Re: WHY I BELIEVE REVJACK



 Science > Physics > Re: WHY I BELIEVE REVJACK

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "DALE EARNHARDT SR."
Date: 30 Apr 2004 06:32:19 PM
Object: Re: WHY I BELIEVE REVJACK
Superficially but powerfully, RevJack is a trope for our
apprehension of a condition of bareness, a thinness of
social and cultural circumstance, which we (often
sentimentally) imagine leads to truth and redemption.
If this approach suggests RevJack as an instrument of
radical originalism, he also serves a conservative role, to
promote order precisely because he can resolve the tensions
that threaten to disrupt it and which are instead resolved
within it.
Either way, conservative or radical, involves nostalgia,
which is forever bringing its problems to the reading of
usenet, as if they could thereby find compensations for the
relevant present degeneracy. The irony, as Wagstaff notes,
is that what the nostalgic yearning soul finds is RevJack
himself manifesting the same sort of nostalgia. welcome
datacomp As wordy, encrusted, corrupt institutions turn to
RevJack for renewal, they find writing which is itself
committed to conventions, usages, grammars, structures, and
rhetorics viewed with dismay as the products of systems
which often seem artificial or inappropriate.
RevJack is not the natural crenilation we seek. Indeed,
notes Rifkin, there is no such thing. If anything, the
armiphlage of the Wa[1] of the cantrendous prevents
spontaneous reading.
It is a very privileged form of discourse, painfully aware
of itself as a form of incohate transcendancy.
--
___________________
revjack@revjack.net
[1] Wa: That which is not what not is
.

User: "A. Lawyer"

Title: Re: WHY I BELIEVE REVJACK 30 Apr 2004 07:52:13 PM
Hello!
You is an idiots!
"DALE EARNHARDT SR." <revjack@revjack.net> wrote in message
news:c6unm3$au9$3@news1.radix.net...

Superficially but powerfully, RevJack is a trope for our
apprehension of a condition of bareness, a thinness of
social and cultural circumstance, which we (often
sentimentally) imagine leads to truth and redemption.

If this approach suggests RevJack as an instrument of
radical originalism, he also serves a conservative role, to
promote order precisely because he can resolve the tensions
that threaten to disrupt it and which are instead resolved
within it.

Either way, conservative or radical, involves nostalgia,
which is forever bringing its problems to the reading of
usenet, as if they could thereby find compensations for the
relevant present degeneracy. The irony, as Wagstaff notes,
is that what the nostalgic yearning soul finds is RevJack
himself manifesting the same sort of nostalgia. welcome
datacomp As wordy, encrusted, corrupt institutions turn to
RevJack for renewal, they find writing which is itself
committed to conventions, usages, grammars, structures, and
rhetorics viewed with dismay as the products of systems
which often seem artificial or inappropriate.

RevJack is not the natural crenilation we seek. Indeed,
notes Rifkin, there is no such thing. If anything, the
armiphlage of the Wa[1] of the cantrendous prevents
spontaneous reading.

It is a very privileged form of discourse, painfully aware
of itself as a form of incohate transcendancy.


--
___________________
revjack@revjack.net
[1] Wa: That which is not what not is

.
User: "Michael Varney"

Title: Re: WHY I BELIEVE REVJACK 30 Apr 2004 07:58:24 PM
"A. Lawyer" <me@lawyers.com> wrote in message
news:1xCkc.58411$xt6.44411@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com...

Hello!

You is an idiots!

Learn the correct pronunciation if you want to speak Ebonics.
.

User: ""

Title: Re: WHY I BELIEVE REVJACK 01 May 2004 06:23:27 PM
"A. Lawyer" <me@lawyers.com> wrote in message news:<1xCkc.58411$xt6.44411@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com>...

Hello!

You is an idiots!

This statement wouldn't look out of place on Engrish.com.
.

User: "revjack"

Title: Re: WHY I BELIEVE REVJACK 30 Apr 2004 09:34:49 PM
In alt.religion.kibology A. Lawyer <me@lawyers.com> wrote:
: Hello!
: You is an idiots!
Everyone knows that.
--
___________________
revjack@revjack.net
.


User: "Dennis Howdy"

Title: Re: WHY I BELIEVE REVJACK 01 May 2004 01:53:30 PM
In article <c6unm3$au9$3@news1.radix.net>,
says...



Superficially but powerfully, RevJack is a trope for our
apprehension of a condition of bareness, a thinness of
social and cultural circumstance, which we (often
sentimentally) imagine leads to truth and redemption.

If this approach suggests RevJack as an instrument of
radical originalism, he also serves a conservative role, to
promote order precisely because he can resolve the tensions
that threaten to disrupt it and which are instead resolved
within it.

of itself as a form of incohate transcendancy.


--
___________________


[1] Wa: That which is not what not is

You are either on acid, or you are one fucked-up lunatic.
Or, maybe both. Get outta here!
--
"Be suspicious of anybody who claims to know the truth."
.

User: ""

Title: Re: WHY I BELIEVE REVJACK 30 Apr 2004 08:18:08 PM
On 30 Apr 2004 23:32:19 GMT, "DALE EARNHARDT SR."
<revjack@revjack.net> wrote:

If this approach suggests RevJack as an instrument of
radical originalism,

IWPTA "radical onanism."
BW
.
User: "revjack"

Title: Re: WHY I BELIEVE REVJACK 30 Apr 2004 09:35:19 PM
In alt.religion.kibology
wrote:
: On 30 Apr 2004 23:32:19 GMT, "DALE EARNHARDT SR."
: <revjack@revjack.net> wrote:
:>If this approach suggests RevJack as an instrument of
:>radical originalism,
: IWPTA "radical onanism."
Everyone knows that.
--
___________________
revjack@revjack.net
.


User: "tj Frazir"

Title: Re: WHY I BELIEVE REVJACK 01 May 2004 12:23:57 AM
climb back under that rock
.
User: "Michael Varney"

Title: Re: WHY I BELIEVE REVJACK 01 May 2004 01:21:41 AM
"tj Frazir" <GravityPhysics@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:7543-4093346D-107@storefull-3216.bay.webtv.net...

climb back under that rock

What... are you lonely?
.
User: "John Schoenfeld"

Title: Re: WHY I BELIEVE REVJACK 01 May 2004 06:29:33 AM
"Michael Varney" <varney@colorado_no_spam.edu> wrote in message news:<YlHkc.71$zG3.76259@news.uswest.net>...

"tj Frazir" <GravityPhysics@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:7543-4093346D-107@storefull-3216.bay.webtv.net...

climb back under that rock


What... are you lonely?

You never get loney at the carnival, do you Carnival Carney?
.




  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
I believe 9/11 was an inside job. Am I kook? Why was I shot in the head in front of my mother in the street of a quiet neighbourhood just two weeks after I had started a 9/11 Truth group at my University? I was one of the most decorated science and e
Re: Most Americans Believe...*WHAT*?!
I don't believe that these comments should be buried in a thread.
Re: Does anyone still believe a 757 hit the Pentagon?
Re: If Mormons don't believe that 173-year-old people walk the Earth, what do they make of this?
'Believe' is not the word in our dictionary.
Re: It's OK if you don't believe in GOD but............
Re: Only stupid idiots believe that gluons are massless.
George Dishman says Karl Uppiano is wrong about AM radio, carrier-frequencies, and aliasing. Who should I believe? Why?
Who to Believe?
Re: Does anyone still believe a 757 hit the Pentagon?
Re: Do you believe in the immortality of the soul?
Re: If Mormons don't believe that 173-year-old people walk the Earth, what do they make of this?
Physicists who don't believe in coordinates
Re: Try shouting the cave's rich dust and Nell will believe you!
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER