| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Uncle Al" |
| Date: |
17 Oct 2005 02:29:59 PM |
| Object: |
River of ***** |
247 new posts to sci.physics this morning. Seven were worth reading.
sci.chem is similarly sterile.
Uncle Al logged on in 1995. 79,300 posts since then. The intervening
decade has witnessed a tragedy of the commons. sci.physics has deeply
fallen over the line of Sturgeon's Law. Gresham's law rules to its
odious inevitable destination. Unmoderated Usenet is a river of *****.
In order to maintain an untenable position one must be actively
ignorant - though stupidity, religion, or insanity are passively
adequate.
Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
with my resources. The parity Eotvos experiment will be replayed
calormetrically, by a chemical group, under written agreement.
Physics groups are still talking and saying nothing. Let their wind
blow - my people will do it. Read about the results, either way,
after they are published.
Goodbye and - less about six sainted folks - go worship Nehemiah
Scudder. FOaD.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
| User: "Traveler" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
18 Oct 2005 09:19:11 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 10:04:10 -0400, Al Zenner <azen@zenner.com> wrote:
Are you in love with Uncle Al?
Need you ask? ahahaha...
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Schultz" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
19 Oct 2005 01:13:20 AM |
|
|
In sci.chem MMu <brilhasti@gmx.net> wrote:
: "Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
: news:4353FBB7.216AB40F@hate.spam.net...
:> Goodbye and - less about six sainted folks - go worship Nehemiah
:> Scudder. FOaD.
: I can't tell you how much I love those "I am leaving on a jetplane" forum
: whiners..
: If you're fed up don't pull off the drama queen, just leave.
Uncle Al has promised in the past that he would no longer be posting to
sci.chem. His neurotic need to be the center of everyone's attention
more or less guarantees that he'll be back, and more likely sooner
than later.
-----
Richard Schultz
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
"Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers which smell bad."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Nomen Nescio" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
18 Oct 2005 09:10:02 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 11:11:05 +0000, jmfbahciv wrote:
You are a fool. He was informing the few, not the many. Those few have a
decision to make.
Uncle is not the only one in these newsgroups where the stalking has
turned, not only viscious, but physical. It appears that the populations
of those retreating into ideology is increasing.
I suggest using remailers. I never post under my real name, and use remailers to obliterate all traces that would lead back to me.
It may not be very brave, but doing that allows me to say what I want, without fear of paying a price.
.
|
|
|
| User: "platopes" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
19 Oct 2005 01:47:29 AM |
|
|
Nomen Nescio wrote:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 11:11:05 +0000, jmfbahciv wrote:
You are a fool. He was informing the few, not the many. Those few have a
decision to make.
Uncle is not the only one in these newsgroups where the stalking has
turned, not only viscious, but physical. It appears that the populations
of those retreating into ideology is increasing.
I suggest using remailers.
Who cares?
I never post under my real name,
Or anything of any value whatsoever.
and use remailers to obliterate all traces
that would lead back to me.
And to flood usenet with horse pucky.
It may not be very brave,
It is absolutely cowardly and a waste of time.
but doing that allows me to say what I want, without fear of paying a price.
Most people would consider being widely known as an idiot a "price",
anonymous or not, idiot.
Go ahead and email me a threat -
Bulk [empty] click.
p
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Traveler" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
18 Oct 2005 09:27:09 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:10:02 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio
<nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 11:11:05 +0000, jmfbahciv wrote:
You are a fool. He was informing the few, not the many. Those few have a
decision to make.
Uncle is not the only one in these newsgroups where the stalking has
turned, not only viscious, but physical. It appears that the populations
of those retreating into ideology is increasing.
The Mariana Trench woman is obviously in love with Uncle *****.
ahahaha... She's in luck. I read somewhere that Uncle *****'s
former wife kicked his insupportable autistic ***** out of the condo.
ahahaha...
I suggest using remailers. I never post under my real name, and use remailers to obliterate all traces that would lead back to me.
It may not be very brave, but doing that allows me to say what I want, without fear of paying a price.
There is a reason why Uncle ***** would attract violence on his
person, even though I very much doubt that it happened. Uncle *****
is known to be a virulent racist ***** who has, on several
occasions, called for genocide.
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Helmut Wabnig EmailAddress" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
19 Oct 2005 02:21:39 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 10:27:09 -0400, Traveler <traveler@nospam.net>
wrote:
I suggest using remailers. I never post under my real name, and use remailers to obliterate all traces that would lead back to me.
It may not be very brave, but doing that allows me to say what I want, without fear of paying a price.
There is a reason why Uncle ***** would attract violence on his
person, even though I very much doubt that it happened. Uncle *****
is known to be a virulent racist ***** who has, on several
occasions, called for genocide.
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
I remember that, too, but took it as irony or sarcasm.
I may be wrong, though.
w.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Happy Dog" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
19 Oct 2005 03:32:51 AM |
|
|
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in
Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
with my resources. The parity Eotvos experiment will be replayed
calormetrically, by a chemical group, under written agreement.
Physics groups are still talking and saying nothing. Let their wind
blow - my people will do it. Read about the results, either way,
after they are published.
Good and grr.
moo
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jason Stanidge" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
17 Oct 2005 07:34:40 PM |
|
|
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:4353FBB7.216AB40F@hate.spam.net...
247 new posts to sci.physics this morning. Seven were worth reading.
sci.chem is similarly sterile.
Uncle Al logged on in 1995. 79,300 posts since then. The intervening
decade has witnessed a tragedy of the commons. sci.physics has deeply
fallen over the line of Sturgeon's Law. Gresham's law rules to its
odious inevitable destination. Unmoderated Usenet is a river of *****.
In order to maintain an untenable position one must be actively
ignorant - though stupidity, religion, or insanity are passively
adequate.
Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
with my resources. The parity Eotvos experiment will be replayed
calormetrically, by a chemical group, under written agreement.
Physics groups are still talking and saying nothing. Let their wind
blow - my people will do it. Read about the results, either way,
after they are published.
Goodbye and - less about six sainted folks - go worship Nehemiah
Scudder. FOaD.
A lot of people, including me will miss you and it's been a privilege to see
some of your posts and hence how a brilliant mind with an IQ above 170
works. Best wishes and good look with the parity Eotvos experiment. ;)
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Greysky" |
|
| Title: WAS- Re: River of ***** : UA begs forgiveness... |
25 Oct 2005 02:16:18 AM |
|
|
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:4353FBB7.216AB40F@hate.spam.net...
247 new posts to sci.physics this morning. Seven were worth reading.
sci.chem is similarly sterile.
Goodbye and - less about six sainted folks - go worship Nehemiah
Scudder. FOaD.
In a personal message to everyone UA has been mean to and for all the
trouble he has caused...
http://www.scrolllock.nl/1.cfm
Please accept his heartfelt wishes for the miserable sog of a human he has
been for the past decade.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Greysky" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
17 Oct 2005 03:14:41 PM |
|
|
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:4353FBB7.216AB40F@hate.spam.net...
247 new posts to sci.physics this morning. Seven were worth reading.
sci.chem is similarly sterile.
I counted 13. You must've woke up late.
Uncle Al logged on in 1995. 79,300 posts since then. The intervening
decade has witnessed a tragedy of the commons. sci.physics has deeply
fallen over the line of Sturgeon's Law. Gresham's law rules to its
odious inevitable destination. Unmoderated Usenet is a river of *****.
Hmm... don't you mean a 'river of blood' from all the unscroupulous
physicists out there stealing your ideas that you intend to excoriate?
In order to maintain an untenable position one must be actively
ignorant - though stupidity, religion, or insanity are passively
adequate.
Don't racism, bigotry, and antisemitism count in your book? Or is it that
you don't like to preach about what you practice...
Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
with my resources. The parity Eotvos experiment will be replayed
calormetrically, by a chemical group, under written agreement.
Physics groups are still talking and saying nothing. Let their wind
blow - my people will do it. Read about the results, either way,
after they are published.
Hear hear! So mote it be! I am glad you are finally realizing how useless a
frustrated old chemist is on a physics newsgroup. Uncle is tired of being a
herpes pustule on Britany Spears shapeless post maternal *****.
Goodbye and - less about six sainted folks - go worship Nehemiah
Scudder. FOaD.
Let me be the first to tell you just how much your prescence on this
newsgroup will be missed - not! Unkie's real reason for leaving us is
because he doesn't want to send anyone on the group a freebie sample diamond
once his process is netting him billions and trillions of rupees -
cheapskate!
Greysky
www.allocations.cc
Learn how to build a FTL radio.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Androcles Androcles@ MyPlace.org" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
17 Oct 2005 05:26:25 PM |
|
|
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:4353FBB7.216AB40F@hate.spam.net...
| 247 new posts to sci.physics this morning. Seven were worth reading.
| sci.chem is similarly sterile.
|
| Uncle Al logged on in 1995. 79,300 posts since then. The intervening
| decade has witnessed a tragedy of the commons. sci.physics has deeply
| fallen over the line of Sturgeon's Law. Gresham's law rules to its
| odious inevitable destination. Unmoderated Usenet is a river of *****.
|
| In order to maintain an untenable position one must be actively
| ignorant - though stupidity, religion, or insanity are passively
| adequate.
|
| Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
| with my resources. The parity Eotvos experiment will be replayed
| calormetrically, by a chemical group, under written agreement.
| Physics groups are still talking and saying nothing. Let their wind
| blow - my people will do it. Read about the results, either way,
| after they are published.
|
| Goodbye and - less about six sainted folks - go worship Nehemiah
| Scudder. FOaD.
|
| --
| Uncle Al
| http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
| (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
| http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
***** AND GOOD RIDDANCE!
YEEE HAAA!
Androcles.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jason Stanidge" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
17 Oct 2005 07:38:49 PM |
|
|
"Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org> wrote in message
news:lyV4f.190$RE.137@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:4353FBB7.216AB40F@hate.spam.net...
| 247 new posts to sci.physics this morning. Seven were worth reading.
| sci.chem is similarly sterile.
|
| Uncle Al logged on in 1995. 79,300 posts since then. The intervening
| decade has witnessed a tragedy of the commons. sci.physics has deeply
| fallen over the line of Sturgeon's Law. Gresham's law rules to its
| odious inevitable destination. Unmoderated Usenet is a river of *****.
|
| In order to maintain an untenable position one must be actively
| ignorant - though stupidity, religion, or insanity are passively
| adequate.
|
| Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
| with my resources. The parity Eotvos experiment will be replayed
| calormetrically, by a chemical group, under written agreement.
| Physics groups are still talking and saying nothing. Let their wind
| blow - my people will do it. Read about the results, either way,
| after they are published.
|
| Goodbye and - less about six sainted folks - go worship Nehemiah
| Scudder. FOaD.
|
| --
| Uncle Al
| http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
| (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
| http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
***** AND GOOD RIDDANCE!
YEEE HAAA!
For who? It will be interesting to see if you can take his place and post
anything substantial with physics in it.
Androcles.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Androcles Androcles@ MyPlace.org" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
18 Oct 2005 03:56:53 AM |
|
|
"Jason Stanidge" <Jameson@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:dj1g2a$3f3$1@news6.svr.pol.co.uk...
|
| "Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org> wrote in message
| news:lyV4f.190$RE.137@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
| >
| > "Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
| > news:4353FBB7.216AB40F@hate.spam.net...
| > | 247 new posts to sci.physics this morning. Seven were worth
reading.
| > | sci.chem is similarly sterile.
| > |
| > | Uncle Al logged on in 1995. 79,300 posts since then. The
intervening
| > | decade has witnessed a tragedy of the commons. sci.physics has
deeply
| > | fallen over the line of Sturgeon's Law. Gresham's law rules to
its
| > | odious inevitable destination. Unmoderated Usenet is a river of
*****.
| > |
| > | In order to maintain an untenable position one must be actively
| > | ignorant - though stupidity, religion, or insanity are passively
| > | adequate.
| > |
| > | Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to
do
| > | with my resources. The parity Eotvos experiment will be replayed
| > | calormetrically, by a chemical group, under written agreement.
| > | Physics groups are still talking and saying nothing. Let their
wind
| > | blow - my people will do it. Read about the results, either way,
| > | after they are published.
| > |
| > | Goodbye and - less about six sainted folks - go worship Nehemiah
| > | Scudder. FOaD.
| > |
| > | --
| > | Uncle Al
| > | http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
| > | (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
| > | http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
| >
| > ***** AND GOOD RIDDANCE!
| > YEEE HAAA!
|
| For who? It will be interesting to see if you can take his place and
post
| anything substantial with physics in it.
|
|
| > Androcles.
I'm not a walking textbook, son. I can actually THINK for myself,
something
Schwartz is incapable of.
This is what drove him away, not his whingeing about the grapes being
sour.
Observation:
http://www.britastro.org/vss/gifc/00918-ck.gif
Explanation:
http://www.ebicom.net/~rsf1/sekerin.htm (fig 3)
(Or stars explode twice in three months).
This is in total disagreement with the holy word of Nehemiah Einstein,
whom
Schwartz worshipped.
Androcles.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Traveler" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
17 Oct 2005 07:53:13 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 01:38:49 +0100, "Jason Stanidge"
<Jameson@nospam.com> wrote:
For who? It will be interesting to see if you can take his place and post
anything substantial with physics in it.
Nobody needs to take the place of Uncle ***** or any of the other
***** kissers on sci.physics. We need creative thinkers and pioneers,
not ***** kissers. If we needed book physics, we would go to the fucking
library. ***** that! We want answers to interesting questions such as,
why do things fucking fall? or why does an electron have an electric
field around it? We don't need no more chicken-***** math theories a la
Newton or Einstein to tell us that things fall. We already fucking
know that. If Uncle ***** does not have the answers or is not
interested in finding the answers, ***** him and the *****-kissing mules
he rode in on. Damnit!
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Helmut Wabnig EmailAddress" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
19 Oct 2005 02:16:48 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 20:53:13 -0400, Traveler <traveler@nospam.net>
wrote:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 01:38:49 +0100, "Jason Stanidge"
<Jameson@nospam.com> wrote:
For who? It will be interesting to see if you can take his place and post
anything substantial with physics in it.
Nobody needs to take the place of Uncle ***** or any of the other
***** kissers on sci.physics. We need creative thinkers and pioneers,
not ***** kissers. If we needed book physics, we would go to the fucking
library. ***** that! We want answers to interesting questions such as,
why do things fucking fall? or why does an electron have an electric
field around it? We don't need no more chicken-***** math theories a la
Newton or Einstein to tell us that things fall. We already fucking
know that. If Uncle ***** does not have the answers or is not
interested in finding the answers, ***** him and the *****-kissing mules
he rode in on. Damnit!
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
Did Uncle Al once call you an idiot?
I have not seen a single post from Uncle Al where he did
unjustice to somebody, never.
:-)
w.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Traveler" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
19 Oct 2005 07:28:45 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 09:16:48 +0200, Helmut Wabnig <EmailAddress>
wrote:
Did Uncle Al once call you an idiot?
I have not seen a single post from Uncle Al where he did
unjustice to somebody, never.
Bzzzt! You meant to ask, did I ever call Uncle ***** a fuckface?
The answer is yes, many times. ahahaha...
BTW, did Uncle ***** ever pound you in the *****? I have never seen
anyone get pounded in the ***** by Uncle ***** who did not ask for
it. ahahaha...AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dirk Bruere at Neopax" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
17 Oct 2005 08:11:16 PM |
|
|
Traveler wrote:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 01:38:49 +0100, "Jason Stanidge"
<Jameson@nospam.com> wrote:
For who? It will be interesting to see if you can take his place and post
anything substantial with physics in it.
not ***** kissers. If we needed book physics, we would go to the fucking
library. ***** that! We want answers to interesting questions such as,
Well, that about sums up sci.physics these days.
Try alt.alien.visitors for REAL creative thinking (and no book physics).
--
Dirk
The Consensus:-
The political party for the new millenium
http://www.theconsensus.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "Traveler" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
17 Oct 2005 08:15:19 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 02:11:16 +0100, Dirk Bruere at Neopax
<dirk.bruere@gmail.com> wrote:
Traveler wrote:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 01:38:49 +0100, "Jason Stanidge"
<Jameson@nospam.com> wrote:
For who? It will be interesting to see if you can take his place and post
anything substantial with physics in it.
not ***** kissers. If we needed book physics, we would go to the fucking
library. ***** that! We want answers to interesting questions such as,
Well, that about sums up sci.physics these days.
Try alt.alien.visitors for REAL creative thinking (and no book physics).
Exactly. If you don't like it, hitch a ride with Uncle *****.
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Helmut Wabnig EmailAddress" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
19 Oct 2005 02:15:36 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 22:26:25 GMT, "Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org>
wrote:
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:4353FBB7.216AB40F@hate.spam.net...
| 247 new posts to sci.physics this morning. Seven were worth reading.
| sci.chem is similarly sterile.
|
| Uncle Al logged on in 1995. 79,300 posts since then. The intervening
| decade has witnessed a tragedy of the commons. sci.physics has deeply
| fallen over the line of Sturgeon's Law. Gresham's law rules to its
| odious inevitable destination. Unmoderated Usenet is a river of *****.
|
| In order to maintain an untenable position one must be actively
| ignorant - though stupidity, religion, or insanity are passively
| adequate.
|
| Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
| with my resources. The parity Eotvos experiment will be replayed
| calormetrically, by a chemical group, under written agreement.
| Physics groups are still talking and saying nothing. Let their wind
| blow - my people will do it. Read about the results, either way,
| after they are published.
|
| Goodbye and - less about six sainted folks - go worship Nehemiah
| Scudder. FOaD.
|
| --
| Uncle Al
| http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
| (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
| http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
***** AND GOOD RIDDANCE!
YEEE HAAA!
Androcles.
Did Uncle Al call you an Idiot?
I have not seen a single post from Uncle Al where he did
unjustice to somebody, never.
w.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Androcles Androcles@ MyPlace.org" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
19 Oct 2005 03:14:40 AM |
|
|
"Helmut Wabnig" <EmailAddress> wrote in message
news:kjsbl157qbspr1dcf080kl12tujulacegu@4ax.com...
| On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 22:26:25 GMT, "Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org>
| wrote:
|
| >
| >"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
| >news:4353FBB7.216AB40F@hate.spam.net...
| >| 247 new posts to sci.physics this morning. Seven were worth
reading.
| >| sci.chem is similarly sterile.
| >|
| >| Uncle Al logged on in 1995. 79,300 posts since then. The
intervening
| >| decade has witnessed a tragedy of the commons. sci.physics has
deeply
| >| fallen over the line of Sturgeon's Law. Gresham's law rules to its
| >| odious inevitable destination. Unmoderated Usenet is a river of
*****.
| >|
| >| In order to maintain an untenable position one must be actively
| >| ignorant - though stupidity, religion, or insanity are passively
| >| adequate.
| >|
| >| Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
| >| with my resources. The parity Eotvos experiment will be replayed
| >| calormetrically, by a chemical group, under written agreement.
| >| Physics groups are still talking and saying nothing. Let their
wind
| >| blow - my people will do it. Read about the results, either way,
| >| after they are published.
| >|
| >| Goodbye and - less about six sainted folks - go worship Nehemiah
| >| Scudder. FOaD.
| >|
| >| --
| >| Uncle Al
| >| http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
| >| (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
| >| http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
| >
| >***** AND GOOD RIDDANCE!
| >YEEE HAAA!
| >
| >Androcles.
| >
| Did Uncle Al call you an Idiot?
Yes.
|
| I have not seen a single post from Uncle Al where he did
| unjustice to somebody, never.
|
Only a fucking idiot would write "Unjustice" for "Injustice"
If you want to be play at being a smart-arse get it right, wanker.
Now *****.
Androcles.
| w. <---- wanker
.
|
|
|
| User: "platopes" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
19 Oct 2005 03:24:23 AM |
|
|
Androcles quoted the entire content of the net as usual, and then
wrote:
Only a fucking idiot would write "Unjustice" for "Injustice"
If you want to be play at being a smart-arse get it right, wanker.
Now ***** Androcles.
Nice nipples. Mine, I mean.
Oh, did you ever imagine a person with the name "Helmut Wabnig" might
not have english as his first language?
Why did you tell yourself to *****?
p
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
19 Oct 2005 03:27:52 AM |
|
|
Luckily very few people will ever see the drivel you 10-year-old
masturbating little shits write.
.
|
|
|
| User: "platopes" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
19 Oct 2005 04:56:24 AM |
|
|
wrote:
Luckily very few people will ever see the drivel you 10-year-old
masturbating little shits write.
Exactly the same very few people who will ever see the incomparable
wisdom you post.
Would you prefer the cyberbrain thingy or whatever to be invite only?
http://groups.google.ca/group/sci.physics/msg/5c9b0f8ce8ad2569?hl=en&
Fickle...
p
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Helmut Wabnig EmailAddress" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
19 Oct 2005 04:49:16 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 08:14:40 GMT, "Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org>
wrote:
| Did Uncle Al call you an Idiot?
Yes.
|
| I have not seen a single post from Uncle Al where he did
| unjustice to somebody, never.
|
Only a fucking idiot would write "Unjustice" for "Injustice"
...
Ah, I see. Thanks for your help.
w.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Androcles Androcles@ MyPlace.org" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
19 Oct 2005 06:34:25 AM |
|
|
"Helmut Wabnig" <EmailAddress> wrote in message
news:ai5cl116274hfc00jonk835b8b67adlipl@4ax.com...
| On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 08:14:40 GMT, "Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org>
| wrote:
|
| >| Did Uncle Al call you an Idiot?
No, I didn't write that. Some fucking stupid moron wrote it.
Androcles.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Zenner" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
19 Oct 2005 08:35:48 AM |
|
|
Helmut Wabnig <EmailAddress> wrote in
news:ai5cl116274hfc00jonk835b8b67adlipl@4ax.com:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 08:14:40 GMT, "Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org>
wrote:
| Did Uncle Al call you an Idiot?
Yes.
|
| I have not seen a single post from Uncle Al where he did
| unjustice to somebody, never.
|
Only a fucking idiot would write "Unjustice" for "Injustice"
...
Ah, I see. Thanks for your help.
Unjustice is a perfectly good word. That's not to say that your
understanding of the concept is reasonable.
http://wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=injustice
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dirk Van de moortel" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
17 Oct 2005 03:20:25 PM |
|
|
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message news:4353FBB7.216AB40F@hate.spam.net...
247 new posts to sci.physics this morning. Seven were worth reading.
sci.chem is similarly sterile.
Uncle Al logged on in 1995. 79,300 posts since then. The intervening
decade has witnessed a tragedy of the commons. sci.physics has deeply
fallen over the line of Sturgeon's Law. Gresham's law rules to its
odious inevitable destination. Unmoderated Usenet is a river of *****.
In order to maintain an untenable position one must be actively
ignorant - though stupidity, religion, or insanity are passively
adequate.
Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
with my resources. The parity Eotvos experiment will be replayed
calormetrically, by a chemical group, under written agreement.
Physics groups are still talking and saying nothing. Let their wind
blow - my people will do it. Read about the results, either way,
after they are published.
Goodbye and - less about six sainted folks - go worship Nehemiah
Scudder. FOaD.
Remember the famous words:
"Al be back!"
Dirk Vdm
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Me" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
17 Oct 2005 05:06:37 PM |
|
|
Goodbye and - less about six sainted folks - go worship Nehemiah
I'm glad your leaving you useless fucking *****!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "cnctut" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
17 Oct 2005 04:16:16 PM |
|
|
Al,
I've been gone for 3 months now and came back to hear you're throwing
in the towel. Please reconsider--I hope my "Goose Physics" post didn't
push you over the edge. You're only one of a handful that has ever
answered a real physics question--for that (and you humor of course) I
thank you.
VR
Tut
.
|
|
|
| User: "Androcles Androcles@ MyPlace.org" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
17 Oct 2005 07:39:09 PM |
|
|
"cnctut" <cnctutwiler@wmconnect.com> wrote in message
news:1129583776.171802.25740@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
| Al,
|
| I've been gone for 3 months now and came back to hear you're throwing
| in the towel. Please reconsider--I hope my "Goose Physics" post didn't
| push you over the edge. You're only one of a handful that has ever
| answered a real physics question--for that (and you humor of course) I
| thank you.
|
| VR
|
| Tut
You heard him, the grapes are sour.
This blew the arsehole out of the water.
Observation:
http://www.britastro.org/vss/gifc/00918-ck.gif
Explanation:
http://www.ebicom.net/~rsf1/sekerin.htm (fig 3)
(Or stars explode twice in three months).
And good riddance to him.
Androcles.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
River of ***** Old Woman Alice Schwartz and GPS.
River of *****
How to clean up the "River of *****"
Re: Worried about lawsuits from a ***** eater?
Re: al Qaeda = *****
HOLY *****! ... You Can Say That Again! 911 Conspiracy.
Holy *****! CITIES ON MARS
Re: al Qaeda = *****
| ***** my tight ***** til I ***** on your *****, we fear them, then we virtually irrigate Bernadette and Oris's solid sauce, Smoking Fool.
Grossi Spam again, deesh, will this guy ever stop, you would think with all the stupid ***** going on in the world that this guy would get a clue and preach to the people that want to hear it.
Re: Oh ***** - OT
***** my tight ***** til I ***** on your *****, her potter was dark, healthy, and nibbles over the lake, Moronic Woman.
Re: Worried about lawsuits from a ***** eater?
rivers of *****
what the freak is this super gravity *****?
|
|
|
