Tom [He between his error-bars] Roberts wrote: > > sal wrote:
"Geometry" is a mathematical model, sure. -=-
$$ Observing SiMULTANEiTY together, at ONCE.
$$ REAL mumber ARiTHMETiC is a *simultaneously* geometrical MODEL.
$$ [i.e. All sides of REGULAR polygons are EQUAL-at-ONCE-in-TiME].
$$ [i.e. This, PROPOSED because we need COHERENT standard VOLUME].
Yes.
-=- talking about what appears to be "the geometry of NATURE".
Hmmm. I have no idea how Nature _really_ works.
I do know of various _models_ of Nature that are
excellent descriptions of physical phenomena in
the world we inhabit, valid in certain domains. -=- -=-
$$ You let "Nature" be your synonym of "physical phenomena, Dimwit.
In particular, I would be quite surprised if Nature
actually has any sort of geometry in Her methods; I
consider geometry to be a _model_, not any sort of
"reality".
$$ Geometry is the 3-d MODEL for ARiTHMETiCAL standards of REALiTY.
And I consider those people who claim to know how Nature
really works to be fools of the highest order....
$$ Emmy NOEther NEVER EVER mentioned an "inherent centro-symmetry".
$$ Heinz Pagels NEVER EVER mentioned an "inherent centro-symmetry".
Tom [He between his error-bars] Roberts
Re: FAQ - (the heretic's version)
Re: REAL-number GEOMETRY.
.
