"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote in message
news:8BS0f.6771$zQ3.6413@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...

"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:jtR0f.394134$x96.63498@attbi_s72...

kogs wrote:

According to current theories, how did matter in this Cosmos "escape from"
the event horizon when this Cosmos expanded past its Schwarzchild radius?
Is there a name for when this Cosmos was its Schwarzchild radius?

[Sam]

How would you calculate the Schwarzschild radius [R] of the *observable*
universe?

[hanson]
There is a wonderful simple, chained equation for this phenomena.
Some characteristics of the lightwall shell , the *observable*
universe are described by the beautiful "cosmic 1234 envelope":

:::: c = (G*M/R)^(1/2) = (G*M*H)^(1/3) = (G*M*br)^(1/4) :::

wherein
c= lightspeed, G= Newton, M= total mass in a sphere of R,
H= 1/Travel time from any center to R at the speed of c and
br = the deceleration (or = the curvature of space in SR/GR
terms) caused by G & M, fixing the value of c, or visa versa.
Plug in the numbers, use the Hubble value for H, and then
see for instance the Pioneer 11 anomaly thru' effects of [br]
........check it out. It's fun......ahahaha.... ahahanson

I guess my real question is:
How did all of the matter contained in this Cosmos "escape from" the lightwall
(thanks for the new word) if matter, and information, cannot escape from a
black hole?

And my idea (I guess I was trolling): [ No, you are not]
Could the spacetime quantum-foam be the Schwarzschild radius of the black hole
in a spacetime-everted universe, and black holes in this Cosmos "feed" matter
into it and expand this Cosmos? It would involve employing a Klein bottle
topology in place of the projective plane in GR. GR is not bound to the
projective plane, but it would open the door to a sub-quantum single-pocket
universe. I understand that discussing sub-quantum metaphysics rightfully
makes physicists uncomfortable, but it gives consciousness a place to reside.
This would mean that particles in this Cosmos are made-up of everted particles
in the single-pocket universe, and that this Cosmos is much older that it
would seem given the big bang model.

What gave me this idea is that it seems like the further astrophysics look
back in time at galaxies -- expecting to see the formation of galaxies --
there structure is similar to locally observed galaxies:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/10/051003233710.htm
Also, why are there no stars between galaxies? Could this Cosmos, and the
single-pocket universe, have formed into an even distribution of stars and
(today in this Cosmos) most of them have "fallen into" the super massive black
holes at the center of galaxies? I do not have any of the math (I am obviously
not a physicists), but dark matter sounds suspiciously like an "ether
argument." I understand that having dark matter falling into black holes and
converting form into tachyons, and the "fabric of spacetime" as a single black
hole located in another universe, is not much better than an "ether
argument"... Well I appear to have just shot-down my argument, but are there
any fringe theories matching what I am describing?

Also, why are there no stars between galaxies? Could this Cosmos, and the
single-pocket universe, have formed into an even distribution of stars and
(today in this Cosmos) most of them have "fallen into" the super massive
black holes at the center of galaxies? I do not have any of the math (I am