It's interesting to look at human beings, who are beings built of of large
chains of hydro carbons. In a way, what kind of purpose, if they have any

would they serve.

In a way, living things build the universe. Concidentally, in the rig vedas,
written thousands of years ago, Lord Vishnu is described as ,the ruler of
the universe, of 4d space-time. It's funny. Supposedly he is the one who
prevades and who is one and one with local space with 3 dimensions of space,
1 time.

It's interesting to look at human beings, who are beings built of of large
chains of hydro carbons. In a way, what kind of purpose, if they have any ,
would they serve.

-suresh


"The Lord of Chaos (Suresh Devanathan)"
<surkum_removetheunderscore_here_dev_and_here_1@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c13hqh$1csn4l$1@ID-182852.news.uni-berlin.de...

A very days ago there was a post here, if laws of physics evolved. It

could,

if in order for that to be true, you are required to put their faith into
laws as having life, or 'laws' as some form of 'higher dimensional' life
forms.

Here's how 'life' is defined in this context: a decison maker.

For example, take books, libraries, computers,etc. Why do we have them?

Why

do we build them? We build them or write books because they are

necessary.

They make life easy, something along those lines. For example, many many
authors write books. However, only a few of them, become popular, or

become

treasured. There are many mathematical concepts. However, the idea of
differentials, fractions, numbers is most commonly explained. In a way,

the

author of the book, accepts some sort of compromise. He is restricting his
analysis to certain kinds of problems, or presenting problems for certain
kinds of readers. In this whole process, he is making decisions, or
estimating what is appropriate for the reader. The readers ,in turn, do

the

same thing. They reader book by many authors on the subject. They find

the

author, or try to stick to author, who is the clearest. Over time, you
would have emergence. Authors who explain things clearly become popular.
Authors, who can relate to large degree of audiences, without compromising
the subject become popular.

In a way, there is like a predator-prey game. Evolution requires this

game.

Predators evolve to hunt preys and preys evolve to elude predators. They
both are decision makers, in changing their forms.

Certainly, if you can make 'a law of physics', a conscious object,

decision

making block, surely, laws could evolve, by competition and by mating.


-suresh