| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
08 Jun 2004 10:16:48 AM |
| Object: |
Reading Aristotle- De Interpretaione |
Reading Aristotle- De Interpretaione
In the first sentence of discourse the premise is postulated.
“Just as all men have not the same writing, so all men have not
the same speech sounds, but the mental experiences, which these
directly symbolize, are the same for all, as also are those things of
which our experiences are the images.”?
Why this is important is the rationalization as the experience of many
men. An entire experience relative to the truth engendered in the
rational necessity of the moment. And for many chapters the truth
predicate is explored for all its necessary relations with the real
form intended by other men.
Without question the postulate is found true. And the intentions of
the man are to be consistent with the symbols used to communicate such
intentions. And here the man is again the good man and the meaning of
evil’s deceit is example after example.
Making the rather explicit formless relation of intended symbol to
predicate.
A daunting task.
Nowhere is the predicate given form by symbol’s necessity. And
the common reader is lost. It is to be read at face value of
good’s intention relative to the deceitful ways intended.
It is a large launch into the world of common discourse. And of
course the end result is a graphic example of the trivial experiences
of some men. A type of interpretation of the senses is graphed. And
this is to be taken as a reality of relative experience between all
men.
A duty to help good men out of the relative experience is also
detailed in the summary.
The last sentence before the summary begins, “For this is true
of that which must necessarily be.
A damming testament to the nature of rationalization.
The summary is then left to the open thinker as the common thinker to
explore. And learn of the school’s inference. And the fallacy
of true and false thinking is given as the task to ponder relative to
that which is proven false.
A false proposition of the evil nature to some men to be judged
otherwise.
All good discourse for learning.
Douglas Eagleson
Gaitherbsurg, MD USA
.
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
