Re: What CP violation? There's no violation according to The Smart Model.



 Science > Physics > Re: What CP violation? There's no violation according to The Smart Model.

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "S. Enterprize Company"
Date: 11 Aug 2003 07:29:30 PM
Object: Re: What CP violation? There's no violation according to The Smart Model.

smart1234@aol.com (S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message
news:<20030811032910.18517.00001111@mb-m18.aol.com>...

What CP violation? There's no violation according to The Smart Model.

http://www.physics.uc.edu/~kayk/cpviol/CP.html


(According to the Smart Model....)
So what, a K meson will not decay the same way all the time. This just

means

that the internal sub-structure varies for each K meson, which will produce
different decay modes.


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/


You are increadibly stupid.

(...Starblade Riven Darksquall...)


The Standard Model doesn't use an internal sub-structure to it's analysis at
the sub-atomic level. The Smart Model does. An analogy of the Standard Model CP
violations is like saying a grain of salt is the smallest particle you can
have, with no internal molecular structure, and when you break it up you always
get a different number of smaller pieces, so there is a parity violation.

Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.

User: "Starblade Darksquall"

Title: Re: What CP violation? There's no violation according to The Smart Model. 12 Aug 2003 04:49:43 AM
(S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message news:<20030811202930.16575.00000268@mb-m25.aol.com>...

(S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message
news:<20030811032910.18517.00001111@mb-m18.aol.com>...

What CP violation? There's no violation according to The Smart Model.

http://www.physics.uc.edu/~kayk/cpviol/CP.html


(According to the Smart Model....)
So what, a K meson will not decay the same way all the time. This just

means

that the internal sub-structure varies for each K meson, which will produce
different decay modes.


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/


You are increadibly stupid.

(...Starblade Riven Darksquall...)



The Standard Model doesn't use an internal sub-structure to it's analysis at
the sub-atomic level. The Smart Model does. An analogy of the Standard Model CP
violations is like saying a grain of salt is the smallest particle you can
have, with no internal molecular structure, and when you break it up you always
get a different number of smaller pieces, so there is a parity violation.

No, you dumbfuck. There's a CP violation because if you change
something's charge and its parity, you do NOT get the same results as
you do before. It has nothing to do with 'breaking something up into
smaller pieces', as you seem to think. It has to do with things which
are normally invariant and symmetric under all other laws of physics
but which in some unique circumstances seem to be capable of being
violated.
When a neutrino is left handed and the antineutrino is right handed...
do I have this the right way or did I reverse it? Anyways, that's a C
violation and a P violation, but putting the two together gives you CP
symmetry. Now take neutral Kaons. The one that spews out matter has a
longer mean lifespan than the other, but the same total lifespan. At
least, if not, it's the other way around. Anyways, they are antimatter
partners of eachother. It violates CP. However, it also violates T.
However, putting the two together gives you CPT invariance. The
universe does not violate CPT.
Now are you getting it?
BTW, just in case you didn't know, C is charge conjugation, P is
parity, and T is time reversal. Normally physics is symmetric to all
of them, but it may have asymmetries to one or to two of these, but
not all three combined.


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/

(...Starblade Riven Darksquall...)
.
User: "S. Enterprize Company"

Title: Re: What CP violation? There's no violation according to The Smart Model. 12 Aug 2003 09:23:03 AM

smart1234@aol.com (S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message
news:<20030811202930.16575.00000268@mb-m25.aol.com>...

smart1234@aol.com (S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message
news:<20030811032910.18517.00001111@mb-m18.aol.com>...

What CP violation? There's no violation according to The Smart Model.

http://www.physics.uc.edu/~kayk/cpviol/CP.html


(According to the Smart Model....)
So what, a K meson will not decay the same way all the time. This just

means

that the internal sub-structure varies for each K meson, which will

produce

different decay modes.


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/


You are increadibly stupid.

(...Starblade Riven Darksquall...)



The Standard Model doesn't use an internal sub-structure to it's

analysis at

the sub-atomic level. The Smart Model does. An analogy of the Standard

Model CP

violations is like saying a grain of salt is the smallest particle you can
have, with no internal molecular structure, and when you break it up you

always

get a different number of smaller pieces, so there is a parity violation.


No, you dumbfuck. There's a CP violation because if you change
something's charge and its parity, you do NOT get the same results as
you do before. It has nothing to do with 'breaking something up into
smaller pieces', as you seem to think. It has to do with things which
are normally invariant and symmetric under all other laws of physics
but which in some unique circumstances seem to be capable of being
violated.

When a neutrino is left handed and the antineutrino is right handed...
do I have this the right way or did I reverse it? Anyways, that's a C
violation and a P violation, but putting the two together gives you CP
symmetry. Now take neutral Kaons. The one that spews out matter has a
longer mean lifespan than the other, but the same total lifespan. At
least, if not, it's the other way around. Anyways, they are antimatter
partners of eachother. It violates CP. However, it also violates T.
However, putting the two together gives you CPT invariance. The
universe does not violate CPT.

Now are you getting it?

Yes.
Here is grain of salt.
.<---
Now watch it decay
.. <-- one mode
... < two mode
Violations found. Two can't be three.


BTW, just in case you didn't know, C is charge conjugation, P is
parity, and T is time reversal. Normally physics is symmetric to all
of them, but it may have asymmetries to one or to two of these, but
not all three combined.

Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
What CP violation? There's no violation according to The Smart Model.
What types of RESONANCE are there ?
What types of RESONANCE are there ?
aluminum sequin Earth's 1st Air-Conditioner; What if Iron Filings; Is there a Magnetic Aluminum??
What's Down There?
Is there anyone here who doesn't know what MDT stands for? MDT unifies quantum mechanics and relativity.
What if there is good news?
what's the power of the spoken word if there's noone to listen (and understand)?
ARE THERE NO LIMTS ON WHAT MAY BE POSTED TO USENET; I MEAN, SAY, 1000000000 TILLION MEGABYE FILES? ONE PER SECOND FOR 100000000000 QUADRILLION YEARS?
What evidence is there for a continuous space-time?
What kind of relationship is there between creation and science ?
There are *THEORETiCAL models*, *MATHEMATiCAL models* and *REAL* models. There are, actually, NO *PHYSiCAL* theories, what-so-ever, you dimwit.!! And, the "theory" is NOT the "mathematics" (i.e. "arithmetic"), dooOP.!! Ph. Tivitists NEVER want to fin
What will we all going to do when there is no more oil ?
Re: Exactly what is the conversion rate?
Re: What causes big climate changes? Re: scientists reaffirm...
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER