Science > Physics > recent anisotropy experiments - gas vs vacuum devices
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"mountain man" |
| Date: |
27 Jul 2004 08:56:37 AM |
| Object: |
recent anisotropy experiments - gas vs vacuum devices |
All *recent* cited experimental upper limits on isotropy seem
to involve the use of vacuum devices, and not gas based devices.
Correct?
Can anyone cite a non-vacuum isotropy experiment not already listed here:
http://www.mountainman.com.au/process_physics/absolute_motion_register.htm
Pete Brown
Falls Creek
Oz
.
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: recent anisotropy experiments - gas vs vacuum devices |
27 Jul 2004 09:44:38 AM |
|
|
mountain man wrote:
All *recent* cited experimental upper limits on isotropy seem
to involve the use of vacuum devices, and not gas based devices.
Correct?
[snip *****]
A gas-filled device would not be homogeneous and isotropic at
scale, idiot - statistical thermodynamics; flow and
stratification; elastic and inelastic scattering.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
| User: "mountain man" |
|
| Title: Re: recent anisotropy experiments - gas vs vacuum devices |
27 Jul 2004 10:00:58 AM |
|
|
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:41066A56.3245C2B7@hate.spam.net...
mountain man wrote:
All *recent* cited experimental upper limits on isotropy seem
to involve the use of vacuum devices, and not gas based devices.
Correct?
[snip *****]
A gas-filled device would not be homogeneous and isotropic at
scale, idiot - statistical thermodynamics; flow and
stratification; elastic and inelastic scattering.
Title: Aether-Drift Velocity and Kinematic Ether Viscosity within Optical
Wave Bands
Published: Spacetime and Substance, Vol.3, No.5 (15), 2002, P.207-224.
Author: - Yuri Galaev, Ph.D
The Russians seem to handle the complexity of the physics
of the gas-filled device --- have a look at the paper.
The point being your standard crackpot patrol list of citations
against the experimental evidence of anisotropy needs to have
a disclaimer that reads "vacuum devices only".
Pete Brown
Falls Creek
Oz
www.mountainman.com.au
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: recent anisotropy experiments - gas vs vacuum devices |
27 Jul 2004 12:02:39 PM |
|
|
mountain man wrote:
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:41066A56.3245C2B7@hate.spam.net...
mountain man wrote:
All *recent* cited experimental upper limits on isotropy seem
to involve the use of vacuum devices, and not gas based devices.
Correct?
[snip *****]
A gas-filled device would not be homogeneous and isotropic at
scale, idiot - statistical thermodynamics; flow and
stratification; elastic and inelastic scattering.
Title: Aether-Drift Velocity and Kinematic Ether Viscosity within Optical
Wave Bands
Published: Spacetime and Substance, Vol.3, No.5 (15), 2002, P.207-224.
Author: - Yuri Galaev, Ph.D
The Russians seem to handle the complexity of the physics
of the gas-filled device --- have a look at the paper.
The point being your standard crackpot patrol list of citations
against the experimental evidence of anisotropy needs to have
a disclaimer that reads "vacuum devices only".
Pete Brown
Empirical idiot Brown, why did he get the wrong answer in
violation of Lorentz Invariance? Because he did a crappy
experiment for the reasons stated above. Pull the bible out of
your ***** and toss it.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
