jmfbahciv@aol.com wrote in
news:dj2ose$8qk_003@s887.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com:

In article <4354e81f$0$11610$3b214f66@usenet.univie.ac.at>,
"MMu" <brilhasti@gmx.net> wrote:

That does not change the fact that he is playing the drama queen here.
What the heck is the post supposed to invoke other than little forced
laudatios.

Ah, another one who cannot read what I write. Uncle was
telling a couple of people that he will no longer be performing
the service we've been depending on him to do. He was also
telling a couple of people the reason that we will not be seeing
posts from him.

Nonsense.

"A couple of people" means email. 7 people means email.

. Making the scene
he's made is a precise fit for "drama queen." But then he's always been
that.

Looks like you're the rear guard. Glad that's settled.

Kick or kiss him (reader's choice) goodbye and lets get back to physics
as best this group allows.

In article <4354e81f$0$11610$3b214f66@usenet.univie.ac.at>,

That does not change the fact that he is playing the drama
queen here. What the heck is the post supposed to invoke
other than little forced laudatios.

Uncle was telling a couple of people that he will no longer be
performing the service we've been depending on him to do.

Which service is that? Kissing John Baez's ***** in public? ahahaha...

He, Al, was also
telling a couple of people the reason that we will not be seeing
posts from him.

The truth is, if you need Uncle ***** on sci.physics, you, too, are
an ***** kisser. If you want book physics, go to sci.physics.research
and leave sci.physics to those who are really trying to understand
nature. I am fucking tired of ***** kissers like Uncle ***** whose
favorite fucking refrain is: physics is not about the why of things
but the how of things. ***** them and the mule they sleep with. I want
to know why things fall, goddamnit! I don't want chicken ***** voodoo
Star-Trek physics, i.e., black holes, wormholes, time travel and the
like. I don't want math physics that explains nothing. I want real
physics, I want mechanisms and principles. If you don't know and don't
care to know, go fucking live with Uncle ***** so he can pack a
chiral diamond up your ***** and see if the rest of sci.physics gives a
rat's *****. ahahaha...
Louis Savain

If you want book physics, go to sci.physics.research and
leave sci.physics to those who are really trying to understand
nature. I am fucking tired of ***** kissers like Uncle *****
whose favorite fucking refrain is: physics is not about the why
of things but the how of things. ***** them and the mule they
sleep with. I want to know why things fall, goddamnit! [..]
I don't want math physics that explains nothing. I want real
physics, I want mechanisms and principles.

jmfbahciv@aol.com wrote in
news:dj5ior$8qk_001@s1177.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com:

In article <Xns96F35C356B843zsp@63.223.5.248>,
Al Zenner <azen@zenner.com> wrote:

jmfbahciv@aol.com wrote in news:dj2l89$8qk_003
@s887.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com:

Uncle is not the only one in these newsgroups where the
stalking has turned, not only viscious, but physical.

Really? Then it is a matter for the police,

This kind of stalking isn't against the law...yet.

Then is isn't "stalking" at all because "stalking" is illegal.

.. Misusing
a legal term doesn't lend validity to nonsense claims.

.. not idle tongue waggle.

Now please tell us what physical stalking has taken place and how
you know about it including police case numbers and jurisdiction.
Otherwise this is just another unfounded claim.

You witnessed a case right here with tacit approval.

Without providing a direct answer you here acknowledge that your
earlier comment was an outright lie since no physical stalking has
happened.

When one posts to usenet one licenses all comers to respond with their
coments. I think *some* excellent arguments have been made regarding Uncle
Al's conduct and the way he conducts business. He has failed to reply to
them in a cogent fashion. The fact that you consider those exchanges where
Al eventually tucked tail and ran despite your stated opinions about his
superiority in every way and in every realm clearly positions you as a
volunteer apologist.

If you're complaining that Al's public comments were forwarded to the
PRC physics team conducting the chiral Eotvos experiment then you
ignore what "public statements" means.

That's not to say that in Uncle Al's case I wouldn't be surprised
if it were true.

What, no comment to this?

Are you in love with Uncle Al?

I am assuming that this is a sexist question meant to imply
that the only possible reason that I can admire Uncle is
due to a base sexual attraction. Does this make you feel
superior to Uncle?

1) While it is often said that the best defense is a good offense this
evasionary reply of yours doesn't qualify because it is so transparent.

2) Any time one assumes facts not in evidence one is making a major
mistake.

3) The question is the consequence of observing someone who is so very
clearly an apologist in the face of damning evidence that love would
at least present some excuse where no other reason is evident.

4) Any truly mature person understands that while lower intelligence
humans universally confuse sex and love

.the two can be, and sometimes
are, mutually exclusive. That's not to say that in your case they
don't combine, but that's not a fact in evidence (as yet, but you've
been skirting the edges.)

5) Every human has their own set of attributes. Uncle Al doubtless has
some superior to mine, and there's just no question in my mind that I
have some superior to his. Your "superiority" question smacks of
testestorone poisoning.

..Do you write all your own material?

Based on all the above, along with a significant number of other
comments you've made in recent months, I have come to hold the opinion
that you must indeed be in love with Uncle Al. What that means to me
compared to what that means to you is not important.

Not that any of this matters to anyone other than you, and perhaps
Uncle Al. But it sure explains the unwarranted awe. I'm glad we have
been able to clear this up. Thanks for participating.

As far as being sexist goes you would do well to put your house in order
before you accuse others.

..The women I hang around with really get angry
whem someone like you, who claims to participate in life on equal terms
with everyone else,

..plays the stalking card the moment that the going
gets a little rough. Another version of crying wolf we really don't need
because it tends to desensitize folks who need to keep their guard up for
those times when the real dangers accompanying an actual physical stalking
do come along.

In the meantime, please study objective and subjective.

Just to keep things in perspective, I think the chiral Eotvos experiment
proposed by Uncle Al should be run and someday will be run.

.. I think it
will result in a null output. I detest loopholes. But IMO the reason
no one is going to run it for some time is Uncle Al. For now he and
the experiment seem to have been informally blacklisted. That's what
happens when you bite the hand that feeds you. Sounds like you and
Uncle Al are the only ones surprised. Is that brilliant?