Re: wrong claims



 Science > Physics > Re: wrong claims

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "brian a m stuckless"
Date: 16 Oct 2005 08:42:49 PM
Object: Re: wrong claims

(1-(2*M/r))^.5 (M in meters).

NO part of that term is SR or GR.
There is NO GR G_uv related to mass M.
There is NO GR radius r for GR POiNT-mass.
The expression is clearly, ONLY, Newtonian.!!
brian a m stuckless
p.s.
WHOLLY see ..it is finished.!!

<> >><> >><> >><> >><>

xxein@bellsouth.net wrote:

(1-(2*M/r))^.5 (M in meters).

NO part of that term is SR or GR.
There is NO GR G_uv related to mass M.
There is NO GR radius r for GR POiNT-mass.
The expression is clearly, ONLY, Newtonian.!!

SR-GR can only tell you "what you will measure".
That's why it is called a "measurement theory".
It is not objective enough to 'see' outside itself.
before our muddled understanding tried to change it.

WHOLLY see ..it is finished.!!
.

 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER