| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Detcennoc07" |
| Date: |
07 Jan 2004 09:19:45 AM |
| Object: |
Retic Postings and SPAM |
Retic Postings and SPAM
There have been multiple accusations that the postings of H. E. Retic are
SPAM. The writer’s postings are carefully constructed so as remain within the
commonly accepted rules concerning SPAM, to wit:
1. Postings of essentially identical material shall not be made to more
than eight Newsgroups. The writer has limited his postings to seven Newsgroups.
2. Postings of essentially identical material shall not be made more
frequently than every 14 days. The writer's posting are separated by a longer
time span.
3. Postings shall be reasonably close to the topic to which the Newsgroups
is dedicated. My postings are closer to being on topic for each Newsgroup than
are most of the postings within that group.
4. The postings shall not be used for commercial purposes. They are not.
5. There shall be no alteration of the header material of the postings.
While the postings are made under many different E-mail names, however AOL
provides for multiple user names and permits them to be altered at will.
None of the writer's actions constitute SPAM as it is currently defined.
The accusations that the writer is a SPAMMER can reasonably considered to be
the slanderous behavior of sick minds. My postings are to de facto public
newsgroups which, as such, cannot limit their postings to material that agrees
with the majority viewpoint and still retain their legitimacy. That type of
censorship is legitimate only when done by moderated groups. To avoid this
censorship, the writer has made use of AOL's useful capability of allowing user
name changes. (It has been alleged that such changes are the characteristic of
a "crank". They are not, they are the response of any reasonable individual
whose ideas are being suppressed.)
The writer concludes that the strident protest against the writer's
postings can only result from fear, otherwise why wouldn't they just be ignored
if the content were thought not to be valid. After all, there are many more
foolish postings than mine made to these Newsgroups without evoking complaint.
The only reason for the complaints would seem to be that the complainer is not
upset by the fact the posted material is "wrong", he is upset by the idea that
they challenge what he has been taught and he may be forced to "go back to the
drawing board" and relearn his physics.
Even more sinister is the possibility that the complainers know that their
science is defective and wish to shield it from question from students of the
subject. Such questions make it much more difficult to indoctrinate students
with the "one true faith" which must not be questioned. It should be noted that
the complainers have not attempted to answer any of the basic questions which
have been raised, instead they have resorted to vilification.
The source material for this posting may be found in "Gravity" (1987),
"The Einstein Hoax" (1997), and "Corrections to Residual Errors in Special
Relativity (1999) located at http://www.members.aol.com/einsteinhoax/site.htm .
EVERYTHING WHICH WE ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE
HAVE ACCEPTED AS TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST
BE MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS
REQUIREMENT.
Please either respond via E-Mail or back any response to a Newsgroup with
E-mail, as Newsgroups are not monitored on a regular basis. Objective responses
will be treated with the same courtesy as they are presented. To prevent the
wastage of time on both of our parts, please do not raise objections that are
not related to material that you have read at the Website. This posting is
merely a summary.
E-Mail
The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 5 years.
In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE MATERIAL
PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by individuals who have
mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without questioning it. If anyone
provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be objectively answered, the
material at the Website will be withdrawn. The failure of such rebuttal to
appear is deafening. Responses asking for a continuation of the postings after
a modem failure produced two days of down time has been most gratifying.
.
|
|
| User: "Franz Heymann" |
|
| Title: Re: Retic Postings and SPAM |
07 Jan 2004 11:41:54 AM |
|
|
"Detcennoc07" <detcennoc07@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040107101945.14188.00002367@mb-m14.aol.com...
Retic Postings and SPAM
Retic never responds to criticisms of his posts.
It is fairly certain that he is a write-only machine.
Franz
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Retic Postings and SPAM |
08 Jan 2004 06:25:08 AM |
|
|
In article <bthgd2$3vj$1@titan.btinternet.com>,
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote:
"Detcennoc07" <detcennoc07@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040107101945.14188.00002367@mb-m14.aol.com...
Retic Postings and SPAM
Retic never responds to criticisms of his posts.
It is fairly certain that he is a write-only machine.
nitpick. Not quite. A write-only machine would soon
go over its quota and crash, if the OS was not well-written,
and pause until operator intervention if the OS was well-written.
This is a runaway comm line, a.k.a. as an open circuit in our
lingo.
/BAH
Subtract a hundred and four for e-mail.
.
|
|
|
| User: "S. Enterprize Company" |
|
| Title: Re: Retic Postings and SPAM - Smart1234 takes up for Retic |
08 Jan 2004 08:13:06 AM |
|
|
In article <bthgd2$3vj$1@titan.btinternet.com>,
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote:
"Detcennoc07" <detcennoc07@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040107101945.14188.00002367@mb-m14.aol.com...
Retic Postings and SPAM
Retic never responds to criticisms of his posts.
It is fairly certain that he is a write-only machine.
I guess he has to keep repeating it to get to your thick skulls.
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2002/08apr_atomicclock.htm
"According to Einstein's theory of gravity and space-time -- called "general
relativity" -- clocks in strong gravity tick slower than clocks in weak
gravity. Because gravity is weaker on the ISS than at Earth's surface, PARCS
should accumulate an extra second every 10,000 years compared to clocks ticking
on the planet below. PARCS won't be there that long, but the clock is so stable
that it will reveal this effect in less than one year. (Strayer notes that
clocks on GPS satellites experience this relativistic phenomenon, too, and that
onboard systems must correct for it.)
"Putting atomic clocks in orbit is a good way to test general relativity," says
Maleki. "General relativity has passed every test so far, but no theory is
perfect -- not even Einstein's. Eventually, as we extend the precision of our
experiments, we expect to find flaws in it, and that will dramatically change
what we know about the nature of the Universe."
The velocity of one orbiting airplane while the other is stationary has
NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH TIME CHANGE DIFFERENCE. There are gravitational
differences experienced while the other airplane is in orbit as you reference
to a stationary one causing the time differences.
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: Retic Postings and SPAM - Smart1234 takes up for Retic |
08 Jan 2004 09:01:07 AM |
|
|
"S. Enterprize Company" wrote:
In article <bthgd2$3vj$1@titan.btinternet.com>,
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote:
"Detcennoc07" <detcennoc07@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040107101945.14188.00002367@mb-m14.aol.com...
Retic Postings and SPAM
Retic never responds to criticisms of his posts.
It is fairly certain that he is a write-only machine.
I guess he has to keep repeating it to get to your thick skulls.
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2002/08apr_atomicclock.htm
"According to Einstein's theory of gravity and space-time -- called "general
relativity" -- clocks in strong gravity tick slower than clocks in weak
gravity. Because gravity is weaker on the ISS than at Earth's surface, PARCS
should accumulate an extra second every 10,000 years compared to clocks ticking
on the planet below. PARCS won't be there that long, but the clock is so stable
that it will reveal this effect in less than one year. (Strayer notes that
clocks on GPS satellites experience this relativistic phenomenon, too, and that
onboard systems must correct for it.)
"Putting atomic clocks in orbit is a good way to test general relativity," says
Maleki. "General relativity has passed every test so far, but no theory is
perfect -- not even Einstein's. Eventually, as we extend the precision of our
experiments, we expect to find flaws in it, and that will dramatically change
what we know about the nature of the Universe."
The velocity of one orbiting airplane while the other is stationary has
NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH TIME CHANGE DIFFERENCE. There are gravitational
differences experienced while the other airplane is in orbit as you reference
to a stationary one causing the time differences.
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
Don't be so stooopid, Smart--GPS design also takes into account the
time dilation as predicted by Special Relativity.
"General Relativity in the Global Positioning System" by Neil Ashby
http://rattler.cameron.edu/EMIS/journals/LRG/Articles/Volume6/2003-1ashby/index.html
http://www.edu-observatory.org/gps/gps_books.html#Relativity
"General Relativity in the Global Positioning System" by Clifford M. Will
http://www.eftaylor.com/pub/projecta.pdf
http://www.edu-observatory.org/gps/gps_books.html#Relativity
.
|
|
|
| User: "S. Enterprize Company" |
|
| Title: Re: Retic Postings and SPAM - Smart1234 takes up for Retic |
08 Jan 2004 07:07:51 PM |
|
|
"S. Enterprize Company" wrote:
In article <bthgd2$3vj$1@titan.btinternet.com>,
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote:
"Detcennoc07" <detcennoc07@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040107101945.14188.00002367@mb-m14.aol.com...
Retic Postings and SPAM
Retic never responds to criticisms of his posts.
It is fairly certain that he is a write-only machine.
I guess he has to keep repeating it to get to your thick skulls.
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2002/08apr_atomicclock.htm
"According to Einstein's theory of gravity and space-time -- called
"general
relativity" -- clocks in strong gravity tick slower than clocks in weak
gravity. Because gravity is weaker on the ISS than at Earth's surface,
PARCS
should accumulate an extra second every 10,000 years compared to clocks
ticking
on the planet below. PARCS won't be there that long, but the clock is so
stable
that it will reveal this effect in less than one year. (Strayer notes that
clocks on GPS satellites experience this relativistic phenomenon, too, and
that
onboard systems must correct for it.)
"Putting atomic clocks in orbit is a good way to test general relativity,"
says
Maleki. "General relativity has passed every test so far, but no theory is
perfect -- not even Einstein's. Eventually, as we extend the precision of
our
experiments, we expect to find flaws in it, and that will dramatically
change
what we know about the nature of the Universe."
The velocity of one orbiting airplane while the other is stationary has
NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH TIME CHANGE DIFFERENCE. There are gravitational
differences experienced while the other airplane is in orbit as you
reference
to a stationary one causing the time differences.
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
Don't be so stooopid, Smart--GPS design also takes into account the
time dilation as predicted by Special Relativity.
"General Relativity in the Global Positioning System" by Neil Ashby
http://rattler.cameron.edu/EMIS/journals/LRG/Articles/Volume6/2003-1ashby
/index.html
http://www.edu-observatory.org/gps/gps_books.html#Relativity
"General Relativity in the Global Positioning System" by Clifford M. Will
http://www.eftaylor.com/pub/projecta.pdf
http://www.edu-observatory.org/gps/gps_books.html#Relativity
These GPS satellites are making corrections for small changes in
gravitational forces not velocity. This has nothing to do with velocity of an
object vs a stationary object in space. The atomic clocks run at different
speeds at different altitudes of the earth due to various gravitational forces.
This isn't velocity. Velocity isn't even part of that.
Changes in gravitational fields causes changes in time not speed.
If there is a full moon on one side of the earth and nothing on the other
side shown, the atomic clocks will run at different speeds again. Constant
corrections on GPS clocks have to be made not due to velocity, but
gravitational effects.
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: Retic Postings and SPAM |
07 Jan 2004 09:58:42 AM |
|
|
Detcennoc07 wrote:
Retic Postings and SPAM
are just that.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: Retic Postings and SPAM |
07 Jan 2004 11:17:26 AM |
|
|
Detcennoc07 wrote:
Retic Postings and SPAM
[snip]
Exactly.
Psychotic ineducable boring spammer retic (Ernest Wittke),
You see yourself this way,
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete6.jpg
The entire remainder of the planet sees you this way,
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete7.jpg
http://b5.sdvc.uwyo.edu/bab5/snds/argcstpd.wav
http://w0rli.home.att.net/youare.swf
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg
http://www.you-moron.com/
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=group%3Asci.physics+author%3Awittke
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete0.jpg
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete1.png
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete2.png
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete3.png
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete4.png
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete5.jpg
http://www.apa.org/journals/psp/psp7761121.html
http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~siegel/quack.html
<http://www.firehead.org/~jessh/film/kubrick/Kubrick-Psycho.html>
<http://www.naturalchild.com/elliott_barker/prisons.html>
The source material for this posting may be found in "Gravity" (1987),
"The Einstein Hoax" (1997), and "Corrections to Residual Errors in Special
Relativity (1999)
[snip]
Hey, stooopid spammer Ernest Wittke - Do you want EVIDENCE? Each of
the 24 GPS satellites carries either four cesium atomic clocks or
three rubidum atomic clocks in orbit, with full relativistic
corrections being applied.
http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0307140
GR structure, especially Part 4/p. 7
<http://rattler.cameron.edu/EMIS/journals/LRG/Articles/Volume4/2001-4will/index.html>
Experimental constraints on General Relativity.
<http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/ptti/ptti2002/paper20.pdf>
Nature 425 374 (2003)
<http://rattler.cameron.edu/EMIS/journals/LRG/Articles/Volume6/2003-1ashby/index.html>
http://www.eftaylor.com/pub/projecta.pdf
Relativity in the GPS system
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0312071
Deeply relativistic neutron star binary
Special Relativity is physics on a topologically trivial Lorentzian
manifold with a metric whose curvature tensor is zero. This is a
perfectly diffeomorphism-invariant condition and does not require
any particular coordinate choice. It is invariant under
the full group of diffeomorphisms. The Poincare group is
the group of *isometries* of the metric in special relativity.
The Special Relativity metric is *non-dynamical* (unlike GR). It
defines the coupling *constants* of your theory. If you change the
metric in any nontrivial way you are changing your theory. An
operation can only be called a "symmetry" of a special-relativistic
(non-gravitational) theory if it preserves the metric, and therefore
the symmetry of special-relativistic theories is the Poincare group
only. General Relativity (gravitation) has a dynamic metric.
NIM A 355 537 (1995)
Physics Letters B 328 103 (1994)
Physical Review Letters 64 1697 (1990)
Physical Review Letters 39 1051 (1977)
Physical Review 135 B1071 (1964)
Physics Letters 12 260 (1964)
Europhysics Letters 56(2) 170-174 (2001)
General Relativity and Gravitation 34(9) 1371 (2002)
http://fourmilab.to/etexts/einstein/specrel/specrel.pdf
<http://www.geocities.com/physics_world/sr/ae_1905_error.htm>
<http://www.physics.gatech.edu/people/faculty/finkelstein/relativity.pdf>
http://users.powernet.co.uk/bearsoft/Paper6.pdf
http://users.powernet.co.uk/bearsoft/LPHrel.html
Longitudinal and transverse mass
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/gpsuser/gpsuser.pdf
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/sigspec/default.htm
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/icd200/default.htm
http://www.trimble.com/gps/index.html
http://sirius.chinalake.navy.mil/satpred/
http://www.phys.lsu.edu/mog/mog9/node9.html
http://egtphysics.net/GPS/RelGPS.htm
http://www.schriever.af.mil/gps/Current/current.oa1
http://edu-observatory.org/gps/gps_books.html
<http://www-astronomy.mps.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit5/gps.html>
If anyone
provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be objectively answered, the
material at the Website will be withdrawn.
Right, like your head has ever been withdrawn from your ***** - even
when you *****.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!
.
|
|
|
| User: "S. Enterprize Company" |
|
| Title: Re: Retic Postings and SPAM |
08 Jan 2004 08:06:42 AM |
|
|
Detcennoc07 wrote:
Retic Postings and SPAM
[snip]
Exactly.
Psychotic ineducable boring spammer retic (Ernest Wittke),
You see yourself this way,
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete6.jpg
The entire remainder of the planet sees you this way,
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete7.jpg
http://b5.sdvc.uwyo.edu/bab5/snds/argcstpd.wav
http://w0rli.home.att.net/youare.swf
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg
http://www.you-moron.com/
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=group%3Asci.physics+author%3Awittke
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete0.jpg
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete1.png
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete2.png
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete3.png
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete4.png
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete5.jpg
http://www.apa.org/journals/psp/psp7761121.html
http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~siegel/quack.html
<http://www.firehead.org/~jessh/film/kubrick/Kubrick-Psycho.html>
<http://www.naturalchild.com/elliott_barker/prisons.html>
The source material for this posting may be found in "Gravity" (1987),
"The Einstein Hoax" (1997), and "Corrections to Residual Errors in Special
Relativity (1999)
[snip]
Hey, stooopid spammer Ernest Wittke - Do you want EVIDENCE? Each of
the 24 GPS satellites carries either four cesium atomic clocks or
three rubidum atomic clocks in orbit, with full relativistic
corrections being applied.
Quoting from link on GPS atomic clocks..
"According to Einstein's theory of gravity and space-time -- called "general
relativity" -- clocks in strong gravity tick slower than clocks in weak
gravity. Because gravity is weaker on the ISS than at Earth's surface, PARCS
should accumulate an extra second every 10,000 years compared to clocks ticking
on the planet below. PARCS won't be there that long, but the clock is so stable
that it will reveal this effect in less than one year. (Strayer notes that
clocks on GPS satellites experience this relativistic phenomenon, too, and that
onboard systems must correct for it.)
"Putting atomic clocks in orbit is a good way to test general relativity," says
Maleki. "General relativity has passed every test so far, but no theory is
perfect -- not even Einstein's. Eventually, as we extend the precision of our
experiments, we expect to find flaws in it, and that will dramatically change
what we know about the nature of the Universe."
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2002/08apr_atomicclock.htm
Like I said before, clock speed is altered by gravity not velocity. What
does those atomic clocks have to do with velocity while in orbit? They are
corrected for gravitational differences.
In black holes gravitational effects are significant enough to cause not
only FTL but time changes.
To have one plane travel around the world while the other is stationary is
showing a time difference ( with atomic clocks) which is ONLY due to
gravitational differences while the other plane is experiencing various
gravitational pull differences while going around the earth.
And you call people "stooopid", it's spelled "stupid".
http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0307140
GR structure, especially Part 4/p. 7
<http://rattler.cameron.edu/EMIS/journals/LRG/Articles/Volume4/2001-4will
/index.html>
Experimental constraints on General Relativity.
<http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/ptti/ptti2002/paper20.pdf>
Nature 425 374 (2003)
<http://rattler.cameron.edu/EMIS/journals/LRG/Articles/Volume6/2003-1ashb
y/index.html>
http://www.eftaylor.com/pub/projecta.pdf
Relativity in the GPS system
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0312071
Deeply relativistic neutron star binary
Special Relativity is physics on a topologically trivial Lorentzian
manifold with a metric whose curvature tensor is zero. This is a
perfectly diffeomorphism-invariant condition and does not require
any particular coordinate choice. It is invariant under
the full group of diffeomorphisms. The Poincare group is
the group of *isometries* of the metric in special relativity.
The Special Relativity metric is *non-dynamical* (unlike GR). It
defines the coupling *constants* of your theory. If you change the
metric in any nontrivial way you are changing your theory. An
operation can only be called a "symmetry" of a special-relativistic
(non-gravitational) theory if it preserves the metric, and therefore
the symmetry of special-relativistic theories is the Poincare group
only. General Relativity (gravitation) has a dynamic metric.
NIM A 355 537 (1995)
Physics Letters B 328 103 (1994)
Physical Review Letters 64 1697 (1990)
Physical Review Letters 39 1051 (1977)
Physical Review 135 B1071 (1964)
Physics Letters 12 260 (1964)
Europhysics Letters 56(2) 170-174 (2001)
General Relativity and Gravitation 34(9) 1371 (2002)
http://fourmilab.to/etexts/einstein/specrel/specrel.pdf
<http://www.geocities.com/physics_world/sr/ae_1905_error.htm>
<http://www.physics.gatech.edu/people/faculty/finkelstein/relativity.pdf>
http://users.powernet.co.uk/bearsoft/Paper6.pdf
http://users.powernet.co.uk/bearsoft/LPHrel.html
Longitudinal and transverse mass
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/gpsuser/gpsuser.pdf
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/sigspec/default.htm
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/icd200/default.htm
http://www.trimble.com/gps/index.html
http://sirius.chinalake.navy.mil/satpred/
http://www.phys.lsu.edu/mog/mog9/node9.html
http://egtphysics.net/GPS/RelGPS.htm
http://www.schriever.af.mil/gps/Current/current.oa1
http://edu-observatory.org/gps/gps_books.html
<http://www-astronomy.mps.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit5/gps.html>
If anyone
provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be objectively answered, the
material at the Website will be withdrawn.
Right, like your head has ever been withdrawn from your ***** - even
when you *****.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: Retic Postings and SPAM |
08 Jan 2004 09:00:15 AM |
|
|
"S. Enterprize Company" wrote:
"Putting atomic clocks in orbit is a good way to test general relativity," says
Maleki. "General relativity has passed every test so far, but no theory is
perfect -- not even Einstein's. Eventually, as we extend the precision of our
experiments, we expect to find flaws in it, and that will dramatically change
what we know about the nature of the Universe."
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2002/08apr_atomicclock.htm
Like I said before, clock speed is altered by gravity not velocity. What
does those atomic clocks have to do with velocity while in orbit? They are
corrected for gravitational differences.
In black holes gravitational effects are significant enough to cause not
only FTL but time changes.
To have one plane travel around the world while the other is stationary is
showing a time difference ( with atomic clocks) which is ONLY due to
gravitational differences while the other plane is experiencing various
gravitational pull differences while going around the earth.
And you call people "stooopid", it's spelled "stupid".
Don't be so stooopid, Smart--GPS design also takes into account the
time dilation as predicted by Special Relativity.
"General Relativity in the Global Positioning System" by Neil Ashby
http://rattler.cameron.edu/EMIS/journals/LRG/Articles/Volume6/2003-1ashby/index.html
http://www.edu-observatory.org/gps/gps_books.html#Relativity
"General Relativity in the Global Positioning System" by Clifford M. Will
http://www.eftaylor.com/pub/projecta.pdf
http://www.edu-observatory.org/gps/gps_books.html#Relativity
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
