| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Jack Sarfatti" |
| Date: |
12 Mar 2005 07:48:52 PM |
| Object: |
reverse engineering ET time machines |
http://stardrive.org
and BLOG "Destiny Matrix" on Blogspot.com
Podcasts & Web Radio coming
REVERSE METRIC ENGINEERING ADVANCED ALIEN SPACE WEAPONS
The key quantity in Puthoff's PV model, a wrong model falsified by
experiment, better than not-even-wrong models (W. Pauli) is g00. What
is goo really? What it is, is
g00(LNIF) = (I0^a + LpB0^aPa(Goldstone Phase)/ih)(LIF)ab(I0^b +
LpB0^bPb(Goldstone Phase)/ih)
Where (LIF)ab is the Minkowski metric i.e +1, -1,-1,-1 all
off-diagonals = 0, and I is the Kronecker delta, i = 1,2,3
g00 = 1 + 2LpB0^0P0(GP)/ih - 2LpB0^iPi(GP)/ih - Lp^2(B0^0P0(GP)/ih)^2 -
Lp^2(B0^iPi(GP)/ih)^2
if I did not make a mistake in algebra.
What is really interesting are the LINEAR terms in Lp that are much
larger than the quadratic terms!
In particular, when there is a gravimagnetic field goi from a rotating
high Tc superconducting part of the saucer fuselage maybe, we get
something like
g0i(LNIF) = (I0^a + LpB0^aPa(Goldstone Phase)/ih)(LIF)ab(Ii^b +
LpBi^bPb(Goldstone Phase)/ih)
Again there will be relatively large Lp terms in the gravimagnetic
field to couple to the EM 3-vector potential Ai in the Ray Chiao
"gravity radio transducer" idea.
This is a BRUTE FORCE method. Mine is more subtle like Tai Chi i.e.
imagine a the control macro-quantum phase is something like
Theta = (e/hc)Integral A.dl
With Pa operating on the Josephson phase difference
Goldstone Phase (GP) - Theta
The local zero point energy density is ~ cos[GP - Theta].
When this zero point energy density is negative we have equal opposite
positive pressure causing an attractive contractive warp. On the other
hand, when this zero point energy density is positive we have a
negative pressure repulsive expansive warp. This is exactly what the
Alcubierre "G-Engine" weightless timelike geodesic glider globally
faster-than-light (locally standing still) time travel machine needs!
The objections of Matt Visser and Stephen Hawking et-al are obviously
not fatal barriers since we see the damn things over our nuclear
missile bases according to Peter Jennings ABC TV Special on Feb 24,
2005. The Cat is Alive and Out of the Box. You want Disclosure? Now you
got it. What's up ***** Cat? We got a Tiger Tiger Eyes Shining Bright
in The Dark Energy of The Knight! :-)
On Mar 12, 2005, at 3:08 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
On Mar 12, 2005, at 2:05 PM, wrote:
Coming from someone who has now completely caved in to my position
re: Einstein equivalence, this is hilarious.
Paul you continue in your delusion that somehow I renounce EEP? In
fact, the opposite is true. EEP in math form is simply
g(LNIF) = (I + B)(Minkowski)(I + B)
e = (I + B) is Einstein-Cartan tetrad
B is the "gauge force" picture i.e. T4 -> Diff(4)
B is the compensating field that RESTORES conservation of Pu currents
including the new dynamical degrees of freedom of the B connection
field.
The B connection is not the same as the (LC) connection in the
geometrodynamic picture.
The EEP is the BRIDGE between the Gauge Force picture and the
Geometrodynamic picture!
I do not in any sense "renounce equivalence"!
Given a metric without gravimagnetism i.e. goi = 0 (no rotating
sources)
ds^2 = goo(cdt)^2 - gijdx^idx^j
i,j = 1,2,3
Physically
dT = (goo)^1/2dt
dL = (gijdx^idx^j)^1/2
For a light ray
ds^2 = c^2dT^2 - dL^2 in the LNIF
ds = 0 (null geodesic)
Therefore, the PHYSICALLY MEASURED SPEED OF LIGHT for that LNIF
observer who sees the above metric will be c the same as in special
relativity, i.e.
dL/dT = c in the LNIF as well as the COINCIDENT LIFs.
The COINCIDENT LIFs and LNIFs are connected together by the
Einstein-Cartan tetrad (I + B) where B is the compensating gauge
potential connection field from locally gauging global T4 to Diff(4).
Z: Excuse me -- my contention was that *in 1916 Einstein GR* the
locally measured speed of light is always c *only in free-fall
frames*.
J: Well you are wrong!
Z: The above is not 1916 GR.
J: It certainly is. You do not know enough of the math to see GR when
it is staring you in the face as it is.
dT = goo^1/2dt
dL = (gijdx^idx^j)^1/2
i,j = 1,2,3
in LNIFs is in GR text books.
You get rotational Sagnac interferometer shifts in SPEED of light only
when there is a gravimagnetic field H = (goi) as defined by Ray Chiao
in his "gravity radio" papers.
His superconducting high-efficiency transducer posits a H.A gravity-EM
coupling where A is the 3-vector potential of EM in the NR Galilean
relativity limit.
Z: It's really very simple. Suppose you have a plane wave in
gravity-free spacetime, propagating at every point at the invariant
speed c as measured in an inertial frame K. Now go to an accelerating
frame K' that is accelerating in a direction perpendicular to the
direction of propagation of the wave. The normals to the wave fronts
of the formerly plane wave now appear to change continuously in time,
tracing *curved* spatial trajectories.
J: Show the math Paul! This is essentially gravity lensing. It does
not imply that magnitude is changing only refraction change of
direction.
Z: According to the equivalence principle, the effect of some
homogeneous gravitational field on the same wave, as observed from
the original inertia frame K, must be identical to the effect of
going to the accelerating frame K' Clearly, if the light path is now
curved, then the speed of propagation of the waves must vary from
point to point on any given wavefront,
J: NONSENSE PAUL! When the metric is of the form:
ds^2 = goo(cdt)^2 - gijdx^idx^j = (cdT)^2 - dL^2
i,j = 1,2,3
the LNIF measured speed of light when ds = 0 is still
dL/dT = c same as in the COINCIDENT LIF.
, either in a gravity-free accelerating frame, or in a gravitational
field viewed from an inertial frame -- as consistently affirmed by
Einstein himself:
". . . according to the general theory of relativity, the law of the
constancy of the velocity of light in vacuo, which constitutes one of
the two fundamental assumptions in the special theory of relativity
[...] cannot claim any unlimited validity. A curvature of rays of
light can only take place when the velocity of propagation of light
varies with position."
- A. Einstein, "The Meaning of Relativity"
J: Hey Professor! Einstein uses "velocity" not "speed" there! Clean
your glasses.
"A curvature of rays of light can only take place when the VELOCITY
of propagation of light varies with position."
IS GENERALLY TRUE FOR ALL WARPED METRICS
"A curvature of rays of light can only take place when the SPEED of
propagation of light varies with position."
IS FALSE and that is not what Einstein wrote! Paul, you garbled the
difference between 'velocity" and "speed"!
A gravimagnetic field (Lense-Thirring frame drag) will IN ADDITION
change the SPEED of light in vacuum, e.g. Sagnac effect, which even
happens in special relativity and even in the Galilean limiting case
since the fringe shifts are seen in lab experiments.
Now, if there is gravimagnetic Lense-Thirring "frame drag", then, in
the LNIF
ds^2 = c^2dT^2 - dL^2 - Hcdt.dr
H is the gravimagnetic 3-vector with components (g0i) and dr is the
3-vector with components (dx^i)
Again ds = 0
(dL/dT)^2 = c^2 - cH(dt/dT).(dr/dT)
The speed of light in a gravimagnetic field is then
dL/dt = c[1 - (dt/dT)H.(dr/cdT)]^1/2
Note the effective sign inside the square root flips when you change
the rotation sense. Of course, Paul you never formulated this
mathematically, nor did he make any specific remarks of any utility
on this problem.
Z: You are not addressing my actual statement, which is that *in 1916
Einstein GR* the locally measured speed of light is always c only in
free-fall frames:
". . . according to the general theory of relativity, the law of the
constancy of the velocity of light in vacuo, which constitutes one
of the two fundamental assumptions in the special theory of
relativity [. . .] cannot claim any unlimited validity. A curvature
of rays of light can only take place when the velocity of
propagation of light varies with position."
- A. Einstein, "The Meaning of Relativity"
J: Answered above. Your sloppy thinking again mistaking "velocity" a
vector for "speed" the magnitude of the vector.
Puthoff also makes a similar mistake thinking that goo is a
"dielectric", i.e. Puthoff-Davis-Yilmaz use:
ds^2 = goo(cdt)^2 - goo^-1(dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2)
dl^2 = dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2
Therefore, when ds = 0
dL/dT = c
dl/dt = c/goo = c/K
goo = n = index of refraction in PV picture
goo = e^-2GM/c^2r is further assumed.
But of course this is wrong since dl/dt is never measured. Hal Puthoff
does an ultra-heretical meta-theoretical song and dance Dog and Pony
show here that makes Matt Visser and Cliff Will red in the face, that,
no doubt, you will think is brilliant. "No possible doubt
whatever!"(Gondoliers);-)
*The Sagnac effect for rotating interferometers is an example. This
formula applies even in GLOBAL SR without tidal curvature in the
rotating GNIF.
Z: That's another can of worms.
J: Not at all. It's simply until you mistify and mystify it with your
ultra-heretical meta-theoretics
Z.
On Mar 12, 2005, at 10:25 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
On Mar 11, 2005, at 10:12 PM, wrote:
Jack Sarfatti wrote:
"Replace light signals with sound to define time" - a genius idea
from Zielinski! ;-)
Z: Well, the sophistication of this dialectical maneuver evidently
went right over your head.
J: Oh yeah? Tell us how to do cosmology with sound waves? The point
Paul is that the invariant light cone structure is essential to all
practical applications in precision cosmology. Indeed, tidal
curvature, as shown by Penrose, is a relative tilt between
neighboring invariant light cones.
Z: Once you adopt 1905 Einstein kinematics, then of course it becomes
fundamental to cosmology.
J: How else would YOU do cosmology? Also you cannot use Lorentz
theory to get gravity!
Z: Except that GR, which is in fact the actual chronogeometric basis
for modern cosmology, supersedes SR and only preserves the empirical
predictions of SR locally, by way of correspondence -- and it even
does away with invariant light speed as to local observations made in
*non-inertial* frames!
J: Of course, so what? You characteristically state well-known facts
of relativity AS IF somehow they are defects in it when just the
opposite is true! You have no understanding of local gauge
invariance, which, in this case is the local gauging of T4 to Diff(4)
whose compensating field Bu^a is precisely the non-trivial part of
the Einstein-Cartan tetrad responsible for "intrinsic warpage"
distinguishing the REAL gravity from the ARTIFICIAL gravity in
Minkowski space-time. A problem you were interested in, that you
never formulated properly, much less solve. I solved it. In Minkowski
space-time Bu^a = 0, the Einstein-Cartan tetrad is the trivial
identity Iu^a, the tangent bundle and the base space are degenerate
and any GCT made on (Minkowski)uv is simply ARTIFICIAL gravity like
in a rotating GNIF since the tidal curvature tensor vanishes in
(Minkowski)uv it will vanish in any GCT made on it. You need the B
field to get real gravity.
.
|
|
|
Related Articles |
Reverse Engineering Alien Space Weapons
Modanese's Metric Engineering Paper at STAIF 2004
Bottling Dark Energy for Metric Engineering WMD Problem
Riccati Differential Equation Relates Probability, Geometry, Physics, Engineering, Cosmology 2: Entropy and Knowledge
Physics graduate school for an Engineering undergraduate
Progress in Metric Engineering in Super Cosmos
VERY GOOD SCIENCE ENGINEERING BOOKS FOR CHEAP
Call Bush to Action on Science, Math, and Engineering Education
| Call For Papers: WORLDCOMP'08: 25 joint conferences in computerscience, computer engineering, and applied computing, USA, July 2008
Call for Participation: WORLDCOMP'06 (Computer Science & Computer Engineering), June 26-29, 2006, Las Vegas, USA
Absence of dark matter particles & metric engineering warp drive
re: Hal Puthoff's Metric Engineering TYPO
please recommend advanced math books for science and engineering?
Free Engineering Handbook
Biomedical Engineering info
|
|
|
