Science > Physics > Rotes over Second vs. Pure 1 over Second! Hertz is wrong!
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"dedanoe" |
| Date: |
08 Sep 2006 08:03:29 AM |
| Object: |
Rotes over Second vs. Pure 1 over Second! Hertz is wrong! |
it's not: speed_of_light = wave_length x frequency
but it is: speed_of_light x rotes = wave_length x frequency
or even better: wave_length / speed_of_light = rotes / frequency = time
meaning frequency is speed for rotes just like c is speed for
wave_length!
counter-part for frequency is not 1/sec=Hz but it is Rote/sec=Hz
IT CHANGES THE WHOLE GAME YOU CALL "GENERAL PHYSICS 2"!
additionally Period for one Rote x Rotes = Elapsed time.
http://dedanoe.tripod.com
you have a nice day now!
.
|
|
| User: "Sorcerer" |
|
| Title: Re: Rotes over Second vs. Pure 1 over Second! Hertz is wrong! |
08 Sep 2006 12:57:45 PM |
|
|
"dedanoe" <dedanoe@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1157720609.597950.79700@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
| it's not: speed_of_light = wave_length x frequency
What is the wavelength of a photon?
Androcles
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Henry" |
|
| Title: Re: Rotes over Second vs. Pure 1 over Second! Hertz is wrong! |
08 Sep 2006 10:17:45 AM |
|
|
dedanoe wrote:
<snipped incomprehensible>
http://dedanoe.tripod.com
How much money do you make from people clicking on to your ad-infested
site?
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
