Re: Why is the Speed Of Light Constant?



 Science > Physics > Re: Why is the Speed Of Light Constant?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Hexenmeister"
Date: 20 Mar 2006 08:42:07 PM
Object: Re: Why is the Speed Of Light Constant?
"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote
in message news:yjFTf.327852$op6.10370075@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
|
| "Hexenmeister" <vanquish@broom.Mickey> wrote in message
news:XfrTf.196980$Q22.59809@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
| >
| > "The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill3@earthlink.net> wrote in message
| > news:pan.2006.03.19.21.29.14.845981@earthlink.net...
| > | On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 20:31:43 +0000, Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
| > |
| > | >
| > | > "Hexenmeister" <vanquish@broom.Mickey> wrote in message
| > | > news:1K_Rf.188720$YJ4.106552@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
| > | >
| > | > [snip]
| > | >
| > | > I wasn't talking to you, load of crap:
| > | >
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/LoadCrap.html
| > | >
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/CrapHuh.html
| > | > besides, since you have killfiled me (6 times now), you can't read
my
| > | > messages - let alone reply to them - without showing what a pathetic
| > | > emotionally disturbed imbecile you are. But be my guest anyway :-)
| > | >
| > | > Dirk Vdm
| > |
| > | It's a public forum, admittedly. Of course, one can easily get c+v in
one
| > | case, where one has a stationary observer and a stationary light
source,
| > | and an object moving at speed v towards that source. The closing
velocity
| > | is therefore c+v, minus a small error since the observer can't be
| > | infinitely far away. I doubt closing velocity is directly measurable,
| > | however.
| > |
| > | The moving object, of course, will see things slightly differently; it
| > | will see a light beam with a higher frequency and shorter wavelength,
but
| > | with speed c.
| > |
| > | As for Hex's killfile(s) -- well, AIUI Hex is on record for stating
that
| > | Einstein postulates c = 0 in SR; therefore, it's quite possible the
| > | killfile request hasn't quite reached his newsreader yet. How he can
| > | actually read your posts therefore is far from clear; maybe he's using
| > | superluminal muons or something... :-)
| >
| >
| > He's quite right, I've killfiled him 6 times already.
You snipped. Did you have something to say, alt.adolf-***** turkey?
Androcles
.

 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER