebrew written in
German, but it has that weirdly semi-comprehensible made-up quality
which makes it sound more like a creole.


Franz




.
User: "sam ende"

Title: Re: Vajk's potential energy "blunder"? 12 Jan 2004 03:04:59 AM
Franz Heymann wrote:

Oh, I forgot to say that it uses only 22 letters of the alphabet. C,
Q, X and Z are not used

interesting. does it have umlaute ?
sammi
.


User: "Jeffrey Meyer"

Title: Re: Vajk's potential energy "blunder"? 12 Jan 2004 05:22:58 AM
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:btrpr1$n58$7@sparta.btinternet.com...


snip

Possibly. You have not expressed them clearly and simply enough for me to
judge.
The essence of Afrikaans is that it was developed from Dutch by the Dutch
settlers in South Africa. Those folk had only minimal, if any, formal
education, and Afrikaans developed essentially as a spoken means of
communication. Later, its was enriched by words provided by the French
Huguenots who settled there, as well as a selection of Malay words and
expressions inherited from the Malay slave population of the Cape. Much
later, it began to acquire a few words adapted from English. This last
accretion was (and probably still is) strenuously resisted by the

guardians

of the language. At present it is a fully fledged language with a well
defined grammar, a wide vocabularly (I did my first-year physics and

applied

maths in Afrikaans at Cape Town University) and an extensive literature.

It

might interest you to know that one of the foremost Afrikaans authors,

C.J.

Langenhoven, was very prolific. He was a fully fledged alcoholic. One

day

the leading local brethren of his home town decided to remonstrate him

about

his public drunkenness. He pointed his fingers at a long stretch of books
on his bookshelf and said: "Gentlemen, you are quite right. I wrote all
those books when I was inebriated. Now please point to all the books you
have written when you were sober."

Afrikaans is an extremely simple language. All but the essential vestiges
of grammar have been shorn off, and its spelling is totally phonetic. It
does, however have one or two joke words arising from the practice of
concatenation, like "seeeend" (sea gull) and
"besturendekommitteejaarvergaderingsverslagopsommingsformaat". (I hasten

to

say that nobody actually uses these!)

Now you might be in a position to tell me whether Afrikaans is a creole or

a

pidgin.

Oh yeah ... Yiddish: I've heard it described as Hebrew written in
German, but it has that weirdly semi-comprehensible made-up quality
which makes it sound more like a creole.


Franz

I often find Afrikaans to be quite coarse sounding. Even so, like Yiddish,
it can be extremely colourful and evocative, where translations into
English lose their punch.
--
Jeffrey





.
User: "Franz Heymann"

Title: Re: Vajk's potential energy "blunder"? 12 Jan 2004 03:23:31 PM
"Jeffrey Meyer" <merlot@icon.co.za> wrote in message
news:40028763$0$216@hades.is.co.za...


"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:btrpr1$n58$7@sparta.btinternet.com...


snip

Possibly. You have not expressed them clearly and simply enough for me

to

judge.
The essence of Afrikaans is that it was developed from Dutch by the

Dutch

settlers in South Africa. Those folk had only minimal, if any, formal
education, and Afrikaans developed essentially as a spoken means of
communication. Later, its was enriched by words provided by the French
Huguenots who settled there, as well as a selection of Malay words and
expressions inherited from the Malay slave population of the Cape. Much
later, it began to acquire a few words adapted from English. This last
accretion was (and probably still is) strenuously resisted by the

guardians

of the language. At present it is a fully fledged language with a well
defined grammar, a wide vocabularly (I did my first-year physics and

applied

maths in Afrikaans at Cape Town University) and an extensive literature.

It

might interest you to know that one of the foremost Afrikaans authors,

C.J.

Langenhoven, was very prolific. He was a fully fledged alcoholic. One

day

the leading local brethren of his home town decided to remonstrate him

about

his public drunkenness. He pointed his fingers at a long stretch of

books

on his bookshelf and said: "Gentlemen, you are quite right. I wrote all
those books when I was inebriated. Now please point to all the books

you

have written when you were sober."

Afrikaans is an extremely simple language. All but the essential

vestiges

of grammar have been shorn off, and its spelling is totally phonetic.

It

does, however have one or two joke words arising from the practice of
concatenation, like "seeeend" (sea gull) and
"besturendekommitteejaarvergaderingsverslagopsommingsformaat". (I

hasten

to

say that nobody actually uses these!)

Now you might be in a position to tell me whether Afrikaans is a creole

or

a

pidgin.

Oh yeah ... Yiddish: I've heard it described as Hebrew written in
German, but it has that weirdly semi-comprehensible made-up quality
which makes it sound more like a creole.


Franz


I often find Afrikaans to be quite coarse sounding. Even so, like Yiddish,
it can be extremely colourful and evocative, where translations into
English lose their punch.

Yes, it can sound quite coarse, as can Dutch and German, its antecedents.
It is probably connected with the pronunciation of "g" as in "aggentaggentig
en og, God, tog nog 'n tog" It sounds rough when the "g" is pronounced like
the Dutch and German "acht".
Franz
.
User: "sam ende"

Title: Re: Vajk's potential energy "blunder"? 15 Jan 2004 03:01:14 PM
Franz Heymann wrote:

Yes, it can sound quite coarse, as can Dutch and German, its
antecedents. It is probably connected with the pronunciation of "g" as
in "aggentaggentig
en og, God, tog nog 'n tog" It sounds rough when the "g" is
pronounced like the Dutch and German "acht".

acht is not rough though, or is it. you've got me thinking now :)
sammi
.




User: ""

Title: Re: Vajk's potential energy "blunder"? 10 Jan 2004 10:45:08 PM
(Edward Green) writes:


You two gentlemen will forgive me ... or maybe not ... but these
snippets of Afrikaans remind me of the English of Robert Burns or
the anonymous contemporary of Chaucer who wrote Sir Gawain and the
Green Knight: a made-up sounding creole at times oddly
comprehensible.

Not surprising: English is a creole of Saxon, Norse, French, and who
knows what all else. Being basically germanic, there are lots of
cognates for English words in Dutch (on which Afrikaans is based).

What is a creole? It's a nice word I chose to use instead of "pidgin"
;-) It is also, I think, distinguished from a pidgin by being an
invented hybrid spawned in the brains of larva exposed to two tongues
at some critical formative period...

Or in plain English, a creole is a pidgen that has become somebody's
native tongue. Pidgins tend to develop into creoles if the cultural
interface is stable enough. There are numerous examples throughout the
Caribbean, South America and parts of Africa.

I was thinking of this recently ... God knows why ... and listed
Creole itself and Afrikaans as candidate creoles, then wondered why
English and Spanish don't seem to have formed one...

I'm not sure whether you are referring to creoles based on English, or
whether you are referring to creolization in the history of English.
There have been examples of both.
In history, the Vikings conquered part of Britain and established
trade with the Saxons. It was discovered that the Saxon and Norse
languages had many common word roots, but very different systems of
conjugation (typical of cousin languages). To communicate, it sufficed
to drop the endings and use the bare word stems. That is precisely the
reason that English is so lacking in inflection compared to, say,
German.
Recently, English-based creoles exist all over the place. The Patois
of Jamaica, Creolese in British Guyana, and plenty of others.

Oh yeah ... Yiddish: I've heard it described as Hebrew written in
German...

Vice versa, of course. It's German written with the Hebrew alphabet,
with a big helping of Hebrew vocabulary tossed in.

...but it has that weirdly semi-comprehensible made-up quality which
makes it sound more like a creole.

It isn't a creole; it lacks the key feature that creoles involve
simplification of the parent grammars.
(I have difficulty distinguishing Yiddish from Hebrew books on sight;
my Hebrew is still uncertain, and I speak no Yiddish. If I can't read
a book, I try again with a german accent. In this way I avoided
accidentally buying "Alle Werke von Sholem Aleichem".)
Regards,
Len.
.








User: "Dirk Van de moortel"

Title: Re: Vajk's potential energy "blunder"? 01 Jan 2004 08:34:17 AM
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message news:bsv1au$e49$17@hercules.btinternet.com...


"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote
in message news:glnIb.106113$QO2.4927589@phobos.telenet-ops.be...


"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message

news:bssv2b$et7$3@titan.btinternet.com...


[snip]

Goeie naand, Dirk,


Hey, 'Goeie naand' is that perhaps your official expr. for our
'Goede avond' (Good evening)?


Ja.

If so, yours sounds exactly
the same as ours when we are talking fast - and in dialect.
Bizarre how some expressions in our drifted apart languages
still sound almost exactly the same when spoken... Nice.

Goeie nacht!


Another example of the same thing

Goeie nag!

En 'n voorspoedige nuwe jaar

Franz

inderdaad, ik wens je ook een voorspoedig en gezond nieuwjaar!
:-))
Dirk Vdm
.



User: "Bill Vajk"

Title: Re: Vajk's potential energy "blunder"? 30 Dec 2003 05:47:31 PM
Franz Heymann wrote:

Having looked at it, all I can say is that I bet Bill wishes he had not
responded in that way.

Not at all, Franz.

How much easier it would have been to say he was
sleepy, or even perhaps drunk at the time he dropped the original booby.

Matter of opinion. That sort of response might have sated some
participants, and not given them quite so much ammunition to
carry on as they have, but given a Schwartz and a Varney they
would have just found some other reason anyway.

I guess he will now have to suffer the consequences for ever and a day.

I've been on and off usenet over a period of about 2 decades,
Franz, and have found that in the realm of "really important
things" very little of what goes on here counts for very much,
although there are some instances where it does.
Let me say that Joe Fischer was verging on fleshing out what
I was talking about, but I'm not concerned about doing so
myself any more than I did the first time we went around
on this subject. In fact I am quite pleased with Joe's replies,
that he went as far as he did, and stopped where he stopped.
I'm frankly a little surprised that you haven't considered the
matter in greater depth beyond the classic textbook engineering
physics rendition usually taken as the ultimate truth in these
parts but I am unwilling to argue any of the points further
because nothing is ever settled here anyway, and everything
just continues to escalate seemingly forever. As a friendly
significantly superior science oriented (and well qualified)
friend said a while back, sci.physics is a cesspit. I must
add that there is an occasional high point, however.
Occasionally someone does actually discuss some real science
worthy of note. That s/n ratio remains quite small.
Nevertheless, I thank you for looking and considering without
simply flaming as is the usual case in usenet newsgroups. I
neither seek nor even want universal acceptance or understanding
of the things I write.
.
User: "Franz Heymann"

Title: Re: Vajk's potential energy "blunder"? 31 Dec 2003 11:34:24 AM
"Bill Vajk" <bill9north@hotmail.DITCHTHIS.com> wrote in message
news:m8oIb.692541$HS4.4914322@attbi_s01...
[snip]

I'm frankly a little surprised that you haven't considered the
matter in greater depth beyond the classic textbook engineering
physics rendition usually taken as the ultimate truth in these
parts but I am unwilling to argue any of the points further
because nothing is ever settled here anyway,

I am sorry to see that you still do not have the guts to admit that you
spoke nonsense.
Or do you really have no notion of the concept of conservation of energy?
In either event, so be it.
Franz
.
User: "Bill Vajk"

Title: Re: Vajk's potential energy "blunder"? 31 Dec 2003 02:03:56 PM
Franz Heymann wrote:

Or do you really have no notion of the concept of conservation of energy?

So please explain to the assembled throng how there
is an actual exchange PE to KE in the conservation
scheme you claim exists in this instance. Tell us how
the mass is altered and/or what medium of exchange is
used.
Well gosh, nothing like that happens while the mass
is in motion. The entire discussion is about accounting!
Accounts receivable and accounts payable, but nothing
actually is exchanged. Is that *really* science, Franz?
Go back and reread the hole through the earth example
I posted in the original discussion and there you will
discover the conservation of energy you're looking
for in the wrong place.
Unless, of course, you've a closed mind like several
others hereabouts.
Fun for those who are a little more astute than the
average bear in sci.* newsgroups:
Say you have a mass which discovers the sudden
new appearance of a strong center of gravity (CG1)
at some (unimportant) distance and is attracted
towards it. Our mass accelerates, and the KE and
PE pair do whatever you think they do.
As our mass continues happily on its way, CG1
suddenly (instant change in velocity) starts to
move in a direction straight away from our mass.
In fact, it moves in such a way that the attractive
force between the two remains constant.
Describe the entire dynamic; How are velocity,
KE, PE, distance between mass and CG1, and
conservation of energy applicable to this
scenario once CG1 starts to move.
The purpose of this exercise is to get a few may
be teetering at the edge of looking beyond engineering
physics to think about how things actually interact
and to stop them relying on textbooks which keep too
many from actually thinking through interesting problems.
.
User: "Franz Heymann"

Title: Re: Vajk's potential energy "blunder"? 01 Jan 2004 09:45:43 AM
"Bill Vajk" <bill9north@hotmail.DITCHTHIS.com> wrote in message
news:MYFIb.245052$_M.1117268@attbi_s54...

Franz Heymann wrote:

Or do you really have no notion of the concept of conservation of

energy?


So please explain to the assembled throng how there
is an actual exchange PE to KE in the conservation
scheme you claim exists in this instance. Tell us how
the mass is altered and/or what medium of exchange is
used.

Well gosh, nothing like that happens while the mass
is in motion. The entire discussion is about accounting!
Accounts receivable and accounts payable, but nothing
actually is exchanged. Is that *really* science, Franz?

Go back and reread the hole through the earth example
I posted in the original discussion and there you will
discover the conservation of energy you're looking
for in the wrong place.

Unless, of course, you've a closed mind like several
others hereabouts.

Fun for those who are a little more astute than the
average bear in sci.* newsgroups:

Say you have a mass which discovers the sudden
new appearance of a strong center of gravity (CG1)
at some (unimportant) distance and is attracted
towards it. Our mass accelerates, and the KE and
PE pair do whatever you think they do.

As our mass continues happily on its way, CG1
suddenly (instant change in velocity) starts to
move in a direction straight away from our mass.
In fact, it moves in such a way that the attractive
force between the two remains constant.

Describe the entire dynamic; How are velocity,
KE, PE, distance between mass and CG1, and
conservation of energy applicable to this
scenario once CG1 starts to move.

The purpose of this exercise is to get a few may
be teetering at the edge of looking beyond engineering
physics to think about how things actually interact
and to stop them relying on textbooks which keep too
many from actually thinking through interesting problems.

Bill, despite your protestations, the kinetic and potential energies of a
dropped object don't both increase.
It is unnecesary for you to make such a long rigmarole of it.
Franz



.
User: "Bill Vajk"

Title: On the conservation of energy 01 Jan 2004 10:11:28 AM
Franz Heymann wrote:

Bill, despite your protestations, the kinetic and potential energies of a
dropped object don't both increase.
It is unnecesary for you to make such a long rigmarole of it.

Who is protesting here? Rather sounds as though you are!
I suggest you relearn (or learn for the first time?) about
the conservation of energy. (<-- Dirk bait.)
"Within some problem domain, the amount of energy
remains constant and energy is neither created
nor destroyed. Energy can be converted from one
form to another (potential energy can be converted
to kinetic energy) but the total energy within the
domain remains fixed."
per NASA.
Do you have any problem with that, Franz?
.
User: "Franz Heymann"

Title: Re: On the conservation of energy 01 Jan 2004 04:10:48 PM
"Bill Vajk" <bill9north@hotmail.DITCHTHIS.com> wrote in message
news:QEXIb.707090$HS4.5039170@attbi_s01...

Franz Heymann wrote:

Bill, despite your protestations, the kinetic and potential energies of

a

dropped object don't both increase.
It is unnecesary for you to make such a long rigmarole of it.


Who is protesting here? Rather sounds as though you are!

I suggest you relearn (or learn for the first time?) about
the conservation of energy. (<-- Dirk bait.)

No need to bait Dirk. He already has your measure.

"Within some problem domain, the amount of energy
remains constant and energy is neither created
nor destroyed. Energy can be converted from one
form to another (potential energy can be converted
to kinetic energy) but the total energy within the
domain remains fixed."

per NASA.

Do you have any problem with that, Franz?

None whatsoever.
My problem is with your statement that when a body drops from the tower of
Pisa, both its kinetic and its potential energy increase as it falls.
I am getting tired of repeating that.
Do you actually possess any cognitive capacity at all?
Franz
.



User: "Franz Heymann"

Title: Re: Vajk's potential energy "blunder"? 01 Jan 2004 03:04:43 PM
"Bill Vajk" <bill9north@hotmail.DITCHTHIS.com> wrote in message
news:MYFIb.245052$_M.1117268@attbi_s54...

Franz Heymann wrote:

Or do you really have no notion of the concept of conservation of

energy?


So please explain to the assembled throng how there
is an actual exchange PE to KE in the conservation
scheme you claim exists in this instance. Tell us how
the mass is altered and/or what medium of exchange is
used.

Well gosh, nothing like that happens while the mass
is in motion. The entire discussion is about accounting!
Accounts receivable and accounts payable, but nothing
actually is exchanged. Is that *really* science, Franz?

Go back and reread the hole through the earth example
I posted in the original discussion and there you will
discover the conservation of energy you're looking
for in the wrong place.

Unless, of course, you've a closed mind like several
others hereabouts.

Fun for those who are a little more astute than the
average bear in sci.* newsgroups:

Say you have a mass which discovers the sudden
new appearance of a strong center of gravity (CG1)
at some (unimportant) distance and is attracted
towards it. Our mass accelerates, and the KE and
PE pair do whatever you think they do.

As our mass continues happily on its way, CG1
suddenly (instant change in velocity) starts to
move in a direction straight away from our mass.
In fact, it moves in such a way that the attractive
force between the two remains constant.

Describe the entire dynamic; How are velocity,
KE, PE, distance between mass and CG1, and
conservation of energy applicable to this
scenario once CG1 starts to move.

The purpose of this exercise is to get a few may
be teetering at the edge of looking beyond engineering
physics to think about how things actually interact
and to stop them relying on textbooks which keep too
many from actually thinking through interesting problems.

Yes. I know about mass/energy and I know about mass dependence on
gravitational potential and all the window dressing you are employing.
And yet the potential energy and kinetic energy do *not* both increase when
a ball is dropped from the top of the Pisa tower.
Franz
.

User: "Len Budney"

Title: Re: Vajk's potential energy "blunder"? 01 Jan 2004 12:08:52 AM
Bill Vajk <bill9north@hotmail.DITCHTHIS.com> wrote:


Say you have a mass which discovers the sudden
new appearance of a strong center of gravity (CG1)
at some (unimportant) distance and is attracted
towards it. Our mass accelerates, and the KE and
PE pair do whatever you think they do.

As our mass continues happily on its way, CG1
suddenly (instant change in velocity) starts to
move in a direction straight away from our mass.
In fact, it moves in such a way that the attractive
force between the two remains constant.

Describe the entire dynamic; How are velocity,
KE, PE, distance between mass and CG1, and
conservation of energy applicable to this
scenario once CG1 starts to move.

Since you've used the word "force", we're assuming that gravity is a
force for the purpose of this gedanken experiment. Once CG1 starts
moving as you've described, the object will undergo constant
acceleration.
At any given instant, the work done by gravity will still equal
-(1/2)mv^2. As a matter of book-keeping, the work done provides the
definition of potential energy.
There is no reasonable way to say that this energy was "stored" in the
object at the start of the experiment, obviously. But "potential
energy" is essentially a book-keeping fiction anyway.
A clean way to remove confusion caused by the motion of CG1 is to
remove it from the picture entirely, and replace it with its force
field. If we assume the trajectories of the object and CG1 follow a
straight line, then we can WLOG define the force field to be equal to
C1/y^2 for y>1, and C1 for y<1, and suppose that the object is
initially positioned on the Y axis at y>1.
It is not difficult to demonstrate that this force-field is
conservative: one begins by observing that work done along closed
paths in the half-planes is zero; next, one observes that work done
along closed convex paths that straddle the line y=1 is also zero, by
adding a line-segment at y=1 and integrating along the two paths, each
residing in a half-plane.
With respect to this force field, "potential energy" becomes a
property of the path, not of the object. Further, the path through the
force-field is determined entirely by the initial position, initial
velocity and duration. Assuming initial velocity to be zero,
"potential energy" can be regarded as a property of pairs of points,
or of (point, duration) pairs.
Explaining the "entire dynamic" would involve things like knowing how
the heck you instantaneously accelerated a planet like that.

The purpose of this exercise is to get a few may
be teetering at the edge of looking beyond engineering
physics to think about how things actually interact
and to stop them relying on textbooks which keep too
many from actually thinking through interesting problems.

Why so coy? If you have some revolutionary insight, impart it.
Regards,
Len.
.
User: "Phil Holman"

Title: Re: Vajk's potential energy "blunder"? 01 Jan 2004 01:59:17 AM
"Len Budney" <lbudney@pobox.com> wrote in message
news:9213c87c.0312312208.4e851436@posting.google.com...

Bill Vajk <bill9north@hotmail.DITCHTHIS.com> wrote:


Say you have a mass which discovers the sudden
new appearance of a strong center of gravity (CG1)
at some (unimportant) distance and is attracted
towards it. Our mass accelerates, and the KE and
PE pair do whatever you think they do.

As our mass continues happily on its way, CG1
suddenly (instant change in velocity) starts to
move in a direction straight away from our mass.
In fact, it moves in such a way that the attractive
force between the two remains constant.

Describe the entire dynamic; How are velocity,
KE, PE, distance between mass and CG1, and
conservation of energy applicable to this
scenario once CG1 starts to move.


Since you've used the word "force", we're assuming that gravity is a
force for the purpose of this gedanken experiment. Once CG1 starts
moving as you've described, the object will undergo constant
acceleration.

At any given instant, the work done by gravity will still equal
-(1/2)mv^2. As a matter of book-keeping, the work done provides the
definition of potential energy.

There is no reasonable way to say that this energy was "stored" in the
object at the start of the experiment, obviously. But "potential
energy" is essentially a book-keeping fiction anyway.

A clean way to remove confusion caused by the motion of CG1 is to
remove it from the picture entirely, and replace it with its force
field. If we assume the trajectories of the object and CG1 follow a
straight line, then we can WLOG define the force field to be equal to
C1/y^2 for y>1, and C1 for y<1, and suppose that the object is
initially positioned on the Y axis at y>1.

It is not difficult to demonstrate that this force-field is
conservative: one begins by observing that work done along closed
paths in the half-planes is zero; next, one observes that work done
along closed convex paths that straddle the line y=1 is also zero, by
adding a line-segment at y=1 and integrating along the two paths, each
residing in a half-plane.

With respect to this force field, "potential energy" becomes a
property of the path, not of the object. Further, the path through the
force-field is determined entirely by the initial position, initial
velocity and duration. Assuming initial velocity to be zero,
"potential energy" can be regarded as a property of pairs of points,
or of (point, duration) pairs.

Explaining the "entire dynamic" would involve things like knowing how
the heck you instantaneously accelerated a planet like that.

The purpose of this exercise is to get a few may
be teetering at the edge of looking beyond engineering
physics to think about how things actually interact
and to stop them relying on textbooks which keep too
many from actually thinking through interesting problems.


Why so coy? If you have some revolutionary insight, impart it.

Revolutionary insight, that's a very kind way of describing it. Here's
another blunder of his that resulted in a similar spew of BS. "If you're
running on the road you are accelerating a mass, that is, the entire
mass of your body. On a treadmill that element is missing". See the
whole thread for context in the following url (message # 4).
http://tinyurl.com/2ul6l
Phil Holman
.









  Page 1 of 3

1

 

2

 

3

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER