| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"MSMaxwell" |
| Date: |
22 Feb 2004 12:58:24 AM |
| Object: |
RSA-576 factored by NOT James Harris |
Oh if I only had another two or three lifetimes of the universe to
complete my factoring by trial division technique I too could have
acheived such fame, wealth , and glory.
http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/challenges/factoring/numbers.html
Kudos to J. Franke et al.
I guess that Unlce Al's challenge to James is gonna have to go up a
notch. We will, of course, be praying for the day when James accepts
the challenge and locks himself in his garage without contact from the
outside world for a few years to crack an RSA challenge.
.
|
|
| User: "James Harris" |
|
| Title: Re: RSA-576 factored by NOT James Harris |
22 Feb 2004 08:22:37 AM |
|
|
(MSMaxwell) wrote in message news:<79bccc27.0402212258.6dbba7e3@posting.google.com>...
Oh if I only had another two or three lifetimes of the universe to
complete my factoring by trial division technique I too could have
acheived such fame, wealth , and glory.
http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/challenges/factoring/numbers.html
Kudos to J. Franke et al.
I guess that Unlce Al's challenge to James is gonna have to go up a
notch. We will, of course, be praying for the day when James accepts
the challenge and locks himself in his garage without contact from the
outside world for a few years to crack an RSA challenge.
Don't be silly. The poster "Uncle Al" is a critic troll and simply
posts in attempts to elicit endless replies so that he can post some
more!
And it turns out that I *have* worked on RSA fairly steadily for a
while, without success.
Remember, my posting strategy is to post MORE not LESS when I'm
working on a problem!!! If you see me posting a lot then there's
probably something I'm working on.
That means that you have it backwards: the more I work on various
problems the more LIKELY I am to post as I HATE THE IDEA of locking
one's self away to work on a problem.
To me it's just a waste as I say post your ideas so that other people
can critique them!
It's worked for me!!!
Now it does bother me that any of you actually take "Uncle Al"
seriously, as it requires I think a tremendous effort to not
understand how that poster operates.
So you should have known that "Uncle Al" is trying to get me to post
more--as long as I reply to him in anger--so that he can reply more.
James Harris
.
|
|
|
| User: "C. Bond" |
|
| Title: Re: RSA-576 factored by NOT James Harris |
22 Feb 2004 10:16:57 AM |
|
|
James Harris wrote:
[snip]
That means that you have it backwards: the more I work on various
problems the more LIKELY I am to post as I HATE THE IDEA of locking
one's self away to work on a problem.
To me it's just a waste as I say post your ideas so that other people
can critique them!
It's worked for me!!!
By what standard to you claim it has worked for you? You have accomplished exactly *nothing* in the years you
have been posting -- except to reveal to all that you are an ignorant CRANK.
[snip]
James "Often in error, but never in doubt." Harris
James, if you don't want to elevate yourself to the intellectual status of a crash dummy, or rise to the demands
of working as a thrift shop mannequin, why not rent yourself out as packing material?
--
There are two things you must never attempt to prove: the unprovable -- and the obvious.
--
Democracy: The triumph of popularity over principle.
--
http://www.crbond.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "David C. Ullrich" |
|
| Title: Re: RSA-576 factored by NOT James Harris |
22 Feb 2004 01:33:30 PM |
|
|
On 22 Feb 2004 06:22:37 -0800, (James Harris) wrote:
[...]
To me it's just a waste as I say post your ideas so that other people
can critique them!
You mean so you can curse people who explain why your ideas
are wrong.
It's worked for me!!!
In what sense has it "worked"? You've succeeded in not proving
FLT, in not demonstrating that any of various well-known facts
are wrong, in coming up with a program to count primes that
involves no ideas less than 200 years old and is slower than
molasses. Most people could accomplish all that in much
less time.
Now it does bother me that any of you actually take "Uncle Al"
seriously, as it requires I think a tremendous effort to not
understand how that poster operates.
So you should have known that "Uncle Al" is trying to get me to post
more--as long as I reply to him in anger--so that he can reply more.
James Harris
************************
David C. Ullrich
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Virgil" |
|
| Title: Re: RSA-576 factored by NOT James Harris |
22 Feb 2004 01:55:22 AM |
|
|
In article <79bccc27.0402212258.6dbba7e3@posting.google.com>,
(MSMaxwell) wrote:
Oh if I only had another two or three lifetimes of the universe to
complete my factoring by trial division technique I too could have
acheived such fame, wealth , and glory.
http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/challenges/factoring/numbers.html
Kudos to J. Franke et al.
I guess that Unlce Al's challenge to James is gonna have to go up a
notch. We will, of course, be praying for the day when James accepts
the challenge and locks himself in his garage without contact from the
outside world for a few years to crack an RSA challenge.
What will we all do for laughs then?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Lord of Chaos \Suresh Devanathan" |
|
| Title: Re: RSA-576 factored by NOT James Harris |
22 Feb 2004 02:40:41 PM |
|
|
Wait, there is the RSA-640. I am heading that way.
-suresh
"MSMaxwell" <slappy_max@excite.com> wrote in message
news:79bccc27.0402212258.6dbba7e3@posting.google.com...
Oh if I only had another two or three lifetimes of the universe to
complete my factoring by trial division technique I too could have
acheived such fame, wealth , and glory.
http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/challenges/factoring/numbers.html
Kudos to J. Franke et al.
I guess that Unlce Al's challenge to James is gonna have to go up a
notch. We will, of course, be praying for the day when James accepts
the challenge and locks himself in his garage without contact from the
outside world for a few years to crack an RSA challenge.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
