rpasken@eas.slu.edu , You have made comments that Momentum is not Conserved in my PAPER. It is not CORRECT. It is explained in 100 Years of E=mc2



 Science > Physics > rpasken@eas.slu.edu , You have made comments that Momentum is not Conserved in my PAPER. It is not CORRECT. It is explained in 100 Years of E=mc2

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "AJAY SHARMA"
Date: 02 Oct 2006 07:49:30 AM
Object: rpasken@eas.slu.edu , You have made comments that Momentum is not Conserved in my PAPER. It is not CORRECT. It is explained in 100 Years of E=mc2
, You have made comments that Momentum is not
Conserved in my PAPER. It is not CORRECT. It is explained in 100 Years
of E=3Dmc2

See how Momentum is conserved in my paper. All references are given in
the end.
Part I
General meaning , explained in 11th class Physics.
The law of momentum conservation,
* In an isolated system, the momentum of system must be
conserved.*
Mathematically implies that
Initial Momentum =3D Final Momentum
mu=3Dmv (1)
As mass remains same in classical mechanics.
So u=3Dv
which is Newton=E2=80=99s First law of motion.
Application of momentum conservation.
When body emits energy ( in this cases light energy)
then it recoils .Thus it is used to calculate the velocity of recoil.
It can be applied to following two cases.
------ Light bullet fired from TOY Gun, system remains at rest.
( body does not recoil with noticeable velocity, it tends to
recoil)
The velocity cam be calculated but may be of the order of
1/100000000000000000000000000000000000 m/s or 10-^40m/s
This case resembles with Einstein=E2=80=99s two waves of equal energy emitt=
ed
in opposite directions.
-----Shot fired from gun, gun moves backward.
the velocity can be calculated from conservation of momentum i.e.
initial momentum =3Dfinal momentum
Vrecoil =3D mv/M ~ 5m/s (say)
Thus after emission of energy BODY MAY REMAIN AT REST OR MOVE, the
Momentum is Conserved. It is basic physics of 11th standard.
If some one does not want to understand this then it his problem.
Einstein did all calculation under Classical conditions of velocity (v
<<c, her v is relative velocity between two systems i.e. system in
which body emits light and second system in which energy is measured.
Part II
The law of conservation of momentum is obeyed in my paper.
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_324&p=
roducts_id=3D4554
When two waves are emitted. The body recoils with velocity v , with
magnitude of the order of 10^-32 m/s i.e.
V (recoil)=3D1/10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
It can be easily calculated.
When two waves of different energies are emitted. If body emits two
light waves of slightly different energies i.e. 0.5001L and 0.4999L
(Einstein has used light waves of energy 0.5L and 0.5L) in opposite
directions. Now using the law of conservation of momentum, it can be
easily justified that in this case body remains at rest.
Let the body of mass 10kg
emits light energy in two waves in visible region equal to
7=2E9512=C3=9710^-19 J, this energy corresponds to TWO light waves in
visible region having wavelength 5000=C2=BAA or energy, 2hc/=CE=BB or
7=2E9512=C3=9710^-19 J.
Let towards the observer the body emits light energy 0.5001L i.e.
3=2E97639512=C3=9710^-19 J i.e. will have momentum ( p1 =3D E/c)
1=2E32546504=C3=9710^-27 m/s.
Secondly, the body emits light wave of energy 0.4999L i.e.
3=2E97480488=C3=9710^-19 J, away from the observer (=CF=86=3D 180=C2=BA) =
i=2Ee. will
have momentum ( p2 =3D E/c) 1.32493496=C3=9710^-27 m/s. Let us assume that
when the body emits light waves of energy and moves (if it actually
does) with velocity Vb , then according to law of conservation of
momentum we get
0 =3D p1 +p2 +MbVb or Vb =3D -(p1 +p2) /Mb =3D
=E2=80=935.3=C3=9710^-32 m/s (2)
0 =3D p1 +p2 +MbVb or Vb =3D -(p1 +p2) /Mb =3D
=E2=80=935.3=C3=9710^-32 m/s (3)
Thus conservation of momentum requires that body should move with
velocity =E2=80=935.3=C3=9710^-32 m/s opposite to observer. Thus body will
tend to move with velocity 5.3=C3=9710^-32 m/s ( away from the observer)
which is immeasurably small by all means, hence the body remains at
rest. Due to this uniform relative velocity v of the system (=CE=BE, =CE=B7=
, =CE=B6
) will not change, if body moves then v will vary accordingly.
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3DEinstein=E2=80=99s Sep 1905 paper=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
The first and basic equation in Einstein=E2=80=99s paper is
l* =3D l{1 =E2=80=93 v/c cos =CF=86 } /=E2=88=9A[1 =E2=80=93 v2 /c2] =
(1)
In eq.(1) v is the relative velocity between light emitting body and
the measuring system i.e. system (=CE=BE, =CE=B7, =CE=B6 ). If body moves=
after
emission with velocity v=E2=80=99 away from the observer, then relative
velocity will be v+v=E2=80=99 (say V). Thus in this case eq.(1) becomes
=E2=84=93* =3D =E2=84=93{1 =E2=80=93 (v+v=E2=80=99) cos =CF=86/c } /=E2=88=
=9A[1 =E2=80=93 (v+v=E2=80=99)2 /c2]
(1a)
The rest of the calculations remain the same. Thus Einstein=E2=80=99s
derivation is also valid if the body moves, Einstein has considered the
simplest case when velocity v=E2=80=99 is zero (V=3D v+v=E2=80=99 =3Dv), wh=
ich is
special case. Also experimentally the law of inter conversion of mass
energy holds good in all possible cases.
Hence you cannot say that LAW OF CONSERVATION OF MOEMTUM IS NOT TAKEN
IN ACCOUNT IN MY PAPER.
It is your MISPERCEPTION.
AJAY SHARMA 2ND Oct 2006
References of Einstein=E2=80=99s work
..
A=2EEinstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641.
.. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND
UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?
Weblink is
Einstein=E2=80=99s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/
PartII
References of Ajay Sharma=E2=80=99s work
My work is available at
A=2E Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222.
=E2=80=9DThe Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation =EF=81=84E =3D Ac2 =
=EF=81=84M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology=E2=80=9D.
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf
For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_324&p=
roducts_id=3D4554
International Conferences
It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the
world
--------------------------------------few of them
1=2E Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the
Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25
August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA
2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems
(
Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53.
3=2E A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 ,
10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol )
University of Warwick , ENGLAND
4=2E A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD
ENGLAND
5=2E A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in
Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA ,
(2003) 585.
6=2E A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United
Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81
plus more
--------------------------------------
Journals
This paper
=E2=80=9DThe Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation =EF=81=84E =3D Ac2 =
=EF=81=84M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology=E2=80=9D.
is published in journal
Physics Essays , CANADA
www.physicsessays.com
The paper
The past ,present and future of E=3Dmc2
will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts,
USA.
In parts it is published in various others journals.
----------------------
Book 100 Years of E=3Dmc2
For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_324&p=
roducts_id=3D4554
.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
rpasken@eas.slu.edu , You have made comments that Momentum is not Conserved in my PAPER. It is not CORRECT. It is explained in 100 Years of E=mc2
rpasken@eas.slu.edu , you have made comments that Momentum is not Conserved in my PAPER. It is not CORRECT. It is explained in 100 Years of E=mc2
rpasken@eas.slu.edu , You have made comments that Momentum is not Conserved in my PAPER. It is WRONG. It is explained in 100 Years of E=mc2
Re: Uncle Al's religious Website.. Smart1234 Comments
Re: Reply 2 steven-J\Subject: Re: If evolution was such a fact, why do scientist disagree? comments by W.R.Thompson
Thank you for all your comments so far - keep 'em coming!
Comments.
Revelation Comments Chap. 9 (updated April 2, 2004)
geophysics/math Ph.D. proposal, comments desired.
comments on cramster.com
Baez's injudicious comments about Einstein
Hillman's injudicious comments about Einstein
Re: Comments on lack of Lightcurve Evidence?
Re: Comments on lack of Lightcurve Evidence?
@%%@ always appealig for cooperation another topic ...COMMENTS??!!
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER