Science > Physics > Russian Scientists and Other Matters.... ( Smart1234's Opinion)
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"S. Enterprize Company" |
| Date: |
05 Aug 2004 01:57:04 AM |
| Object: |
Russian Scientists and Other Matters.... ( Smart1234's Opinion) |
Russian Scientists and Other Matters.... ( Smart1234's Opinion)
There appears to me to be a lot of tension between the United States and
Russia. Why? Well, the United States has the ability to blow the world up (
nuclear wise) as well as does Russia. Does Russia want a confrontation with the
US in regard to nuclear war? No. I don't think so. Russian scientists seem to
work together very well with astronauts and their cosmonauts. We ( the US)
worked very well with them in outer space. And we also share common interests
in science. I also noticed that since Russia was converted from communism to
something that appears to be more democratic like the US, I think they are
becoming to act more like the United States in government and economics. Like
for example, they elect presidents now. President Putin was elected. Before
there was just Czars like dictators for a State controlled government.
Here are some statements made by Professor Yasin of Russia:
http://www.nixoncenter.org/publications/Program%20Briefs/vol5no22yasin.htm
"Ultimately, Yasin continued, a healthy and growing Russia will be much less
threatening to the West than a weak and chaotic state. Thus, further Western
economic assistance is important to address U.S. and European security
concerns. Yasin also urged America and the West to cooperate with Russia in
solving problems between the global "north" and "south," i.e., between the
developed and developing worlds. In his view, such cooperation between nations
of what he argued to be one civilization will be essential in the 21st
century."
So this looks like to me that if we can help the Russians with their
economy, tensions should reduce between the two world super powers. With the
tension reduced we could work together more freely and prevent any type of
future confrontation or war. And how do we do this? Well let's look at
historical documents.
Alaska was bought from Russian in the year 1867. This was due to Indian
problems there and economy problems in Russia.
http://www.bartleby.com/43/43.html
Believe it or not Prince Charles of England has Russian ancestry. Just look
up historical documents. This makes Russia like a cousin to Great Britain. All
these years they disagreed with Great Britian and all along they didn't notice
this.
If Russia wanted a military confrontation they would have already done so.
They have submarines that can deliver about 200 hydrogen bombs to the US. So
they don't want to do anything in regard to this because Nuclear War means no
one wins. It's like a stalemate. What do the Russian want? They want their
economy to grow like the US and prosper like us. They also want to help the
world, in my opinion. So what do we do? Can we help them economically? I think
so. Will this hurt our economy in doing so? No, I don't think so. I think it
will help us have a more secure and safe world.
My ancestors land was taken from me as I mentioned before but do I want to
disturb the US or other countries? No. I thought maybe there would be a trust
fund to help my ancestors. My attorney is still looking into this. But this is
another case.
While I was researching my ancestry background and historical records I
noticed something very interesting.
1) Indians apear to have migrated from India through the Berling Strait about
1500 years before the early settlers even got here. Historical records clearly
show the language and the migration process on WWW links.
2) In the 1600's when the early settlers were discovering and colonizing the
New Land, ( America - Now the United States), I wondered why wasn't Russia part
of this too. Everyone in other nations were. Then I noticed some historical
records that may have been over looked.
3) We do know that the Russians had settled land in Alaska and built churches
and houses etc..., during this time. But the Indians killed most of of the
early Russian settlers in that area. Thne the Monroe Doctrine put further
pressure on Russia to sell the land to prevent expansion of Russia and further
complications due to super power conflict. So the British and the US started
making paper work like this.
http://www.akip.org/rusus.html
http://www.bartleby.com/43/43.html
The Russians agreed and signed the documents.
But these documents included ONLY Alaska. And the "The Alaskan Statehood Act
1957" went into further legal details of Alaskan security.
http://www.environmentalchemistry.com/yogi/reference/ak_statehood_act/
Ok I agree with this so far but there is only one small techicality that was
over looked in the Alaskan Purchase, and here it is in BLACK AND WHITE signed
by the Presidents and Secretary of State and Russia in regard to Alaska.
The Russian-American
Treaty of 1867
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
TREATY WITH RUSSIA.
March 30, 1867
[.........] skipping sections etc...
THEN, under Article 1
"1st. That the island called Prince of Wales Island shall belong wholly to
Russia,"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
Where is this located one may ask? It is located at the southeastern area
of Alaska. This is not Alaskan territory. This appears to be Russian territory.
All the documentations like the Alaskan Statehood Act of 1957, only involved
the purchased state of Alaska. The Prince of Wales Island iis not Alaskan
territory as far as I can see ( correct me if I am wrong). And look at this:
http://www.akip.org/unc.html
The United Nations appears to have some amount of say so in this area which
includes the National Security of the United States. But if Russia only looks
at this area in terms of economic business transactions, this is not a threat
to US national security. They own this land technically as far I can see. Let's
take a closer look at this area.
Prince Of Wales Island
http://home.surewest.net/hannon/
This land appears to be worth about an average of about $100,000 an acre.
There is 640 acres in a mile. It is 140 miles long and 30 miles wide. This is
about $100 billion dollars worth of property that looks like it should be
Russian owned. There is no taxes there. I think that with proper negotiations
with the US and the United Nations, this land could be transferred to it's
original owners, the Russians. They could establish a tax there to help
their economy or give a tax relief to those occuping it for a tax reduction.
This would help boost the Russian economy and improve relations with the United
States.
As it was shown, Russia has already changed from communism and all they
need now is econmic help. The Russian-America Treaty which included the Alaskan
purchase clearly shows it was Russian territory. Gold and oil was discovered
after this treaty in Alaska, so the US has made alot of profits from Alaska
that was originally Russian. So why can't we help them now with their economy
and let them have their own land which IS NOT Alaskan? It is only called
something southeast of Alaska, NOT Alaska.
Will this endanger National Security? No. This is only a business
transaction not a military one. If it would become a military one then the UN
seems to have authority to stop any further action of this.
Am I un-American? No. THEY signed this treaty I didn't. THEY made this
agreement not me. I only show what THEY signed in the treaty according to
historical records. Will it help the economy? Sure I thnk so. And it should
also help a more stable secure relationship with Russia.
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.
|
|
| User: "Double-A" |
|
| Title: Re: Russian Scientists and Other Matters.... ( Smart1234's Opinion) |
05 Aug 2004 09:02:00 AM |
|
|
(S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message news:<20040805025704.19398.00002351@mb-m17.aol.com>...
Russian Scientists and Other Matters.... ( Smart1234's Opinion)
There appears to me to be a lot of tension between the United States and
Russia. Why? Well, the United States has the ability to blow the world up (
nuclear wise) as well as does Russia. Does Russia want a confrontation with the
US in regard to nuclear war? No. I don't think so. Russian scientists seem to
work together very well with astronauts and their cosmonauts. We ( the US)
worked very well with them in outer space. And we also share common interests
in science. I also noticed that since Russia was converted from communism to
something that appears to be more democratic like the US, I think they are
becoming to act more like the United States in government and economics. Like
for example, they elect presidents now. President Putin was elected. Before
there was just Czars like dictators for a State controlled government.
Here are some statements made by Professor Yasin of Russia:
http://www.nixoncenter.org/publications/Program%20Briefs/vol5no22yasin.htm
"Ultimately, Yasin continued, a healthy and growing Russia will be much less
threatening to the West than a weak and chaotic state. Thus, further Western
economic assistance is important to address U.S. and European security
concerns. Yasin also urged America and the West to cooperate with Russia in
solving problems between the global "north" and "south," i.e., between the
developed and developing worlds. In his view, such cooperation between nations
of what he argued to be one civilization will be essential in the 21st
century."
So this looks like to me that if we can help the Russians with their
economy, tensions should reduce between the two world super powers. With the
tension reduced we could work together more freely and prevent any type of
future confrontation or war. And how do we do this? Well let's look at
historical documents.
Alaska was bought from Russian in the year 1867. This was due to Indian
problems there and economy problems in Russia.
http://www.bartleby.com/43/43.html
Believe it or not Prince Charles of England has Russian ancestry. Just look
up historical documents. This makes Russia like a cousin to Great Britain. All
these years they disagreed with Great Britian and all along they didn't notice
this.
If Russia wanted a military confrontation they would have already done so.
They have submarines that can deliver about 200 hydrogen bombs to the US. So
they don't want to do anything in regard to this because Nuclear War means no
one wins. It's like a stalemate. What do the Russian want? They want their
economy to grow like the US and prosper like us. They also want to help the
world, in my opinion. So what do we do? Can we help them economically? I think
so. Will this hurt our economy in doing so? No, I don't think so. I think it
will help us have a more secure and safe world.
My ancestors land was taken from me as I mentioned before but do I want to
disturb the US or other countries? No. I thought maybe there would be a trust
fund to help my ancestors. My attorney is still looking into this. But this is
another case.
While I was researching my ancestry background and historical records I
noticed something very interesting.
1) Indians apear to have migrated from India through the Berling Strait about
1500 years before the early settlers even got here. Historical records clearly
show the language and the migration process on WWW links.
2) In the 1600's when the early settlers were discovering and colonizing the
New Land, ( America - Now the United States), I wondered why wasn't Russia part
of this too. Everyone in other nations were. Then I noticed some historical
records that may have been over looked.
3) We do know that the Russians had settled land in Alaska and built churches
and houses etc..., during this time. But the Indians killed most of of the
early Russian settlers in that area. Thne the Monroe Doctrine put further
pressure on Russia to sell the land to prevent expansion of Russia and further
complications due to super power conflict. So the British and the US started
making paper work like this.
http://www.akip.org/rusus.html
http://www.bartleby.com/43/43.html
The Russians agreed and signed the documents.
But these documents included ONLY Alaska. And the "The Alaskan Statehood Act
1957" went into further legal details of Alaskan security.
http://www.environmentalchemistry.com/yogi/reference/ak_statehood_act/
Ok I agree with this so far but there is only one small techicality that was
over looked in the Alaskan Purchase, and here it is in BLACK AND WHITE signed
by the Presidents and Secretary of State and Russia in regard to Alaska.
The Russian-American
Treaty of 1867
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
TREATY WITH RUSSIA.
March 30, 1867
[.........] skipping sections etc...
THEN, under Article 1
"1st. That the island called Prince of Wales Island shall belong wholly to
Russia,"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
Where is this located one may ask? It is located at the southeastern area
of Alaska. This is not Alaskan territory. This appears to be Russian territory.
All the documentations like the Alaskan Statehood Act of 1957, only involved
the purchased state of Alaska. The Prince of Wales Island iis not Alaskan
territory as far as I can see ( correct me if I am wrong). And look at this:
http://www.akip.org/unc.html
The United Nations appears to have some amount of say so in this area which
includes the National Security of the United States. But if Russia only looks
at this area in terms of economic business transactions, this is not a threat
to US national security. They own this land technically as far I can see. Let's
take a closer look at this area.
Prince Of Wales Island
http://home.surewest.net/hannon/
This land appears to be worth about an average of about $100,000 an acre.
There is 640 acres in a mile. It is 140 miles long and 30 miles wide. This is
about $100 billion dollars worth of property that looks like it should be
Russian owned. There is no taxes there. I think that with proper negotiations
with the US and the United Nations, this land could be transferred to it's
original owners, the Russians. They could establish a tax there to help
their economy or give a tax relief to those occuping it for a tax reduction.
This would help boost the Russian economy and improve relations with the United
States.
As it was shown, Russia has already changed from communism and all they
need now is econmic help. The Russian-America Treaty which included the Alaskan
purchase clearly shows it was Russian territory. Gold and oil was discovered
after this treaty in Alaska, so the US has made alot of profits from Alaska
that was originally Russian. So why can't we help them now with their economy
and let them have their own land which IS NOT Alaskan? It is only called
something southeast of Alaska, NOT Alaska.
Will this endanger National Security? No. This is only a business
transaction not a military one. If it would become a military one then the UN
seems to have authority to stop any further action of this.
Am I un-American? No. THEY signed this treaty I didn't. THEY made this
agreement not me. I only show what THEY signed in the treaty according to
historical records. Will it help the economy? Sure I thnk so. And it should
also help a more stable secure relationship with Russia.
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
Are you trying to do for history what you have already done for science?
Double-A
.
|
|
|
| User: "S. Enterprize Company" |
|
| Title: Re: Russian Scientists and Other Matters.... ( Smart1234's Opinion) |
05 Aug 2004 02:10:34 PM |
|
|
smart1234@aol.com (S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message
news:<20040805025704.19398.00002351@mb-m17.aol.com>...
Russian Scientists and Other Matters.... ( Smart1234's Opinion)
There appears to me to be a lot of tension between the United States
and
Russia. Why? Well, the United States has the ability to blow the world up (
nuclear wise) as well as does Russia. Does Russia want a confrontation with
the
US in regard to nuclear war? No. I don't think so. Russian scientists seem
to
work together very well with astronauts and their cosmonauts. We ( the US)
worked very well with them in outer space. And we also share common
interests
in science. I also noticed that since Russia was converted from communism
to
something that appears to be more democratic like the US, I think they are
becoming to act more like the United States in government and economics.
Like
for example, they elect presidents now. President Putin was elected. Before
there was just Czars like dictators for a State controlled government.
Here are some statements made by Professor Yasin of Russia:
http://www.nixoncenter.org/publications/Program%20Briefs/vol5no22yasin.htm
"Ultimately, Yasin continued, a healthy and growing Russia will be much
less
threatening to the West than a weak and chaotic state. Thus, further
Western
economic assistance is important to address U.S. and European security
concerns. Yasin also urged America and the West to cooperate with Russia in
solving problems between the global "north" and "south," i.e., between the
developed and developing worlds. In his view, such cooperation between
nations
of what he argued to be one civilization will be essential in the 21st
century."
So this looks like to me that if we can help the Russians with their
economy, tensions should reduce between the two world super powers. With
the
tension reduced we could work together more freely and prevent any type of
future confrontation or war. And how do we do this? Well let's look at
historical documents.
Alaska was bought from Russian in the year 1867. This was due to Indian
problems there and economy problems in Russia.
http://www.bartleby.com/43/43.html
Believe it or not Prince Charles of England has Russian ancestry. Just
look
up historical documents. This makes Russia like a cousin to Great Britain.
All
these years they disagreed with Great Britian and all along they didn't
notice
this.
If Russia wanted a military confrontation they would have already done
so.
They have submarines that can deliver about 200 hydrogen bombs to the US.
So
they don't want to do anything in regard to this because Nuclear War means
no
one wins. It's like a stalemate. What do the Russian want? They want their
economy to grow like the US and prosper like us. They also want to help the
world, in my opinion. So what do we do? Can we help them economically? I
think
so. Will this hurt our economy in doing so? No, I don't think so. I think
it
will help us have a more secure and safe world.
My ancestors land was taken from me as I mentioned before but do I want
to
disturb the US or other countries? No. I thought maybe there would be a
trust
fund to help my ancestors. My attorney is still looking into this. But
this is
another case.
While I was researching my ancestry background and historical records I
noticed something very interesting.
1) Indians apear to have migrated from India through the Berling Strait
about
1500 years before the early settlers even got here. Historical records
clearly
show the language and the migration process on WWW links.
2) In the 1600's when the early settlers were discovering and colonizing
the
New Land, ( America - Now the United States), I wondered why wasn't Russia
part
of this too. Everyone in other nations were. Then I noticed some historical
records that may have been over looked.
3) We do know that the Russians had settled land in Alaska and built
churches
and houses etc..., during this time. But the Indians killed most of of the
early Russian settlers in that area. Thne the Monroe Doctrine put further
pressure on Russia to sell the land to prevent expansion of Russia and
further
complications due to super power conflict. So the British and the US
started
making paper work like this.
http://www.akip.org/rusus.html
http://www.bartleby.com/43/43.html
The Russians agreed and signed the documents.
But these documents included ONLY Alaska. And the "The Alaskan Statehood
Act
1957" went into further legal details of Alaskan security.
http://www.environmentalchemistry.com/yogi/reference/ak_statehood_act/
Ok I agree with this so far but there is only one small techicality that
was
over looked in the Alaskan Purchase, and here it is in BLACK AND WHITE
signed
by the Presidents and Secretary of State and Russia in regard to Alaska.
The Russian-American
Treaty of 1867
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
TREATY WITH RUSSIA.
March 30, 1867
[.........] skipping sections etc...
THEN, under Article 1
"1st. That the island called Prince of Wales Island shall belong wholly to
Russia,"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
Where is this located one may ask? It is located at the southeastern
area
of Alaska. This is not Alaskan territory. This appears to be Russian
territory.
All the documentations like the Alaskan Statehood Act of 1957, only
involved
the purchased state of Alaska. The Prince of Wales Island iis not Alaskan
territory as far as I can see ( correct me if I am wrong). And look at
this:
http://www.akip.org/unc.html
The United Nations appears to have some amount of say so in this area
which
includes the National Security of the United States. But if Russia only
looks
at this area in terms of economic business transactions, this is not a
threat
to US national security. They own this land technically as far I can see.
Let's
take a closer look at this area.
Prince Of Wales Island
http://home.surewest.net/hannon/
This land appears to be worth about an average of about $100,000 an acre.
There is 640 acres in a mile. It is 140 miles long and 30 miles wide. This
is
about $100 billion dollars worth of property that looks like it should be
Russian owned. There is no taxes there. I think that with proper
negotiations
with the US and the United Nations, this land could be transferred to it's
original owners, the Russians. They could establish a tax there to help
their economy or give a tax relief to those occuping it for a tax
reduction.
This would help boost the Russian economy and improve relations with the
United
States.
As it was shown, Russia has already changed from communism and all they
need now is econmic help. The Russian-America Treaty which included the
Alaskan
purchase clearly shows it was Russian territory. Gold and oil was
discovered
after this treaty in Alaska, so the US has made alot of profits from
Alaska
that was originally Russian. So why can't we help them now with their
economy
and let them have their own land which IS NOT Alaskan? It is only called
something southeast of Alaska, NOT Alaska.
Will this endanger National Security? No. This is only a business
transaction not a military one. If it would become a military one then the
UN
seems to have authority to stop any further action of this.
Am I un-American? No. THEY signed this treaty I didn't. THEY made this
agreement not me. I only show what THEY signed in the treaty according to
historical records. Will it help the economy? Sure I thnk so. And it should
also help a more stable secure relationship with Russia.
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
Are you trying to do for history what you have already done for science?
No not at all. I have just been reviewing Historical documents. Like for
example, why is it called the Prince of Wales Island? Who is this? Look at the
link:
http://www.royal.gov.uk/output/page415.asp
Who said he could have that Island? He just moves in and says it's his??? As
far as I know it was Russian territory. But due to complications with the
United States and the United Nations, I don't think Russian can claim that
Island now. So the way I see it, the Prince of Wales should compensate Russia (
The democratic constitutional Russia using American type economics - they elect
presidents now, it isn't communist Russia anymore).
Great Britain appears to still be playing this King and Queen type authority
rule. They don't appear to be democratic. They don't even have presidents. They
have Dukes, Princes, Earls, Lords, Kings, Queens etc... . This type of activity
was done away with hundreds of years ago.
Now look at this:
Australia, it had been around for about 40000 years with the Indonesians
inhabitants and legal claims to the land. Then all of a sudden Captian Cook
from Great Britian says it's Britain country now in honor of the Duke of York
and the Queen. They even made their own rules under the Queen to claim that
Indonesian Island.
http://www.worldrover.com/history/australia_history.html
Now look at all the other Indonesian countries.
http://geography.about.com/library/cia/ncindonesia.htm
All of those Islands shown are considered Indonesian, except for Australia
which was taken from them by the British. The British claimed the people there
were stone culture people not worthy to have their country.
Look at the Jews and Israel in history. They wondered around the world like
vegabonds with no home to go to, UNTIL the British gave them their land back.
And now the British are setting up the NWO or the New World Rulership for
the Queen, under what they call the European Common Wealth ( or Market) or
European Union.
http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/
http://www.fact-index.com/e/eu/european_union.html
This type rulership of Kings and Queens is similar to dictatorships. They go
to a country and say it's mine now. This is not in accordance with the United
Nations or the United States.
And again, the first United States under governor Peter Minuit and my
ancestors and 100's of other people were thrown out of New Amsterdam, New
Netherlands ( now New York, New York). The first capital of the US was New
Amsterdam. And this was done to please the Duke of York, under the King ( or
Queen) of Britain.
This is illegal activity, in my opinion. And I think it is about time Britain
compensates people for their losses.
I am not trying to start a war or trouble with anyone. It's just a simple
case of economics. I think 50% compensation paid, where we all share in
wealth is good enough. Why can't the wealth and fortune go around to other
people too?
Double-A
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.
|
|
|
| User: "S. Enterprize Company" |
|
| Title: Re: Russian Scientists and Other Matters.... ( Smart1234's Opinion) |
06 Aug 2004 02:53:54 PM |
|
|
Great Britain appears to still be playing this King and Queen type authority
rule. They don't appear to be democratic. They don't even have presidents.
They
have Dukes, Princes, Earls, Lords, Kings, Queens etc... . This type of
activity
was done away with hundreds of years ago.
Now look at this:
Australia, it had been around for about 40000 years with the Indonesians
inhabitants and legal claims to the land. Then all of a sudden Captian Cook
from Great Britian says it's Britain country now in honor of the Duke of York
and the Queen. They even made their own rules under the Queen to claim that
Indonesian Island.
http://www.worldrover.com/history/australia_history.html
Now look at all the other Indonesian countries.
http://geography.about.com/library/cia/ncindonesia.htm
All of those Islands shown are considered Indonesian, except for Australia
which was taken from them by the British. The British claimed the people
there
were stone culture people not worthy to have their country.
Look at the Jews and Israel in history. They wondered around the world like
vegabonds with no home to go to, UNTIL the British gave them their land back.
And now the British are setting up the NWO or the New World Rulership for
the Queen, under what they call the European Common Wealth ( or Market) or
European Union.
http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/
http://www.fact-index.com/e/eu/european_union.html
This type rulership of Kings and Queens is similar to dictatorships. They
go
to a country and say it's mine now. This is not in accordance with the United
Nations or the United States.
And again, the first United States under governor Peter Minuit and my
ancestors and 100's of other people were thrown out of New Amsterdam, New
Netherlands ( now New York, New York). The first capital of the US was New
Amsterdam. And this was done to please the Duke of York, under the King ( or
Queen) of Britain.
This is illegal activity, in my opinion. And I think it is about time
Britain
compensates people for their losses.
I am not trying to start a war or trouble with anyone. It's just a simple
case of economics. I think 50% compensation paid, where we all share in
wealth is good enough. Why can't the wealth and fortune go around to other
people too?
Almost every place in history I look, the British are BIG TIME TROUBLE
MAKERS.
Example: I just wanted to see what China's History was like for example, how
old is the chinese culture and where did they come from etc.. . And then I find
this.
http://www-chaos.umd.edu/history/modern.html#western
It appears the British, according to historical records, in the 1800's were
big time drug dealer overlords, like the drug cartels, that the United States
is against and so is China. Look at this:
"The Opium War, 1839-42
[....]
In 1839 the Qing government, after a decade of unsuccessful anti-opium
campaigns, adopted drastic prohibitory laws against the opium trade. The
emperor dispatched a commissioner, Lin Zexu ( 1785-1850), to Guangzhou to
suppress illicit opium traffic. Lin seized illegal stocks of opium owned by
Chinese dealers and then detained the entire foreign community and confiscated
and destroyed some 20,000 chests of illicit British opium. The British
retaliated with a punitive expedition, thus initiating the first Anglo-Chinese
war, better known as the Opium War (1839-42). "
So we can see that China in their OWN country wanted harmful drugs and drug
dealers out of their country. Opium is the source of Cocaine, Heroin and
"crack". So the emperor makes laws to stop this in his country. They tried to
stop British Drug Overlords and then due to the British strong ability to take
over other countries illegally, they conquer China and take over Hong Kong.
Continue quote:
"The British retaliated with a punitive expedition, thus initiating the first
Anglo-Chinese war, better known as the Opium War (1839-42). Unprepared for war
and grossly underestimating the capabilities of the enemy, the Chinese were
disastrously defeated, and their image of their own imperial power was
tarnished beyond repair. The Treaty of Nanjing (1842), signed on board a
British warship by two Manchu imperial commissioners and the British
plenipotentiary, was the first of a series of agreements with the Western
trading nations later called by the Chinese the "unequal treaties." Under the
Treaty of Nanjing, China ceded the island of Hong Kong ( or Xianggang in
pinyin) to the British; abolished the licensed monopoly system of trade; opened
5 ports to British residence and foreign trade; limited the tariff on trade to
5 percent ad valorem; granted British nationals extraterritoriality (exemption
from Chinese laws); and paid a large indemnity. In addition, Britain was to
have most-favored-nation treatment, that is, it would receive whatever trading
concessions the Chinese granted other powers then or later. The Treaty of
Nanjing set the scope and character of an unequal relationship for the ensuing
century of what the Chinese would call "national humiliations." The treaty was
followed by other incursions, wars, and treaties that granted new concessions
and added new privileges for the foreigners. "
I think Hong Kong should be restored to it's original state and returned to
China from British control and they should be compensated for their losses
caused by the British Drug Dealers.
And this British BULL goes on and on. If it wasn't for the help of the
French, the America Revolution may have failed. The British again tried to take
over America for the pleasure of the Kings and Queens and Dukes and..., you
might as well say DICTATORS. But with the French assistance, they were able to
stop these barbarians. And then later the Statue of Liberty ( French BTW) was
place at the foundations of the United States to show how the French and the
United States agree to freedom and human rights for all people.
Everytime I watch TV, the so called "House of Commons" say destroy and more
war against Iraq. Then the President responds with more military aid in the
billions of dollars to stop Suddam Hussein.
http://costofwar.com/
But,
1) There are no weapons of mass destruction found there. The UN didn't even
have time to finish their vote. As far as could be seen, he did show the public
he removed all chemical and biological weapons and challenged President Bush to
a dabate, like politicians do.
2) Suddam is in custody. He's not a threat to anyone.
3) And this rumor that Suddam Hussein was with Bin Ladin in the World Trade
Center bombing doesn't appear to me to be correct. Bin Ladin lived in
Afganistan and started the Taliban at the time, Saddam Hussein was just taking
care of his own problems in his OWN country. Afganistan is a different country
than Iraq.
The way I see it, the British are causing terrorism. They ( Arabs) see the
history of the British and how they have the history background of destroying
countries and taking them over for the pleasure of some duke or something. They
don't want this.
And you know what else I think, the British want to distract the United
States into believing Iraq is still a problem. Why? I think it is to allow
distraction time for their ECONOMIC WAR plan to take over the world
economically and THEN control and take over America and all the other countries
by the NWO ( or the One World Rulership under British CONTROL).
While Presient Bush continues to focus to Iraq, the British are really
focusing on obtaining more countries into their EU ( European Union) to make
all other countries run their banking system through their control. And look at
this, the way they elect presidents into the NWO is ridiculus. They put it like
this. In 2001 this person will be World President, in 2002 this person will be
World President all the way to 2005, 2006, 2007.... . This isn't how presidents
are elected.
I think Iraq people ( and Arabs in general) appear to be telling the
Americans ( because of British CONTROL and influence), they just want to be
left alone. have their own independence. Everytime, there is prisoner abuse in
Iraq, Iraq ( "terrorists" ) retailiate and kill or abuse an American.
Am I for terrorist? NO. What we should do as Americans is, leave that
country. We need billions of dollars to help our own people here in the United
States. Just let the new leaders of Iraq handle their own private countries
affairs.
Stop listening to the BRITISH. We need to start focusing where the REAL
PROBLEM IS. This is World domination by the British as a ONE WORLD "so called
GOVERMENT" under Kings and Queens and DUKES and etc... .
Dictatorships ( King and Queen rule) have never worked in the past in
history, and they will never work in the future.
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Double-A" |
|
| Title: Re: Russian Scientists and Other Matters.... ( Smart1234's Opinion) |
07 Aug 2004 05:38:16 AM |
|
|
(S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message news:<20040806155354.28913.00000853@mb-m26.aol.com>...
[snipped self-quoting]
Almost every place in history I look, the British are BIG TIME TROUBLE
MAKERS.
Example: I just wanted to see what China's History was like for example, how
old is the chinese culture and where did they come from etc.. . And then I find
this.
http://www-chaos.umd.edu/history/modern.html#western
It appears the British, according to historical records, in the 1800's were
big time drug dealer overlords, like the drug cartels, that the United States
is against and so is China. Look at this:
"The Opium War, 1839-42
Most deplorable!
[....]
In 1839 the Qing government, after a decade of unsuccessful anti-opium
campaigns, adopted drastic prohibitory laws against the opium trade. The
emperor dispatched a commissioner, Lin Zexu ( 1785-1850), to Guangzhou to
suppress illicit opium traffic. Lin seized illegal stocks of opium owned by
Chinese dealers and then detained the entire foreign community and confiscated
and destroyed some 20,000 chests of illicit British opium. The British
retaliated with a punitive expedition, thus initiating the first Anglo-Chinese
war, better known as the Opium War (1839-42). "
So we can see that China in their OWN country wanted harmful drugs and drug
dealers out of their country. Opium is the source of Cocaine, Heroin and
"crack".
Then what are coca leaves for?
So the emperor makes laws to stop this in his country. They tried to
stop British Drug Overlords and then due to the British strong ability to take
over other countries illegally, they conquer China and take over Hong Kong.
Continue quote:
"The British retaliated with a punitive expedition, thus initiating the first
Anglo-Chinese war, better known as the Opium War (1839-42). Unprepared for war
and grossly underestimating the capabilities of the enemy, the Chinese were
disastrously defeated, and their image of their own imperial power was
tarnished beyond repair. The Treaty of Nanjing (1842), signed on board a
British warship by two Manchu imperial commissioners and the British
plenipotentiary, was the first of a series of agreements with the Western
trading nations later called by the Chinese the "unequal treaties." Under the
Treaty of Nanjing, China ceded the island of Hong Kong ( or Xianggang in
pinyin) to the British; abolished the licensed monopoly system of trade; opened
5 ports to British residence and foreign trade; limited the tariff on trade to
5 percent ad valorem; granted British nationals extraterritoriality (exemption
from Chinese laws); and paid a large indemnity. In addition, Britain was to
have most-favored-nation treatment, that is, it would receive whatever trading
concessions the Chinese granted other powers then or later. The Treaty of
Nanjing set the scope and character of an unequal relationship for the ensuing
century of what the Chinese would call "national humiliations." The treaty was
followed by other incursions, wars, and treaties that granted new concessions
and added new privileges for the foreigners. "
I think Hong Kong should be restored to it's original state and returned to
China from British control
Uh, didn't that already happen seven years ago?
Has there been some kind of hitch?
and they should be compensated for their losses
caused by the British Drug Dealers.
And this British BULL goes on and on. If it wasn't for the help of the
French, the America Revolution may have failed. The British again tried to take
over America for the pleasure of the Kings and Queens and Dukes and..., you
might as well say DICTATORS. But with the French assistance, they were able to
stop these barbarians. And then later the Statue of Liberty ( French BTW) was
place at the foundations of the United States to show how the French and the
United States agree to freedom and human rights for all people.
Sure different than the French we know today, huh?
Everytime I watch TV, the so called "House of Commons" say destroy and more
war against Iraq.
What do you have, a BBC direct feed?
Then the President responds with more military aid in the
billions of dollars to stop Suddam Hussein.
http://costofwar.com/
But,
1) There are no weapons of mass destruction found there. The UN didn't even
have time to finish their vote. As far as could be seen, he did show the public
he removed all chemical and biological weapons and challenged President Bush to
a dabate, like politicians do.
But Bill O'Reilly "knew" they were there!
2) Suddam is in custody. He's not a threat to anyone.
3) And this rumor that Suddam Hussein was with Bin Ladin in the World Trade
Center bombing doesn't appear to me to be correct. Bin Ladin lived in
Afganistan and started the Taliban at the time, Saddam Hussein was just taking
care of his own problems in his OWN country. Afganistan is a different country
than Iraq.
The way I see it, the British are causing terrorism. They ( Arabs) see the
history of the British and how they have the history background of destroying
countries and taking them over for the pleasure of some duke or something. They
don't want this.
It does make me wonder why the U.S. wanted British military help in
the war. The Iraqis have too many old scores to settle with the
Brits.
And you know what else I think, the British want to distract the United
States into believing Iraq is still a problem. Why? I think it is to allow
distraction time for their ECONOMIC WAR plan to take over the world
economically and THEN control and take over America and all the other countries
by the NWO ( or the One World Rulership under British CONTROL).
While Presient Bush continues to focus to Iraq, the British are really
focusing on obtaining more countries into their EU ( European Union) to make
all other countries run their banking system through their control. And look at
this, the way they elect presidents into the NWO is ridiculus. They put it like
this. In 2001 this person will be World President, in 2002 this person will be
World President all the way to 2005, 2006, 2007.... . This isn't how presidents
are elected.
I think Iraq people ( and Arabs in general) appear to be telling the
Americans ( because of British CONTROL and influence), they just want to be
left alone. have their own independence. Everytime, there is prisoner abuse in
Iraq, Iraq ( "terrorists" ) retailiate and kill or abuse an American.
Am I for terrorist? NO. What we should do as Americans is, leave that
country. We need billions of dollars to help our own people here in the United
States. Just let the new leaders of Iraq handle their own private countries
affairs.
Stop listening to the BRITISH. We need to start focusing where the REAL
PROBLEM IS. This is World domination by the British as a ONE WORLD "so called
GOVERMENT" under Kings and Queens and DUKES and etc... .
Dictatorships ( King and Queen rule) have never worked in the past in
history, and they will never work in the future.
Right. Those are the only forms of government worse than democracy.
Double-A
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pyriform" |
|
| Title: Re: Russian Scientists and Other Matters.... ( Smart1234's Opinion) |
06 Aug 2004 07:41:28 PM |
|
|
S. Enterprize Company wrote:
Great Britain appears to still be playing this King and Queen type
authority rule. They don't appear to be democratic. They don't even
have presidents. They
have Dukes, Princes, Earls, Lords, Kings, Queens etc...
Don't forget Baronets. And Knights, in all their various flavours (a
Knight Commander of The Most Noble Order of the Garter would naturally
look down on a mere Knight Commander of The Most Honourable Order of the
Bath, for example). This is only right and proper.
Plenty of baubles are available, some hereditary, some not. It's a
fantastic system and lets us all dress up in ermine whenever we feel
like it.
And now the British are setting up the NWO or the New World
Rulership for the Queen, under what they call the European Common
Wealth ( or Market) or European Union.
<Snigger> Even for an American, your tenuous grasp of world politics is
remarkable. I expect you think the "World Series" actually involves
countries other than your own.
http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/
Save me some time here. Are these the people who think the British Royal
family are actually a bunch of giant shape-shifting lizards, or is this
another lot?
No, don't bother. I've just looked. Almost immediately found a reference
to David Icke, former British TV presenter, and now full-time loony.
These *are* the people who think the British Royal family are actually a
bunch of giant shape-shifting lizards.
Almost every place in history I look, the British are BIG TIME
TROUBLE MAKERS.
Too right. You should see our football fans (that's proper football, not
that girly game you lot play in body armour and can't get anyone else
interested in).
It appears the British, according to historical records, in the
1800's were big time drug dealer overlords, like the drug cartels,
that the United States is against and so is China.
Yes indeedy. And let's not forget the slave trade. Hell, my ancestors
*owned* your ancestors.
I think Hong Kong should be restored to it's original state and
returned to China from British control and they should be compensated
for their losses caused by the British Drug Dealers.
Look, I really don't know how to break this to you, but China resumed
control of Hong Kong in 1997. Did you manage to sleep right through the
handover?
And this British BULL goes on and on. If it wasn't for the help of
the French, the America Revolution may have failed. The British again
tried to take over America for the pleasure of the Kings and Queens
Take it over? You overthrew *us*. That's what revolution means, you
idiot.
Everytime I watch TV, the so called "House of Commons" say
destroy and more war against Iraq. Then the President responds with
more military aid in the billions of dollars to stop Suddam Hussein.
You think Blair is controlling Bush? I know Bush is a moron, but over
here we all think it's the other way round. Blair is Bush's lap dog.
Bin Ladin lived in Afganistan and started the Taliban at the time
He didn't start the Taliban, you imbecile. Oh, I give up...
Afganistan is a different country than Iraq.
What is this? Geography for 4-year-olds?
<remaining wild descent into lunacy snipped>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pyriform" |
|
| Title: Re: Russian Scientists and Other Matters.... ( Smart1234's Opinion) |
05 Aug 2004 10:27:12 AM |
|
|
Double-A wrote:
Are you trying to do for history what you have already done for
science?
I can't wait until he gets round to the history of science...
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
