| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Uncle Al" |
| Date: |
17 Oct 2005 02:29:59 PM |
| Object: |
River of ***** |
247 new posts to sci.physics this morning. Seven were worth reading.
sci.chem is similarly sterile.
Uncle Al logged on in 1995. 79,300 posts since then. The intervening
decade has witnessed a tragedy of the commons. sci.physics has deeply
fallen over the line of Sturgeon's Law. Gresham's law rules to its
odious inevitable destination. Unmoderated Usenet is a river of *****.
In order to maintain an untenable position one must be actively
ignorant - though stupidity, religion, or insanity are passively
adequate.
Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
with my resources. The parity Eotvos experiment will be replayed
calormetrically, by a chemical group, under written agreement.
Physics groups are still talking and saying nothing. Let their wind
blow - my people will do it. Read about the results, either way,
after they are published.
Goodbye and - less about six sainted folks - go worship Nehemiah
Scudder. FOaD.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
| User: "tj Frazir" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
17 Oct 2005 04:57:31 PM |
|
|
The standard you CONTRIBUTE to.
The ***** you toss around like a chicken skinnin jungle monkey .
Dont let the door hit you on the *****.
10 years of physics ad you dont understand a fucking thing.
***** river ''' hell look at th fucking mountain it flows down from !!
Note to UA ..
if you ***** in the water dont compain abou the river.
And if your happey and warm in ***** river ,,keep yer mouth shut.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Traveler" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
17 Oct 2005 04:54:25 PM |
|
|
Uncle ***** wrote:
Goodbye
*****! ***** kisser. And stay the ***** away from sci.physics. If only
you could take the other ***** kissers with you! They know who they are.
ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Zenner" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
17 Oct 2005 06:12:26 PM |
|
|
Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in
news:4353FBB7.216AB40F@hate.spam.net:
247 new posts to sci.physics this morning. Seven were worth reading.
sci.chem is similarly sterile.
A reader usually can find what they are looking for regardless of
actual content.
snip
Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
with my resources.
I had rather wondered about that.
The parity Eotvos experiment will be replayed
calormetrically, by a chemical group, under written agreement.
1) Any 1st year law student would tell you that written agreements
mean nothing by themselves. Enforcability demands much more than a
well written agreement even where there is an initial meeting of the
minds.
2) Do you have access to previously qualified test equipment or are
you rolling your own?
3) Why do you think it remains a "parity Eotvos experiment"?
Physics groups are still talking and saying nothing. Let their wind
blow - my people will do it.
PRC people were "my people" earlier, no?
Read about the results, either way, after they are published.
OK
Goodbye and - less about six sainted folks - go worship Nehemiah
Scudder. FOaD.
Bitterness is a harsh taskmaster. Are you sure you're up to it?
Are any of your groupies leaving with you or do you fear you need
some sort of rear guard? (I guess this is how we find out. LOL)
Regardless, good luck in actually achieving *some* sort of results,
*any* sort of results. If you do, no matter what they are, I'm
sure we'll hear about them from you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Schultz" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
19 Oct 2005 01:11:20 AM |
|
|
In sci.chem Al Zenner <azen@zenner.com> wrote:
: Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in
: news:4353FBB7.216AB40F@hate.spam.net:
:> Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
:> with my resources.
:
: I had rather wondered about that.
You must know that he's busy working on his secret formula for kg-sized
gem-quality diamonds. If it hadn't been for usenet, he'd have finished
that project a decade ago.
-----
Richard Schultz
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
". . .Mr Schutz [sic] acts like a functional electro-terrorist who
impeads [sic] scientific communications with his too oft-silliness."
-- Mitchell Swartz, sci.physics.fusion article <EEI1oz.43q@world.std.com>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Helmut Wabnig EmailAddress" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
19 Oct 2005 02:17:48 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 06:11:20 +0000 (UTC),
(Richard Schultz) wrote:
In sci.chem Al Zenner <azen@zenner.com> wrote:
: Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in
: news:4353FBB7.216AB40F@hate.spam.net:
:> Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
:> with my resources.
:
: I had rather wondered about that.
You must know that he's busy working on his secret formula for kg-sized
gem-quality diamonds. If it hadn't been for usenet, he'd have finished
that project a decade ago.
-----
Richard Schultz
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
". . .Mr Schutz [sic] acts like a functional electro-terrorist who
impeads [sic] scientific communications with his too oft-silliness."
-- Mitchell Swartz, sci.physics.fusion article <EEI1oz.43q@world.std.com>
Did Uncle al ever call you an Idiot?
I have not seen a single post from Uncle Al where he did
unjustice to somebody, never.
:-)
w.
.
|
|
|
| User: "platopes" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
19 Oct 2005 02:24:27 AM |
|
|
Helmut Wabnig wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 06:11:20 +0000 (UTC),
(Richard Schultz) wrote:
In sci.chem Al Zenner <azen@zenner.com> wrote:
: Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in
: news:4353FBB7.216AB40F@hate.spam.net:
:> Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
:> with my resources.
:
: I had rather wondered about that.
You must know that he's busy working on his secret formula for kg-sized
gem-quality diamonds. If it hadn't been for usenet, he'd have finished
that project a decade ago.
-----
Richard Schultz
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
". . .Mr Schutz [sic] acts like a functional electro-terrorist who
impeads [sic] scientific communications with his too oft-silliness."
-- Mitchell Swartz, sci.physics.fusion article <EEI1oz.43q@world.std.com>
Did Uncle al ever call you an Idiot?
I have not seen a single post from Uncle Al where he did
unjustice to somebody, never.
:-)
w.
http://groups.google.ca/group/sci.physics/msg/4d2186135ed21f0e?hl=en&
There ya go.
p
.
|
|
|
| User: "Helmut Wabnig EmailAddress" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
19 Oct 2005 02:32:42 AM |
|
|
On 19 Oct 2005 00:24:27 -0700, "platopes" <platopes@yahoo.com> wrote:
Helmut Wabnig wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 06:11:20 +0000 (UTC),
(Richard Schultz) wrote:
In sci.chem Al Zenner <azen@zenner.com> wrote:
: Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in
: news:4353FBB7.216AB40F@hate.spam.net:
:> Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
:> with my resources.
:
: I had rather wondered about that.
You must know that he's busy working on his secret formula for kg-sized
gem-quality diamonds. If it hadn't been for usenet, he'd have finished
that project a decade ago.
-----
Richard Schultz
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
". . .Mr Schutz [sic] acts like a functional electro-terrorist who
impeads [sic] scientific communications with his too oft-silliness."
-- Mitchell Swartz, sci.physics.fusion article <EEI1oz.43q@world.std.com>
Did Uncle al ever call you an Idiot?
I have not seen a single post from Uncle Al where he did
unjustice to somebody, never.
:-)
w.
http://groups.google.ca/group/sci.physics/msg/4d2186135ed21f0e?hl=en&
There ya go.
p
Ok you won, there is at least one :-)
w.
.
|
|
|
| User: "platopes" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
19 Oct 2005 02:53:20 AM |
|
|
Helmut Wabnig wrote:
On 19 Oct 2005 00:24:27 -0700, "platopes" <platopes@yahoo.com> wrote:
Helmut Wabnig wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 06:11:20 +0000 (UTC),
(Richard Schultz) wrote:
In sci.chem Al Zenner <azen@zenner.com> wrote:
: Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in
: news:4353FBB7.216AB40F@hate.spam.net:
:> Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
:> with my resources.
:
: I had rather wondered about that.
You must know that he's busy working on his secret formula for kg-sized
gem-quality diamonds. If it hadn't been for usenet, he'd have finished
that project a decade ago.
-----
Richard Schultz
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
". . .Mr Schutz [sic] acts like a functional electro-terrorist who
impeads [sic] scientific communications with his too oft-silliness."
-- Mitchell Swartz, sci.physics.fusion article <EEI1oz.43q@world.std.com>
Did Uncle al ever call you an Idiot?
I have not seen a single post from Uncle Al where he did
unjustice to somebody, never.
:-)
w.
http://groups.google.ca/group/sci.physics/msg/4d2186135ed21f0e?hl=en&
There ya go.
p
Ok you won, there is at least one :-)
w.
A hollow victory - the good ones *far* outnumbered the bad. I only
remembered as it was something of a battle of the Titans to a
layperson.
R.I.P. Franz
p
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bruce Sinclair" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
19 Oct 2005 06:03:01 PM |
|
|
In article <onsbl11ugldri06aaqg82cfvmocrbvuc81@4ax.com>, Helmut Wabnig <EmailAddress> wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 06:11:20 +0000 (UTC),
(Richard Schultz) wrote:
In sci.chem Al Zenner <azen@zenner.com> wrote:
: Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in
: news:4353FBB7.216AB40F@hate.spam.net:
:> Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
:> with my resources.
:
: I had rather wondered about that.
You must know that he's busy working on his secret formula for kg-sized
gem-quality diamonds. If it hadn't been for usenet, he'd have finished
that project a decade ago.
-----
Richard Schultz
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
". . .Mr Schutz [sic] acts like a functional electro-terrorist who
impeads [sic] scientific communications with his too oft-silliness."
-- Mitchell Swartz, sci.physics.fusion article <EEI1oz.43q@world.std.com>
Did Uncle al ever call you an Idiot?
I have not seen a single post from Uncle Al where he did
unjustice to somebody, never.
I saw a few. He was great to start with. Then he went all nasty and
basically any usefulness he had became less than his agravation factor.
Note to Al ... it is possible to be polite and accurate instead of nasty and
mostly accurate :)
Bruce
----------------------------------------
I believe you find life such a problem because you think there are the good
people and the bad people. You're wrong, of course. There are, always and
only, the bad people, but some of them are on opposite sides.
Lord Vetinari in Guards ! Guards ! - Terry Pratchett
Caution ===== followups may have been changed to relevant groups
(if there were any)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Thomas Johnson" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
19 Oct 2005 07:27:12 PM |
|
|
Richard Schultz wrote:
In sci.chem Al Zenner <azen@zenner.com> wrote:
: Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in
: news:4353FBB7.216AB40F@hate.spam.net:
:> Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
:> with my resources.
:
: I had rather wondered about that.
You must know that he's busy working on his secret formula for kg-sized
gem-quality diamonds. If it hadn't been for usenet, he'd have finished
that project a decade ago.
But, if he is really gone, we will miss the 10th aniversary "3rd and
final attempt" at making diamonds.
Sure, he's gone. Yup.
Thomas.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Traveler" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
17 Oct 2005 06:49:50 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 19:12:26 -0400, Al Zenner <azen@zenner.com> wrote:
The parity Eotvos experiment will be replayed
calormetrically, by a chemical group, under written agreement.
1) Any 1st year law student would tell you that written agreements
mean nothing by themselves. Enforcability demands much more than a
well written agreement even where there is an initial meeting of the
minds.
Uncle ***** does not have a legal problem. His problem is
stupidity. Anybody who thinks he or she can bring GR down by
challenging the EP is a stupid crackpot. And Uncle ***** is an *****
kisser on top of being a crackpot. ***** kisser is worse than crackpot.
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jim Logajan" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
17 Oct 2005 11:15:04 PM |
|
|
Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote:
247 new posts to sci.physics this morning. Seven were worth reading.
sci.chem is similarly sterile.
Old news re sci.physics, IMHO. Stopped reading it 7 or 8 years ago. Have
only been reading sci.chem for last few months.
Unmoderated Usenet is a river of *****.
Some unmoderated groups remain islands of relative sanity. I'm not going to
say which ones, since I hate to lead the pigs to unspoiled ground.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Richard J Kinch" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
21 Oct 2005 10:14:13 AM |
|
|
Uncle Al writes:
Unmoderated Usenet is a river of s**t.
So Uncle Al discovers the doctrine of original sin, after years of mocking
us Christians.
When may we expect your complete conversion?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Quantum Mirror" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
22 Oct 2005 07:57:08 PM |
|
|
Richard J Kinch wrote:
Uncle Al writes:
Unmoderated Usenet is a river of s**t.
So Uncle Al discovers the doctrine of original sin, after years of mocking
us Christians.
Are you saying the doctrine of original sin is a river of *****? Or the
doctrine of christians is *****?
When may we expect your complete conversion?
What is there to convert to? I suppose you believe in alchemy also. Do
I have some lead uh, I mean gold for you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \dlzc\ N: dlzc1 D:cox" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
22 Oct 2005 08:01:39 PM |
|
|
Dear Quantum Mirror:
"Quantum Mirror" <junebug@pgrb.com> wrote in message
news:1130029028.827102.260370@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Richard J Kinch wrote:
....
When may we expect your complete conversion?
What is there to convert to? I suppose you believe in
alchemy also. Do I have some lead uh, I mean gold
for you.
Wouldn't that make it "proto-gold"?
David A. Smith
.
|
|
|
| User: "Quantum Mirror" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
22 Oct 2005 08:28:19 PM |
|
|
N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) wrote:
Dear Quantum Mirror:
"Quantum Mirror" <junebug@pgrb.com> wrote in message
news:1130029028.827102.260370@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Richard J Kinch wrote:
...
When may we expect your complete conversion?
What is there to convert to? I suppose you believe in
alchemy also. Do I have some lead uh, I mean gold
for you.
Wouldn't that make it "proto-gold"?
David A. Smith
I thought just plain lead would do more good where christians are
concerned. :) It sounded a little harsh. I like the idea of proto-gold.
You could threaten someone and they wouldn't even know. "Their gonna to
be diggin proto-gold out of you when I'm through with ya"!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Thorson" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
17 Oct 2005 03:00:11 PM |
|
|
Uncle Al wrote:
Unmoderated Usenet is a river of *****.
Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things
to do with my resources.
a) You contributed to it by responding to the idiots
and trolls, and worse yet, engaging in flamewars
with same. You're hardly in a position to gripe.
b) A lot of us in sci.chem will miss your bits of
obscure knowledge. You've contributed a lot that
we would not have known otherwise.
I hope your proclamation only applies to the two
newsgroups you've posted it to, and not that oasis
of high signal-to-noise ratio to which you also
contribute. (And which will not be mentioned here,
for obvious reasons.)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dirk Bruere at Neopax" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
17 Oct 2005 03:15:17 PM |
|
|
Mark Thorson wrote:
Uncle Al wrote:
Unmoderated Usenet is a river of *****.
Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things
to do with my resources.
a) You contributed to it by responding to the idiots
and trolls, and worse yet, engaging in flamewars
with same. You're hardly in a position to gripe.
b) A lot of us in sci.chem will miss your bits of
obscure knowledge. You've contributed a lot that
we would not have known otherwise.
I hope your proclamation only applies to the two
newsgroups you've posted it to, and not that oasis
of high signal-to-noise ratio to which you also
contribute. (And which will not be mentioned here,
for obvious reasons.)
sci.physics.research?
--
Dirk
The Consensus:-
The political party for the new millenium
http://www.theconsensus.org
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
19 Oct 2005 04:46:46 PM |
|
|
Uncle Al wrote:
[...]
Goodbye and - less about six sainted folks - go worship
Nehemiah Scudder. FOaD.
It's ironic that if Uncle Al drops by now he'll be able,
like Mark Twain, to read his own "obituaries" so to speak.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
21 Oct 2005 01:52:21 PM |
|
|
Uncle Al wrote:
247 new posts to sci.physics this morning. Seven were worth reading.
sci.chem is similarly sterile.
Uncle Al logged on in 1995. 79,300 posts since then. The intervening
decade has witnessed a tragedy of the commons. sci.physics has deeply
fallen over the line of Sturgeon's Law.
Exit the world of the sequential USENET readers and welcome to our
world: the non-sequential, pattern-search, query-based reader.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Quantum Mirror" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
22 Oct 2005 03:24:02 PM |
|
|
Uncle Al wrote:
247 new posts to sci.physics this morning. Seven were worth reading.
sci.chem is similarly sterile.
Uncle Al logged on in 1995. 79,300 posts since then. The intervening
decade has witnessed a tragedy of the commons. sci.physics has deeply
fallen over the line of Sturgeon's Law. Gresham's law rules to its
odious inevitable destination. Unmoderated Usenet is a river of *****.
In order to maintain an untenable position one must be actively
ignorant - though stupidity, religion, or insanity are passively
adequate.
Screw it. Let the world save itself. I've got better things to do
with my resources. The parity Eotvos experiment will be replayed
calormetrically, by a chemical group, under written agreement.
Physics groups are still talking and saying nothing. Let their wind
blow - my people will do it. Read about the results, either way,
after they are published.
Goodbye and - less about six sainted folks - go worship Nehemiah
Scudder. FOaD.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
Thanks for the entertainment you have provided. I will not return to
sci.physics as you were the last real scientist to regularly post. I
wish you would start a blog on your website to read and discuss the
Parity Eotvos experiment. I would be a regular visitor and try to add
my 2 cents when I could contribute. A blog is a much better place for
meaningful science discussions. That is where I spend all my spare time
now. Thank you for leaving this ***** hole so I don't need to come back!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Zenner" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
23 Oct 2005 02:51:36 PM |
|
|
"Quantum Mirror" <junebug@pgrb.com> wrote in
news:1130012642.028621.34940@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Uncle Al wrote:
247 new posts to sci.physics this morning. Seven were worth reading.
sci.chem is similarly sterile.
snip
Thanks for the entertainment you have provided. I will not return to
sci.physics as you were the last real scientist to regularly post.
After this you post 3 additional replies over 2 days.
I
wish you would start a blog on your website to read and discuss the
Parity Eotvos experiment. I would be a regular visitor and try to add
my 2 cents when I could contribute. A blog is a much better place for
meaningful science discussions. That is where I spend all my spare time
now. Thank you for leaving this ***** hole so I don't need to come back!
So why are you still here participating more than a day later?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Quantum Mirror" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
23 Oct 2005 03:57:42 PM |
|
|
Al Zenner wrote:
"Quantum Mirror" <junebug@pgrb.com> wrote in
news:1130012642.028621.34940@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Uncle Al wrote:
247 new posts to sci.physics this morning. Seven were worth reading.
sci.chem is similarly sterile.
snip
Thanks for the entertainment you have provided. I will not return to
sci.physics as you were the last real scientist to regularly post.
After this you post 3 additional replies over 2 days.
I
wish you would start a blog on your website to read and discuss the
Parity Eotvos experiment. I would be a regular visitor and try to add
my 2 cents when I could contribute. A blog is a much better place for
meaningful science discussions. That is where I spend all my spare time
now. Thank you for leaving this ***** hole so I don't need to come back!
So why are you still here participating more than a day later?
The fucking cops are everywhere smelling for some *****! FOAD! When
idiots quit responding to my posts and I am sure Al has not replied I
will not be back!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Zenner" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
23 Oct 2005 04:31:40 PM |
|
|
"Quantum Mirror" <junebug@pgrb.com> wrote in
news:1130101062.346556.247600@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Al Zenner wrote:
"Quantum Mirror" <junebug@pgrb.com> wrote in
news:1130012642.028621.34940@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Uncle Al wrote:
247 new posts to sci.physics this morning. Seven were worth
reading. sci.chem is similarly sterile.
snip
Thanks for the entertainment you have provided. I will not return to
sci.physics as you were the last real scientist to regularly post.
After this you post 3 additional replies over 2 days.
I
wish you would start a blog on your website to read and discuss the
Parity Eotvos experiment. I would be a regular visitor and try to add
my 2 cents when I could contribute. A blog is a much better place for
meaningful science discussions. That is where I spend all my spare
time now. Thank you for leaving this ***** hole so I don't need to
come back!
So why are you still here participating more than a day later?
The fucking cops are everywhere smelling for some *****! FOAD! When
idiots quit responding to my posts and I am sure Al has not replied I
will not be back!
Well that would make Uncle Al a liar if he replied, wouldn't it?
There was no need for *you* to lie in the first place. Once a liar,
always a liar. Now we can't count on the fact that your latest version
is true any more than your earlier statement was.
I'm just trying to get the facts straight. I think I got it now.
But if you're going to stay I do think you ought to know there's no
shame in admitting it. If you want to know what's going on with Uncle
Al, keep an eye on his web page.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "hanson" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
23 Oct 2005 05:07:38 PM |
|
|
Mike Varney aka "Quantum Mirror" <junebug@pgrb.com> wrote in message
news:1130101062.346556.247600@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
& in news:1130012642.028621.34940@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Uncle Al wrote:
247 new posts to sci.physics this morning. Seven were worth reading.
sci.chem is similarly sterile. .... FOaD.
[Varney]
Thanks for the entertainment you have provided. I will not return to
sci.physics as you were the last real scientist to regularly post.
[Zenner]
After this you post 3 additional replies over 2 days.
[Varney]
I wish you would start a blog on your website to read and discuss the
Parity Eotvos experiment. I would be a regular visitor and try to add
my 2 cents when I could contribute. A blog is a much better place for
meaningful science discussions. That is where I spend all my spare time
now. Thank you for leaving this ***** hole so I don't need to come back!
[Zenner]
So why are you still here participating more than a day later?
[Varney]
When idiots quit responding to my posts and I am sure Al has
not replied I will not be back!
[hanson]
ahahaha... Zenner, you are asking Mikey questions that seem to
aggravate his core and embarrass him deeply.....as can be seen
in the even more embarrassing retorts that Mikey just delivered...
Mikey, listen, did something more than scientific colleaguery develop
between you and Al at that APS meeting? You couldn't be the
reason for Al's divorce announcement, or could you now?... wow!
Mikey, remember, Yehiel Porat alluded to this ever since then and
began to open his posts to you with "Hi homo".... ahahaha....
[Varney]
The fucking cops are everywhere smelling for some *****! FOAD!
[hanson]
Wow, Mikey, did the cops catch you with your pants down when you
were taking a dump in & stinking up a public place that was not
designated for your urgent activity? But, don't tell'em to FAOD...
Just tell them that you have diarrhea nervosa ever since Al left.
Thanks for the laughs guys..... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
ahaha.. ahahanson
.
|
|
|
| User: "Traveler" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
23 Oct 2005 05:54:49 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 22:07:38 GMT, "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote:
Mike Varney aka "Quantum Mirror" <junebug@pgrb.com> wrote in message
ahahaha... So Quantum ***** was Mike Varney all along, eh? Haysoos
Martinez! I'm slipping. I knew there was something familiar in the
thorough manner he kisses Uncle *****'s *****. That should have
alerted me to the *****'s true identity. Nobody kisses Uncle
*****'s ***** like Varnette. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "hanson" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
23 Oct 2005 06:55:22 PM |
|
|
"Traveler" <traveler@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:0s4ol1hadfmetib1nti4i1pl9u6iuf40qs@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 22:07:38 GMT, "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote to:
Mike Varney aka "Quantum Mirror" <junebug@pgrb.com> wrote in message
[Louis Savain]
ahahaha... So Quantum ***** was Mike Varney all along, eh? Haysoos
Martinez! I'm slipping. I knew there was something familiar in the
thorough manner he kisses Uncle *****'s *****. That should have
alerted me to the *****'s true identity. Nobody kisses Uncle
*****'s ***** like Varnette. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
[hanson]
..... AHAHAHA... yeah, don't you remember, how we had Mikey
going when he came along in the cloaks of/as "Mu-pi", then loaded
as "weed is good.org" only to nym-shift into "nunyabiz.." and a few
others... The ensuing assertion/denial games were **hilarious.**
ahahaha... Let's milk it again to the hilt if Mikey is going to swallow
the hook again this time.... ahahaha...
PS:
I had some recent notions along your wall-to-wall particle/particle
insinuations. I asked myself why is it that in a discrete and self-similar
universe particles (large and small) do come predominantly in
certain preferred sizes? -- Since physics is primarily an activity of
measuring = **comparing** things and stuff with each other against
humankind's artificial and arbitrarily chosen standards, some very
interesting precipitates emerged. When I see it clearly & if the
numbers fit I may post it to your website... perhaps even here...
But, don't hold your breath... I am here for fun! ..... ahahaha....
Take care, dude
hanson
PS2: Hey, Mikey!... you have been warned... AHAHAHA.....
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
23 Oct 2005 07:49:11 PM |
|
|
hanson wrote:
[...]
PS:
I had some recent notions along your wall-to-wall particle/particle
insinuations. I asked myself why is it that in a discrete and self-similar
universe particles (large and small) do come predominantly in
certain preferred sizes? -- Since physics is primarily an activity of
measuring = **comparing** things and stuff with each other against
humankind's artificial and arbitrarily chosen standards, some very
interesting precipitates emerged. When I see it clearly & if the
numbers fit I may post it to your website... perhaps even here...
But, don't hold your breath... I am here for fun! ..... ahahaha....
Take care, dude
hanson
Any chance of posting a URL for this? I tried searching on
"Mike Varney" physics home blog etc etc, but couldn't find
anything.
Cheers
John R Ramsden (jhnrmsdn@yahoo.com.uk)
* Remove m from com to reply
* "From" address is defunct
.
|
|
|
| User: "hanson" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
24 Oct 2005 12:57:52 AM |
|
|
<john_ramsden@sagitta-ps.com> wrote in message
news:1130114951.635092.37930@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote to Traveler, Louis Savain
in message news:KpV6f.6588$iH6.4687@trnddc01...
PS:
I had some recent notions along your wall-to-wall particle/particle
insinuations. I asked myself why is it that in a discrete and self-similar
universe particles (large and small) do come predominantly in
certain preferred sizes? -- Since physics is primarily an activity of
measuring = **comparing** things and stuff with each other against
humankind's artificial and arbitrarily chosen standards, some very
interesting precipitates emerged. [1] When I see it clearly & if the
numbers fit I may post it to your website... perhaps even here...
But, don't hold your breath... I am here for fun! ..... ahahaha....
Take care, dude
hanson
[John]
Any chance of posting a URL for this?
[hanson]
Thanks for asking, John. My answer to you is above in following [1]....
.... & in the remote case that I find something that **really** moves
me then I may publish it rather then url it. Meanwhile enjoy this:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/0f1a7daa49aa8cf3
since this post contains the background of what I referred to above.
BTW, by "your website", above, I was referring to Louis Savain url
http://www.rebelscience.org/Crackpots/notorious.htm
and not to Mikey. Mikey was doing different work.
[John]
I tried searching on "Mike Varney" physics home blog etc etc, but
couldn't find anything. --- John R Ramsden (jhnrmsdn@yahoo.com.uk)
[hanson]
Al Zenner already gave you http://rintintin.colorado.edu/~varney/
and here is some interesting stuff that Varney was working on
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0210004
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Zenner" |
|
| Title: Re: River of ***** |
23 Oct 2005 10:47:19 PM |
|
|
wrote in
news:1130114951.635092.37930@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
hanson wrote:
[...]
PS:
I had some recent notions along your wall-to-wall particle/particle
insinuations. I asked myself why is it that in a discrete and
self-similar universe particles (large and small) do come predominantly
in certain preferred sizes? -- Since physics is primarily an activity
of measuring = **comparing** things and stuff with each other against
humankind's artificial and arbitrarily chosen standards, some very
interesting precipitates emerged. When I see it clearly & if the
numbers fit I may post it to your website... perhaps even here...
But, don't hold your breath... I am here for fun! ..... ahahaha....
Take care, dude
hanson
Any chance of posting a URL for this? I tried searching on
"Mike Varney" physics home blog etc etc, but couldn't find
anything.
This still works.
http://rintintin.colorado.edu/~varney/
One might guess that he's trying to keep a lower profile these days.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
River of ***** Old Woman Alice Schwartz and GPS.
River of *****
How to clean up the "River of *****"
Re: Worried about lawsuits from a ***** eater?
Re: al Qaeda = *****
HOLY *****! ... You Can Say That Again! 911 Conspiracy.
Holy *****! CITIES ON MARS
Re: al Qaeda = *****
| ***** my tight ***** til I ***** on your *****, we fear them, then we virtually irrigate Bernadette and Oris's solid sauce, Smoking Fool.
Grossi Spam again, deesh, will this guy ever stop, you would think with all the stupid ***** going on in the world that this guy would get a clue and preach to the people that want to hear it.
Re: Oh ***** - OT
***** my tight ***** til I ***** on your *****, her potter was dark, healthy, and nibbles over the lake, Moronic Woman.
Re: Worried about lawsuits from a ***** eater?
rivers of *****
what the freak is this super gravity *****?
|
|
|
